The Influence of foreign aid on growth of Pakistan

Abstract
This paper shows the effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development if there should arise
an occurrence of Pakistan utilizing time arrangement information from 1987 to 2016. The factors
utilized in the investigation are GDP, FDI, ODA and Remittances. Gross domestic product and
ODA have been used an alternative for development of economy and help individually. Further
to dispose of unit root issue (ADF) test has been utilized in the examination to check the station
diletantish of factors. J.J approach has is utilized in the paper to check since quite a while ago run
and short run connection of factors. Aftereffects of the investigation shows that unfamiliar guide
negatively affects the monetary development over the long haul and as yet certain in the short
run while FDI and settlements are decidedly identified with financial development yet in the
short run both have positive effect on monetary development.
Keywords foreign direct investment, foreign aid and remittances

Introduction
This paper research the impact of unfamiliar guide on development of economy in Pakistan. The
unfamiliar inflows are unfamiliar direct speculation, settlements and unfamiliar guide (ODA).
Unfamiliar inflows have huge job in the improvement of an economy. Unfamiliar inflows are too
fundamental to even think about controlling the economy of creating nations. The unfamiliar
inflows are made based on an economy explicit prerequisite.
The unfamiliar guide is required when there is lack of capital and low investment funds in an
economy. Diminishing in singular salary diminishes the winning of the legislature from duties
and it crush government consumption and development of the nation additionally get down. The
examination portrays that the reliance is a terrible stun on the host nation and the issue of
distribution of assets is likewise a major issue in Pakistan so it isn't important however it might
escape numerous issues.
The investigation uncovers that guide development interface dependent on harrod-domar
development models. There were additionally some different models by Chenery and Strout
(1966). The presumption of these models was that development is just kept up over the top work
flexibly and profitability of capital. It was assumed that lacking degree of sparing and interest in
the vast majority of the creating nations. LDCs are not in position to create the income and to
achieve significant degree of open venture. Unfamiliar guide is a significant device to fill vital
hole in creating nations. The hole can be filled by unfamiliar guide and ought to be filled to build
the financial development.
As Pakistan is a creating nation so unfamiliar guide is significant for the turn of events. To get
Pakistan out of budgetary emergency or endless loop of destitution unfamiliar guide fundamental
because of monetary emergencies unfamiliar guide function as a boosting factor in improving the
development of an economy. Capital streams like guide, FDI and settlements have a significant
job in improving turn of events. Capital inadequacy is significant obstacle in the improvement of
an economy. This can be fathomed inside and remotely. Inside the nation by sparing and
expanding trades Externally through FDI, awards or by outer credits.
All of these examinations have conflicting choices about the viability of new assistance open
parts budgetary direct. These assessments straightforwardly perceive that new guide diminishes
charge assortment tries and is subbed between open theory and open use. This paper contributes
not only to the general discussion on how the undertakings of new guide might be surveyed at
this point notwithstanding the specific conversation on the ramifications for new guide
straightforwardly part's money related lead in Pakistan.
Settlements in the hard and fast inflows decrease from 16.35% in 1980 to 12.48% in 2008 on the
segment of FDI (new direct endeavor) extended from 0.26% to 9.96% in this period.The segment
of new commitment extended from 1985 to 2000 yet it tumbled down to 76% in 2008 when
appeared differently in relation to 93.91%.
Capital inflows may help with dealing with various issues through FDI, Remittances and help.
can help nearby economy through various ways like portfolio inflows settlements and help are
huge for family economy to push toward budgetary new development. New portfolio inflows can
give a better open door than close by capital market progression.. The objective of this paper is
to check the impact of new guide on financial turn of events.

Objectives of the study

The main objective of this study is to analyze the relationship among FDI and growth of
economy
 To inspect the effect of foreign aid on GDP of Pakistan’s economy.
 To assertain impact of remittances on growth of Pakistan.

