Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Building
a
R&D Center, Hanil Co., Ltd, Iksan, 570-946, South Korea
b
Research Center of Industrial Technology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, 561-756, South Korea
Received 15 April 2005; received in revised form 11 September 2005; accepted 22 September 2005
Available online 28 August 2006
Abstract
Basic properties of blast furnace slag cement mortar and concrete are investigated by adding inorganic activators. The result of this
research concludes that slag cement mixed with suitable activator agents such as lime, gypsum and limestone powder could accelerate the
compressive strength and tighten pore structure at early age. The addition of activator into mortar and concrete containing slag cement
produces superior properties, reduced shrinkage and less carbonation compared to mortar and concrete containing slag cement without
the addition of activator. Consequently, there are possibilities for manufacturing blast furnace slag cement, which could compensate the
weak properties at early curing age. When compared with ordinary Portland cement, this cement has superior characteristics for long
curing age.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Granulated blast-furnace slag; Pore size distribution; Drying shrinkage, Carbonation
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.09.010
K.J. Mun et al. / Construction and Building Materials 21 (2007) 1576–1582 1577
Table 1
Chemical and physical properties of materials used
Materials Properties
Chemical components (%) Blain (cm2/g) Specific gravity
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO SO3 Ig-loss In-R
GBFS 34.51 17.04 0.30 42.65 6.87 0.06 – – 4600 2.91
Limestone powder 0.7 0.07 0.19 54.5 1.12 0.1 43.24 0.08 8000 2.73
Anhydrate gypsum 0.16 0.1 0.04 39.07 – 53.83 6.71 0.09 4600 2.40
Ca(OH)2 1.20 0.70 0.40 60.50 1.40 0.30 24.38 0.22 6000 2.27
OPC 19.88 5.39 3.21 62.39 3.84 0.04 2.15 0.81 3300 3.15
2.2. Mixture proportion tar mixture was 48.5%, and the proportions of cement:
sand was 1:2.45. Table 3 shows the mixture proportion
Table 2 shows the mix proportion for blended cement for evaluating the carbonation properties of concrete con-
used to compare and to evaluate the single or complex taining blended cement.
actions of each activator. The W/C of blended cement mor-
2.3. Experimental method
Table 2
All tests were carried out based on Korean Standards
Proportions of the blended cement mixture
(KS). Molds of dimensions 50 · 50 · 50 mm for compres-
Mix no. Mix proportion (%) sive strength, 40 · 40 · 160 mm for drying shrinkage, and
OPC BFS A.G H.L L.S.P 80 · 100 · 200 mm for carbonation were prepared. The
A 100 0 0 0 0 samples were cured at 20 ± 2 C in water after 1-day stan-
B 70 30 dard room and kept cured until the time of testing. The
C 50 50 paste of OPC and slag cement were hardened to measure
D 30 70
E 47.5 2.5 0 0 the differential thermal analysis (DTA) and pore structure.
F 49.5 0 0.5 0
G 47.5 50 0 0 2.5 3. Results and discussion
H 47 2.5 0.5 0
I 44.5 2.5 0.5 2.5
3.1. Pore volume
4000 1000~10000nm
100~1000nm
10~100nm
3~10nm
/g)
3000
3
Cm
-4
Pore volume( × 10
2000
1000
0
A B C D E F G H I
Type of cement
Fig. 1. Pore distribution and pore volume according to mix type of cement (7 days).
1578 K.J. Mun et al. / Construction and Building Materials 21 (2007) 1576–1582
3.2. Compressive strength of cement mortars hydration formations such as C–S–H, and C4AH13.
The gypsum forms a dense ettringite structure through
Fig. 2 shows compressive strengths according to the hydration with Al2O3, and limestone powder does not
type of cement used for mixture proportion. It is evident only increase density by filling up pore formed in the
that the 3-day and 7-day compressive strengths of 30% process of hydration of cement but also contributes to
(B) with GBFS increase more than 50% (C), and more the increase of compressive strength, when forming a
than 70% (D), respectively. In Fig. 2, E–G specimens carbonate crystal by substituting sulfate for ettringite.
present compressive strengths when gypsum, slacked The substituted sulfate is thought to promote hydration
lime, and limestone powder are used separately. As for in blast furnace slag [4,5].
the 3-day compressive strengths, there exist 30% increase In the case of using an activator alone, a stimulative
in the compressive strength of E specimen containing a action is observed as gypsum tends to be larger than slaked
2.5% addition of gypsum, 24% increase in compressive lime and to be higher than limestone powder. It is reported
strength for F specimen with 0.5% of slacked lime addi- that the addition of activators is a very effective way to
tion, and 13% increase for G specimen containing 2.5% increase early strength of blast furnace slag cement. H
limestone powder addition. These results indicate an and I specimens represent the compressive strengths with
improvement compared to cases where no activator is the increase in various kinds of activators. The early com-
added. The result obtained with the addition of slacked pressive strength of blast furnace slag cement (I) with
lime restrains the film formation of GBFS particle sur- added gypsum, slaked lime, and limestone at fixed propor-
face by producing alkali from early hydration, rapidly tions is higher than the others. This can be attributed to the
destroying the early formed acid film, and promoting compound actions of activators.
K.J. Mun et al. / Construction and Building Materials 21 (2007) 1576–1582 1579
-1
-2
-3
-
-4
3D
-5
7D
-6 28 D
-7
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
0
It is certain that the drying shrinkage ratio of cement
-1
mortar with an activator addition has a similar tendency
to cement mortar without activator for 1 day of curing per- -2
iod, but changes with a distinct difference after 3 days.
-3
Also, when comparing the drying shrinkage of I specimen
with that of A specimen (OPC), there is no significant dif- -4 28 D
ference in the shrinkage ratio for 56 days of drying period, 7D
-5
but after 90 days, I specimen shows a slightly higher ten- 3D
dency than A (OPC). This proves that if a small quantity -6
of activator agent is mixed or added to blast furnace slag
-7
cement in the definite ratio, it could effectively reduce
defects, as drying shrinkage at early curing age of blast fur- -8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
nace slag cement.
Fig. 10. Comparison of carbonation depths with added activators (I), without activator (A) and with OPC (C).
1582 K.J. Mun et al. / Construction and Building Materials 21 (2007) 1576–1582
out activator addition. It is confirmed that at 180-day of that blast furnace slag cement of approximately
curing period, the carbonation depth is reduced to about the same early strength with OPC is feasible to
20%. be manufactured.
Also, comparing the carbonation depth of I and A (OPC) (3) In the case of mixing or adding a small quantity of
specimen, I specimen is higher than A (OPC) specimen from activator to blast furnace slag cement, a great reduc-
early to later duration of carbonation. The main reason is tion of drying shrinkage at early curing period and a
that the continuous hydration of GBFS partly uses up the decrease in carbonation depth are confirmed.
Ca(OH)2 and then self-carbonation generated in the process
of diminishing potential of hydrogen (pH) occurs. Acknowledgement