Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_________________________________________
Shamanism and the Origins of Spirituality
and Ritual Healing*
_________________________________________
Michael Winkelman
michaeljwinkelman@gmail.com
Abstract
The concept of the shaman has cross-cultural validity, reecting common
patterns of behavior associated with spiritual healing practices found in
foraging societies worldwide. The empirical characteristics associated with
these practices are examined from evolutionary perspectives and in terms
of an evolutionary psychology that identies their underlying biological
bases. The physiological foundations of shamanism are revealed by exam-
ining the biological and evolutionary roots for community ritual and the
physiological aspects of altered states of consciousness (ASC). Shamanic
rituals expanded primate community bonding rituals involving emotional
vocalizations and drumming as social signaling and communication
processes. The ASC involve the ritual induction of an integrative mode of
consciousness that enhanced self-awareness and social identity formation
in the concepts of souls and spirits and produced a variety of physical and
psychological healing processes. Shamanic practices are part of human
nature and involve a variety of evolved capacities that have assisted in
human adaptation and survival.
Introduction
The concepts associated with the term shaman are quite varied. The
referent for this concept has shifted over time from an exoticized foreign
‘other’ to a wide range of contemporary spiritual healing practices.
Shamanism is now viewed as being involved across time and cultures in
such diverse areas as art, dance, healing, hunting, music, politics, spiri-
tuality, and many other phenomena in the ancient and contemporary
* Material in various parts of this paper has been adapted from Winkelman
(2002b, 2004a, forthcoming) and Winkelman and Baker (2008).
© Equinox Publishing Ltd 2010, 1 Chelsea Manor Studios, Flood Street, London SW3 5SR.
Winkelman Shamanism and the Origins of Spirituality 459
world. The term shaman has been applied to religious leaders, healers,
mystics, prophets, political leaders, and performance artists. Can the
term have much usefulness with such a variety of uses and referents?
This article addresses this question, both suggesting the need for a
more delimited use of the concept of shaman that makes it more useful,
while also pointing to broader phenomena of shamanistic healing that
reect the diversication of this ancient human spiritual healing practice.
This perspective contends that there are biological bases for a universal
manifestation of a more delimited hunter-gatherer shamanism, as well as
a universal manifestation of ‘shamanistic healers’ as a consequence of
sociocultural evolution (Winkelman 1990, 1992). Both of these perspec-
tives are linked to biological origins of a capacity for the ritual alteration
of consciousness, and the sociocultural factors that affect the manifesta-
tion of these human potentials. These approaches place the origins of
this commonality of ‘shamanisms’ across time and space of spiritual
healing practices in both biological and social evolutionary contexts that
emphasize a primordial form of shamanism associated with hunter-
gatherer societies, as well as a transformation of that potential into other
forms of shamanistic healers—shaman/healers, healers, and mediums—
as a consequence of social factors. Both an aboriginal shamanism and the
many shamanisms today are based in factors derived from the ancient
phylogenetic roots of ritual as a mechanism for communication and
social coordination.
Although the usefulness of the term shaman has been undermined by
its use to refer to a diverse range of phenomena, it nonetheless reects
something real. Cross-cultural research illustrates that the concept of the
shaman reects the existence of similar religious practitioners which have
been found in pre-modern foraging and simple horticultural and pas-
toral societies around the world (Winkelman 1992, 2000). While the idea
of the shaman has great antiquity in Western culture, having been part
of the intellectual discourse of eighteenth-century Europe (Flaherty 1992),
it was the renowned scholar of comparative religion, Mircea Eliade
(1964; originally published in French in 1951) who inuentially proposed
a cross-cultural concept of the shaman. He argued that the concept of the
shaman was far broader than the Siberian origins of the term. His cha-
racterizations of the shaman, however, were in part responsible for sub-
sequent confusion regarding the exact nature of shamans. He offered a
general characterization of the shaman as someone who entered ecstasy
to interact with the spirits on behalf of the community, but also empha-
sized many other additional specic concepts of the shaman that some
subsequent researchers neglected in their generalizations of this term.
