Photovoltaic System Integration

Photovoltaic System Integration for
Roehampton Vale Campus, Kingston

University London
Omar Hamdan
Supervised by: Dr. Paul Wagstaff
MSc Renewable Energy Engineering
October 2012
Faculty of SEC, Kingston University

II
Synopsis
This thesis is divided in a way to permit the reader to follow the content in a
logical sequence.
The main objective of this thesis is to design a photovoltaic system to be

optimally integrated with the electrical system in Kingston University London,
Roehampton Vale campus. This system main objective is to supply the electrical
demand of the facility.
The thesis presents a piece of work to calculate the power output of the
photovoltaic system in hand calculations and software simulation.
The thesis will evaluate the location of the installation by means of radiation
falls on the location, construction of the photovoltaic system, sizing the system by
evaluate the options according to area available and capital cost.
The hand calculation will present a model develop on excel to calculate the
power output by calculating the solar irradiances on a tilted surface, converting the
irradiances to electrical power and considering the effect of temperature on
photovoltaic cells.
The simulation part will present an entire design of the system by means of
calculating the power output, losses associated with the conversion process and
connection, shade study and result analysis
The sizing of the system was carried out through hand calculation, simulation
and economical analysis. Finally an economical evaluation for many models will be
presented.
Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

III
Table of Contents
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... VI
List of Tables............................................................................................................................... VIII
List of Equations ........................................................................................................................... IX
Chapter One .................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.2.0 Building Integrated PV System .............................................................................................. 5
1.3.0 Solar Radiation and Solar Constant ....................................................................................... 7
1.4.0 Geometrical Considerations: ................................................................................................. 8
1.4.1 The Declination angle............................................................................................................ 9
1.4.2 Solar Hour Angle ................................................................................................................... 9
1.4.3 The Latitude angle .............................................................................................................. 10
1.4.4 The Sunset Hour angle ........................................................................................................ 10
1.4.5 Slope Angle ......................................................................................................................... 10
1.4.6 Surface Azimuth angle ........................................................................................................ 10
1.4.7 Angle of Incident ................................................................................................................. 10
1.4.8 Zenith Angle........................................................................................................................ 11
1.5.0 Solar Radiations reaches a specific tilted surface ................................................................. 11
1.5.1 Clearness Index: .................................................................................................................. 12
1.5.2 Calculating of Hourly Global and Diffused Irradiance ........................................................... 12
Chapter Two ................................................................................................................................ 15
2.1.0 System Components ........................................................................................................... 16
2.1.1 Solar Cell Basics: ................................................................................................................. 16
2.1.2 Light characteristics ............................................................................................................ 17
2.1.3 Electrical Characteristics of a PV-Cell: .................................................................................. 18
2.1.4 Voltage and Current in PV Plant .......................................................................................... 21
2.2.0 Electrical Power Output: ..................................................................................................... 22
2.3.0 Components Selection PV panel .......................................................................................... 23
2.3.1 PV Panel Selection Methodology ......................................................................................... 24
2.3.2 Chosen Panel ...................................................................................................................... 24
2.4.0 Inverter and Control............................................................................................................ 26
2.4.1 Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT): ............................................................................ 26
2.4.2 Connection of Inverter to Array........................................................................................... 26
2.4.3 Inverter, process and Functions .......................................................................................... 28

IV
2.4.4 Component Selection, Inverter ........................................................................................... 29

2.4.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 30
2.5.0 Shading: .............................................................................................................................. 33
Chapter Three ............................................................................................................................. 34
3.1.0 Project Demand and Hand Calculations ............................................................................... 35
3.1.1 Process of progression: ....................................................................................................... 35
3.1.2 Overview, System Demand and Electrical System Review:................................................... 36
3.2.1 Hand Calculation: ................................................................................................................ 38
3.2.2 Summary and Assumptions: ................................................................................................ 38
3.2.3 Calculating the hourly solar radiation on the system: .......................................................... 39
3.2.4 Calculation: ......................................................................................................................... 41
3.2.5 Hand Calculation Results and Analysis: ................................................................................ 46
3.2.6 Area optimising and assessment ......................................................................................... 52
3.2.7 shading consideration ......................................................................................................... 53
3.3.0 calculating the hourly electrical power produced through all the year ................................. 55
3.3.1 System sizing ...................................................................................................................... 55
Chapter Four ............................................................................................................................... 60
4.1.0 Project Simulation............................................................................................................... 61
4.1.1 Preliminary Design .............................................................................................................. 61
4.2.0 Full Project Design .............................................................................................................. 64
4.2.1 Shade Simulation ................................................................................................................ 65
4.2.2 Electrical Layout .................................................................................................................. 70
4.2.3 Panel Layout Design ............................................................................................................ 71
4.2.4 Simulation Results and Review ............................................................................................ 73
Chapter Five ................................................................................................................................ 78
5.1.0 Electrical Configurations ..................................................................................................... 79
5.1.1 Measurement of the Energy Produced and Sold to the Grid ................................................ 80
5.2.0 Protection and Earthing of the System: ............................................................................... 81
5.3.0 Protection Against Over Current on AC Side: ....................................................................... 82
5.4.0 Comparison between Hand Calculation and Simulation....................................................... 82
Chapter Six .................................................................................................................................. 83
6.1.0 Economical Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 84
6.1.1 Assumptions ....................................................................................................................... 84
6.2.0 Sizing the System Based on Data from the Economic Model ................................................ 85

V
6.2.1 Maximum Power Output..................................................................................................... 85

6.2.2 System Limited by the Minimum Demand of December ...................................................... 87
6.2.3 Using the Data from Simulation for 20% of December System Size ...................................... 87
6.3.0 Analysis............................................................................................................................... 93
Chapter Seven ............................................................................................................................. 94
7.1.0 Critical Review .................................................................................................................... 95
7.2.0 Further Work ...................................................................................................................... 95
Chapter Eight............................................................................................................................... 96
7.1.0 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 97
References .................................................................................................................................. 98
Bibliographies ............................................................................................................................ 100
Appendix A ................................................................................................................................ 101
Appendix B ................................................................................................................................ 102
Appendix C ................................................................................................................................ 104

