Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/348845374
CITATIONS READS
0 13
3 authors, including:
Sura L. Alkhafaji
University of Kerbala
19 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Solvent Extracts of Carthamus tinctorius Flowers View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sura L. Alkhafaji on 28 January 2021.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
INTRODUCTION:
Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) is an annual, thistle,
semi-spinal plant that belongs to the Asteraceae family
and it grows in a warm climate. Its flowers are yellow,
orange or red (Figure 1). Initially, it is found in Southern
Asia, (especially in China, India, Iran and Egypt),
southern Europe, North and South America 1. The other
producing regions are Turkey, Argentina, Australia, Iraq,
and Russia.
Figure 1: The Flowers of Safflower
6055
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 13(12): December 2020
According to medicinal effects and pharmacotherapeutic The flower remains from the second extraction were re-
uses of C. tinctorius, further chemical determination is extracted using ME solvent 600 ml. After maceration for
required to examine the chemical components of this six days, it was filtered. The filtrate was dried using a
plant, for that reason, this present work was aimed to rotatory evaporator at a temperature of 40˚C to get ME
extract the safflower petals of C. tinctorius using three extract. All the extracts were stored for GC-MS analysis.
different solvents (ethyl acetate, methanol and hexane),
then the chemical constituents were identified by GC- GC–MS analysis for identification of C. tinctorius
MS technique. GC–MS is one of the most well-known chemical composition:
analytical techniques in many scientific fields due to its The three extracts were examined by a GC (Agilent
high sensitivity, low detection limit, rapid identificationTechnologies 7890A) interfaced with a mass- selective
and its ability to analyse a number of ingredients in detector (MSD, Agilent 7000) furnished with a polar
analytes concurrently. Also, it is aimed to examine the in Agilent HP-5ms (5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane)
vitro antibacterial activity of the active agents against capillary column (30x0.25mm i. d. and 0.25μm film
Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus heamolyticus, thickness). The carrier gas was Helium with a linear flow
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. of 1ml/min, and the volume of injection was 1µl of the
sample. The injector temperature was 200˚C. The
The antibacterial activity of safflower extracts against ionisation potential of 70 eV, interface temperature of
tested bacteria is attributed to phenolic derivatives that 250˚C, and acquisition mass range 50-800 were the MS
are available in the form of ester or rarely in glycosides operating parameters.
form, flavonoids (in the form of glycosides), alkaloids,
terpenoids and other bioactive compounds. The identification of compounds was based on
comparison of their mass spectra and retention indices
MATERIAL AND METHODS: (RIs) with those documented in the Wiley and NIST
Plant sample preparation: mass spectral databases, and authentic samples
Safflower applied in this work was acquired from the (compound available in our laboratories), additional
local market. The orange flowers were washed, then they library data of the GC– MS system or from literature
were dried in the Pharmacognosy Department, College data.
of Pharmacy, Kerbala University, Iraq.
Determination of antibacterial activity:
Solvents and Chemicals: Tested Bacterial strains and culture media
Ethyl acetate EA, methanol ME, and hexane HE were preparation:
used as the extraction solvents in this study. These three The antibacterial activity of the EA, ME and HE extract
analytical grade solvents were purchased from Sigma of safflower was examined against two gram-positive
Aldrich. bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus and
Staphylococcus and two gram-negative bacterial strains
which are Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
These bacterial strains were isolated and acquired from
the medical laboratory unit, Al-Kafeel Hospital, Karbala.
6056
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 13(12): December 2020
All Bactria were cultured in sterilised nutrient broth and HE extract consist of 40, 35 and 27 identified
(NB) at 37°C for 16-18 h. Nutrient broth (NB, 25g/L), compounds, respectively. These compounds are ranging
Muller-Hinton (MH, 38g/L), was dissolved in distilled from flavonoids and its glucopyranoside, terpenes,
water. The tools that have been used; the glasses coumarins, esters, alkanes, phenols, essential oils,
(pipettes, tubes, Z- rode and beakers), filter paper disc (5 alkaloids, vitamins and others.
mm in diameter) and the solution of NB and MH were
sterilised using autoclave at 15Ibs at 121˚C for fifteen The major components were 4’, 6-
minutes. The concentration of tested bacteria, cultures Dimethoxyisoflavonne-7-O-β- D-glucopyranoside, 7, 4’
were prepared by comparing with 5% McFarnald –dimethoxy-3-hydroxy flavone, Ascaridole, Hexa-
solution (0.05ml BaCl2 solution in broth, and 9.95ml of hydro- farnesol, 9- cis Retinoic acid, 4-hydroxy-7-
H2SO4 solution in 1% in broth) that adjusted to 150x10 6 methoxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl) coumarin, Gossypetin,
colony-forming unit CFU/ml. 1800µg/mL of each crude Citronellyl tiglate, Papaverine, Tetratricontane,
extract was prepared by dissolving 1.8mg in 1.0ml of Gardenin, Octacosane, Phytanic acid, Morin and
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Isolongiflol.
