Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
" Recycling fly ash as artificial coarse lightweight aggregate for concrete was achieved.
" Various mechanical properties of the concretes were tested and compared.
" Silica fume (SF) was used as mineral admixture to enhance the properties of concretes.
" Two types of steel fibers with two volume fractions were added to concrete.
" Utilizing both SF and steel fibers provided superior mechanical performance compared to control.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper reports an experimental study on the mechanical properties of steel fiber incorporated plain
Received 4 July 2012 and silica fume (SF) concretes produced with cold bonded artificial fly ash aggregates (AFAs). Two con-
Received in revised form 27 September 2012 crete series with water-to-binder (w/b) ratios of 0.35 and 0.55 were designed. SF incorporation was
Accepted 21 November 2012
achieved by 10% replacement of the weight of cement by silica fume. Two types of hooked-end steel
Available online 28 December 2012
fibers with length/aspect ratios of 60/80 and 30/40 were utilized. AFA, produced from cold bonding
pelletization of 90% class F fly ash and 10% Portland cement, was used as coarse aggregate in all of the
Keywords:
concrete mixtures. The mechanical properties investigated were compressive strength, modulus of
Bonding strength
Concrete
rupture, and bonding strength between rebar and concrete. The tests were carried out at the end of
Cold bonding 28 day water curing. Analyses of variance of the experimental results were performed and the contribu-
Mechanical properties tions of the significant factors on the mechanical characteristics of the concretes were determined for
Silica fume statistical evaluations. Moreover, correlation of the experimental data was carried out to monitor the
Steel fiber interaction between mechanical properties and bonding strength of the concretes. The results demon-
strated that incorporation of SF and utilization of different types of steel fiber reinforcements significantly
affected the mechanical properties of the concretes regardless the w/b ratio.
Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0950-0618/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.074
M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990 983
governed by sintering method, the energy saving concern has led Table 1
the researchers to benefit from cold-bonding pelletization process Properties of Portland cement, silica fume and fly ash.
for production of artificial aggregates. Chemical analysis (%) Portland cement Silica fume Fly ash
Since artificial lightweight aggregates (LWAs) has relatively CaO 62.58 0.45 4.24
lower strength than natural aggregates, the concretes including SiO2 20.25 90.36 56.2
LWA may have less mechanical properties than that including Al2O3 5.31 0.71 20.17
natural aggregate [13]. In such cases, to improve the mechanical Fe2O3 4.04 1.31 6.69
MgO 2.82 – 1.92
property of the concrete containing artificial aggregates, some SO3 2.73 0.41 0.49
mineral admixtures can be used as modifier. For example, silica K2O 0.92 1.52 1.89
fume is well known for its improvement in both durability and Na2O 0.22 0.45 0.58
mechanical properties of concrete [14–18]. Therefore it has been Loss on ignition 1.02 3.11 1.78
Specific gravity 3.15 2.2 2.25
used as a replacement material in the production of high perfor-
Fineness (m2/kg) 326a 21,080b 287a
mance concrete. Bhanja and Sengupta [17] carried out an extensive
a
experimental study over the water–binder ratios ranging from 0.26 Blaine specific surface area.
b
BET specific surface area.
to 0.42 and silica fume to binder ratios from 0.0 to 0.3. Compres-
sive, flexural, and split-tensile strengths at 28 days were deter-
mined. They reported that the compressive as well as the tensile
strengths increased with silica fume incorporation.
Improvement in mechanical properties of the concrete accompa- Table 2
nies long term and safe service life of the structural performance of Sieve analysis and physical properties of normal weight aggregate.
the reinforced concrete (RC) structures even under extreme loading Sieve size (mm) Fine aggregate (%)
cases. Performance of RC as a composite material depends on many
River sand Crushed sand
different characteristics of its components [19]. Due to the weakness
16 100 100
of concrete in tension, it needs to be reinforced when used as struc-
8 99.7 100
tural element. The stress transfer results in bond stresses at the 4 94.5 99.2
interface between the concrete and the steel. Bond strength is the 2 58.7 62.9
transfer of axial force from a reinforcing steel bar to the surrounding 1 38.2 43.7
concrete results in the development of tangential stress components 0.5 24.9 33.9
0.25 5.4 22.6
along the contact surface area [20]. For reinforced concrete as a com-
Fineness modulus 2.79 2.38
posite material, it is necessary for the reinforcing steel to be conve- Specific gravity 2.66 2.45
niently bonded to the surrounding concrete. If there is a good bond
there is little or no slip of the steel relative to concrete which means
that stress is properly transferred across the steel-concrete [21].
