Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1History
o 1.1Ideal language
o 1.2Logical atomism
o 1.3Logical positivism
o 1.4Ordinary language
2Contemporary analytic philosophy
o 2.1Philosophy of mind and cognitive science
o 2.2Ethics in analytic philosophy
2.2.1Meta-ethics
2.2.2Normative ethics
2.2.3Applied ethics
o 2.3Analytic philosophy of religion
o 2.4Political philosophy
2.4.1Liberalism
2.4.2Analytical Marxism
2.4.3Communitarianism
o 2.5Analytic metaphysics
o 2.6Philosophy of language
o 2.7Philosophy of science
o 2.8Epistemology
o 2.9Aesthetics
3See also
4Notes
5References
6Further reading
7External links
History[edit]
The history of analytic philosophy (taken in the narrower sense of "20th-/21st-
century analytic philosophy") is usually thought to begin with the rejection of British
idealism, a neo-Hegelian movement.[8]
British idealism as taught by philosophers such as F. H. Bradley (1846–1924) and T. H.
Green (1836–1882), dominated English philosophy in the late 19th century. Since its
beginning, a basic goal of analytic philosophy has been conceptual clarity,[9] in the name of
which Moore and Russell rejected Hegelianism for being obscure—see for example
Moore's "A Defence of Common Sense" and Russell's critique of the doctrine of internal
relations.[10] Inspired by developments in modern formal logic, the early Russell claimed that
the problems of philosophy can be solved by showing the simple constituents of complex
notions.[9] An important aspect of British idealism was logical holism—the opinion that there
are aspects of the world that can be known only by knowing the whole world. This is closely
related to the opinion that relations between items are internal relations, that
is, properties of the nature of those items. Russell, along with Wittgenstein, in response
promulgated logical atomism and the doctrine of external relations—the belief that the
world consists of independent facts.[11]
Russell, during his early career, along with his collaborator Alfred North Whitehead, was
much influenced by Gottlob Frege (1848–1925), who developed predicate logic, which
allowed a much greater range of sentences to be parsed into logical form than was
possible using the ancient Aristotelian logic. Frege was also influential as a philosopher of
mathematics in Germany at the beginning of the 20th century. In contrast to Edmund
Husserl's 1891 book Philosophie der Arithmetik, which argued that the concept of
the cardinal number derived from psychical acts of grouping objects and counting them,
[12]
Frege argued that mathematics and logic have their own validity, independent of the
judgments or mental states of individual mathematicians and logicians (which were the
basis of arithmetic according to the "psychologism" of Husserl's Philosophie). Frege further
developed his philosophy of logic and mathematics in The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884)
and The Basic Laws of Arithmetic (German: Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, 1893–1903),
where he provided an alternative to psychologistic accounts of the concept of number.
Like Frege, Russell argued that mathematics is reducible to logical fundamentals in The
Principles of Mathematics (1903). Later, his book written with Whitehead, Principia
Mathematica (1910–1913), encouraged many philosophers to renew their interest in the
development of symbolic logic. Additionally, Russell adopted Frege's predicate logic as his
primary philosophical method, a method Russell thought could expose the underlying
structure of philosophical problems. For example, the English word "is" has three distinct
meanings which predicate logic can express as follows: