CBL Assignment 7

Submitted by: Babar Mairaj

Student ID: 20181-24336

Answer 1:

Judgement: This contract is anticipatory breach.

Conclusion: As Mr A didn’t have enough crops to deliver, this resulted in the contract being
void, hence, anticipatory breach of contract.

Answer 2:

Judgement: The contract is breach due to non-fulfillment of task.

Conclusion: Mr. B defaulted in payment now he has 2 options monitory remedy payment and
quantum merit remedy.

Answer 3:

Judgement: The contract is void due to supervening impossibility.

Conclusion: The contract is void because the bond has been acquired by the government and
subject matter is not in possession.

Answer 4:

Judgement: Mr A can’t be sued as the contract is not void.

Conclusion: Due to strikes and lockouts the contract is not void and Mr. B can’t sue Mr. A as it
is not an excuse of super vanning impossibility.

Answer 5:

Judgement: Mr A cannot be discharged as the contract is not void.

Conclusion: The contract is not void as the third party is at fault and Mr A will have to pay.

Answer 6:

Judgement: Due to discharge on ground of super vanning impossibility, the contract is void.

Conclusion: The contract is void because there is an excuse of super vanning impossibility and
can be discharged as the war was declared.
Answer 7:

Judgement: Excuse of super vanning impossibility and contract is void.

Conclusion: Because of destruction of subject matter the contract is void and can be discharged
because of super vanning impossibility.