VI
List of Figures
Figure 1: GHG and CO2 emissions by sector. (EC, 2010) ...................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Electricity consumptions by Sector. (DECC, 2009) ................................................................ 4
Figure 3: Electrical PV generation (European commission, 2010) ....................................................... 5
Figure 4: Grid-connected photovoltaic system. (Luque and Hegedus, 2011). ...................................... 6
Figure 5: Earth Positions around the sun (Scharmer, 2000) ................................................................ 8
Figure 6: Solar Geometry Angles (Duffie and Beckman, 2006). ......................................................... 11
Figure 7: Schematic of a solar cell. The solid white lines indicate the conduction and valence bands of
the semiconductor layers; the dotted white lines indicate the Fermi level in the dark. .................... 16
Figure 8: Light wavelength ranges ................................................................................................... 18
Figure 9 Equivalent circuit of Photovoltaic ....................................................................................... 19
Figure 10 Voltage-Current characteristics example (ABB, 2010) ....................................................... 20
Figure 11 Selected Panel Dimensions ............................................................................................... 25
Figure 12 photovoltaic panel curves with different irradiances. ....................................................... 25
Figure 13 typical circuit used in PV inverters. ................................................................................... 28
Figure 14 inverter combination ....................................................................................................... 32
Figure 15 PWM DC to AC process .................................................................................................... 32
Figure 16 By-Pass diode under shading ............................................................................................ 33
Figure 17 system demand in kW ...................................................................................................... 37
Figure 18 Day Length for each month .............................................................................................. 47
Figure 19 Clearness Index and the diffused radiation ratio ............................................................... 47
Figure 20 total irradiance on a tilted surface per hour for each month............................................. 49
Figure 21 total estimated electrical output per hour each month. ................................................... 51
Figure 22 The monthly production of the system ............................................................................. 51
Figure 23 Roof Top of the Location. ................................................................................................. 52
Figure 24 calculating the area of shade effect .................................................................................. 54
Figure 25 Monthly Percentage of the total demand when maximum power produced. ................... 56
Figure 26 Percentage of the Supply to the Demand ......................................................................... 58
Figure 27 Monthly Demand Vs. Production. ..................................................................................... 58
Figure 28 Program's first interface page .......................................................................................... 61
Figure 29 Site data entry. ................................................................................................................. 62
Figure 30 mutual shading Visualisation/optimisation ....................................................................... 63
Figure 31 Sun Path and Mutual shading. .......................................................................................... 63
Figure 32 Preliminary Power Output, Horizontal and tilt surface comparison. .................................. 64
Figure 33 Near Shading design tool interface ................................................................................... 64
Figure 34 building a new object to simulate the shading .................................................................. 65
Figure 35 the final built structure. ................................................................................................... 66
Figure 36 PV panels build user interface. ......................................................................................... 66
Figure 37 Final system before the shade simulation......................................................................... 67
Figure 38 Top View, photovoltaic generator position ....................................................................... 68
Figure 39 Shading process ............................................................................................................... 68
Figure 40 shading when the system is placed at the eastern side of the building. ............................ 69
Figure 41 shading when the system is placed at the western side of the building............................. 70
Figure 42 System Design interface ................................................................................................... 72
Figure 43 Array power optimisation graph. ...................................................................................... 72

VII
Figure 44 Module Layout design and layout tool interface. .............................................................. 73

Figure 45 Simulation Production vs. Demand ................................................................................... 74
Figure 46 loss Diagram of the whole system along the year. ............................................................ 75
Figure 47 Daily input/output diagram .............................................................................................. 76
Figure 48 Array voltage distribution ................................................................................................. 76
Figure 49 Daily Power output along the year. .................................................................................. 77
Figure 50 Performance Ratio for each month. ................................................................................. 77
Figure 51 Electrical System Layout. .................................................................................................. 80
Figure 52 kWh meter integration with the system ........................................................................... 81
Figure 53 Cash Flow when installing 250 kWp as maximum assumption .......................................... 87
Figure 54 Cash flow of system sized based on 20% of December demand. ....................................... 89
Figure 55 Cash flow of System sized based on 20% of December demand. Simulation results .......... 89
Figure 56 Saving on Electricity bill in first model .............................................................................. 92
Figure 57 Saving on Electricity bill in the second model ................................................................... 92
Figure 58 Demand and Production for the first model ..................................................................... 93
Figure 59 Demand and Production for the second model ................................................................ 93

VIII
List of Tables
Table 1 System Demand kW ............................................................................................................ 37

Table 2. Monthly Ground Reflectance, (Albedo) .............................................................................. 39
Table 3 Monthly average meteorological data (EUROPEAN COMMISSION) ...................................... 40
Table 4 Site Data and Calculated information for one hour of the year ............................................ 40
Table 5 Irradiance Ht according to day hours for each month along the year.................................... 48
Table 6 Average kWh production per hour for each month. ............................................................. 50
Table 7 Maximum power system production and comparison with the system demand .................. 55
Table 8 Minimum Production considering 20% of the Demand in December. .................................. 57
Table 9 Shading factor for the beam radiation at different sun positions. ........................................ 70
Table 10 Simulation Data Output. .................................................................................................... 74
Table 11 Maximum power output applied on the built economical model (in £) .............................. 86
Table 12 20% of December production assumption applied on the built economical model (in £).... 88
Table 13 20% of December production assumption applied on the built economical model/
simulation result (in £) ..................................................................................................................... 90

IX
List of Equations
Equation 1 Extraterrestrial Radiation ................................................................................................. 8
Equation 2 Declination Angle ............................................................................................................. 9
Equation 3 Solar Time ........................................................................................................................ 9
Equation 4 E value. ............................................................................................................................ 9
Equation 5 Sunset Hour Angle ......................................................................................................... 10
Equation 6 Incident Angle ................................................................................................................ 10
Equation 7 Zenith Angle .................................................................................................................. 11
Equation 8 Clearness Index .............................................................................................................. 12
Equation 9 global Hourly irradiance on horizontal surface ............................................................... 12
Equation 10 Diffused Radiation Ratio ws ≤ 81.4˚ ............................................................................... 13
Equation 11 Diffused Radiation Ratio ws > 81.4˚ ............................................................................... 13
Equation 12 Average Daily irradiance .............................................................................................. 13
Equation 13 rt ratio ......................................................................................................................... 13
Equation 14 constant a .................................................................................................................... 13
Equation 15 constant b .................................................................................................................... 13
Equation 16 Diffused irradiance ....................................................................................................... 13
Equation 17 Beam irradiance ........................................................................................................... 14
Equation 18 rd ratio......................................................................................................................... 14
Equation 19 Total irradiance on tilted surface.................................................................................. 14
Equation 20 Rb Value ....................................................................................................................... 14
Equation 21 Photon Energy ............................................................................................................. 17
Equation 22 Atmospheric Mass ....................................................................................................... 18
Equation 23 Diode current............................................................................................................... 19
Equation 24 current delivered by the photovoltaic panel ................................................................. 19
Equation 25 Filling Factor ................................................................................................................ 21
Equation 26 Cell temperature effect on the cell Efficiency ............................................................... 22
Equation 27 Ambient temperature relation with the cell temperature ............................................ 22
Equation 28 tilt angle correction factor for the cell temperature ..................................................... 22
Equation 29 Energy supplied to the building and the electrical grid ................................................. 23

