Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Author’s name)
(Institutional Affiliation)
LEADERSHIP ON THE LINE BOOK REVIEW 2
Introduction
For many years, we have worked together as a team. Some colleagues have come and
gone while we still endure the day-to-day activities of this company as we strive to make ends
meet. We need to adapt to change and work out our differences regardless of the aggression. We
should review these ups and downs in a deeper perspective as we come up with buffers to those
that infringe on out comfort and conducive work environment. We can use the concept of
“adaptive leadership” as depicted by the renowned authors, Ronald Heifetz and Marty Linsky, in
the book Leadership on the Line, in which they reveal the comprehensiveness of the notion of
adaptive leadership. In their understanding, it is domineering for our leaders to draw a line
between leadership and authority as well as between technical problems and adaptive challenges.
Several leaders flop in their efforts to uphold leadership tasks when they misguidedly
address adaptive tasks as if they were technical problems. When it comes to technical problems,
even though hypothetically multifaceted and unfavorably important, our leaders should have an
identified solution within the knowledge capacity of those in authority. In disparity, adaptive
challenges typically require a learning experience, which we already have. The displaced
aggression we have experienced from the government needs scrutiny and demands an adaptation
of behaviors, attitudes and principles, or of organizational roles, standards, and events. A person
in authority who has the answers, decision-making power, and the power to enforce necessary
steps usually solves technical problems. However, adaptive problems do not want a leader who
exercises authority. Instead, they involve a leader who is keen to frame and examine tough
questions, to challenge reality, drag out issues and to challenge existing procedures. The most
important thing our leaders can do is to transfer accountability for solving the problem to the
We can take a related example from evolutionary ecology, which sees prosperous
adaptation as needed for preservation of DNA, removal of redundant DNA, and producing new
DNA that can work well under new settings. From this context, we can discover that following
basic conventions:
Adaptive change involvements work up the past instead of getting rid of it.
The theory of adaptive leadership begins with the understanding that in the modern world, no
dysfunctional organizations exist for the reason that all organizations go through their daily tasks
at the level of adaptation they are eager to involve in. The above information will help our
organization to come up with various ways of combatting aggression by engaging our leaders to
The main reason why we have to adapt to these changes regardless of how hard they hit us is to
endure the tough times as we anticipate unfolding of better outcomes. Evidently, organizations
reluctant to adapt may turn out to be non-viable and ultimately die. Some present organizations,
though seeming dysfunctional, in reality, may be best fitted out to accomplish their current
determination. Therefore, as the government makes drastic changes, we should realize that
organizational development processes do not merely embrace change at all but they assist in
maintaining those characteristics, which promise the endurance of our organization. This will
LEADERSHIP ON THE LINE BOOK REVIEW 4
produce uninterrupted small changes in order to adapt our organization to the shifting conditions
Life gives us the greatest leadership workshop for working out adaptive leadership. The
development of the best leadership style takes place when a leader in an organization discovers
the many prospects to implement adaptive leadership in the diverse parts of his or her life. This
book, however, has taught me that leadership is not purely a matter of best tactics and practices. I
feel that our leaders should be tasked to create our organizations view with themselves as the
most significant system in order for us and our organization to move forward. Like any other
organization, I have confidence in our leaders as they can form a complex unit with opposing
principles, interests, partialities, tendencies, ambitions, and fears to tackle the problem at hand. I
believe that an understanding of the personal system will benefit any leader to develop the
There are a couple of things we have struggled with while trying to make changes to my personal
life but I have realized that one of the most imperative codes of adaptive tasks is “getting on the
balcony.” Leaders always feel that they must engage themselves in things that will not at one
have the capacity to establish their problems and apprehend their roots. We as leaders
consequently need the aptitude to step back and to see the changed developments as if we are
standing on a balcony with the intention of looking at the scenario in a wider and deeper
perspective. It is only during this time that we will learn about the magnitude of the damage the
government imposed on us and identify value conflicts and power struggles, recognize patterns
challenging transitions, thereby stimulating their daily habits, devotions, principles and ways of
LEADERSHIP ON THE LINE BOOK REVIEW 5
life. As executives of this successful company, I would like to urge you to look at leadership in a
different angle that does not donate to our own demise. We should ask ourselves, the reasons
why leaders do not attain success in their endeavors. We need to contemplate on this enquiry
deeply but the simplest answer is leaders fail to make out adaptive challenges. Leaders can in
positions of power, mostly confuse adaptive challenges with technical problems. I need to
reiterate that there is a big difference between the two since the issues we need to deal with at the
moment carries both technical problems, which are easy to identify, as well as adaptive
challenges, which are difficult to identify and easy to deny. Our staff can help us in solving this
since we should also look at it as an adaptive challenge. On the other hand, we should come up
with technical solutions, which are generally accepted to integrate our efforts to deal with the
issue at hand. In this sense, I have a strong feeling that the executive staff have a mandate to
practice shrewd leadership so that we are not understood as unsatisfactory and irritating, but even
so, in such a way that our staff can absorb. Consequently, the more heat you can take as
executive members of this organization, the more contented you will be in observing our
problems and keeping ourselves alive in business. You must repeatedly teach yourself how to be
cautious and keep yourself levelheaded when everything around you is at stake. This will make
our staff have the capacity to take in the shocks with confidence since silence is also a form of
action.
Conclusion
We can only achieve solutions to our harms when the individuals with the problem, and
that I mean all of us, experience the process as a team to turn out to be the people with the
solution. Internalization, possession and resolution to these issues is a vital remedy to our
organization. Our staff might echo their grievances every day, but it is only us as leaders, and
LEADERSHIP ON THE LINE BOOK REVIEW 6
especially you as the senior leaders, help resolve and achieve lasting progress. It is a mutual ploy
to distinguish the discussion over issues as a plan for taking you out of action. By
you can expand the odds of your endurance. You deny the staff members the chance to include
your input into the concern, and you support the accountability for the work where it should be.
It is worth noting, that I challenge many people as a leader of my staff in this organization but I
have realized that those you challenge will experiment your stability and judge your merit by
your reaction to their annoyance. If we have the endurance to hold firm long enough, continuing
to hold respect to their anguishes and defending their viewpoint without feeling you must protect
yourself, you may discover that in the succeeding calm, relationships in this organization become
stronger. It stresses that we stay true to the vision and mission of this company.
References
LEADERSHIP ON THE LINE BOOK REVIEW 7
Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business
School Press.