Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22 06 21
Notes
SL. THE HINDU
TOPICS
NO. PAGE NO.
Schedule III – It provides security features to define high quality counterfeit Indian currency
notes which includes watermark, latent image and see through registration in currency notes
Section 36 of the original Act provides for “Denotification of terrorist organisation”. The 2019
Amendment adds the word “Individual” along with terrorist organisation.
Accordingly, the 2019 Amendment adds a new schedule namely Fourth Schedule providing names
of individual terrorists.
Section 25 of UAPA 1967 provided for “Powers of investigating officer and designated authority and
appeal against order of designated authority”. The 2019 Amendment adds - “Investigation to be
conducted by an officer of the National Investigation Agency, with the prior approval of the Director
General of National Investigation Agency”.
Section 43 of UAPA 1967 provided for Officers competent to investigate offences. The 2019
Amendment provides investigative powers to National Investigation Agency below the rank of
Inspector.
In the Second Schedule, International Convention for Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism
(2005) has been added.
The Home Minister also stated in Parliament that Amendment made to UAPA will not be misused
against any individual unless individuals including Urban Maoists engage in terrorist activities against
the security and sovereignty of India.
The Home Minister said that this law does not take away powers of the state police. However,
when National Investigative Agency (NIA) takes up a case having international and inter-state
ramifications, all the facts pertinent to the case are with the NIA, and not with the state police.
Previously under the 1967 UAPA law, it required that NIA take prior permission from the respective
state DGPs to start investigation in terror cases. This delayed the investigation process and allowed the
accused to hide their traces or activities.
The 2019 amendment also gives powers to DG, NIA to attach properties acquired from proceeds of
terrorism.
Earlier, under section 43 of UAPA, an officer not below the rank of DSP or equivalent was
competent to investigate offences under UAPA. Amendment to section 43 has allowed to make
the Inspectors of NIA competent to investigate offences punishable under UAPA.
The Act defines terrorist acts to include acts committed within the scope of any of the treaties listed
in Second Schedule to the Act. The Second Schedule earlier listed Nine treaties.
The Amendment has added another treaty to the list namely The International Convention for
Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (2005).
SECOND SCHEDULE – UAPA
(i) Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (1970);
(ii) Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (1971);
(v) Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (1980) as amended from time to
time;
(vi) Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil
Aviation, supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety
of Civil Aviation (1988);
(vii) Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the safety of Maritime Navigation
(1988);
(viii) Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms
located on the Continental Shelf (1988);
Two or more State Governments may, with the consent of a Chairperson or Member of a State Commission,
appoint such Chairperson or such Member of another State Commission simultaneously if such Chairperson or
Member consents to such appointment. Such appointments must be made after obtaining the recommendations of
the Appointment Committee.
Appointment – SHRC
The Chairperson and Members shall be appointed by the Governor by warrant under his hand and seal.
Appointment of Chairperson & Members shall be made after obtaining the recommendation of a
Committee consisting of:
Chief Minister Chairperson
Speaker of the Legislative Member
Assembly
Minister in-charge of the Member
Department of Home in that
State
Leader of the Opposition in the Member
Legislative Assembly
For states having Legislative Members
Council - Chairman and Leader
of the Opposition in that Council
Sitting Judge of a High Court or a sitting district judge shall not be appointed except after consultation with the
Chief Justice of the High Court of the concerned State.
Resignation & Removal – SHRC
Resignation - The Chairperson or a Member of a State Commission may, by notice in writing under his hand
addressed to the Governor, resign his office.
Removal - Chairperson or any Member of the State Commission shall only be removed from his office by order of
the President on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court, on a reference being
made to it by the President, has, on inquiry held in accordance with the procedure prescribed in that behalf by the
Supreme Court, reported that the Chairperson or such Member ought on any such ground to be removed.
Term of Office – SHRC
Chairperson shall hold office for a term of 3 years from the date on which he enters upon his office or until he
attains the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier and shall be eligible for re-appointment.
Member shall hold office for a term of 3 years from the date on which he enters upon his office and shall be
eligible for re-appointment.
No Member shall hold office after he has attained the age of seventy years.
On ceasing to hold office - Chairperson or a Member shall be ineligible for further employment under the
Government of a State or under the Government of India.
Amendments Proposed under Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019
The amendments addresses the concerns raised at certain global platforms and also by respective State
Governments as they faced difficulties in finding suitable candidates to the post of Chairperson of the respective State
Commissions owing to the earlier eligibility criteria for the post.
Amendment made NHRC more compliant with Paris Principles - The proposed amendments has enabled both
the National as well as the State Human Rights Commissions to be more compliant with the Paris Principles regarding
NHRC’s autonomy, independence, pluralism and wide-ranging functions in order to effectively protect and promote
human rights.
The Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019, provides for the following changes
Date: 22-Jun-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
Retired Judge of SC can be appointed as Chairperson - A person who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court is
also made eligible to be appointed as Chairperson of the Commission in addition to the person who has been the
Chief Justice of India.
3 Members to be appointed (instead of 2) from amongst persons having knowledge of, or practical experience
in, matters relating to human rights. Out of these 3, 1 member shall be a Woman.
Deemed Members of NHRC - To include Chairperson of the National Commission for Backward Classes,
Chairperson of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and the Chief Commissioner for Persons with
Disabilities as deemed Members of the Commission as members of NHRC.
Reduction in Tenure - To reduce the term of the Chairperson and Members of the Commission and the State
Commissions from five to three years and the fact that they shall be eligible for re-appointment.