1
Chapter One

2
1.1 Introduction
Since the first public power distribution system was developed, in 1882, by the
famous Thomas Edison, our modern life style started to shape. Electricity made a
shift for human history, bringing all life’s modern luxuries into being (Chapman,
2005). Before electricity became available over 100 years ago, houses were lit with
kerosene lamps, food was cooled in iceboxes, and wood-burning or coal-burning
stoves warmed rooms. In other words, Electricity has changed that and become a
key driver in our modern life development.
Electrical power generation started in the form of cool power plants using
Steam turbines to drive Direct Current generators. That was followed by huge
developments in electrical power generation methods. Combined cycle power plant,
Nuclear Power Plant and Hydroelectric Power Plant are the latest forms of power
generation methods. Although those types of power plants are considered to have
high reliability and low loss of load probability (LOLP) fraction, they still suffer from
many major issues threatening the globe indirectly, by increasing Green House
Gases (GHG), and increasing the availability of some types of fuel, which might not
be available for all nations, either now or in the future.
Waldau A. J. et al, (2011) mentioned that "besides the increasing pressure on

the supply side of energy by the increasing world energy demand, environmental
concerns shared by a majority of the public and add to the list of weaknesses of
fossil fuels and the problems of nuclear energy. These concerns include the societal
damage caused by the existing energy supply system, whether such damage is of
accidental origin (oil slicks, nuclear accidents, methane leaks) or connected to
emissions of pollutants". Baker, (2004) added that generating electricity has made
major damages to the environment which might, in the end, cause global
catastrophes. Green House Gases (GHG) and CO2 emissions in particular cause
environmental damages. The Global warming or the expansion of the ozone hole,
which could lead to the melting of more ice in Antarctica and increase the water level
in the seas, represent clear examples of the danger of GHG. Such Issues have led
scientists to search for other alternatives, which might balance the scales.

3
Renewable Power Generation is being strongly considered. The technology

offers a free fuel energy that is free of GHG emissions. Solar Power Generation has
a long history and a promising future. Generally, Photovoltaic Power Systems helped
to supply electricity to many rural places but since 1991, this case has changed. In
Aachen, Germany (1991), the first installation of building-integrated photovoltaic's
(BIPV) was realized.
In addition, the energy market in the UK is growing, according to many market

analysts. In December 1997, the European Council and the European Parliament
adopted the “White Paper for a Community Strategy and action Plan”. In this paper,
the aims are described as follows, “Renewable energy sources may help to reduce
dependence on imports and increase security of supply. Positive effects also
anticipated in terms of CO2 emissions and job creation. Renewable energy sources
accounted in 1996 for 6% of the union’s overall gross internal energy consumption.
The union’s aim is to double this figure by 2010” (European Commission, 2010). The
UK government is stating policies to support renewable projects. Subsequently,
seeking sustainable and cleaner energy to provide a secure energy level of
consumption is an international concern.
Residential Buildings contribute in a large way to the total GHG and CO2
emissions. In the UK, residential CO2 and GHG emissions are 14% and 12%
respectively. The commercial institutions contribute in 3.8% and 3.2% (European
Commission, 2010). Figure (1) illustrates GHG and CO2 emissions by each sector.
As well, Domestic and household consumption of electricity represents 32% of the
total electricity generation, while the commercial sector consumes 19% of the total
electricity produced. (DECC, 2010). Refer to Figure (2).
Figure 1: GHG and CO2 emissions by sector. (EC, 2010)

4
Consequently, it is important to
consider better solutions for residential
sector electricity production. If the
nineteenth century was the age of coal
and the twenty century is the age of oil,
then definitely the twenty one century is
the age of sun and solar power. Building
Integrated PV system (BIPV) considered
being one of most efficient solutions. PV
system integration in buildings can
overcome all the above problems and
achieve most of the required objectives to Figure 2: Electricity consumptions by Sector. (DECC,
2009)
certain extend.
Furthermore, PV systems on roof or on Façade become more challenging.

The UK market faces a short drop in demand, due to reduction on feed in tariff (FIT)
by UK government. As a result, most of the PV panels prices dropped dramatically.
On the other hand, installation cost still almost the same. For sure, the
competitiveness among the market contractors has increased which opened a space
for less installation prices.
On the other hand, the UK electricity production using solar cell has increased
dramatically. The total production in 2005 is 10.9 MW; this number has jumped in
2011 to be 975.8 MW (DECC, 2012). This is an indication on how promising is the
photovoltaic market is. The total consumption of electricity from photovoltaic in 1999
used to be only 1000 MWh this number has increase along the decade to be 11000
MWh in 2007. Figure (3) shows the increase along nine years (European
Commission, 2010)
Finally, it is important to note that the UK photovoltaic market now is under

uncertainty conditions due to the change of the incentives and feed in tariff low. All
the calculations of the financial part have been done under this assumption, which
might decrease the figure. On the other hand, when the market returns to a stable
situation the figures are expected to increase.

5
Gross Electricity Generation of

Photovoltaic GWh
Gross Electricity Generation of Photovoltaic GWh
10 11
8
3 4 3 4
1 1
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Figure 3: Electrical PV generation (European commission, 2010)
1.2 Building Integrated PV System

Examining Photovoltaic modules for building integration, produced as a
standard building product that fit into standard façade and roof structures (IEA,
1996). Since the first integration for Photovoltaic into buildings, it has become one of
the fastest growth market segments in photovoltaic (Benemann J. et al, 2001).
There are several reasons for the great interest in PV systems in buildings. Its
image as a high-tech and its futuristic technology makes it more interesting for
engineers, architect and consumers. As well, integration of PV is technically simple
to install compared with other solar technologies such as solar thermal (Fieber A.,
2005). Furthermore, the price of PV panel integration in building is economically
attractive where its profit expectation is promising.
A roof or façade element with photovoltaic can be used in all kind of building's
structures, curtain wall façade (with isolating glass), rear vented curtain wall façade ,
structural glazing and tilted façade . It is expected from the photovoltaic system to
cover day lighting, reduce the noise and produce electricity (Benemann J. Et al,
2001). While Thomas R. and Fordham M. argued (2001) that the reasons of why
Photovoltaic is attractive technology is that using it includes supplying all, or most
likely the largest portion, of the annual electricity requirement of a building, making a
contribution to the environment, making a statement about innovative architectural

6
and engineering design and using them as a demonstration or educational project

(Thomas R. and Fordham M., 2001).
To integrate a PV system in any building, many considerations must be taken

into account by the designer and engineers. One of the crucial points is the
orientation of the building and tilt angle of the PV panel, solar irradiations and the
electrical system used including the proposed inverter and control methods.
In general, any BIPV system consists of Photovoltaic panel(s), inverter(s) and

accessories, which are usually referred to as Balance of System (BOS) and
switchgears. PV panels are the main component used to convert the energy carried
by the photons, particles that exist in sunlight, into electrical power. The inverter will
convert the produced DC electrical power by the PV panels to an AC usable
electrical power. The BOS includes kWh meter(s), cables, fuses, combiners, fittings,
grounding connections, switchgear and strings, DC and AC switches and
connectors.
The PV system integrated into a building would not need a storage system,
batteries; since the storage system is normally used to supply the load during the
night hours or when there is not enough radiation to produce electricity into the PV
panels. In this case, the national grid will act as a storage system (Luque and
Hegedus, 2011). Figure (4) illustrates a basic grid connected (On-Grid) schematic of
PV system. More details about each component of the system are presented later;
specifically on PV cell, module and array and on the conditioning system (inverter).
Figure 4: Grid-connected photovoltaic system. (Luque and Hegedus, 2011).