Rational of the study

As referenced in the writing survey, numerous specialists have reached their inferences about the
effect of FDI on financial development with numerous different factors in detail. Be that as it
may, none of above talked about the effect of FDI on monetary development in since quite a
while ago run. So in this investigation it is talked about that either FDI drives the economy
towards the development in since quite a while ago run or it is just material for short run.

Literature Review
In the past examinations some are of the view that unfamiliar guide , unfamiliar direct venture
and settlements positively affect financial development yet in addition negatively affect
monetary development.
Mehboob et.al (2011) delineates the impact of unfamiliar guide on monetary development of
Pakistan. The outcome shows that unfamiliar inflows have positive effect on monetary
development. Monetary development is upgraded by capital inflows and it is recommended that
Pakistan should increment financial development to get out of endless loop of unfamiliar guide.
Moriera (2005) mirrors the commitment of unfamiliar guide in creating nations on development.
Aftereffect of the examination shows that the guide has less impact in short run than the since
quite a while ago altercation development and in the guide _growth connection the delay ought
not be overlooked.
Ullah et al. (2011) shows the connection between unfamiliar guide and reserve funds,
speculations which are beneficial for monetary development of Pakistan. The investigation
utilized time arrangement information from (1972-2010). The investigation utilized GARCH
difference method. Unfamiliar guide and development are exceptionally connected while
unfamiliar guide instability is week by week cooperative with monetary development.
Fasanya and Onakoya(2012) shows the effect of foreign aid on economic growth in Nigeria
using time series data over the period 1970_2010. Study explores that aid has meaningful impact
on economic growth. The study reflects the effect of foreign aid positive on economic growth in
Nigeria.
Gebregergis and Mekuria(2018) analyzed that unfamiliar guide has expanded quickly in the time
of post war. The examination shows the connection between unfamiliar guide and financial
development in Ethiopia utilizing time arrangement information over the period (1981_2015).
The investigation investigates relationship of help with improvement of nation whether it is
sensible or not. Co mix investigation has been utilized in the examination. ADF test is utilized to
check fixed of factors to apply right strategy and to keep away from fake outcomes. The
examination has inspected long effect of advancement help on monetary development. Vector
blunder revision model examination is utilized to decide connections between factors in short
run.
Asideu(2014) shows that whether the unfamiliar guide meaningfully affects financial
development in sub Saharan African nations. Board information has been utilized for 38 nations
utilizing timespan 1990_2004. Essential training has constructive outcome on development and
post essential instruction doesn't meaningfully affects development as the development builds, it
expands the portion of help in essential training.
Jones(2013) inspected theory of unfamiliar guide drove development by utilizing board
information of African nations. Co-mix strategies used to check the since quite a while ago run
relationship between unfamiliar guide and development of economy covering timeframe
1986_1992.The outcome shows unfamiliar guide has a solid and critical effect both in since a
long time ago run and short run.
Wamboye(2012) used panel data for the time period 1975_2011 in the study. The study explores
foreign aid matters to economic growth regarding quality and quantity of foreign aid in least
developing countries. The study result depicts that quantity matters more to economic growth
than quality. It is concluded that different type of aid flows and quantity of it with continuous
flow is beneficial for least developed countries.
Martinez (2015) investigates the impact of unfamiliar guide on development. The examination
results show that unfamiliar guides are decidedly identified with the financial development of a
country.
Hatemi and Irandoust(2005) attempts to show the connection between financial development and
unfamiliar guide by utilizing board information timeframe from 1974 to 1996 of six nations. The
outcomes delineate that factors contained unit root in their board arrangement and indicated
unfamiliar guide is decidedly identified with monetary action for every nation over the long haul.
The investigation likewise reasons that unfamiliar guide additionally has constructive outcome
on genuine salary when household sparing is enhanced reserve funds.
Malik (2008) investigates the effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development in the six least
fortunate African nations. The timespan is utilized separately extraordinary for six nations. The
investigation found that there is for quite some time run relationship among per capita genuine
GDP, help and speculation as level of GDP. Monetary development and unfamiliar guide
adversely related over the long haul in the majority of these nations.