In this study, effectiveness of SF and fiber reinforcement on the Table 3
mechanical properties of concretes incorporating cold bonded Properties of steel fibers.
artificial fly ash aggregates (AFAs) were investigated through an
Designation of the steel Diameter D Length L Aspect ratio (L/
experimental program. AFA was used as coarse aggregate in the con- fibre (mm) (mm) D)
crete production. The mechanical properties of the concretes were
St1 0.75 60 80
evaluated in terms of compressive and flexural strengths measured St2 0.75 30 40
at the end of 28 days of curing. Moreover, as being one of the most
critical properties for pertinent structural behavior, adherence be-
tween reinforcing steel bar and concrete were evaluated by means
of bonding strength test at the same age. The concretes dealt with Silica fume (SF) obtained from Norway was used as a mineral admixture in con-
this study were produced by two different water/binder (w/b) ratios. crete production. SF has a specific surface are of 21,080 m2/kg and specific gravity of
2.2 g/cm3. Chemical analysis and some physical properties of SF are given in Table 1.
For steel fiber reinforced concretes, two different types of steel fiber
Fine aggregate was a mix of river sand and crushed limestone sand. Aggregates
with aspect length/aspect ratios of 60/80 and 30/40 were utilized. were obtained from local sources. Properties of the fine aggregates are presented
The steel fibers were added to concrete with 0.25% and 0.75% of in Table 2. Sulphonated naphthalene formaldehyde based high range water-reduc-
the volume of the concrete. The statistical analysis and calculation ing admixture with specific gravity of 1.19 was employed to achieve slump value of
14 ± 2 cm for the ease of handling, placing, and consolidation in all concrete mix-
of the contributions of the independent factors on mechanical
tures. The superplasticizer was adjusted at the time of mixing to achieve the spec-
behavior of concretes were made by general linear model analysis ified slump.
of variance (GLM-ANOVA). Furthermore, the relation between Two types of commercially available hooked end steel fibers (Dramix 60/80 and
mechanical properties and the bonding strength of the concretes Kemerix 30/40) were used for production of steel fiber reinforced concretes. The
were assessed through correlating the experimental data. geometrical properties and aspect ratios of the steel fibers are given in Table 3. Six-
teen mm diameter reinforcing ribbed steel bars with minimum yield strength of
420 MPa were utilized for preparing the reinforced concrete specimens to be used
for testing the bonding strength.
2. Experimental study
CEM I 42.5 R type Portland cement with a specific gravity of 3.14 and Blaine In the first stage of the experimental program artificial fly ash aggregates (AFAs)
fineness of 326 m2/kg was utilized for both manufacturing AFA aggregates and were produced through the cold bonding agglomeration process of fly ash and Port-
preparing the concrete test specimens. The chemical composition of the cement land cement in a tilted pan at an ambient temperature. For this, 10% PC and 90% FA
is shown in Table 1. A class F fly ash (FA) conforming to ASTM C 618 was uti- were mixed in powder form in the pelletizer shown in Fig. 1. After the dry powder
lized for manufacturing cold-bonded artificial fly ash aggregates (AFA). It was mixture of about 10–13 kg was fed into the pan, the disc was rotated at a constant
provided from Ceyhan Sugözü thermal power plant located in Mediterranean re- speed to assure the homogeneity of the mixture. The amount of sprayed water used
gion in Turkey. FA has a specific gravity of 2.25 and specific surface of 287 m2/ during pelletization process has been determined as the coagulant to form spherical
kg. Table 1 presents the chemical and some physical characteristics of the fly ash pellets with the motion of rolling disc [1,2,6,7,22]. The optimum water content re-
used. quired for each type of powder was determined according to ASTM D2216-10 [23].