7
To explain how the solar system does work, it is important to describe the
nature of the sun light and the radiations that fall on earth's surface. As well, a short
introduction about the sun and earth position should be presented to be able to
elucidate sunlight, radiation analysis and solar system.
1.3 Solar Radiation and Solar Constant

It is obvious that the Photovoltaic system is related to the sun and the earth's
movement around it, thus, studying this movement and the way the radiation will fall
into the earth's surface has great importance, in order to achieve the highest
possible performance. In addition, it is important to understand the geometric
relationships between a planet relative to the earth at anytime and the incoming
radiation. This will make it possible to find the power output for any system intended
to be installed.
The sun is a sphere containing hot gaseous matter and has a diameter of
1.39 x 109 m. On average, the earth is 1.5 x 10 11 meter away from the sun. This
distance equals about 12000 times the earth's diameter. The earth revolves around
the sun in an elliptical unusual orbit that varies the distance between the sun and the
earth by 1.7%. The day of the closest approach in the northern hemisphere is known
as Perihelion and occurs on the 2nd of January, whilst on 2nd of July, the earth is at
its greatest distance from the sun, this distance is known as Aphelion, see Figure (5)
(Scharmer, 2000). The sun has an effective blackbody temperature of 5777 K. The
radiation emitted by the sun and its spatial relationship to the earth result in a nearly
fixed intensity of solar radiation outside the earth's atmosphere, often referred to as
extraterrestrial radiation. The extraterrestrial radiation's values, referred to as solar
constant, found in the literature vary slightly due to the measurement techniques or
assumptions for necessary estimations. The World Radiation Centre (WRC) has
adopted a value of 1367 W/m2, with 1% uncertainty (IEA, 1996).
The Solar Radiation outside the earth's atmosphere changes throughout the
year due to the change in the distance from the sun and the rotation of earth around
its axis. The solar radiation outside the atmosphere is then calculated depending on
the eccentricity correction factor ( ) and the day of the year (Luque and Hegedus,

8
2011). According to (Duffie and Beckman, 2006), depends on the distance of the
earth from the sun, which will vary by ± 1.7% of its mean value , which is equal to
11
1.495×10 m. A simple equation for engineering proposes combines the change in
the day and distance and defines the solar radiation outside the earth's atmosphere
as following:
Equation 1 Extraterrestrial Radiation
Where
Gsc: solar constant, 1367 W/m2.
n: is the day number of the year.
Figure 5: Earth Positions around the sun (Scharmer, 2000)
1.4 Geometrical Considerations:

To put a formula to find the radiation received on the system's surface, tilted
surface, by only knowing the total radiation on the horizontal surface. It is important
to know the direction from which the beam or the diffused radiations are received.
The geometrical properties should be studied. The next definitions and equations are
used in the calculation later in this paper.

9
1.4.1 The Declination Angle :
It is the key input for the solar geometry. It is defined by (UNESCO and NELP,
1978) as "the angle between the Equatorial Plane and the line joining the centre of
the Earth's sphere to the centre of the solar disk. The axis of rotation of the Earth
about the poles is set at an angle to that so called Plane of the Ecliptic. "The angle
varies along the Julian days between 23.45˚ and -23.45˚. The following equation
relates to the declination angle and the day number n, along the year.
Equation 2 Declination Angle
1.4.2 Solar Hour Angle :
According to (PEN, 2012), is the angular displacement of the sun east and
west of the local meridian. It changes 1˚ each for minutes and 15˚ each hour. It
changes 15˚ each hour after the solar noon and -15 each hour before the solar noon.
The solar noon corresponds to the moment when the sun at the highest point in the
sky. So the solar noon does not depend on the local time but on the solar time. The
solar time can be found as following:
Equation 3 Solar Time
Where Lst is the standard meridian for the local time zone, L loc is the longitude
of the specific location in degree. E is the equation of time in minutes which equals
to:
Equation 4 E value.

10
1.4.3 The Latitude angle :
It is the angular location north of the equator as positive and south of the
equator as negative. Its values range between -90˚ and +90˚.
1.4.4 The Sunset Hour angle:
According to (RETScreen International, 2005) is the angle of the sun at the

sunset solar hour. It can be found using the following equation:
Equation 5 Sunset Hour Angle
1.4.5 Slope Angle :
This is the tilt angle where the Photovoltaic panel or array is tilted from the
horizontal. Generally, as a rule of thumb, to collect maximum annual energy, a
surface slope angle should be adjusted to be equal to the latitude angle. For the
summer maximum energy gain, slope angle should be approximately 10˚ to 15˚ less
than the latitude and for the winter, maximum energy gain can be acquired when the
angle is adjusted to be 10˚ to 15˚ more than the latitude. (Duffie and Beckman,
2006).
1.4.6 Surface Azimuth angle :
This is the deviation of the projection, on a horizontal plane, of the normal to

the surface from local meridian. It is equal to zero when it is pointed to the south,
negative to the east and positive to the west. It ranges between .
1.4.7 Angle of Incident
This is the angle between the beam radiation on a surface and the normal to
that surface. It can be calculated as follows:
Equation 6 Incident Angle

11
1.4.8 Zenith Angle :
It is the angle between the vertical of the sun and the incident solar beam. Its value
must be between 0˚ and 90˚. For a horizontal surface the zenith angle can be
calculated using the following equation.
Equation 7 Zenith Angle
The following figure (6) illustrates the angles on a tilted surface. Please note
that the previous equations will be implemented in a hand calculation for the total
power output of the proposed system, later in this paper. The calculation will be done
using Microsoft Excel.
Figure 6: Solar Geometry Angles (Duffie and Beckman, 2006).
1.5 Solar Radiations reaches a specific tilted surface
The directions from which solar radiation reaches a specific tilted surface are
a dependent on conditions of cloudiness and atmospheric clarity (Duffie and
Beckman, 2006). Those radiations are considered to be distributed over the sky
dome. In general, the data of cloudiness and clarity are widely available.

