s1a2024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Pape Technology Selection Paper Course: CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) Criteria Excellent Identified 10 points an Provided an appropriat excellent e overview of technolog a” emerging technology yand or emerging provided application @N Paragraph" v a4 overview _ technology. of Fe I The overview tecttgoles propriate! Y=. mused ‘formation BaP Tore : ao” pv _ Professional literature in Lato (Recaffdition to information 19px rom other sources, ie. news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, (Authoritativ e sources were cited). Outstanding 8 points Provided an introduction that contained an outstanding overview of an emerging techology or emerging application of technology. The overview appropriate! yused information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other sources, i.e, news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, (Authoritativ Acceptable 7 points Provided an introduction that contained an overview of an emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The provided some details about how the technology is used. The overview drew some information from the survey of the professional literature in. addition to information from other sources, ie. news articles, industry or government white papers Needs Improvemen t 6 points Identified an appropriate technology. Provided an overview or introduction ‘that was lacking in detail Information from the survey of the professional literature was used in the overview (authoritativ e sources were cited). Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Identified an appropriate technology but the overview of that technology lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from the survey of the professional literature or other authoritative sources. hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInstdropboxlusertolier_ submi_flas-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08p=08ou584465 (CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UMGC Learning Mana, ing / Unacceptabl Ciiterion Score Opoints 10 The introduction and/or overview sections of the paper were off topic or failed to provide an overview of the emerging application of technology. am12024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Criteria Excellent Surveyed 10 points Profession identified 10 al or more Literature Papers from (100r professional more literature. All Papers papers used in identified _ the survey and cited) were from the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, eee Computer Society Digital Library, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct), Appropriately used 10 or more papers from the survey of the literature throughout the discussion (as demonstrated by correctly formatted and placed citations}. hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsldropboxlusertotier_submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08bp=08ou584865 e sources were cited.) Gutstanding 8 points Survey of the literature was based upon eight papers from one or more of the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, EEE Computer Society Digital brary, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct) Appropriately used at least 8 papers from the survey of the literature throughout the discussion ofthe technology (as demonstrated by correctly formatted and placed citations) Acceptable or from authoritative Web sites, (Authoritativ e sources were cited.) 7 points Survey of the literature was based upon papers from of the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, lee Computer Society Digital Library, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct) Appropriately used at least 6 papers from the survey of the literature throughout the discussion ofthe technology (as demonstrated by correctly formatted and placed citations) Needs Improvemen t 6 points Survey of the literature was based upon four or five papers from of the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, Ieee Computer Society Digital Library, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct), Appropriately used at least 4 papers from the survey of the literature throughout the discussion of the technology (as demonstrated by correctly formatted and placed citations). Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Survey of the literature was based upon. three or more papers from of the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, eee Computer Society Digital Library, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct) Appropriately used at least 3 papers from the survey of the literature throughout the discussion ofthe technology (as demonstrated by paraphrasing and including correctly formatted and placed citations}. Missing / Unacceptabi C‘iterion Score 0 points /10 Survey of the literature was based upon two or fewer papers from of the four approved sources (ACM Digital Library, lee Computer Society Digital Library, Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, and Science Direct). OR, did not appropriately information from authoritative amts1a2024 Criteria Summariz ed cybersecu rity issues that need investigati on using the characteri stics (features and capabilitie s) of the technolog y hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Excellent 10 points Provided an excellent discussion of the cybersecurity Issues that need Investigating using the characteristics ofthe emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Outstanding 8 points Provided an outstanding discussion of the cybersecurity Issues that need Investigating using the characteristics ofthe emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Acceptable 7 points Provided a discussion of the cybersecurity issues that need investigating using three or characteristics of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Needs Improvemen t 6 points Discussion provided few details as to the cybersecurity issues that need investigating. Discussion Included two characteristics of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Discussed cybersecurity issues and technology characteristics which need investigating in the context of the emerging technology but the discussion lacked detail and/or was rot well supported by information drawn from the survey of the professional literature, Missing / Unacceptabl 0 points The discussion of cybersecurity issues and/or technology characteristics was based upon personal opinion (no citations for sources from survey of the professional