ASC involving a sense of some aspect of the self separating from the
body; and these ASC experiences of shamans do not involve ‘possession’
by the spirits in the sense of being taken over and controlled by them.
Rather, the shamanic ASC is a conscious state of entry into another expe-
riential domain in which the shaman is a self-controlled actor (Winkel-
man 1992).
The soul ight typically occurred after dancing and drumming for
hours, when the shaman collapses or lays down and appears to be
unconscious; however, during this period of quiescence, there is an
experience of a departure of the personal soul or spirit from the body,
which travels to the spirit realms. This ability to travel to the spirit world
was part of the shamanic initiation and development process, generally
involving a ‘vision quest’ during which illness, spontaneous alterations
of consciousness, or a variety of deliberate activities produced a spirit
world encounter with a spirit ally. This spirit being, generally manifested
in an animal form, was the basis of the shaman’s powers. These powers
often presented themselves as powerful carnivores that attacked and
killed the initiate. These initiatory experiences of personal death were
subsequently followed by a re-membering of the initiate, as the animal
spirits reassemble the shaman, who was reborn as a stronger and more
powerful person. These experiences gave the shaman the ability to domi-
nate and control the spirit powers, using them for a variety of profes-
sional tasks. The shaman used these spirits to heal, recover the lost souls
of patients, or guide the souls of the deceased into the after-life. Animal
and plant spirits were alter-egos or identities that shamans could assume,
providing them with numerous powers and supernatural abilities.
Shamanic concepts of illness included a concern with the loss of souls
or some personal essence, which can occur for a variety of reasons,
including fright, a transgression, or theft by a spirit or sorcerer. Other
illness concepts included the consequences of a foreign object that has
intruded into the body, such as a magical dart sent by another shaman.
Shamans also engaged in a variety of concepts of healing based on phys-
ical processes—massage, plant medicines, diet, and other physical effects
of rituals.
shamanic ritual with what Lawick-Goodall (1968) calls the maximal dis-
plays of chimpanzees, their most complex ritualized behaviors. Some of
the homologies between chimpanzee displays and shamanic practices
include community rituals focused on alpha-male displays involving
drumming, emotional vocalizations, and bipedal (upright) charges that
provide community integration, protective functions, and emotional
release.
The similarities in chimpanzee ritualizations and shamanic practices
worldwide reect biological bases:
1. community bonding rituals that involve emotional vocalizations
and drumming as social signaling and communication processes;
2. ASC that involve the elicitation of an integrative mode of con-
sciousness; and
3. healing capacities based on the above processes, including ritual
effects in eliciting opioid responses and the ASC that provide
physiological relaxation and integration (Winkelman 2000, 2002b;
Winkelman and Baker 2008).
The physiological foundations of shamanic ritual are revealed by
examining the biological and evolutionary roots for community ritual
and the physiological aspects of ASC. The conservative aspects of bio-
logical evolution are found in the preservation in shamanism of the
functions of previous adaptive structures found in ritual activities of
other animals. These implicate ancient areas of the brain, referred to by
McLean as the ‘R-complex’ and the paleomammalian brain, which are
involved in community bonding and attachment processes. Uniquely
human foundations of shamanism are also found in the brain system,
particularly innate modules for representation of animals, others, and
self.
Shamanism is based on exaptations (the selection of features of prior
adaptations for new adaptive functions) of these innate systems, involv-
ing new selective pressures on previously established features for new
adaptive functions. Shamanic practices expanded the capacities of ritual
for community integration and used them to produce ASC that enhanced
awareness and capacities for representation. ASC integrated prior repre-
sentational capacities to produce metaphoric thought that enabled new
forms of cognition and symbolic healing processes. These are manifested
in the roles of animal spirit concepts in the formation of personal and
social identities and the information processing and integration provided
in the visionary images of shamanic ASC. These provided mechanisms
for personal individuation, social integration, and cognitive and emo-
tional integration by combining the outputs of different innate cognitive
the branches of nearby trees, throw rocks and other objects, and ail
with sticks or branches. Extended features of the display, such as leaping,
hurling rocks and branches, and beating on the ground, can escalate to
more intimidating charging displays—stamping the feet, slapping hands
against the ground, throwing rocks and sticks, combined with upright
running. The most dramatic type of aggressive, dominant behavior is the
charging display, during which a chimp (usually a male), may shake,
drag, or ail branches, throw objects, slap the ground with its hands and
stomp with its feet, leap and swing through trees, vocalize, and even
drum on tree trunks or buttresses of trees with the feet. This display may
be quadrupedal, but in its maximal form involves a vigorous bipedal
charge that enables them to beat with their arms, grasp branches and
wave them from side to side and beat them on the ground.