12
In this paper radiations have been dealt with as three parts; Beam radiation,
Diffused radiations and Ground reflected or what is known as Albedo. The beam
radiations are the amount of radiations that have been received on a specific surface
without scattering; it will be represented as H b. The diffused radiations are those
radiations, which their direction have been changed before they receive a specific
surface. Finally, the ground reflected radiations are the radiations received on a
specific surface after they have been reflected from the ground.
1.5.1 Clearness Index:

The Clearness index gives a measure of atmospheric transparency. It shows
the relation between solar radiation at the Earth's surface and extraterrestrial
radiation. It is related to the path of which the solar radiations have been received on
earth's surface, which will be illustrated in a later section, referred to as atmospheric
AM value. It also represents the composition and the cloud content of the
atmosphere (Luque and Hegedus, 2011). Thus, the Clearness Index is defined as:
Equation 8 Clearness Index
Where, is the monthly average daily solar radiation on a horizontal surface

and is the monthly average extraterrestrial daily solar radiation, which can be
found from the following equation:
Equation 9 global Hourly irradiance on horizontal surface
1.5.2 Calculating of Hourly Global and Diffused Irradiance
To calculate the hourly irradiances, a developed method by Erbs et al and

introduced by (Duffie and Beckman, 2006), was used. It is obvious that the amount
of the diffused radiations will be a function of Kt, thus the theory developed the
monthly average diffused fraction correlation. Equations for these correlations are as
following, for :

13
Equation 10 Diffused Radiation Ratio ws ≤ 81.4˚
For :
Equation 11 Diffused Radiation Ratio ws > 81.4˚
The average daily irradiance is now broken into hourly values. To do so, the
equation developed by Collares-Pereira is used in the calculations. The formulas are
as following:
Equation 12 Average Daily irradiance
Where is:
Equation 13 rt ratio
Where (a) and (b) are values can be found as follows:
Equation 14 constant a
Equation 15 constant b
Note that the values of sunset angle and the hour angles are in radians. Then
the values of both the diffused and the Beam irradiances can be calculated as
follows:
Equation 16 Diffused irradiance

14
Equation 17 Beam irradiance
can be found using this equation:
Equation 18 rd ratio
The calculation of the total hourly irradiance is a combination of the three

irradiances values; the beam irradiance, diffused irradiance and the ground
reflectance. This equation was developed upon an Isotropic Model, which had been
derived by Jordan and Liu in 1963 (Duffie and Beckman, 2006). The equation equals
to:
Equation 19 Total irradiance on tilted surface
Where:
Equation 20 Rb Value
Moreover, is the average diffused ground reflectance, Albedo.

15
Chapter Two

16
2.1 System Components
2.1.1 Solar Cell Basics:

The Solar cell is a solid-state device that absorbs light and converts part of its
energy- directly into electricity. The process is done within the solid work structure;
the solar cell does not have any moving parts (Richard J. K., 1995).
The photovoltaic cell is manufactured by combining two layers of

semiconductors differently doped, a p-type and an n-type layer. The combination will
result of a matching between holes and electrons which will lead to creating a
potential layer. This is why the solar cells are usually referred to as "Photovoltaic
cells", the photovoltaic effect. Photovoltaic effect is the electrical potential, developed
between the two dissimilar materials. When the two dissimilar material's common
junction, or what is called the depletion layer, is illuminated with radiation of photons,
thus an electrical potential gradient will be created (Mukund R. P., 1999).
Each photon, if it has enough energy, is capable of releasing an electron,

which has a negative charge, or creating a hole, which has positive charge. The
accumulated process will result in a current and potential difference on cell's sides,
the p-type and the n-type. The released electrons will be accelerated because of the
resultant gradient, which is called Fermi level, and can then be circulated as a
current through an external circuit, see figure (7) (Mukund R. P., 1999).
Figure 7: Schematic of a solar cell. The solid white lines indicate the conduction and valence bands of the semiconductor
layers; the dotted white lines indicate the Fermi level in the dark.

17
2.1.2 Light characteristics

All electromagnetic radiations can be viewed as being composed of particles
called Photons. According to the theory of quantum, the photons are particles that
travel in vacuum with the speed of light and have no mass. Each photon carries
specific amounts of energy as a packet, referred to as an electron volt (ev). The
amount of energy is related to the proton's source spectral properties. The shorter
the wavelength of the proton, the larger the packet (Richard J. K., 1995).
The sunlight spectral is divided into three regions see figure (8). The first
region has a wavelength between 400 to 700 nanometres. At 700 nanometres, the
visible spectrum appears red and on the shorter end of 400 nanometres it appears
violate. All other colours appear in between. Our eyes are most sensitive to the
spectrum around 500 nanometres. At 400 nanometres and less, the spectrum is
called Ultraviolet (UV) wavelength and most of it is filtered or absorbed by the Ozone
or the transparent material before it reaches the earth's surface. Our skin perceives
the spectrum as radiant heat spectrums above 700 nanometres, which is referred to
as Infrared (Clark and Eckert, 1975). The water vapour, CO2 and other substances in
our atmosphere absorb most of the Infrared spectrums. On the other hand, Most of
those absorptions become longer wavelengths than the wavelengths the solar
system uses. While the solar system effectively collects wavelengths less than 2000
nanometres, thus its efficiency is not significantly affected (Duffie and Beckman,
2006). Photon's energy can be calculated as follows:
Equation 21 Photon Energy
Where is the wavelength, is Plank's constant ( ) and is the

speed of light ( m/s).
As well as this, the energy held by a photon is affected by Air Mass. The Air
Mass is the path length which light takes through the atmosphere normalized to the
shortest possible path length (the shortest path is when the sun is directly overhead).
The Air Mass quantifies the reduction in the energy of light as it passes through the
atmosphere and is absorbed by air, dust, ozone (O3), carbon dioxide (CO2), and
water vapour (H2O) with the last three having a high absorption for photons that have

18
energies close to their bond energies. The air mass (AM) is defined using the
following equation (noting that is defined later in this paper):
Equation 22 Atmospheric Mass
Figure 8: Light wavelength ranges
2.1.3 Electrical Characteristics of a PV-Cell:

A PV cell equivalent circuit is similar to that of the diode, since they have
similar structures. A photovoltaic cell is considered as a current generator and can
be represented by the equivalent circuit of Figure (9). The current I at the outgoing
terminals is equal to the current generated through the PV effect I PV by the ideal
current generator, decreased by the diode current Id and by the ground leakage
current Ish. The resistance in series Rs represents the internal resistance to the flow
of generated current and depends on the thickness of the junction P-N, the present
impurities and on contacts resistances.
The shunt resistance Rsh takes into account the current to earth under normal
operational conditions. In an ideal cell the values of Rs is zero while the value of Rsh
is maximum. On the contrary, in a high-quality silicon cell the typical value of Rs is
around five milliohm and the shunt resistance is around 285 ohm. The conversion

19
efficiency of the PV cell is greatly affected also by a small variation of R s, whereas it

is not affected by the variation of Rsh too much.
Figure 9 Equivalent circuit of Photovoltaic
The no-load voltage Voc, open circuit voltage, occurs when the load does not
absorb any current, i.e. IL equals zero, thus according to ohms law, the open circuit
voltage will be the current passing through the shunt resistance, times the shunt
resistance Voc =IshRsh (Luque and Hegedus, 2011)
In addition, the diode current is given by the classical formula for the direct
current:
Equation 23 Diode current
Where: ID is the diode's saturation current, Q is the charge of the electron

(1.6×10-19 C), A is the identity factor of the diode and it depends on the
recombination factor between the holes and electron inside the diode itself (for
crystalline silicon it is about 2). K is the Boltzmann constant (1.38×10 -23 J/K). Finally,
T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin degree. Therefore, the current supplied to the
load is given by:
Equation 24 current delivered by the photovoltaic panel
The final term, the ground-leakage current, in practical cells is small

compared to Iph and ID, thus it can be ignored. The diode-saturation current can be

20
determined experimentally by applying the open circuit voltage Voc in the dark (when
Iph is zero) and measuring the current going into the cell. This current is usually
referred to as the dark current or the reverse diode-saturation current. (Mukund R.
P., 1999).
The voltage-current characteristic curve of a PV module is shown in Figure10.

The generated current is at its highest under short-circuit conditions (Isc), whereas
with the circuit open, the voltage (Voc=open circuit voltage) is at the highest. Under
the two of those conditions, the electric power produced in the module is equal to
zero, whereas under all the other conditions, when the voltage increases, the
produced power rises too; at first, it reaches the maximum power point (Pm) and
then it falls suddenly near to the no-load voltage value. (Sera, D et al, 2007)
Figure 10 Voltage-Current characteristics example (ABB, 2010)
In summary, the electrical characteristics needed to be known about for a

photovoltaic module is as follows:
 Isc short-circuit current;

21
 Voc no-load voltage;

 Pm maximum produced power under standard conditions (STC);
 Im current produced at the maximum power point;
 Vm voltage at the maximum power point;
 FF filling factor: this is a parameter which determines the form of the
characteristic curve V-I. It can be defined as the actual maximum power
divided by the ideal power value; the ideal power is that value that would be
obtained under ideal conditions. i.e. when the voltage is equal to the open
voltage and the current is equal to the short circuit current. The filling factor is:
Equation 25 Filling Factor
It should be pointed that all those data can be found in the manufacturer data
sheet. Most of the information is experimentally distinguished. There are some
methods to calculate the series resistance value but it will not be needed in this
paper, thus it will not be presented.
2.1.4 Voltage and Current in PV Plant

PV modules generate a current from 4 to 10 A at a voltage from 30 to 40 V.
To achieve the projected peak power, the panels are electrically connected in series
to form the strings, which are connected in parallel. The trend is developing strings
constituted by as many panels as possible, given the complexity and cost of wiring,
in particular of the paralleling switchboards between the strings. The maximum
number of panels which can be connected in series (and therefore the highest
reachable voltage) to form a string is determined by the operational range of the
inverter and by the availability of the disconnection and protection devices suitable
for the voltage reached. In particular, the voltage of the inverter is bound, due to
reasons of efficiency, to its power. Generally, when using inverters with power lower
than 10 kW, the voltage range most commonly used is from 250V to 750V, whereas
if the power of the inverter exceeds 10 kW, the voltage range usually is from 500V to
900V. (ABB, 2010)

22
2.2.0 Electrical Power Output:

The electrical power output of the system will depend on three values, the
total hourly irradiance, and the efficiencies of the electrical components used and the
total area of the panels. The values of total hourly irradiance will be found as
described previously in this thesis.
The efficiency of the Photovoltaic's arrays will be characterised by the

average module temperature T c. Thus, the efficiency will depend on the ambient
temperature (RETScreen International, 2005). The efficiency equation using the
calculation for this study purpose is as follows:
Equation 26 Cell temperature effect on the cell Efficiency
Where is the temperature coefficient for the module efficiency and and
are the efficiency and the temperature of the panel under the Standard Testing
Conditions (STC). Normally the testing temperature is equal to 25C˚. In addition, the
standard testing conditions will define the Nominal Operating Cell Temperature
NOCT. NOCT values normally ranges from 42C˚ to 46C˚ (Luque and Hegedus,
2011). The average module temperature T c is related to the mean monthly ambient
temperature through the following equation, which had been developed by Evans in
1981 (Duffie and Beckman, 2006):
Equation 27 Ambient temperature relation with the cell temperature
Furthermore, the equation above is valid when the tilting angle is equal to the
latitude angle minus the declination angle, when the tilt angle is different, then the
right side of the equation has be multiplied by a correction factor defined as C f.
(RETScreen International, 2005). It can be found using the following equation:
Equation 28 tilt angle correction factor for the cell temperature
Where sM is equal to the latitude angle minus the declination angle and s is
the current tilt angle.

23
On the other hand, STC efficiency will vary for each type of module. In
general, the efficiency values range between 5%, for example for a module of a-Si
type, up to about 15%, for example a mono-crystalline silicon module.
Finally, the power output of the PV generator can be defined as the total reached
irradiances multiplied by the final efficiency and the total area used S. The
equation can be shown below:
Equation 29 Energy supplied to the building and the electrical grid
To calculate the electrical power delivered by the PV generator, which is

received by the building or the grid, the EP must be multiplied by the inverter
efficiency and the electrical losses due to the wiring. As well, other miscellaneous
losses of the BOS should be deducted from the total power production (RETScreen
International, 2005).
In later sections, a method to calculate the power output will be presented and
illustrated systematically giving one example of the whole system. The codes and
work sheet of the hand model can be found in the appendix A.
2.3.0 Components Selection PV panel

In order to optimise the system for the best conditions, it is highly required to
choose the most suitable component in the system. Reliable, high efficient and low
cost components are the optimal components to choose. In the following, the
detailed process for the main component selection is presented.
There are many kinds of photovoltaic panels which vary in material used,
technology, manufacturing process and size. Looking into the features of each panel
then comparing it with its price and its installation cost can be a very difficult process,
especially if the life time of the PV panel, warranty, market availability and efficiency
are taken into account as well. Therefore, the selection process can be narrowed by
specifying the priority features needed in the panel.

