You are on page 1of 2

Asian Journal of Surgery 43 (2020) 1008e1009

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Asian Journal of Surgery


journal homepage: www.e-asianjournalsurgery.com

Letter to Editor

Long-term survival with eribulin monotherapy after whole brain


radiation therapy in a patient with brain metastasis from breast cancer
(60 mg/m2, every 3weeks, intravenously). Thereafter a salvage mas-
tectomy with axillary node dissection was performed. And a resid-
ual mass of 5 cm was found. The patient refused to continue
Keywords: chemotherapy after surgery and switched to hormone therapy
Breast cancer
Brain metastasis
(tamoxifen 20 mg daily). The patient developed multiple bone me-
Palliative chemotherapy tastases and liver metastasis as observed on PET CT scan performed
Eribulin in May 2017. The patient was consequently started on third-line
Whole brain radiation therapy systemic chemotherapy from May 2017, comprising of gemcitabine
(1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, intravenously) with
paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks, intravenously). The PET CT
performed 10 months later revealed exacerbation of the liver
metastasis, while a BM (2.8  1.6 cm) was observed in the frontal
To the editor, lobe on the brain MRI (Fig. 1). In March 2018, the patient underwent
WBRT (total 3000 cGy: 300 cGy/day for 10 days) and was started on
Brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer has a very poor prog- eribulin monotherapy (1.4 g/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 3weeks,
nosis, with a one-year survival rate of only 20%. The cytotoxic intravenously) in April 2018. The brain MRI performed six months
agents may not cross the bloodebrain barrier (BBB), so their effec- later showed a decrease in the metastatic lesions, and a further
tiveness is limited.1 Eribulin is a non-taxane microtubule dynamic decrease after continued therapy. The recent MRI study performed
inhibitor with proven therapeutic effects in metastatic breast can- in December 2019 showed stable brain metastatic lesions (Fig. 2).
cer, which has been shown to improve overall survival, but is The chemotherapy schedule was delayed due to leukopenia and
controversial in BM.2 We report a case of long-term benefit was discontinued from September 2019 to December 2019 due to
achieved through eribulin therapy after the whole brain radiation the patient’s personal situation. However the patient was reiniti-
in a patient with brain metastasis of breast cancer. ated into the therapy at the same dose in December 2019. 28th Eri-
In March 2015, a 61-year-old woman was diagnosed with inva- bulin monotherapy was completed on April 28, and is being
sive ductal carcinoma of 2.5 cm. Ipsilateral axillary lymph node me- considered for continued administration.
tastases and multiple bone metastases were detected. The clinical Eribulin may exert effect after passing through the BBB: the
stage of her disease was determined to be T2N1M1. The histological WBRT may increase the BBB permeability.3 The BBB in metastatic
grade was moderate, positive for estrogen receptor and progester- brain tumors tends to be relatively permeable compared to the pri-
one receptor, negative for HER2, and Ki-67 labeling index <4%. mary brain tumors.4 Incidentally, when the brain metastases grow
The patient underwent primary systemic chemotherapy from larger than 0.2 cm, it results in capillary angiogenesis. These newly
March 2015 to July 2015, comprising of six cycles of docetaxel formed capillaries exhibit abnormal BBB function. The P-sugar
(75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks, intravenously) with doxorubicin

Fig. 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. A heterogeneous enhancing brain parenchymal mass (2.5  1.6 cm) was identified in the right frontal region of the cerebrum in
March 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.002
1015-9584/© 2020 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-
ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Letter to Editor / Asian Journal of Surgery 43 (2020) 1008e1009 1009

Fig. 2. Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. In December 2019, eribulin was sustained and brain metastatic lesions remained small.

protein (P-gp) which is involved in resistance to cytotoxic agent, is References


reduced expression in the angiogenesis iafter WBRT.3,5
1. Arslan C, Dizdar O, Altundag K. Chemotherapy and biological treatment options
in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis: an update. Expet Opin Pharmac-
Conclusion other. 2014;15:1643e1658.
2. Cortes J, O’Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treat-
ment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE):
Eribulin monotherapy after WBRT may be an effective treatment a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet. 2011;377:914e923.
for brain metastasis from breast cancer and further study is needed. 3. Bart J, Nagengast WB, Coppes RP, et al. Irradiation of rat brain reduces P-glyco-
protein expression and function. Br J Canc. 2007;97:322e326.
4. Zhang RD, Price JE, Fujimaki T, et al. Differential permeability of the blood-brain
barrier in experimental brain metastases produced by human neoplasms
Declaration of competing interest implanted into nude mice. Am J Pathol. 1992;141:1115e1124.
5. Easton AS. Regulation of permeability across the blood-brain barrier. Adv Exp
Med Biol. 2012;763:1e19.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Sung Ui Jung, Chang Wan Jeon, Jin Hyuk Choi*


Acknowledgments Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kosin
College of Medicine, Kosin Univ. Gospel Hospital, Busan, South Korea
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation
of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) *
Correspinding author. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of
(No. 2019M3E5D1A02070865). And we would like to thank Editage Surgery, University of Kosin College of Medicine, Kosin Univ.
(www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing. Gospel Hospital, 262, Gamcheon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, Republic of
Korea.
Appendix A. Supplementary data E-mail address: drchoijinhyuk@gmail.com (J.H. Choi).

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at 3 May 2020


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.002. Available online 4 July 2020

You might also like