literature) OR this content element was missing. Criterion Score /10 sits1a2024 Criteria Summariz ed cybersecu rity issues that need investigati on using the technolog y interactio ns with people / environme nts / processes associated with the emerging technolog yor emerging applicatio nof technolog y Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Excellent 10 points Provided an excellent discussion of the cybersecurity Issues that need Investigating using the Interactions between the technology and people / environments / processes associated with the emerging, technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Outstanding 8 points Provided an outstanding discussion of the cybersecurity Issues that need Investigating using the Interactions between the technology and people / environments / processes associated with the emerging technology or emerging application of technology, The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Acceptable 7 points Provided a discussion of the cybersecurity issues that need investigating using the interactions between the technology and people / environments / processes associated with the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Needs Needs Significant Improvemen mprovemen t points 4 points Discussion _ Discussed provided few cybersecurity details as to issues and the technology cybersecurity interactions Issues that which need need investigating investigating. in the context Discussion _of the Included two emerging or more technology interactions but the between the discussion emerging _ lacked detail technology or or was not emerging well application of | supported by technology information and people / drawn from environment / authoritative processes. The sources. discussion appropriately used information from authoritative hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Missing / Unacceptabl 0 points The discussion of cybersecurity issues related to technology ractions was based upon personal opinion (no citations for sources from survey of the professional literature) OR this content element was missing. Criterion Score /10 ants1a2024 Criteria Summariz ed cybersecu rity related costs and benefits associated with the adoption of the emerging technolog yor emerging applicatio nof technolog y hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Excellent 10 points Provided an excellent discussion of the cybersecurity related costs and benefits associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, Industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Outstanding 8 points Provided an outstanding discussion of the cybersecurity related costs and benefits associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology, The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, Industry or government white papers. and authoritative Web sites. Acceptable 7 points Provided a discussion of the cybersecurity related costs and benefits associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology, The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Needs Improvemen t 6 points Discussion provided few details as to the cybersecurity related costs and benefits associated with adoption of the technology and/or did not mention cybersecurity issues that rive costs or benefits Discussion included two interactions between the emerging technology or emerging application of technology and people / environment / processes. The discussion appropriately used information from authoritative Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Discussed cost and benefits associated with adoption ofthe emerging technology or emerging application of technology but the discussion lacked detail did not address cybersecurity rot well supported by information drawn from authoritative Missing / teri Criterion Unacceptabl Score 0 points /10 The discussion of costs and benefits related to technology ‘adoption was based upon personal opinion (no citations for sources from survey of the professional literature) OR this content element was missing. sts1a2024 Criteria Summariz ed cybersecu rity related risks and/or vulnerabili ties associated with the adoption of the emerging technolog yor emerging applicatio nof technolog y hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Excellent 10 points Provided an excellent discussion of the cybersecurity related risks and/or vulnerabilities associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Outstanding 8 points Provided an outstanding discussion of the cybersecurity related risks and/or vulnerabilities associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites. Acceptable 7 points Provided a discussion of the cybersecurity related costs and risks or vulnerabilities (only one required) associated with the adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used information from the survey of the professional literature in addition to information from other news articles, industry or government white papers and authoritative Web sites, Needs Improvemen t 6 points Discussion addressed the cybersecurity related risks vulnerabilities but provided few details. Discussion Included two or more risks. vulnerabilities related to adoption of the emerging technology or emerging application of technology. The discussion appropriately used Information from authoritative Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Discussed risks or winerabilities associated with adoption ofthe emerging technology or emerging application of technology but the discussion lacked detail, did not adequately address cybersecurity rot well supported by information drawn from authoritative Missing / Unacceptabl 0 points The discussion of risks or vulnerabilities related to technology ‘adoption was based upon personal opinion (no citations for sources from survey of the professional literature) OR this content element was missing. Criterion Score /10 ent‘142024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Criteria Provided a summary recommen dation which provides a justificatio n for spending money on EVALUTIN G the selected emerging technolog yor emerging applicatio nof technolog yusinga ilot implement ation or other formal evaluation study hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Excellent 10 points Provided an excellent summary recommendati fon which was well supported by the body of the paper and Included: (a) an explicit statement regarding recommendati fon that this technology be selected by the panel for formal evaluation, (b) justification expressed in terms of return on Investment