self and other manifested in a visual symbolic capacity that Hunt (1995)
refers to as presentational symbolism. This nonverbal symbolic capacity
for self-reference is the same system underlying dreaming (Hunt 1995).
This visionary aspect of the shaman’s ASC is based in a complex synes-
thesia, a blending of corporeal, visual, and auditory sensory modalities.
This synthesis provides a special form of self awareness experienced as
apart from the body.
Soul ight has implications embodied in the etymological roots of the
word ‘ecstasy’—standing outside of oneself. This reveals the ability of
perspective-taking that is derived from the capacity to take the role of
the ’other’ towards one’s self (Hunt 1995). It is also a capacity derived
from mimesis, the ability to represent with the body. The body is a
neurological basis for human experience and knowing (Newton 1996)
and is a principal aspect of metaphors used in analogic thinking
(Friedrich 1991). Body image combines memory, perception, affect, and
cognition in presentational symbolism, utilizing the capacity for cross-
modal translation that is at the foundation of symbolic thought (Hunt
1995). This cognitive feature of shamanism reects extensions of human
cognitive potentials. This presentational symbolic system based in pre-
linguistic structures provided mechanisms for representation and new
forms of self-awareness that produced transcendence of ordinary body-
based awareness and identity. Out-of-body experiences emphasize a
sense of reference no longer tied to the physical body, which is the
original form of knowledge. Body-based representational systems pro-
vide a symbolic system for all levels of organization from metabolic
levels through self-representation and advanced conceptual functions.
The body-image dynamics of soul ight reect a natural symbol system,
a biologically based model that organizes both internal and external
experiences, as well as a reference system that extends awareness
beyond that body-based reference (Laughlin 1997).
The shaman’s visionary experiences engage the use of a presentational
symbolism (Hunt 1995). Symbolic imagery and visions of shamans’
visionary experiences engage the same brain structures associated with
processing perceptual information (Baars 1997) and dreaming (Hunt
1995). Images are a pre-verbal symbol system that have the capacity to
recruit and coordinate muscle systems to achieve goals, arousing auto-
nomic responses and engaging unconscious muscle control centers
(Baars 1997). Images engage psychobiological communication processes
that mediate across different levels of information processing, integrating
unconscious, non-volitional, affective, and psychophysiological informa-
tion at cognitive levels. This visual information system links domains of
experience, integrating somatic, psychological, and cognitive levels
cooperation with others to adapt to their local ecological niche. The need
for cooperation with other humans makes essential some knowledge of
their mental states (2001: 120, 122).
Pascal Boyer discusses how the social mind inference system is
extended through spirit concepts. Actual people are limited in their
access to social information about others, whereas spirits are presumed
to have, or potentially to have, full access to strategic information about
other’s motivations and actions. Assumptions about spirits’ knowledge
are an important adaptation, one that has an empirical basis in the
implicit and unconscious cognitive processes that humans engage
through divinatory practices (Winkelman and Peek 2004). Supernatural
agents expand human scenario building, helping them to engage in
mental thought processes without actual circumstances. Imaging scena-
rios and possible consequences is an example of decoupled cognition, a
mental ability also manifested in play and concepts of spirits that violate
intuitive assumptions. The ability of the mental hardware programs
(inference systems) to operate decoupled from environmental input
allows them to operate independently of actual experience, functioning
in a counterfactual mode that explores alternative scenarios through
imaginary characters that engage the process of inferring mental states of
others.
