Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lôclized Heating For Induction Heating Catalyst
Lôclized Heating For Induction Heating Catalyst
Science &
Technology
View Article Online
PAPER View Journal
Controlling temperature with high spatial resolution has been a challenge and the bottleneck for advancing
scientific discoveries at the micro-scale level. Herein, we exploit the heat generated from magnetic
nanoparticles when placed in an alternating magnetic field to drive catalytic chemical reactions. A catalytic
Received 5th March 2020, microstructure was assembled using a positively charged polyelectrolyte in the presence of negatively
Accepted 19th May 2020
charged magnetic and gold nanoparticles. As a proof of concept, we monitored the conversion of
resazurin into the fluorescent resorufin in solution and when confined in small hydrogels. In both cases, we
DOI: 10.1039/d0cy00439a
demonstrate the possibility to drive chemical reactions using the locally generated heat from magnetic
rsc.li/catalysis nanoparticles. This might prove an effective strategy for energy efficient catalysis.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Catal. Sci. Technol.
View Article Online
Fig. 1 (A) The catalytic reduction reaction of resazurin to the fluorescent resorufin in the presence of iron oxide (Fe3O4), gold nanoparticles
(AuNPs), and the reducing agent NH2OH. (B) Schematic representation of the heat induction setup; a frequency generator is connected to a coil
where the micro-catalytic MNPs/AuNPs solution is placed and subjected to an alternating magnetic field (frequency = 110 kHz). (C) The assembly
of the prepared micro-catalytic MNPs/AuNPs structure is driven by the electrostatic interaction between negatively charged MNPs and AuNPs
using positively charged polyelectrolytes (PDDA).
reaction since it is easy to monitor the formation of its iron oxide nanoparticles, respectively, to 3800 nm upon the
product using steady-state fluorescent spectroscopy. addition of PDDA (Table S1†). Finally, TEM images of the
catalytic complex revealed large aggregates. However, these
2. Results and discussions images were not conclusive given the size distribution of the
Au and MNP particles and the difficulty in comparing their
The preparation of the catalytic microstructure (MNPs/ contrast given the aggregated state of the sample (Fig. 3C).
AuNPs) is achieved by first synthesizing citrate-capped To evaluate the reaction efficiency, we monitored the
magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (140 mg mL−1; 33 ± 8 nm fluorescence intensity of resorufin produced under different
N = 132) and gold nanoparticles (1.4 mg mL−1; 24 ± 6 nm N = experimental conditions at different time points. The choice
154), (Fig. 2) followed by the addition of the positively of concentrations of both nanoparticles took into
charged polyelectrolyte (poly diallyl dimethyl ammonium consideration not only the conversion efficiency but also the
chloride (PDDA)) to a mixture of equal volumes of MNPs and technical aspect of the experiment such as avoiding large
Au NPs. aggregates, signal scattering, or quenching of the fluorescent
In order to confirm the assembly, an external magnetic signal by the gold nanoparticles. The reaction temperature
field was applied to the MNPs/AuNPs mixture, and the was controlled by placing the solution in a water bath. The
absorption spectrum of the resulting supernatant was optimized solution was then tested at different temperatures
compared to that of a pristine gold nanoparticles solution. ranging between 25.0 °C and 85.0 °C with a step increment
The absence of any detectable signal representing gold of 10.0 °C (Fig. S4†). The temperature was monitored and
nanoparticles in the supernatant indicates the efficient tracked using a thermocouple dipped inside the solution and
assembly of the metal particles onto the pulled MNPs connected to a data logger. As such, we carried all further
(Fig. 3A and B). In addition, dynamic light scattering catalytic reactions at 45.0 °C. At this temperature, the
measurements showed an increase in the average reaction kinetics would allow us to observe the enhancement,
hydrodynamic radius from 92 nm and 257 nm for gold and if any, in the conversion of resazurin when carried out in a
Catal. Sci. Technol. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
View Article Online
Fig. 2 TEM images and size distribution for (A) magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) (33 ± 8 nm N = 132) and (B) gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) (24 ± 6 nm
N = 154).
water bath and compare it to that placed in an alternating generated heat provides a more energy-efficient option. An
magnetic field. external heating sources is relatively sluggish method for
To ensure comparable experimental conditions transferring energy into the catalytic hotspot site, since it
throughout the experiment, the solution temperature was depends on the thermal conductivity of the reactor. The local
monitored over time. Within the first 2–3 minutes, in both heat can reduce the rate of side products.