Tadesse (2011) portrays the effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development in Ethiopia.
Time arrangement information has been utilized in the examination from 1970_2009. The
outcomes portrays the unfamiliar guide is so helpful for development. Help strategy alludes
negative effect on development because of ramifications of terrible strategies. The finish of the
examination investigates the general negative effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary
development because of ramifications of terrible strategies.
Adamu (2013) shows the effect of unfamiliar guide on financial development of ECOWAS.
Board information is utilized in the investigation from 1990_2009. The outcomes shows that
trades venture locally and unfamiliar stores have positive effect on unfamiliar guide. The finish
of the investigation is unfamiliar guide is fundamental for ECOWAS to improve their monetary
development.
Hosain(2014) investigate about Bangladesh and unfamiliar guide. This study delineates
Bangladesh as a beneficiary of unfamiliar guide and gauges thirty years information from
(1980_2012) and measures the impact of unfamiliar guide on financial development. The
unfamiliar guide has useful impact on monetary development and measurably huge in
Bangladesh and help additionally produce decreasing return in Bangladesh. Tang and Bundhoo
(2017) shows the impact of unfamiliar guide on financial development of the sub saharan
African locale. This study portrays the significance of unfamiliar guide to financial development
of the area. The outcome shows that unfamiliar guide is fundamental for monetary and
institutional condition of beneficiary nation.
Ekanayake and Chatrna (2010) looks at the impact of unfamiliar guide on monetary development
of least created nations utilizing timeframe from (1980_2007). Consequence of the study shows
unfamiliar guide has combo impact on financial development in LDCs.
Mohey_ud_Din(2005) portrays that import send out and sparing venture holes are been full-filled
by unfamiliar assets and its of numerous sorts like FDI, EXTERNAL bank credits help and a lot
more yet unfamiliar guide is earlier as opposed to advances or fDI. The got information is over
1960_2002. This study shows the upgrading impact of unfamiliar guide on financial
advancement in Pakistan.
Hodler and Knight (2009) investigates the effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development
utilizing board information for 114 guide beneficiary nations after some time 1962 _ 2001. The
outcome shows unfamiliar guide have diminished monetary development in fractionalized
nations generally are in sub saharan Africa.
Younis (2015) shows the effect of unfamiliar guide in improving manageable improvement
utilizing board information for four south Asian nations after some time 1976_2013. The
outcome portray that unfamiliar guide negatively affects supportable advancement aside from
where development is less. This alludes south Asian nations should take help when GDP is less.
Besides, exchange transparency and local sparing rate have an important and constructive
outcome in accomplishing manageable turn of events.
Mallaye and urbain (2013) investigates the macroeconomic effect of unfamiliar guide on the
components of development utilizing board information for 37 sub saharan African states after
some time 2000 to 2010. The outcomes shows unfamiliar guide has beneficial outcome on
physical capital amassing and help expands enlistment in essential instruction.
Balcioglu (2016) shows connection among unfamiliar guide and monetary development utilizing
board information for six nations over the time 1992_2014. The outcomes shows that unfamiliar
guide streams have positive effect on real salary so unfamiliar guide is useful for creating nations
and in using profits by unfamiliar assets.
Saibu and obioesio (2017) investigates effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development and
improvement in Nigeria utilizing time arrangement information during 1970 to 2015. The
outcomes alludes unfamiliar guide is significant in improving development and ramifications of
good approach will prompted increment in financial development so this finishes up unfamiliar
guide is beneficial in expanding development in Nigeria.
Chervin and wijnbergen (2009) inspect the impact of unpredictability of unfamiliar guide on
financial development .board information has been utilized for 155 countries after some time
1966 to 2001. The Results of the examination alludes help instability and utilization has positive
connection.
Stein et.al(2016) shows the effect of unfamiliar guide on financial development of creating
nations utilizing time more than 1960 to 2010 in Egypt. Result alludes help is beneficial for
Egypt which will help in the improvement of nation. It has a positive effect so Egypt needs help
from America for its turn of events.
Khan and Ahmed (2007) shows the effect of unfamiliar guide on financial development of
Pakistan utilizing time Series information over 1972_2006. The outcomes portrays negative
effect of unfamiliar guide on monetary development further outcomes shows household venture
and unfamiliar direct speculation inflows are fixings in expanding development in Pakistan.