6057
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 13(12): December 2020
gram-negative bacteria was determined by a disc increased up to 225µg/ml. However, non-polar solvent
diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration HE extracts had a MIC value range between 225 and 900
(MIC). A significant effect of solvent polarity was µg/ml against all bacterial species.
predicted. So, as shown in Table 4, and at 1800 mg/ml,
EA and ME extracts of safflower had an inhibition on all Table 5: MIC of EA, ME and HE extracts of C. tinctorius petals
test organisms. EA manifested the main inhibitory Tested organism Extract MIC value Mg/ml
Escherichia coli EA 28.12
results and ME extracts. EA solvent extract inhibited in ME 112.5
some extent S. haemolyticus and P. aeruginosa, and ME HE 900
extract on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus for which the Pseudomonas aeruginosa EA 28.12
inhibition zone (DIZ) were 12 mm and 8 mm, and 7, 5 ME 112.5
HE 450
mm, respectively. While the inhibition activity of HE Staphylococcus aureus EA 28.12
extracts was the lowest against all type of selected ME 225
bacteria. HE 225
Staphylococcus heamolyticus EA 28.12
Table 4: Antibacterial activity of different extracts of C. tinctorius ME 112.5
petals by disc diffusion method HE 900
Tested organism Type of Extract Inhibition zone
(DIZ) mm Regarding MIC data, the bacterial inhibition activity of
Escherichia coli EA 5 the three extracts against all tested organisms was in
ME 5
HE 5 decreasing order as following: EA extract > ME extract
Pseudomonas EA 8 > HE extracts. The highest antibacterial activity was
aeruginosa ME 7 achieved by EA extract against all gram-positive and
HE 5 gram-negative bacteria. Overall, the high MIC values of
Staphylococcus aureus EA 5
ME 5
the tested bacteria in this study suggest an organism
HE 5 resistance to antibiotics or the plant extract is less active
Staphylococcus EA 12 against pathogens, while the low MIC values for bacteria
heamolyticus ME 7 indicate the efficiency of plant extract.
HE 5
CONCLUSION:
Among gram-positive bacteria, maximum antibacterial
The findings of this study revealed that the safflower
action was obtained against S. haemolyticus followed by
plant consists of several chemical compounds. Seventy-
S. aureus. While, amongst gram-negative strains,
eight chemicals in petals part of C. tinctorius could be
maximum activity was realized against P. aeruginosa
recognised by GC-MS analysis. The chemicals of EA,
followed by E. coli. Contrarily, HE extract showed low
ME and HE extracts from safflower have moderate to
activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative
worthy antibacterial activity against tested pathogens.
organism because it could be inclined by the fact that the
Therefore, it is suggested that these extracts may help to
inhibition zone depends on how the antimicrobial
open the door to discover new antibiotic agents to treat
compound can diffuse equally through the bacterial wall.
many infectious diseases. Further research is needed to
Therefore, for obtaining quantitative results, it was
isolate and identify other secondary metabolites from the
decided to apply MIC procedure to determine the
extracts employed for testing the antibacterial activity
antibacterial activity.
and understanding the principal mechanisms.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test was
carried out against S. aureus, S. heamolyticus, E. coli and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
P.aeruginosa. MIC results were reported in Table 5. The The authors are grateful to the authorities of Kerbala
results revealed MIC values ranging from 28.12- 900 College of Pharmacy for providing all the necessary
µg/ml. The selected extracts showed the different level facilities to complete this work. the authors are thankful
of the antibacterial effect depends on the tested bacterial to medical laboratory unit, Al-Kafeel Hospital, Karbala
strains. Knowing that very low concentration of extract for providing the bacterial strains.
is required to suppress the growth of bacteria.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
According to MIC data, the results indicated that EA The authors declare no conflict of interest.
extract had the same bioactivity against all types of
pathogens in a concentration of 28.12µg/ml. Also, ME REFERENCES:
extract inhibited S. heamolyticus, E. coli and P. 1. Toma W, Guimaraes LL, Brito AR et al. Safflower oil: an
integrated assessment of phytochemistry, antiulcerogenic activity,
aeruginosa in minimum concentration of about 112.5 and rodent and environmental toxicity. Revista Brasileira de
µg/ml except for S. aureus; it was observed that MIC has Farmacognosia. 2014; 24(5):538-544.
6059
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 13(12): December 2020
2. Nagaraj G, Devi GN, Sriinvas CVS. Safflower petals and their 20. Magina MD, Dalmarco EM and Wisniewski AJ: Chemical
chemical composition . 5th Intl Safflower Conf 23-27 July USA. composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils of Eugenia
2001; pp 301-302. species. J Nat Med 2009; 63(3): 345-350.
3. Yao D, Wang Z, Miao L et al. Effects of extracts and isolated
compounds from safflower on some index of promoting blood
circulation and regulating menstruation. Journal of
Ethnopharmacol. 2016;191:264-272.
4. Duan JL, Wang JW, Guan Y et al. Safflor yellow A protects
neonatal rat cardiomyocytes against anoxia/reoxygenation injury
in vitro. Acta pharmacologica Sinica. 2013; 34(4): 487- 495)
5. Rahimi P, Asgary S, Kabiri N. Hepatoprotective and
hypolipidemic effects of Carthamus tinctorius oil in Alloxan-
induced Type 1 Diabetic Rats. Journal of Herb Med
Pharmacology. 2014; 3(2): 107-111.
6. Asp ML, Collene AL, Norris LE et al . Time-dependent effects of
safflower oil to improve glycemia, inflammation and blood lipids
in obese, post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes: a
randomized, double-masked, crossover study. Clinical Nutrition.
2011;30(4):443-449.
7. Li HX, Han SY, Wang XW et al. Effect of the carthamins yellow
from Carthamus tinctorius L. on hemorheological disorders of
blood stasis in rats. Food and chemical toxicology. 2009; 47(8):
1797-802.
8. Nuramatjan A, Deyong LV, Rutong R et al. Neuroprotective
Effects of a Standardized Flavonoid Extract from Safflower
against a Rotenone-Induced Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease.
Molecules. 2016 21(9): 1107.
9. Tzu-Kai L, Lily Z, Santiago JL. Anti-Inflammatory and Skin
Barrier Repair Effects of Topical Application of Some Plant
Oils.(2018), International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;
19(1): 70.
10. Kim EO, Oh JH, Lee SK, et al. Antioxidant properties and
quantification of phenolic compounds from safflower (Carthamus
tinctorius L.) seeds. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2007;
16(1): 71–77.
11. Koyama N, Kuribayashi K, Seki T, et al. Serotonin derivatives,
major safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed antioxidants,
inhibit low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and
atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, Journal of
agricultural and food chemistry. 2006; 54 (14): 4970–4976.
12. Karapanagiotis I, Chryssoulakis Y. Investigation of red natural
dyes used in historical objects by HPLC-DAD-MS, Annales de
chimie. 2006; 96 (1–2): 75–84.
13. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic
compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated
with anticancer. Life Science. 2003;74(17): 2157-2184.
14. Popilov Li et al. Analgesic properties of CF extracted from the
Safflor (Carthamus tinctorius) seeds and its potential uses.
Pharmaceutical chemistry. 2009;43(1): 4.
15. Turgumbayeva AA, Ustenova GO, Stabayeva GC et al.
Phytochemical Screening and Biological Activities of the Camel
Thorn (Alhagi kirghisorum) and Safflower Flowers (Carthamus
tinctorius L.) Grown in Kazakhstan. American-Eurasian Journal of
Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 2014; 14(12): 1487-
1491.
16. Zhou FR, Zhao MB, Tu PF. Simultaneous determination of four
nucleosides in Carthamus tinctorius L. and Safflower injection
using highperformance liquid chromatography. Journal of China
Pharmaceutical Science (China) 2009;18:326-330.
17. Ben MA, Mansouri F, Zraibi L, et al. Comparative study of four
safflower oils (Carthamus tinctorius) varieties grown in eastern of
Morocco. Inside Food Symposium, 2013.
18. Mohammed SJ. The effect of environmental factors on the
physiology, yield and oil composition of safflower (Carthamus
tinctorius L.). PhD thesis, University of Plymouth, 2013.
19. Kazuma K, Takahashi T, Sato K, et al. Quinochalcones and
flavonoids from fresh florets in different cultivars of Carthamus
tinctorius L. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry. 2000;
64(8): 1588-1599.
6060