984 M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990
Specific gravity and water absorption tests were carried out as per ASTM C127
[24] to determine physical properties of the AFA. Moreover, crushing strength test
was performed as per BS 812, part110 [25]. Practically, individual pellets were
placed between two parallel plates and loaded diametrically until failure occurred.
Crushing test was conducted on particles of various sizes from 6 to 12 mm by using
a 28 kN capacity load-ring. A number of representative agglomerates were statisti-
cally tested and the average of the results was defined as crushing strength or
generally named as crushing value. Fig. 2 shows the crushing strength test config-
uration and strength values of the cold bonded fly ash aggregates produced in this
study. Additionally, water absorption and saturated surface dry specific gravity val-
ues of the AFAs were determined as 12.7% and 1.92, respectively.
Cold bonded artificial fly ash aggregates (AFAs) were used as coarse aggregates
for all of the concrete mixtures. AFA used in concrete production was almost in sat-
Fig. 1. The general view of the pelletization disc.
urated surface dry (SSD) state in order not to affect the proportion of the mixing
water due to high water absorption. For this, before mixing, AFAs were presoaked
Then, the water was sprayed on the mixture with a quantity of 22% by weight. The for- for 30 min to maintain the saturation. Then the AFA was taken out of water and
mation of pellets occurred between 10 and 12 min in trial productions. The total pel- put on a mesh for the outflow of excessive surface water during an extra 30 s.
letization time was determined as 20 min for the compaction of fresh pellets. Finally, The extra water on the surface of the pellets was rubbed out manually by a dry
they were kept in sealed plastic bags for 28 days in a curing room in which the tem- towel. This method was reported to be an effective way to provide SSD condition
perature and relative humidity were 21 °C and 70%, respectively. The curing method for the cold bonded artificial aggregates [6,8,10].
adopted in this study is a practical and simple method to fit the laboratory conditions. Two series of concrete mixtures with water-to-binder ratios of 0.35 and 0.55
At the end of the curing period, hardened aggregates were sieved into fractions from 4 were designed to produce plain and SF incorporated concretes. SF modified con-
to 16 mm sizes to be used as coarse aggregate in concrete production. Further details cretes were produced by 10% replacement of the cement with SF by the weight.
of cold bonding pelletization were presented elsewhere by the authors [10]. For production of steel fiber reinforced concretes, each type of steel fibers (St1
Fig. 2. (a) Aggregate crushing strength test configuration and (b) crushing strength of artificial fly ash aggregates.
M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990 985
Table 4
Mix proportions (kg/m3).
Mix ID w/b ratio Water Cement Silica fume Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate Steel fiber SPa
Natural sand Crushed sand AFA (4–16 mm) St1 St2
Control I 0.35 157.5 450 0 566.9 199.2 766.1 0 0 8.5
SF0-25St1 157.5 450 0 566.9 199.2 766.1 19.6 0 10.5
SF0-25St2 157.5 450 0 566.9 199.2 766.1 0 19.6 12.5
SF0-75St1 157.5 450 0 566.9 199.2 766.1 58.9 0 11.5
SF0-75St2 157.5 450 0 566.9 199.2 766.1 0 58.9 14
Control II 157.5 405 45 561.9 197.4 759.3 0 0 8.75
SF10-25St1 157.5 405 45 561.9 197.4 759.3 19.6 0 10.8
SF10-25St2 157.5 405 45 561.9 197.4 759.3 0 19.6 12.5
SF10-75St1 157.5 405 45 561.9 197.4 759.3 58.9 0 11.8
SF10-75St2 157.5 405 45 561.9 197.4 759.3 0 58.9 14.8
Control I 0.55 192.5 350 0 656.3 281.25 562.5 0 0 0.5
SF0-25St1 192.5 350 0 656.3 281.25 562.5 19.6 0 1.5
SF0-25St2 192.5 350 0 656.3 281.25 562.5 0 19.6 1.75
SF0-75St1 192.5 350 0 656.3 281.25 562.5 58.9 0 3
SF0-75St2 192.5 350 0 656.3 281.25 562.5 0 58.9 3.25
Control II 192.5 315 35 653.9 280.22 560.4 0 0 1
SF10-25St1 192.5 315 35 653.9 280.22 560.4 19.6 0 1.75
SF10-25St2 192.5 315 35 653.9 280.22 560.4 0 19.6 2.5
SF10-75St1 192.5 315 35 653.9 280.22 560.4 58.9 0 3.5
S10-75St2 192.5 315 35 653.9 280.22 560.4 0 58.9 4
a
Superplasticiser.
