Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Year
UCLan Coursework Assessment Brief
2020/21
School of Engineering
Module Title: Strategic Project Management Code: BN4440 Level 7
This reassessment is worth
Performance Measurement 100% of the overall module
mark.
THE BRIEF/INSTRUCTIONS
Given this position, senior management at BIG AT GOOD SOLUTIONS have decided to
implement a performance management and measurement tool that would allow them to align
the strategic, management and operational requirements of the business. They are therefore
considering the adoption of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) or Performance Pyramid tools to
improve on the overall business performance. However, this is completely new to them (and
they have never done this before).
As the new construction/project manager working for You are required to prepare a
management report and advise management on:
2.The potential positive and negative impact of adopting a Balanced Scorecard in BIG AT
GOOD SOLUTIONS’s existing business strategy (from a change perspective –focussing on
existing organisational and project processes only);
(30%)
3.How BIG AT GOOD SOLUTIONS might undertake such a transition by creating a NEW
Balanced Scorecard, including a full implementation strategy; and
(30%)
4. All risk issues that need to be considered. Make and state any assumptions as required.
(20%)
(10%)
1
Learning Outcomes Assessed (from the Module Descriptor, available on Blackboard):
- LO1 Demonstrate critical knowledge and understanding of core business drivers and
strategic decision-making processes with respect to project problems in complex and
unpredictable situations (and their potential impact on the core business), including the
application of robust, viable, and defendable solutions;
- LO2 Critically appraise Organisational and project environments, and be able to
demonstrate advanced project management competence using innovative applied
techniques to assess, manage and control project variables (micro and macro)
throughout the project lifecycle;
- LO3 Demonstrate in depth understanding of internal and external information
management systems and processes, and be able to apply advanced cognitive skills to
provide considered solutions, especially in contextually diverse collaborative
environments;
- LO4 Critically evaluate the concepts and theories of project financing and funding,
cognisant of: bidding strategies and global business drivers, fiscal drivers and KPI’s,
decision-making techniques, procurement routes and production/project planning
methodologies.
Please note that this is the final time you can submit – not the time to submit!
Your feedback/feed forward and mark for this assessment will be provided on [30/08/2021, Blackboard]
SUBMISSION DETAILS
The required word count for this assignment is 4000 words. This is subject to a + or – 10% compensation.
In other words, if the assessment length is 4000 words, submissions between 3600 and 4400 words would be
acceptable. You will need to be careful in the way you use the word count to support key arguments and facts in
your report. Where possible, supplement information with material contained in the appendices.
The assignment must be submitted through Turnitin that would allow the module tutors to check for improper
use of sources or potential plagiarism by scanning through numerous databases.
You need to complete and attach the Coursework Cover Sheet p. 4 as first page of your submission.
Presenting coursework for assessment
Your written assignments must be presented in the following format:
- It must be word-processed in 12-point Arial font. Line spacing should be 1,5 lines
- It must be black text on a white background
- All pages must be numbered
- Margins must be as follows: Top: 2.54 cm, Bottom: 2.54 cm, Left: 2.54 cm, Right: 2.54 cm
- It should not contain your name(s)
- The number of words (excluding the front cover, title page, contents page, executive summary, reference list,
bibliography or appendices) should be stated at the front of the submission.
2
- The following file-naming convention should be used for the submission of the BN4440
assignment. [Module code] [Assignment title] [Student number] i.e. [BN4440]
[Strategic Project Management] [2894573]
3
Coursework Cover Sheet
Engineering
Assessment Title:
Performance Measurement
Disclaimer: The information provided in this assessment brief is correct at time of publication. In the unlikely Version: 1
event that any changes are deemed necessary, they will be communicated clearly via e-mail and a new
version of this assessment brief will be circulated.
Students should add this coversheet, to the start of their assessment before submission through Turnitin.
Have you checked the following in order to maximise the grade you can Please mark X
achieve for this assignment? to confirm
Learning Outcomes have been addressed
Similarity check via Turn-it-in
Referencing accuracy according to provided guide
Grammar
Spelling
Word count (or other length limitation as described in the brief)
WELLBEING
We wish to support any student who is I believe that I do / I do not need to apply for
experiencing mitigating circumstances which mitigating circumstances for this assignment at
prevents students from performing to the best of this moment in time
their ability when completing or submitting
assignments. If you are experiencing such Please delete as appropriate
circumstances then you may apply for mitigating
circumstances. Wherever possible this must be (You may still apply for mitigating circumstances
done prior to handing your assignment. if you subsequently feel that your performance
has been adversely affected by issues that you
may currently be unaware of).
4
SELF – REFLECTION This section suggested for inclusion if appropriate to the assessment otherwise can
be deleted
Details of this can be found in the assignment Simply rate how you think this assessment will
brief. In order to ensure the assessment process perform against the assessment criteria; i.e. 1st
is fair, we want to make sure that the (very good/excellent), 2:1 (good), 2:2
assessment criteria are clear to you in advance. (competent), 3rd (basic), fail (weak).
This helps us provide detailed comments on
your work and clarify things you do not
understand
E.g. Understanding, including knowledge