Spirits are also useful strategic concepts in personal identity and social
integration. Spirits have social psychological functions as fundamental
representations of the structure of human psychology, a language of
intrapsychic dynamics of the self and psychosocial relations with others.
Spirit beliefs also reect the cultural dynamics of social and interpersonal
relations. Spirits are used in shamanism to manipulate self-dynamics
and personal identity. Beliefs about the particular qualities of spirits are
learned, providing symbolic systems that reect ‘complexes’, integrated
perceptual, behavioral, and personality dynamics that operate indepen-
dently of ego control. Manipulation of these complexes through ritual
practices can heal by re-structuring and integrating the unconscious
personality dynamics with social models, paralleling standard psychia-
tric procedures of healing through uniting the unconscious and
conscious mind.
Conclusions:
Shamanism and the Future of Humanity
The concept of shamanism stands at a paradoxical cross-road. On one
hand it represents one of the most ancient of all human spiritual prac-
tices, while on the other hand, modied forms of it are being revitalized
and spread in modern society (see Winkelman 2003; Walker and Frid-
man 2004). Our ancient pasts and futures collide in the re-emergence of
some of the most powerful of human capacities, found in what has been
conceptualized as spiritual healing. Why have some modern humans re-
embraced these ancient healing potentials? This essay has argued that
shamanic beliefs and practices must be understood as part of human
nature, as a variety of evolved capacities that have assisted in human
adaptation and survival. Many of the original features of hunter-gatherer
shamanism have become attenuated or altogether disappeared in the
context of a variety of modern shamanistic healers. The original features
of shamanism, such as soul ight, death and rebirth, sorcery, transforma-
tion into animals, hunting skills, and pre-eminent community leadership
are not found associated with many forms of contemporary shamanistic
healing. But many other features, such as ASC, associated healing prac-
tices, and spiritual assumptions, persist as central features of modern
shamanistic healing practices.
While one may legitimately question whether religious practices today
have the same adaptive capacity as they did in early evolutionary his-
tory (Winkelman and Baker 2008), the resurgence of shamanism may be
appropriately understood in terms of its continued manifestation of
innate human dynamics and needs. Understanding the ways shamanism
ties into aspects of our ancient psychology, our unconsciousness, and
our complex psychological condition, suggests that shamanism is not a
vestige of our past. Rather, shamanism reects a vital aspect of humans’
evolved psychology with continued applications in the present and
future.
References
Arcadi, A., D. Robert, and C. Boesch. 1998. ‘Buttress Drumming by Wild Chimpan-
zees: Temporal Patterning, Phrase Integration into Loud Calls, and Preliminary
Evidence for Individual Distinctiveness’, Primates 39.4: 505-18.
doi:10.1007/BF02557572.
Atran, S. 2006. ‘The Cognitive and Evolutionary Roots of Religion’, in McNamara
2006: 181-208.
Baars, B. 1997. In the Theater of Consciousness (New York: Oxford University Press).
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195102659.001.1.
Bird-David, N. 1999. ‘Animism Revisited Personhood, Environment, and Relational
Epistemology’, Current Anthropology 40: 67-91. doi:10.1086/200061.
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought (New
York: Basic Books).
Brereton, D. 2000. ‘Dreaming, Adaptation, and Consciousness: The Social Mapping
Hypothesis’, Ethos 28.3: 379-409. doi:10.1525/eth.2000.28.3.379.
Brown, S. 2000. ‘The “Musilanguage” Model of Music’, in Wallin, Merker, and Brown
2000: 271-300.
Bulbulia, J. 2006. ‘Nature’s Medicine: Religiosity as an Adaptation for Help and
Cooperation’, in McNamara 2006: 87-121.
Crowe, B. 2004. Music and Soul Making: Toward a New Theory of Music Therapy
(Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press).
d’Aquili, E., C. Laughlin, and J. McManus (eds.). 1979. The Spectrum of Ritual (New
York: Columbia University Press).