testing. Bonding strength between concrete and reinforcement were tested on cubic
reinforced concrete specimen. In order to have a smooth surface to provide uniform
load distribution, the top surface of the pullout specimens were capped with
gypsum coating. The details and dimensions of the pullout test specimen are
illustrated in Fig. 3.
For each test, three specimens were used. Each experimental parameter was
determined by averaging the results obtained from those specimens. All of the tests
were performed at the end of 28 day curing period.
The compression test conforming to ASTM C39 [26] was carried out on the spec-
imens by a 3000 KN capacity testing machine. Three-point flexural tensile strength
conforming to ASTM C293 [27] was applied to the prismatic specimens through
100 kN capacity bending frame. Bonding strength of the concretes was determined
in accordance with RILEM RC6 [28]. The bonding strength, s, is calculated by divid-
ing the tensile force by the surface area of the steel bar embedded in concrete (Eq.
(1)). For this test, specially modified test apparatus was installed to 600 kN capacity
universal testing machine (Fig. 4).
F
s¼ ð1Þ
pdL
where F is the tensile load at failure (N), d and L are the diameter (mm) and embed-
ment length (mm) of the reinforcing steel bar, respectively. In this study, d and L are
16 mm and 150 mm, respectively.
Fig. 3. Details of the bonding strength test specimen. 3.1. Compressive strength
Fig. 4. Photographic view of the pullout test device: (a) installing the test apparatus and (b) testing the specimen.
of steel fiber resulted in slight rise of the compressive strength of the sult of flexural tensile strength tests is given in Fig. 6 to reveal the
concretes without depending on the incorporation of SF and w/b effectiveness of steel fiber reinforcement and silica fume. The re-
ratio. Nili and Afroughsabet [31] reported that 28 day compressive sults revealed that steel fiber incorporation provided significant in-
strengths of plain concrete produced with w/b ratio of 0.46 were crease in flexural strength. Kayali et al. [32] reported that the major
41.3 MPa, 46.4 MPa, and 47.3 MPa for steel fiber volume fractions contribution of the steel fibers was due to the increase of tensile
of 0%, 0.5%, and 1.0%, respectively. Moreover, the influence of aspect strain capacity of the concrete. In the study of Nanni [33] it was re-
ratio can also clearly be seen from Fig. 5. The higher the aspect ratio, ported that, tensile strength can significantly increase when steel
the higher the increase in compressive strength was observed, fiber was added to the concrete due to the crack arresting effect
especially for SF incorporated ones. For instance, the plain concretes of the fibers. The maximum flexural tensile strength values of
produced with w/b ratio of 0.35 and steel fiber volume fraction of 9.20 and 7.22 MPa were observed for concretes coded SF10-75St1
0.75% had 46.5 MPa and 45.9 MPa for St 1 and St 2, respectively. for w/b ratios of 0.35 and 0.55, respectively. Without depending
However, SF included concretes with the same parameters had on the type of steel fiber, the modulus of rupture results of con-
49.2 MPa and 48.9 MPa for St 1 and St 2, respectively. cretes incorporated with 0.25% volume fraction of steel fiber ap-
peared to be very close to each other. Another noticeable finding
3.2. Tensile strength from the tensile strength testing is that the contribution of St1
was observed to be better than that of St2. This situation may be
The tensile strength of plain and SF incorporated concretes were attributed to the orientation and properties of the steel reinforce-
evaluated in terms of three point modulus of rupture. The test re- ment within the cement matrix. In general, crack propagation is
M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990 987
Fig. 8. Typical failure patterns of concretes: (a) without steel fiber and (b) with steel fiber.
based on the bond strength of the fibre, thus, depending on the fibres of mixed aspect ratio. They used two types of steel fibres
material characteristics of the matrix and the fibre properties with 50/40 and 25/20 length/aspect ratios. It was reported that
which are tensile strength, the geometry, orientation, and aspect the fibrous concretes containing 100% long fibres had higher ten-
ratio. Mohammadi et al. [34] studied the properties of plain sile strength and fracture toughness than the concretes containing
concrete and steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC) containing 100% short fibres, for the same volume fraction. Yazıcı et al. [35]
988 M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990
used three different hooked end steel fibres with aspect ratios of
45, 65, and 80. The fibres with aspect ratios of 65 and 80 have
the same length and they are longer than the other one. The ob-
tained results revealed that for the same length, increasing the as-
pect ratio from 65 to 80, generally resulted in improvement of the
mechanical properties, depending on the volume fraction. How-
ever, the concretes incorporating short fibres with lower aspect ra-
tio had relatively lower tensile strength values than the other
fibrous concretes.
Table 5
Statistical analysis of the test result.
Dependent variable Independent variable Sequential sum of squares Computed F P value Significance Contribution (%)
Compressive strength w/b ratio 894.16 16544.05 0.000 Yes 95.5
SF replacement 35.1 649.43 0.000 Yes 3.7
Type of steel fibre 0.9 16.68 0.002 Yes 0.1
Steel fiber volume fraction 6.0 111.02 0.000 Yes 0.6
Error 0.6 – – – 0.1
Total 936.75 – – – –
Bonding strength w/b ratio 13.64 39.30 0.000 Yes 34.1
SF replacement 2.43 6.99 0.023 Yes 6.1
Type of steel fibre 3.4 9.80 0.010 Yes 8.5
Steel fiber volume fraction 16.73 48.19 0.000 Yes 41.8
Error 3.82 – – – 9.5
Total 40.02 – – – –
Flexural strength w/b ratio 8.36 70.92 0.000 Yes 20.6
SF replacement 2.08 17.60 0.001 Yes 5.1
Type of steel fibre 3.54 30.01 0.000 Yes 8.7
Steel fiber volume fraction 25.34 215.07 0.000 Yes 62.4
Error 1.29 – – – 3.2
Total 40.61 – – – –
M. Gesoğlu et al. / Construction and Building Materials 40 (2013) 982–990 989
7%) leaded to more than two or three times increases in bond 6. Conclusions
strength [40].
The following conclusions can be drawn in accordance with the
experimental results presented herein.
4. Statistical evaluation of the test results
[3] Bilgen G, Kavak A, Yıldırım ST, Çapar OF. Blast furnace slag and its importance [22] Döven AG. Lightweight fly ash aggregate production using cold bonding
in the construction sectors. In: The Second National Solid Waste Management _
agglomeration process, PhD thesis, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey; 1998.
Conference Mersin; 2010. [23] ASTM D2216-10, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of
[4] Dongxu L, Zhongzi X, Zhimin L, Zhihua P, Lin C. The activation and hydration of Water.
glassy cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 2002;32:1145–52. [24] ASTM C 127, Standard test method for specific gravity and absorption of coarse
[5] Cheeseman CR, Virdi GS. Properties and microstructure of lightweight aggregate, Annual Book of ASTM Standards; 2007.
aggregate produced from sintered sewage sludge ash. Resour Conserv Recycl [25] BS 812. Part 110: 1990 Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value
2005;45:18–30. (ACV).
[6] Gesoğlu M. Effects of lightweight aggregate properties on mechanical, fracture, [26] ASTM C39/C39M-12 standard test method for compressive strength of
and physical behavior of lightweight concretes. PhD thesis, Boğaziçi cylindrical concrete specimens annual book of ASTM standard, Philadelphia,
_
University, Istanbul, Turkey; 2004. vol. 04–02, p. 7; March 2012.
[7] Gesoğlu M, Özturan T, Güneyisi E. Effects of fly ash properties on [27] ASTM C293/C293M-10 Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete
characteristics of cold-bonded fly ash lightweight aggregates. Constr Build (using simple beam with center-point loading) annual book of ASTM standard,
Mater 2007;21:1869–78. Philadelphia, vol. 04–02, p. 3; September 2010.