Data and Methodology

This study analyses the annual data covering time period from 1987_2010. The factors
consolidated are Gross local item, unfamiliar direct speculation, settlements and unfamiliar
guide. Johansen and vector blunder have been utilized for assessments of the econometric model.
The investigation has utilized GDP as reliant variable and following factors unfamiliar guide ,
unfamiliar direct venture and settlements as free factor .Gross residential item is utilized as
intermediary for financial development. State bank of Pakistan , global budgetary measurements
and hands book of insights of Pakistan are the sources that have been utilized in the examination
to gather information for the separate factors.

The Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test for unit roots

As the mix-up term is likely not going to be monotonous sound, and Fuller expanded their test
procedure suggesting an expanded interpretation of the test which recollects extra loosened terms
of the penniless variable for solicitation to slaughter autocorrelation. The leeway length on these
extra terms is either constrained by the Akaike Information Criterion (AlC) or Schwartz
Bayesian Criterion (SBC), or even more helpfully by the leeway length essential to light up the
residuals (for instance after each case we check whether the residuals of the ADF backslide are
autocorrelated or not through LM tests and not the DW test).The three expected sorts of the ADF
test are given by the going with conditions:
The differentiation between the three backslides again concerns the proximity of the
deterministic segments and aside from if the econometrician realizes the veritable data making
measure, there is a request concerning whether it is commonly appropriate to evaluate (1.1), (1.2)
or (1.3). Dol dado, Jenkinson and Sosvilla-Rivero ( 1990) propose a technique which starts from
the appraisal of the most expansive model given by (1.3) and then reacting to a great deal of
requests concerning the fittingness of each model and moving to the accompanying model. It
ought to be concerned here that, though supportive, this procedure isn't proposed to be applied in
a mechanical way. Plotting the data and watching the outline is a portion of the time incredibly
supportive because it can obviously show the proximity or not of deterministic regressors.
Regardless, this strategy is the most sensible way to deal with test for unit roots when the kind of
the data creating measure is dark.
Johansen approach
It was referred to before that if we have various variables in the model, by then there is an
opportunity of having more than one co-organizing vector. By this we infer that the elements in
the model may outline a couple of parity associations directing the joint progression of the
evident large number of variables. All things considered, for n number of components we can
have quite recently up to n-1 co-organizing vectors. Subsequently, when n = 2, which is the least
troublesome case, we can get that if co-coordination exists, by then the co-fusing vector is
unique. Having n > 2 and expecting that only a solitary co-consolidating relationship exists,
where there are actually more than one, is an exceptional issue that can't be settled by the EG
single-condition approach. Thusly, a choice as opposed to the EG approach is required and this is
the Johansen approach for different conditions.
In order to present this methodology, it is important to widen the single-condition screw up
update model to a multivariate one. We should expect that we have three components, , and
which would all have the option to be endogenous, for instance we have that (using lattice
documentation for). It very well may be reformulated in a vector mistake adjustment model
(VECM) as follows:
Where (I = 1, 2, ... ,k-1) and
Here we have to painstakingly inspect the 3 x 3 lattice. (The grid is 3 x 3 because of the way that
we expect three factors in.) The cross section contains information as for the since a long time
prior run associations. We can fall apart = where will fuse the speed of acclimation to congruity
coefficients while will be the since quite a while back run system of coefficients.
As such the term is tantamount to the screw up correction term ( in the single-condition case, of
course, very contains up to (n-1) vectors in a multivariate structure. For ease we acknowledge
that k = 2, so we have only two loosened terms, and the model is then the going with:
++ (3)
or
++ (4)
Let us currently examine just the mistake amendment part of the principal condition (for example
for on the left-hand side of) which gives:(5)
Where is the principal column of the network. Condition (5) can be revised as:
)+
Which shows obviously the two co-coordinating vectors with their separate speed of
modification terms.

RESULTS
variables LEVEL 1st difference
GDP -0.548051 -5.116592*
FDI -3.059222 -3.225334***
ODA -3.621157 -6.559889*
REM 0.083806 -4.526803*

The information utilized in the examination isn't fixed so there is issue of unit root. To defeat the
issue of unit root (ADF) test has been utilized in the examination. The ADF test delineates fixed
of information at level or first distinction. The factors utilized in the investigation are GDP, FDI,
ODA and settlements. By applying (ADF) test all factors are not fixed at level so do it from the
start contrast. All the factors are fixed from the outset contrast at one percent level of hugeness
aside from FDI. It is fixed at 10% degree of centrality. All the factors are fixed from the start
contrast so J.J approach would be utilized.
One star shows 1 % level of noteworthiness
Two stars shows 10 % level of centrality
Results of Johansen co integration test
All the factors are fixed from the outset distinction that is the reason Johansen co-incorporation
approach is being utilized to check the since quite a while ago run relationship of factors
Table 1

Unrestricted Co-integration Rank Test (Trace)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.755909 76.38452 47.85613 0.0000

At most 1 * 0.547952 35.48832 29.79707 0.0099
 At most 2 0.315774 12.46327 15.49471 0.1360
At most 3 0.049057 1.458720 3.841466 0.2271

Table one show the aftereffects of follow measurements. Right off the bat choose the co
incorporating factor which is follow measurement, which is appeared at none (invalid
speculation) When follow measurement is more noteworthy than basic worth oddball the invalid
theory which shows the since quite a while ago run relationship of variable. The follow
measurement is more prominent than basic. (atmost 1 *) co mix condition which shows two co
joining condition at 5% level of noteworthiness.
Table 2
Unrestricted Co-integration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)

Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.755909 40.89620 27.58434 0.0006

At most 1 * 0.547952 23.02505 21.13162 0.0268
At most 2 0.315774 11.00455 14.26460 0.1540
At most 3 0.049057 1.458720 3.841466 0.2271

Table 2 show the same like table 1 when max Eigen statistic is greater than critical value then
reject the null hypothesis. It also give the same results two integrating factor at 5% level of
significance so reject the null hypothesis according to max Eigen criteria.
Vector Error Correction Estimates

Cointegrating Eq: CointEq1

GDP(-1) 1.000000

FDI(-1) -25.09763
(1.41767)
[-17.7034]

ODA(-1) 91.87876
(11.0586)
[ 8.30836]

REM(-1) -18.70318
(0.93487)
[-20.0061]

C -1.39E+11
Error Correction: D(GDP) D(FDI) D(ODA) D(REM)

CointEq1 -0.123569 0.018440 -0.022832 -0.009484

(0.08682) (0.00904) (0.00515) (0.00725)
[-1.42336] [ 2.03970] [-4.43426] [-1.30734]

D(GDP(-1)) 0.114608 -0.022204 0.016509 0.016770

(0.23661) (0.02464) (0.01403) (0.01977)
[ 0.48438] [-0.90114] [ 1.17645] [ 0.84823]

D(GDP(-2)) 0.045623 0.015965 0.001380 0.019312

(0.21842) (0.02274) (0.01295) (0.01825)
[ 0.20888] [ 0.70190] [ 0.10651] [ 1.05818]

D(FDI(-1)) 4.563435 0.563289 -0.046843 0.278483

(2.34473) (0.24417) (0.13907) (0.19592)
[ 1.94625] [ 2.30694] [-0.33684] [ 1.42138]