De Waal, F. 1997. Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Dietrich, A. 2003. ‘Functional Neuroanatomy of Altered States of Consciousness: The
Transient Hypofrontality Hypothesis’, Consciousness and Cognition 12: 231-56.
doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00046-6.
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press).
———. 2001. A Mind so Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness (New York: W.W.
Norton & Co.).
Eliade, M. 1964. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy (New York: Pantheon Books).
Flaherty, G. 1992. Shamanism and the Eighteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press).
Frecska, E., and Z. Kulcsar. 1989. ‘Social Bonding in the Modulation of the Physiology
of Ritual Trance’, Ethos 17.1: 70-87. doi:10.1525/eth.1989.17.1.02a00040.
Freeman, W. 2000. ‘A Neurobiological Role of Music in Social Bonding’, in Wallin,
Merker, and Brown 2000: 411-24.
Friedrich, P. 1991. ‘Polytrophy’, in J.W. Fernandez (ed.), Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of
Tropes in Anthropology (Stanford: Stanford University Press): 17-55.
Geissmann, T. 2000. ‘Gibbon Songs and Human Music from an Evolutionary
Perspective’, in Wallin, Merker, and Brown 2000: 103-23.
Glazier, S. (ed.). 1997. Anthropology of Religion: A Handbook of Method and Theory
(Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).
Goodall, J. 1986. The Chimpanzees of the Gombe: Patterns of Behavior (Cambridge, MA
and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University).
Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion (Oxford: Oxford
University Press).
Hauser, M. 2000. ‘The Sound and the Fury: Primate Vocalizations as Reections of
Emotions and Thought’, in Wallin, Merker, and Brown 2000: 77-102.
Hayden, B. 2003. Shamans, Sorcerers, and Saints: A Prehistory of Religion (Washington,
DC: Smithsonian Books).
Hubbard, T. 2002. ‘Some Correspondences and Similarities of Shamanism and
Cognitive Science: Interconnectedness, Extension of Meaning and Attribution of
Mental States’, Anthropology of Consciousness 13.2: 26-45.
doi:10.1525/ac.2002.13.2.26.
Hunt, H. 1995. On the Nature of Consciousness (New Haven and London: Yale
University Press).
Kirkpatrick, L. 2005. Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion (New York:
Guilford Press).
Koenig, H., M. McCullough, and D. Larson. 2001. Handbook of Religion and Health
(Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Kohler, W. 1927. The Mentality of Apes (New York: Harcourt Brace).
doi:10.1037/11338-000.
Laughlin, C. 1997. ‘Body, Brain, and Behavior: The Neuroanthropology of the Body
Image’, Anthropology of Consciousness 8.2–3: 49–68.
Laughlin, C., and E. d’Aquili. 1974. Biogenetic Structuralism (New York: Columbia
University Press).
Laughlin, C., J. McManus, and E. d’Aquili. 1992. Brain, Symbol and Experience: Toward a
Neurophenomenology of Consciousness (New York: Columbia University Press).
Lawick-Goodall, J. 1968. ‘The Behaviour of a Free-living Chimpanzees in the Gombe
Stream Reserve’, Animal Behavior Monographs 1.3: 161-311.
———. 1971. In the Shadow of Man (New York: Delta Publishing).
Leukel, F. 1972. Introduction to Physiological Psychology (Saint Louis: Mosley Press).
Levi-Strauss, C. 1962. Totemism (Boston: Beacon).
Mandell, A. 1980. ‘Toward a Psychobiology of Transcendence: God in the Brain’, in D.
Davidson and R. Davidson (eds.), The Psychobiology of Consciousness (New York:
Plenum Press): 379-464.
Marler, P. 2000. ‘Origins of Music and Speech: Insights from Animals’, in Wallin,
Merker, and Brown 2000: 31-48.
McClenon, J. 2002. Wondrous Healing: Shamanism, Human Evolution and the Origin of
Religion (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press).
———. 2006. ‘The Ritual Healing Theory: Therapeutic Suggestion and the Origin of
Religion’, in McNamara 2006: 135-58.