solutions, the target temperature (45.0 °C) was achieved and There has been growing evidence that indicates that the
remained stable during the entire experiment window (Fig. local surface temperature of the nanoparticles is higher than
S5†). At different time intervals, the fluorescent signal of the the solution temperature which can allow an efficient
resorufin was sampled and compared. The catalytic micro- conversion. Pellegrino et al., for instance, probed the
structure when placed in an alternating magnetic field distance-dependent temperature as generated by magnetic
showed a comparable catalytic conversation to the water bath nanoparticles using a thermo-sensitive molecule.31 The local
solution (Fig. 4). While all trials consistently followed the temperature surrounding the MNPs was found to be
same trend, the measured fluorescent signal varied from one approximately 45 °C greater than the solution temperature.
sample to another (evident by the large error bars in Fig. 4). Zink et al. also reported a temperature gradient with a
The micro-catalytic structure has a tendency to aggregate in measured MNPs surface temperature of 42 °C while the
solution. Despite taking many measures to homogenize the solution temperature was equal to 19 °C.32 In another
solution before making any transfer to the reaction mixture, example, the localized heat was used to increase in the total
we believe our effort did not lead to completely eliminating negative charge of the silica surface due to the deprotonation
this error. of silanol groups.33 CO2 hydrogenation was also performed
While both experimental heating conditions yielded by locally generated heat.34 Despite gold nanoparticles being
similar efficiency, the localized heat method could be utilized widely reported as an efficient catalyst for the reduction of
to manipulate chemical reactions and synthesize molecules resazurin,22,35,36 we observed a substantial catalytic activity
with deliberate spatial accuracy. In addition, the locally from the magnetic nanoparticles alone. This activity was
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Catal. Sci. Technol.
View Article Online
Fig. 3 (A) The assembly of the micro-catalytic structure was evident by the clear supernatant upon applying an external magnetic field. (B)
Absorption spectra of pristine gold NPs solution and of the supernatant of a MNPs/AuNPs sample upon separation. (C) TEM images of MNPs/
AuNPs catalytic complex at different scales.
Catal. Sci. Technol. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
View Article Online
Fig. 7 Fluorescent microscopy images of agar gel before and after exposure to an alternating magnetic field in the presence of resazurin, NH2OH,
and MNPs/AuNPs complex. The histograms represent the numerical values of the integrated fluorescence intensity before and after heat
induction. Images were acquired using a 5× objective with NA = 0.8 coupled with an excitation filter of 541–551 nm, and the emission was
collected between 565–605 nm.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Catal. Sci. Technol.
View Article Online
polyIJdiallyl dimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA), and Absorption spectra. Absorption spectra were measured
trisodium citrate dihydrate were purchased from Sigma using Jasco, V-570 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer in a double
Aldrich. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride and ammonium beam mode. All solutions were placed in a 1 cm × 1 cm
hydroxide (28%) were purchased from Acros. Difco LB agar quartz cuvettes while keeping the total volume constant and
Lennox was obtained from BD Diagnostic. equal to 2 mL. Before each measurement, the solution was
allowed to homogenize and stabilize for 2–3 min.
Synthesis of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs)
Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were synthesized Steady-state fluorescent spectroscopy
using a previously published procedure.43 Briefly, equimolar Resazurin is a weak fluorescent blue dye that is widely used
masses of ironIJII) chloride FeCl2·4H2O (1.2 g) and ironIJIII) in biological applications.22,32 Upon heating and in the
Published on 20 May 2020. Downloaded by Uppsala University on 6/8/2020 12:10:13 PM.
chloride FeCl3·6H2O (3.25 g) were dissolved in 80 mL presence of AuNP as a catalyst and the reducing agent
deionized water. Next, 10 mL of ammonium hydroxide hydroxylamine (NH2OH), resazurin is reduced into resorufin,
solution (28% w/v) was added while mechanical stirring. a strong fluorescence molecule. The reduction of resazurin
Twenty minutes later, 4.4 g of trisodium citrate dihydrate was done in a 2 mL-tube containing a mixture of 70 mg mL−1
powder was dissolved and the whole mixture was stirred MNPs/0.7 mg mL−1 AuNP, and 2 mM resazurin. Fluorescence
while the temperature was raised and maintained at 90 °C intensity of resorufin was obtained by first diluting the
for 30 min. After cooling down to room temperature, the reaction mixture in a 0.5 mM NaOH. All solutions were
magnetic nanoparticles produced were collected by an placed in a 1 cm × 1 cm quartz cuvettes. Before each
external magnet and re-suspended in 10 mL deionized water measurement, the solution was allowed to homogenize and
(Fig. S1†) yielding an estimated 140 mg mL−1 solution of stabilize for 2–3 min. Steady-state fluorescent spectroscopy
particle size equal to ca. 257 nm (Table S1†). was acquired by exciting at 532 nm using a Thermo Scientific
Lumina spectrophotometer while collecting the emissions
Synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) between 545 nm and 700 nm.
Catal. Sci. Technol. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
View Article Online
2017, 121, 1033–1040. 28 R. E. Rosensweig, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2002, 252, 370–374.
6 G. H. Darwish, A. Koubeissi, T. Shoker, S. A. Shaheen and P. 29 Q. A. Pankhurst, J. Connolly, S. Jones and J. Dobson, J. Phys.
Karam, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 823–826. D: Appl. Phys., 2003, 36, R167.
7 G. H. Darwish, J. Abouzeid and P. Karam, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 30 A. Ito, M. Shinkai, H. Honda and T. Kobayashi, J. Biosci.
67002–67010. Bioeng., 2005, 100, 1–11.
8 S. Uchiyama and C. Gota, Rev. Anal. Chem., 2017, 36, 31 A. Riedinger, P. Guardia, A. Curcio, M. A. Garcia, R.
20160021-39. Cingolani, L. Manna and T. Pellegrino, Nano Lett., 2013, 13,
9 R. Tanimoto, T. Hiraiwa, Y. Nakai, Y. Shindo, K. Oka, N. 2399–2406.
Hiroi and A. Funahashi, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 22071. 32 J. Dong and J. I. Zink, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5199–5207.
10 A. A. Alaulamie, S. Baral, S. C. Johnson and H. H. 33 W. Wolak, A. Kolomeisky, M. Dudek, M. Marć and L. Najder-
Richardson, Small, 2017, 13, 1601989. Kozdrowska, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2019, 52, 465001.
11 T. Bai and N. Gu, Small, 2016, 12, 4590–4610. 34 A. Bordet, L. M. Lacroix, P. F. Fazzini, J. Carrey, K. Soulantica
12 I. Steinberg, G. Tamir and I. Gannot, Molecules, 2018, 23, 670. and B. Chaudret, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55,
13 M. Çakır, D. Çalışkan, B. Bütün and E. Özbay, Sensors, 15894–15898.
2016, 16, 1612. 35 X. Zhou, W. Xu, G. Liu, D. Panda and P. Chen, J. Am. Chem.
14 X. He, F. Duan, J. Liu, Q. Lan, J. Wu, C. Yang, W. Soc., 2009, 132, 138–146.
Yang, Q. Zeng and H. Wang, Materials, 2017, 10, 36 M. M. Nigra, I. Arslan and A. Katz, J. Catal., 2012, 295,
1362. 115–121.
15 W. Ha, J. Yu, X.-Y. Song, J. Chen and Y.-P. Shi, ACS Appl. 37 P. Li, D. E. Miser, S. Rabiei, R. T. Yadav and M. R. Hajaligol,
Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 10623–10630. Appl. Catal., B, 2003, 43, 151–162.
16 H. J. Lee, Y. Liu, J. Zhao, M. Zhou, R. R. Bouchard, T. 38 H. M. T. Galvis, J. H. Bitter, C. B. Khare, M. Ruitenbeek, A. I.
Mitcham, M. Wallace, R. J. Stafford, C. Li and S. Gupta, Dugulan and K. P. de Jong, Science, 2012, 335, 835–838.
J. Controlled Release, 2013, 172, 152–158. 39 S.-S. Lin and M. D. Gurol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32,
17 C. Xiao, J. Ding, L. Ma, C. Yang, X. Zhuang and X. Chen, 1417–1423.
Polym. Chem., 2015, 6, 738–747. 40 K. Y. Lee and D. J. Mooney, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101,
18 S. Chen, C. Wan and Y. Wang, J. Power Sources, 2005, 140, 1869–1880.
111–124. 41 J. L. Drury and D. J. Mooney, Biomaterials, 2003, 24,
19 T. F. Fuller and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1993, 140, 4337–4351.
1218–1225. 42 S. Sershen, S. Westcott, N. Halas and J. West, The Japanese
20 J. R. Adleman, D. A. Boyd, D. G. Goodwin and D. Psaltis, Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for
Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 4417–4423. Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials,
21 F. Wang, C. Li, H. Chen, R. Jiang, L.-D. Sun, Q. Li, J. Wang, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000, 51, 293–298.
J. C. Yu and C.-H. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 43 H. Zhou, J. Lee, T. J. Park, S. J. Lee, J. Y. Park and J. Lee,
5588–5601. Sens. Actuators, B, 2012, 163, 224–232.
22 C. J. B. Alejo, C. Fasciani, M. Grenier, J. C. Netto- 44 V. Salgueiriño-Maceira, M. A. Correa-Duarte, M. Farle, A.
Ferreira and J. C. Scaiano, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, López-Quintela, K. Sieradzki and R. Diaz, Chem. Mater.,
1506–1511. 2006, 18, 2701–2706.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Catal. Sci. Technol.