D(FDI(-2)) -7.053498 0.268001 -0.631811 -0.644408

(2.93004) (0.30512) (0.17378) (0.24483)
[-2.40731] [ 0.87834] [-3.63570] [-2.63204]

D(ODA(-1)) 11.08478 -0.526510 0.895883 0.985679

(5.47156) (0.56979) (0.32452) (0.45720)
[ 2.02589] [-0.92405] [ 2.76066] [ 2.15590]

D(ODA(-2)) 4.125608 -0.302595 -0.128822 -0.196279

(3.41216) (0.35533) (0.20237) (0.28512)
[ 1.20909] [-0.85159] [-0.63655] [-0.68841]

D(REM(-1)) 3.736672 -0.591120 0.278498 0.490966

(3.08337) (0.32109) (0.18287) (0.25764)
[ 1.21188] [-1.84098] [ 1.52290] [ 1.90560]

D(REM(-2)) 4.220528 0.181104 0.237423 0.289175

(2.72187) (0.28345) (0.16143) (0.22744)
[ 1.55060] [ 0.63894] [ 1.47071] [ 1.27145]

C 1.40E+09 4.47E+08 -4.28E+08 -1.61E+08

(3.2E+09) (3.3E+08) (1.9E+08) (2.7E+08)
[ 0.43850] [ 1.34698] [-2.26719] [-0.60655]

R-squared 0.571911 0.411300 0.687406 0.666014

Adj. R-squared 0.357867 0.116949 0.531109 0.499022
Sum sq. Resids 1.06E+21 1.15E+19 3.71E+18 7.37E+18
S.E. equation 7.66E+09 7.98E+08 4.54E+08 6.40E+08
F-statistic 2.671930 1.397314 4.398070 3.988281
Log likelihood -670.8023 -607.4647 -591.7028 -601.3007
Akaike AIC 48.62874 44.10462 42.97877 43.66434
Schwarz SC 49.10452 44.58041 43.45456 44.14012
Mean dependent 8.59E+09 76339587 57130357 6.39E+08
S.D. dependent 9.56E+09 8.49E+08 6.63E+08 9.04E+08

Determinant resid covariance (dof

adj.) 3.55E+71
Determinant resid covariance 6.06E+70
Log likelihood -2440.672
Akaike information criterion 177.4765
Schwarz criterion 179.5700
Number of coefficients 44

Dependent Variable: D(GDP)

Method: Least Squares (Gauss-Newton / Marquardt steps)
Date: 04/21/18 Time: 20:34
Sample (adjusted): 1989 2016
Included observations: 28 after adjustments
D(GDP) = C(1)*( GDP(-1) - 25.0976277941*FDI(-1) +
91.8787613186*ODA(
-1) - 18.7031809762*REM(-1) - 138727330255 ) +
C(2)*D(GDP(-1)) +
C(3)*D(GDP(-2)) + C(4)*D(FDI(-1)) + C(5)*D(FDI(-2)) +
C(6)*D(ODA(-1))
+ C(7)*D(ODA(-2)) + C(8)*D(REM(-1)) + C(9)*D(REM(-2))
+ C(10)

Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C(1) -0.123569 0.086815 -1.423358 0.1717

C(2) 0.114608 0.236608 0.484379 0.6340
C(3) 0.045623 0.218415 0.208884 0.8369
C(4) 4.563435 2.344733 1.946249 0.0674
C(5) -7.053498 2.930036 -2.407307 0.0270
C(6) 11.08478 5.471562 2.025890 0.0579
C(7) 4.125608 3.412157 1.209091 0.2423
C(8) 3.736672 3.083370 1.211879 0.2412
C(9) 4.220528 2.721874 1.550597 0.1384
C(10) 1.40E+09 3.18E+09 0.438497 0.6662