McLean, P. 1990. The Triune Brain in Evolution (New York: Plenum Press).
———. 1993. ‘On the Evolution of Three Mentalities’, in J. Ashbrook (ed.), Brain,
Culture and the Human Spirit: Essays from an Emergent Evolutionary Perspective
(Lanham, MD: University Press of America): 15-44.
McNamara, P. (ed.). 2006. Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary
Studies Alter our Understanding of Religion. I. Evolution, Genes, and the Religious
Brain (Westport, CT: Praeger).
Merker, B. 2000. ‘Synchronous Chorusing and Human Origins’, in Wallin, Merker,
and Brown 2000: 315-27.
Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and
Science (London: Thames & Hudson).
Molino, J. 2000. ‘Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Music’, in Wallin, Merker, and
Brown 2000: 165-76.
Newton, N. 1996. Foundations of Understanding (Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s
Publishing Co.).
Noll, R. 1985. ‘Mental Imagery Cultivation as a Cultural Phenomenon: The Role of
Visions in Shamanism’, Current Anthropology 26: 443-51. doi:10.1086/203305.
Oubré, A. 1997. Instinct and Revelation: Reections on the Origins of Numinous Perception
(Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach).
Pandian, J. 1997. ‘The Sacred Integration of the Cultural Self: An Anthropological
Approach to the Study of Religion’, in Glazier 1997: 505-16.
Randall, J. 2001. ‘Evolution and Function of Drumming as Communication in
Mammals’, American Zoologist 41.5: 1143-56. Online: www.bioone.org (accessed
29 April 2005).
Reynolds, V. 2005. The Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest (New York: Oxford
University Press). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515463.001.0001.
Reynolds, V., and F. Reynolds. 1965. ‘Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest’, in I.
DeVore (ed.), Primate Behavior (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston): 368-424.
Samuel, G. 1990. Mind, Body and Culture: Anthropology and the Biological Interface
(Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
Swanson, G. 1973. ‘The Search for a Guardian Spirit: a Process of Empowerment in
Simpler Societies’, Ethnology 12: 359-78. doi:10.2307/3773123.
Tylor, E. 1924 [1871]. Primitive Culture (New York: Brentano).
Valle, J.P., and R.H. Prince. 1989. ‘Religious Experiences as Self-healing Mechanisms’,
in C.A. Ward (ed.), Altered States of Consciousness and Mental Health: A Cross
Cultural Perspective (Newbury Park, CA: Sage): 149-66.
Vollenweider, F. 1998. ‘Recent Advances and Concepts in the Search for Biological
Correlates of Hallucinogen-induced Altered States of Consciousness’, The Heffter
Review of Psychedelic Research 1: 21-32.
Walker, M., and E. Fridman (eds.). 2004. Shamanism: An Encyclopedia of World Beliefs,
Practices and Culture (Santa Barbara: ABC Clio).
Wallin, N., B. Merker, and S. Brown (eds.). 2000. The Origins of Music (Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press).
Walton, K., and D. Levitsky. 1994. ‘A Neuroendocrine Mechanism for the Reduction
of Drug Use and Addictions by Transcendental Meditation’, in D. O’Connell and
C. Alexander (eds.), Self-Recovery: Treating Addictions Using Transcendental
Meditation and Maharishi Ayur-Veda (New York: Hayworth Press): 89-117.
Winkelman, M. 1990. ‘Shaman and Other “Magico-Religious Healers”: A Cross-
Cultural Study of their Origins, Nature and Social Transformation’, Ethos 18.3:
308-52. doi:10.1525/eth.1990.18.3.02a00040.
———. 1992. Shamans, Priests and Witches: A Cross-Cultural Study of Magico-religious
Practitioners (Anthropological Research Papers, 44; Tempe: Arizona State
University Press).
———. 1997. ‘Altered States of Consciousness and Religious Behavior’, in Glazier
1997: 393-428.
———. 2000. Shamanism the Neural Ecology of Consciousness and Healing (Westport, CT:
Bergin & Garvey).