Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
make more informed decisions in mini-implant place- sociated with tissue attenuation coefficients. The center
ment. Many studies have assessed bone quantity in value, among multiple adjacent HU readings, was se-
the palate, but only a few have examined palatal bone lected as the cortical bone density value for each point.
densities.5–7,11 Therefore, the purpose of this study was During a preliminary study, the center value among
to quantitatively evaluate bone density in the palate so multiple adjacent values was close to the mean of the
as to provide guidelines for mini-implant placement multiple values (data not shown). Based on the out-
that are essential for implant site selection and implant comes from a preliminary study and those from a pre-
success prediction. vious study where center values were selected, the
center value was chosen for use in this study.12 In ad-
MATERIALS AND METHODS dition to determining HU units, the palatal bone was
categorized according to the D1–D5 Misch and Kircos
Figure 1. (A) Measurement points. (B) Bone density was measured at 9 points with intervals of 3 mm, perpendicular to reference line (R)
through the incisive foramen and the posterior nasal spine.
showed constant values posterior to AP ⫽ 2 in most sites. Unlike the female group, the male group exhib-
sites, being more constant in the female group. No- ited bone densities of less than 850 HU in posterior
tably, bone densities at ML ⫽ 2 showed the highest sites ML⫽ 5 and AP ⫽ 8 and 9.
values compared with other MLs in the female group.
Bone densities decreased posteriorly at ML ⫽ 4 and DISCUSSION
ML ⫽ 5 in both male and female groups (Figure 4). The growing demand for orthodontic treatment with
The highest values were found at AP ⫽ 2 for most ML minimal compliance requirements and maximal an-
chorage has led to expansion of the use of mini-im- although insufficient information is available on the ef-
plants. Among other factors related to the stability of fects of bone density.
mini-implants, anatomic location has been reported to In the present study, bone density was measured in
be critical.8–10 Clinical evidence of the importance of the midpalatal area and its vicinity posterior to the in-
bone quantity at the implant location has been found, cisive foramen. Our measurements were performed at
locations 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mm from the midpalatal than 850 HU of bone density at sites posterior to AP
suture to each lateral side, and at positions 3, 6, 9, ⫽ 6 and ML ⫽ 4 and ML ⫽ 5. Differences in bone
12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27 mm posterior to the pos- density between neighboring sites should be taken
terior margin of the incisive foramen. These locations into consideration, especially when a second site is
were chosen because the thickness of palatal cortical selected after an initial mini-implant failure. Similar var-
bone was measured at these same positions in the iation in bone thickness of the palate has been found
previous study.11 in other studies.7,11 When both bone quantity and the
This study evaluated whether bone density varies quality of mini-implant placement are taken into ac-
between sexes and between left and right sides of the count, the posterior and lateral regions of the palate
palate. It is surprising to note that the higher bone den- should be considered so the possibility of perforation
sity values in the female group were statistically sig- and loosening of the implant can be reduced.
nificant at most sites. Consistent with this study, a pre- In our study, bone density decreased with increas-
vious study reported that mean values for bone den- ing AP in both groups, similar to observations for bone
sity of the lumbar spine and the neck of the femur were thickness. Bone density at ML ⫽ 1 and ML ⫽ 2, how-
greater in South Korean females, up to 35 years of ever, was constant as AP increased. Bone densities
age, when compared with those of South Korean at AP ⫽ 1 and 2 and ML ⫽ 1 were lower than at ML
males. Bone densities in South Korean females peak ⫽ 2. This can be explained in part by the closeness
at around 35 years of age, slowly decrease until the of the incisive foramen at AP ⫽ 1 and 2 and ML ⫽ 1.
age of 50, and then rapidly decrease after 50 years of Bone density at ML ⫽ 2 was greater than at ML ⫽ 1,
age; bone densities in South Korean males have been with particular significance in the female group. This
observed to decrease at a linear rate.14 On the other can be explained in part by the fact that the palatal
hand, no difference in bone density was observed be- midline gap, formed during the prenatal period, be-
tween left and right sides of the palate in this study. comes reduced by deposition of bone, and, by the age
This finding is consistent with observations of bilateral 21, fibrous tissue with collagen fibers run parallel to
symmetry in bone density reported for the palate of the surface.16 Nevertheless, bone densities at ML ⫽ 1
the rhesus monkey.15 Another study also showed no showed denser bone—greater than 1000 HU. Addi-
difference in bone densities between left and right tionally, bone densities in both groups from ML ⫽ 1 to
sides.12 ML ⫽ 5 up to AP ⫽ 5 showed dense bone. This in-
It is interesting to note that a large amount of vari- dicates that mini-implants can be placed from 3 mm
ation was seen in palatal bone densities within individ- posterior to the incisive foramen and 1 to 5 mm para-
uals at all sites in both male and female groups. Some median without onset of problems related to bone
subjects from both male and female groups had less quality if bone quantity is sufficient.
CONCLUSIONS
and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am 12. Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the al-
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:177–182. veolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am
6. Kyung SH, Lim JK, Park YC. A study on the bone thickness J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:30–37.
of midpalatal suture area for miniscrew insertion. Korean J 13. Misch CE, Kircos LT. Diagnostic imaging and techniques.
Orthod. 2004;34:63–70. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed.
7. Bernhart T, Vollgruber A, Gahleitner A, Dörtbudak O, Haas St Louis: Mosby; 1999:73–87.
R. Alternative to the median region of the palate for place- 14. Yong SJ. Bone mineral density of normal Korean adults,
ment of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. PhD thesis, 1989, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
2000;11:595–601. 15. Miller AJ, Cann CE, Nielsen I, Roda G. Craniomandibular
8. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study bone density in the primate as assessed by computed to-
of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants mography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:117–
used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im-
125.
plants. 2004;19:100–106.
16. Pritschard JJ, Scott JH, Girgis PG. The structure and de-
9. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T,