[8] Joseph G, Ramamurthy K. Influence of fly ash on strength and sorption [28] RILEM RC 6. Recommendations for the testing and use of constructions
characteristics of cold-bonded fly ash aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater materials bond test for reinforcement steel. 2. Pull-out test; 1996. p. 3.
2009;23:1862–70. [29] Güneyisi E, Gesoğlu M, Karaoğlu S, Mermerdasß K. Strength, permeability and
[9] Kayali O. Fly ash lightweight aggregates in high performance concrete. Constr shrinkage cracking of silica fume and metakaolin concretes. Constr Build
Build Mater 2008;22:2393–9. Mater 2012;34:120–30.
[10] Gesoğlu M, Güneyisi E, Öz HÖ. Properties of lightweight aggregates produced [30] Ding JT, Li Z. Effects of metakaolin and silica fume on properties of concretes.
with cold-bonding pelletization of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace ACI Mater J 2002;99:393–8.
slag, Mater Struct 2012;45:937–49. [31] Nili M, Afroughsabet V. Property assessment of steel–fibre reinforced concrete
[11] Koçkal NU. Effects of lightweight fly ash aggregate properties on the made with silica fume. Constr Build Mater 2012;28:664–9.
performance of lightweight concretes, PhD thesis, Boğaziçi University, [32] Kayali O, Haque MN, Zhu B. Some characteristics of high strength fiber
_
Istanbul, Turkey; 2008. reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete. Cement Concr Compos
[12] Turkish Statistical Institute, Press Release 8. <http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/ 2003;25:207–13.
2010>. [33] Nanni A. Splitting-tension test for fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Mater J
[13] Koçkal NU, Özturan T. Durability of lightweight concretes with lightweight fly 1998;85(4):229–33.
ash aggregates. Constr Build Mater 2011;25:1430–8. [34] Mohammadi Y, Singh SP, Kaushik SK. Roperties of steel fibrous concrete
[14] Alexander MG, Magee BJ. Durability performance of concrete containing containing mixed fibres in fresh and hardened state. Constr Build Mater
condensed silica fume’’. Cem Concr Res 1999;29:917–22. 2008;22:956–65.
[15] Al-Khaja WA. Strength and time-dependent deformations of silica fume [35] Yazıcı Sß , Inan G, Tabak V. Effect of aspect ratio and volume fraction of steel
concrete for use in Bahrain. Constr Build Mater 1994;8:169–72. fiber on the mechanical properties of SFRC. Constr Build Mater
[16] Khatri RP, Sirivivatnanon V, Yu LK. Effect of curing on water permeability of 2007;21:1250–3.
concretes prepared with normal Portland cement and with slag and silica [36] Baran E, Akis T, Yesilmen S. Pull-out behavior of prestressing strands in steel
fume. Mag Concr Res 1997;49:167–72. fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 2012;28:362–71.
[17] Bhanja S, Sengupta B. Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of [37] Chan Y, Chu S. Effect of silica fume on steel fiber bond characteristics in
concrete. Cem Concr Res 2005;35:743–7. reactive powder concrete. Cem Concr Res 2004;34:1167–72.
[18] Poon CS, Kou SC, Lam L. Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore [38] Abu-Lebdeh T, Hamoush S, Heard W, Zornig B. Effect of matrix strength on
structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete. Constr pullout behavior of steel fiber reinforced very-high strength concrete
Build Mater 2006;20:858–65. composites. Constr Build Mater 2011;25:39–46.
[19] Ersoy U, Özcebe G, Tankut T. Reinforced Concrete. Ankara (Turkey): METU [39] Harajli MH, Salloukh KA. Effect of fibers on development/splice strength of
Press; 2003. reinforcing bars in tension. ACI Mater J 1997;94(4):317–24.
[20] Pillai SU, Kirk DW. Reinforced concrete design in Canada. McGraw-Hill; 1983. [40] Krstulovic-Opara N, Watson KA, LaFave JM. Effect of increased tensile strength
[21] Warner RF, Rangan BV, Hall AS, Faulkes KA. Concrete Structures. Australia: and toughness on reinforcing-bar bond behavior. Cem Concr Compos
Longman; 1998. 1994;16(2):129–41.