24
2.3.1 PV Panel Selection Methodology

The selection of the PV panel for this project was based on three aspect as
priority features; the efficiency of the photovoltaic panel, the panel price and the
market availability. In addition to those characteristics, an additional facet took
priority when the economical evaluation had been completed. The project life-time
needed to be increased because the payback and the breakeven level of output, was
found to be longer than 20 years. Hence, the PV panel life-time and the entire project
studies have been extended to 25 years.
2.3.2 Chosen Panel

The panel which has the highest efficiency is mostly mono-crystalline, thus
the panel's types have been narrowed by only mono-crystalline panels. One of the
most established, experienced brands in the market of manufacturing panels is
SHARP, when the panel specifications have been studied, and only the panels with
life-time of 25 years are used. They had a higher level of efficiency was compared to
the other panels in the market.
The panel is mono-crystalline which has 14.14% efficiency and lower

sensitivity to the variation of the temperature, the voltage variation is only a
decreasing of 104 mV/˚C. The peak power of the panel is 185 W P. The voltage at
maximum power point is 24 while the current is 7.71 Amp. The filling factor is
71.75%. The Nominal Operation Cell Temperature (NOCT) is 47.5 ˚C. The Panel
dimensions as show in figure 11 is 1.318×0.994 m. the panel has a bypass diodes
which, as mentioned before, will minimise the loss in output when shading occurs.
The panel behaviour with different irradiances is shown in figure 12.
Additional data about the panel which might be useful for the installer:
 156.5 mm × 156.5 mm mono-crystalline solar cells

 48 cells in series
 2,400 N/m2 mechanical load-bearing capacity (245 kg/m2)
 1,000 V DC maximum system voltage
 IEC/EN 61215, IEC/EN 61730, Class II (VDE: 40021391)
Finally, a vital point need for economical evaluation purposes; a full

performance of the panel is guaranteed for five years, a 90% of the full performance

25
for ten years and an 80% for twenty five years. Therefore, it will be possible to
extend the project life time to twenty five years. (A detailed data sheet is attached in
appendix C for the reader to refer to if needed).
Figure 11 Selected Panel Dimensions
Figure 12 photovoltaic panel curves with different irradiances.

26
2.4.0 Inverter and Control
2.4.1 Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT):

A maximum Power Tracker is a device that keeps the impedance of the circuit
of the cells at levels corresponding to best operation. It also converts the resulting
power from the PV array, so its voltage is that required by the load. There is some
power losses associated with the power tracking process
Any PV array, however its size or sophistication, is only capable of producing

Direct Current (DC) power, thus for the system to be integrated into the building it is
necessary to have a methodology to convert the produced DC power into the
building integrated AC power system. The DC to AC Inverter, sometimes referred to
as converter, is used to achieve this function. The System might require more than
one inverter depending on the system size and sophistication.
2.4.2 Connection of Inverter to Array

For many systems, a three-phase inverter is used. In addition, in some cases,
single phase inverter is only needed with a final decision taken by knowing whether
the grid supply is single or three phases; this is because the system should be
coupled with the electrical grid. The system can be connected to the inverters with
three deferent methods depending on the rating of both the PV Generator and the
inverter.
The first method is a single inverter plant, which might consist of single or
several strings; a string is a connection of many modules to form one DC output,
positive wire and negative wire. The single inverter plant implies that the rating of
both the PV generator and the inverter required is relatively small. This method has
many advantages in terms of lower investment cost and low maintenance; but on the
other hand, using one inverter will reduce the reliability of the system since a total
stoppage of power production will occur in case of inverter failure. In addition, this
solution is not suitable for increasing the size of the system, since these increases
the problems of protection against over currents and the problems deriving from
different shading that is when the exposition of the panels is not the same in the
whole plant (Esram and Chapman, 2007).

27
The second method is to have many strings with an inverter for each string. In
this layout, the blocking diode will prevent the source direction from being reversed;
it is usually included in the inverter. The diagnosis on production is carried out
directly by the inverter, which in addition can provide protection against the over-
current and under-voltage on the DC side. Moreover, having an inverter on each
string will reduce the coupling problems between the modules and inverters and the
reduction of the performances caused by shading or different exposition. Again, in
different strings, modules with different characteristics may be used, thus increasing
the efficiency and reliability of the whole plant. (Esram and Chapman, 2007).
Finally, the last method is to have a combination of large-size plants, the PV

field is generally divided into more parts (subfields), each of them served by an
inverter of one’s own to which different strings in parallel are connected. In
comparison with the layout previously described, in this case there are a smaller
number of inverters with a consequent reduction of the investment and maintenance
costs. However it maintains the advantage of reducing the problems of shading,
different expositions of the strings and of those due to the use of modules that are
different from one another, if subfield strings with equal modules and with equal
exposition are connected to the same inverter. Besides, the failure of an inverter
does not involve the loss of production of the whole plant (as in the case of single-
inverter), but of the relevant subfield only. It is advisable that each string can be
disconnected separately, so that the necessary operation and maintenance
verifications can be carried out without putting the whole PV generator out of service.
When installing a parallel switchboard on the DC side, it is necessary to provide for
the insertion on each string of a device for the protection against over-currents and
reverse currents so that the supply of shaded or faulted strings from the other ones
in parallel is avoided. Protection against over-currents can be obtained by means of
either a thermo-magnetic circuit breaker or a fuse, whereas protection against
reverse current is obtained through blocking diodes. With this configuration, the
diagnosis of the plant is assigned to a supervision system, which checks the
production of the different strings (ABB, 2010).

28
2.4.3 Inverter, process and Functions

Inverters take a great role in photovoltaic electrical production; the inverter makes it
possible to convert the DC power to an AC power used in the building's systems. It
will add a great flexibility with dealing with the produced power since the dealing with
DC power can often be difficult and dangerous.
It is important to present a brief introduction about the inverter in order to be

able to understand the basic methodology of how the inverter works. The circuit used
in the inverter is usually a three phase bridge inverter. This circuit is used to convert
the DC power to three phase AC power, which will make it easy to connect, and to,
integrate, the whole new photovoltaic system into the existing system in the building.
Moreover, after integrating both systems together; it is possible to connect their
integration to the electrical grid through a bidirectional kWh meter to calculate the
spending and selling. The typical circuit used in the inverter can be seen in figure 13.
Figure 13 typical circuit used in PV inverters.
The process of inverting the DC power to an AC power inside the

inverter is done using mostly a Pulse Width Modulator PWM to great a sinusoidal AC
output. The process can be explained using figure 13. The battery in the figure
represent the PV panels production, they are connected to the inputs of three legs,
two transistors, and are protected from the reverse current by a diode connected in
parallel with each of them. The DC voltage should be converted to a three phase,
lines, AC output, therefore, each transistor, of the six transistors, will be triggered
sequentially by a controller. The controller has a reference PWM wave, Sinusoidal