R-squared 0.571911 Mean dependent var 8.59E+09

Adjusted R-squared 0.357867 S.D. dependent var 9.56E+09
S.E. of regression 7.66E+09 Akaike info criterion 48.62874
 Sum squared resid 1.06E+21 Schwarz criterion 49.10452
Log likelihood -670.8023 Hannan-Quinn criter. 48.77419
F-statistic 2.671930 Durbin-Watson stat 2.243105
Prob(F-statistic) 0.036285

Johansen long run estimation results

According to long run co-integration equation FDI has a negative relationship with GDP
because the coefficient has a negative sign. Foreign aid has a positive relationship with GDP
because coefficient of foreign aid has a positive sign and remittances have also a negative
relationship with GDP in the long run.
CONCLUSION
The examination analyze effect of unfamiliar guide on financial development utilizing time
arrangement information from 1987 to2016 utilizing Johansen co-combination procedure and
vector blunder revision model. The outcome shows that FDI and settlements positively affect
financial development, these positively affect development in short run. Unfamiliar guide has
negative effect on monetary development in since quite a while ago run yet negative too in the
short run. Based on result it is presumed that unfamiliar guide is immaterial because of
debasement in our legislature, financial shakiness, terrible foundation , absence of social
administrations , absence of advancement consumption, so our nation turns into a limit of
reliance in the unfamiliar guide circle. It is prescribed that the Government ought to need to
complete the debasement and make unadulterated key arrangement to use unfamiliar guide in a
correct manner. To break the reliance of unfamiliar guide government ought to use the
residential assets well.
References
Acemoglu D., S. Johnson and J. A. Robinson (2001), “The colonial origins of comparative
development:
An empirical investigation”, American Economic Review 91(5): 1369-1401.
Alvi E., D. Mukherjee and E.K. Shukralla (2008), “Aid, policies, and growth in developing
countries: A
new look at the empirics”, Southern Economic Journal, 74(3): 693-706
Azariadis C. and J. Stachurski (2005), “Poverty traps”, in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.),
Handbook of
Economic Growth, North Holland: Amsterdam.
Burnside C. and Dollar (2000), “Aid, policies and growth”, American Economic Review 90(4):
847-868.
Caner M. and B. Hansen (2004), “Instrumental Variable estimation of a Threshold Model”,
Econometric
Theory 20(5): 813-843.
Chan K.S. (1993), “Consistency and limiting distribution of the Least Squares estimator of a
Threshold
Autoregressive Model”, The Annals of Statistics 21(1): 520-533.
Clemens M.A., R. Bhavnani and S. Radelet (2004) “Counting chickens when they hatch: The
short-term
effect of aid on growth”, Center for Global Development Working Paper 44: Washington.
Commission for Africa (2005), Our Common Interest: Report Of The Commission For Africa,
http://www.commissionforafrica.org.
Dalgaard C. and H. Hansen (2001), “On aid, growth and good policies”, Journal of Development
Studies
37(6): 17–41.
Dalgaard C., H. Hansen and F. Tarp (2004), “On the empirics of foreign aid and growth”,
Economic
Journal 114(496): F191–216.
Devarajan S., M. Miller and Eric V. Swanson (2002), “Goals for development: History,
prospects and
costs”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2819.
Doucougliagos H. and M. Paldam (2008), “Aid effectiveness on growth: a meta study”,
European
Journal of Political Economy 24(1), 1–24.
Easterly W. and R. Levine (1997), “Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions”,
Quarterly
Journal of Economics 112(4): 1203–50.
Easterly W. (2006), “Reliving the 1950s: the big push, poverty traps, and takeoffs in economic
development”, Journal of Economic Growth, 11: 289–318
Malik,G,.(2008). Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: A Cointegration Analysis of the Six Poorest
African Countries, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, VOL. 38 NO. 2, pp 1 – 10
Gillanders, R,. (2016). The Effects of Foreign Aid in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Economic and
Social Review, Vol. 47, No. 3, Autumn, pp. 339-360.