Eligibility for Chairperson of SHRC - A person who has been a Judge of a High Court is also made eligible to be
appointed as Chairperson of the State Commission in addition to the person who has been the Chief Justice of the
High Court.
SHRC for certain UTs - The Central Government may confer upon the State Commission the functions relating to
human rights being discharged by the Union territories, other than the Union territory of Delhi, J&K and Ladakh.
NHRC for UTs of Delhi, J&K and Ladakh - Functions relating to human rights in case of Union territory of Delhi,
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh shall be dealt by NHRC.
The Commission shall, perform all or any of the following functions, namely
(a) Inquire, on its own initiative or on a petition presented to it by a victim or any person on his behalf, into
complaint of
(i) violation of human rights or abetment or
(ii) negligence in the prevention of such violation, by a public servant;
(b) Intervene in any proceeding involving any allegation of violation of human rights pending before a
court with the approval of such court;
(c) Visit, under intimation to the State Government, any jail or any other institution under the control of
the State Government, where persons are detained or lodged for purposes of treatment, reformation or
protection to study the living condition of the inmates and make recommendations thereon.
(d) Review the safeguards by or under the Constitution or any law for the protection of human rights
and recommend measures for their effective implementation.
(e) Review the factors, including acts of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of human rights and
recommend appropriate remedial measures.
(f) Study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and make recommendations
for their effective implementation;
(g) Undertake and promote research in the field of human rights.
(h) Spread human rights literacy among various sections of society and promote awareness of the
safeguards available for the protection of these rights through publications, the media, seminars and other
available means;
(i) Encourage the efforts of non - Governmental organizations and institutions working in the field of
human rights;
(j) Any other functions as it may consider necessary for the promotion of human rights.
Background to CDS:
Date: 22-Jun-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
The creation of a CDS to act as a single-point military adviser to the Prime Minister on strategic
issues was one of the in-direct recommendations of the Kargil Review Committee on higher
military reforms after the 1999 conflict.
In 2012, the Naresh Chandra committee recommended the appointment of a Permanent
Chairman COSC as a midway to allay apprehensions over the CDS. Currently, the senior-most of
the three chiefs functions as the Chairman of the COSC.
D.B. Shekatkar Committee also recommended the formation of CDS.
The Chief of Defence Staff, apart from being the head of the Department of Military Affairs, will also be the
Permanent Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee. He will act as the Principal Military Adviser
to Raksha Mantri on all tri-Services matters. The three Chiefs will continue to advise RM on matters
exclusively concerning their respective Services. CDS will not exercise any military command, including
over the three Service Chiefs, so as to be able to provide impartial advice to the political leadership.
The Department of Military Affairs headed by CDS will deal with the following:
(i) The Armed Forces of the Union, namely, the Army, the Navy and the Air Force.
(ii) Integrated Headquarters of the Ministry of Defence comprising Army Headquarters, Naval
Headquarters, Air Headquarters and Defence Staff Headquarters.
(iii) The Territorial Army.
(iv) Works relating to the Army, the Navy and the Air Force.
(v) Procurement exclusive to the Services except capital acquisitions, as per prevalent rules and
procedures.
Apart from the above, the mandate of the Department of Military Affairs will include the following
areas:
(a) Promoting jointness in procurement, training and staffing for the Services through joint planning
and integration of their requirements.
(b) Facilitation of restructuring of Military Commands for optimal utilisation of resources by bringing
about jointness in operations, including through establishment of joint/theatre commands.
(c) Promoting use of indigenous equipment by the Services.
As the Permanent Chairman of Chiefs of Staff Committee, CDS will perform the following
functions:
CDS will administer tri-services organisations. Tri-service agencies/organisations/commands
related to Cyber and Space will be under the command of the CDS.
CDS will be member of Defence Acquisition Council chaired by Raksha Mantri and Defence
Planning Committee chaired by NSA.
CDS will function as the Military Adviser to the Nuclear Command Authority.
Bring about jointness in operation, logistics, transport, training, support services, communications,
repairs and maintenance, etc of the three Services, within three years of the first CDS assuming
office.
Ensure optimal utilisation of infrastructure and rationalise it through jointness among the
services.
Implement Five-Year Defence Capital Acquisition Plan (DCAP), and Two-Year roll-on Annual
Acquisition Plans (AAP), as a follow up of Integrated Capability Development Plan (ICDP).
Date: 22-Jun-2021 DNS Notes - Revision
It is expected that this reform in the Higher Defence Management would enable the Armed Forces to
implement coordinated defence doctrines and procedures and go a long way in fostering jointmanship
among the three Services. The country would be benefitted by coordinated action on greater
jointmanship in training, logistics and operations as well as for prioritisation of procurements.
Concerns:
1. The creation of Chief of the Defence Staff may lead to dilution in the operational control of the
respective service chief.
2. The main apprehensions of the Indian Air Force is on how exploit its limited offensive
resources and enabling equipment and platforms such as AWACS, refuelers, electronic
warfare platform, etc if they are hived off to multiple theatre commands.
3. It would be difficult to replicate every Single Service Command to every Theatre Command,
which requires a considerable large budgetary allocation to Ministry of Defence.
4. Theatre Command structure has not been adopted by any major country in the recent past.
5. India’s military engagements in the past such as during Kargil War has not highlighted any
form of major issues of cooperation or ‘Jointness’ among the various military service
commands in India.
6. Integrated theatre commands when adopted in developing countries have shown a greater
ability of political influence by the top tier Integrated military commanders on the
Government.