for monies spent during the evaluation, (c) identification of a specific recommended type of formal evaluation study. Outstanding 8 points Provided an outstanding summary recommendati fon which was well supported by the body of the paper and Included: (a) an explicit ement regarding recommendati con that this technology be selected by the panel for formal evaluation, (b) justification expressed in terms of return on Investment for monies spent during the evaluation, (<) identification of a specific recommended type of formal evaluation dy. Acceptable 7 points Provided a summary recommendati ‘on which was supported by the body of the paper and included the following: (a) recommendati ‘on that this technology be selected by the panel for formal evaluation, (b) justification for spending money on an evaluation, (¢) identification ofa recommended type of formal evaluation study. Needs Improvemen t 6 points Provided a summary recommendati on which was supported by the body of the paper and included mention of the following (a) recommendati on that this technology be selected by the panel for formal evaluation, (b) justification for spending money on an evaluation, (c) recommendati on fora formal evaluation study. Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Provided a summary recommendati fon which was not supported by the body of the paper or which failed to include mention as to selection of the technology for an evaluation study. OR, the summary was rot well supported by information drawn from authoritative resets a iterion Unaccentab! Soe Opoints — / 10 The summary recornmendatl missing or was not supported by the body of. the paper. m1s1a2024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Criteria Excellent Addressed 10 points security Demonstrated issues excellence in using the use of standard *2ndard cybersecurity terms (e.g. terminology confidenti to support ality, discussion of integrity, ‘he availability ‘@°"0°8y Appropriately »non- used 5 or repudiatio more standard n, terms authentici ty, accountab ity, auditabilit y, etc.). hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Outstanding Acceptable Bpoints 7 points Discussion _ Correctly used showed an standard outstanding cybersecurity understanding terminology and to support Integration of discussion of dard the cybersecurity technology. terminology Appropriately tosupport used 3 or discussion of more standard the terms. technology. Appropriately used 4 or more standard terms, Needs Improvemen t 6 points Correctly used standard cybersecurity terminology to support. discussion of the technology. Appropriately used 2 or more standard terms. Needs Significant Improvemen t 4 points Attempted to use standard cybersecurity terminology to support discussion of the technology. essins a iiterion Unaccentab! Soe Opoints — / 10 bid not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology the discussion OR misused or incorrectly defined standard cybersecurity terms, ants1a2024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UMC Leaming Mana Criteria Excellent Profession 5 points alism Part work contains 1: a reference Consistent. list containing Use and ewes forall | cited Formattin oources 8 for Sufficient Citations information is and provided to Reference sow reader tofind and List retrieve the cited sources, Reference list entries and in- text citations consistently and correctly formatted using an appropriate citation style (APA, MLA, ete.) hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Outstanding 4 points Work contains a reference list containing entries forall cited Sufficient Information is provided to allow a reader tofind and retrieve the cited sources. One or two inconsistencie format for in text citations and/or reference list entries. Acceptable 3 points Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited Sufficient information is provided to allow a reader to find and retrieve the cited sources. No more than inconsistencie format for in- text citations and/or reference list, entries. Needs Improvemen t 2 points Work has no more than three paragraphs with omissions of citations crediting sources for facts and information. Work contains areference list containing entries for cited Work contains no more than 5 minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. Needs Significant Improvemen t 1 point Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and/or consistently apply a professional formatting style for the reference list, and/or citations, Missing / Unacceptabl 0 points Reference list is missing, Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative sources for information used in the paper. Criterion Score 15 ont‘142024 Criteria Profession alism Part 2: Organizati on& Appearanc e Profession alism Part 3: Execution Total hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 Excellent 5 points Submitted ‘work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, ete.is appropriate to the assignment type, 10 points No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation Outstanding 4 points Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents 2 professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment's directions). 8 points Work contains in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. Acceptable 3 points Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc (OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting Professional appearance could be improved, 7 points Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work, Needs Improvemen t 2 points Submitted ‘work has multiple style or formatting Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement. 6 points Submitted work has formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation, Work is unprofessional in appearance. Technology Selection Study Recommendation Paper - CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UGC Leaming Mana Needs Significant Improvemen t Missing / Unacceptabl C‘iterion Score 1 point 0 points 15 Submitted work meets No work submitted requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance. points points / 10 Submitted No work work is difficult to read / understand submitted and has significant formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. / 100 som12024 Technology Selection Study Recommendation Pape Overall Score (CSIA 459 6980 Evaluating Emerging Technologies (2215) - UMGC Learning Mana, Do Not Use This Block © points minimum hitpsfleam.umge-oduld2UInsitropboxlusertolier_ submit_fles-6212db=110 19688 grpid=O8isprv=08}bp=08ou584465 wt