29
form. The controller will trigger one of the transistors in a process and will form three
phase AC power. Each of the phases is shifted by 120˚ electrical degree.
Furthermore, in this process the inverter is able to vary the voltage and
frequency at the output. For the case of building integration, the frequency required
to be fixed to either 50 Hz in the UK or 60 Hz in other places. On the other hand, the
inverter need to be able to cope with the variation in the voltage level, hence the PV
generator, relatively, does not have a fixed voltage. The voltage variation can be due
to the change in the temperature of the cell or due to the voltage drop caused by the
resistance of wiring.
The output wave ought to be filtered to lower the effect of any ripples or
harmonics, which might be caused during the conversion process.
2.4.4 Component Selection, Inverter

In conjunction with the photovoltaic panel, the selection of an optimal inverter
to use for the project can be a difficult process since there are many issues to be
considered. One of the main issues when selecting an inverter is to consider the
Maximum Power Point Tracking MPPT voltage range which might affect the final
performance of the system. Any inverter with MPPT will be able to optimally
decrease the effect of shadowing.
In order to select a suitable inverter to be used in the system, some aspects

should be considered. The capability of the inverter to cope with the variation in
voltage is an important matter. The system size is determined according to much
iteration to evaluate the system technically and economically. According to the
system size the inverter rated power will be distinguished. Therefore, the options to
choose an inverter will be limited to a certain level. It is better to choose an inverter
rating half the system size. In this way, two inverters will be installed instead of one.
The main purpose of this is to increase the reliability of the system. When one of the
inverters is out of service only half of the system is lost. Under certain
circumstances, one inverter could be selected, especially if the system rating is low.
The inverter type chosen for this project is going to be able to handle the
whole system solely, since the system size is relatively small compared other
projects. After considering many aspects the system's voltage and current have been

30
stated. Hence, the voltage rating is also known. The system voltage is ranging
between 540 V and 576 V, 576 V to be the maximum power point voltage. Now, the
options to choose an inverter, are narrowed, due to the fact that only the inverters
have voltages around this range. ±25% of the maximum and the minimum voltage
are considered as a good estimation because a margin of variation above or below
the maximum or the minimum level must be considered. Finally, the market
availability, quality guarantee and the cost should be taken into account.
2.4.5 Summary
In summary, the selection of the inverter, depending on size, is carried out
according to the PV array rated power that the inverter should manage. The size of
the inverter can be determined, from 0.8 to 0.9 for the ratio between the active power
delivered to the network and the PV generator. This ratio considers the power under
real operational conditions (working temperature, voltage drops on the electrical
connection...etc) in addition to the efficiency of the inverter itself.
Finally, the choice of correct size, for the inverter, must be done by taking the
following considerations:
- DC Side:
 rated power and maximum power;

 rated voltage and maximum admitted voltage;
 variation field of the MPPT tracking voltage under standard operating
conditions;
- AC Side:
 rated power and maximum power which can be continuatively delivered by

the conversion group, as well as the field of ambient temperature at which
such power can be supplied;
 rated current supplied;
 maximum delivered current allowing the calculation of the contribution of the
PV plant to the short circuit current;
 maximum voltage and power factor distortion;
 maximum conversion efficiency;

31
 Efficiency at partial load and at 100%.
- Other:
 Market availability
 Life time
 Cost
The chosen inverter is a tri-phased Sinvert 60 M from Siemens with 50 Hz

frequency and has a nominal power of 65 kVA (apparent). The inverter has a
minimum MPP voltage of 450 V and a maximum MPP voltage of 750 V. The power
conditioning unit consists of Isolated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) inverter, DC/AC
distribution, isolating transformer and a controller number SIMATIC S7. It also has a
MPP tracking for optimum utilisation of PV field power. In addition, it has an optional
Voltage Ampere Reactive (VAR) controller for three-phase network. The unit comes
with a control panel with display of operating states and actual values for the user to
interface in order to set the parameters of the inverter.
Furthermore, it does have a switch-over in both manual and automatic mode

by integrated key-switch. Moreover, the following features are included in the unit,
isolation monitoring with selective fault allocation and safety disconnection;
visualization and service software Power Protect solar; interface for process
visualization and an optional integration in management systems via Ethernet,
cabinets for floor mounting, forced ventilation by fan, air intake through lower cabinet
front and cabinet bottom, air discharge through the cabinet roof; cable entry at base
from. Figure 14 shows the component's internal combination. Figure 15 shows the
process in PWM to convert the DC power to an AC power.

32
Figure 14 inverter combination
Figure 15 PWM DC to AC process

33
2.5.0 Shading:
Taking into consideration the area occupied by the modules of a PV plant,
part of them (one or more cells) may be shaded by trees, fallen leaves, chimneys,
clouds or by PV panels installed nearby. In the case of shading, a PV cell consisting
in a junction P-N stops producing energy and becomes a passive load. This cell
behaves as a diode, which blocks the current produced by the other cells connected
in series, thus jeopardizing the whole production of the module (Seung-Ho and Eun-
Tack, 2002). Moreover the diode is subject to the voltage of the other cells which
may cause the perforation of the junction due to localized overheating (hot spot) and
damages to the module. In order to avoid that one or more shaded cells prevent the
production of a whole string, some diodes which by-pass the shaded or damaged
part of module are inserted at the module level. Thus, the functioning of the module
is guaranteed even if with reduced efficiency. In theory, it would be necessary to
insert a by-pass diode in parallel to each single cell, but this would be too onerous
for the ratio costs/benefits. Therefore, by-pass diodes are usually installed for each
module (Kajihara and Harakawa, 2005). See figure 16
Figure 16 By-Pass diode under shading

34
Chapter Three

35
3.1.0 Project Demand and Hand Calculations

This approach is to decide whether the system will be feasible or not. The
feasibility study will be done through a hand calculation and system simulation using
PVsyst. The Use of both methods; hand and simulation will make it easier to decide
the system size and specification. In addition, the hand calculation will present a
power output at an hourly pace which then can be compared with hourly demand if
available. The hand calculation will make it easier to predict the hourly share of the
proposed system to set an economical plan for the building.
The first section will describe the hand calculation of the system. The
calculation will use one day, as an example to demonstrate the method. Starting with
only one monthly value, for each month, the hand calculation will find the hourly
estimated power output throughout the day, then, the estimated daily total kWh that
can be produced. It is important to note that the hand calculation does not consider
the system losses, since it is going to be considered in the simulation more precisely.
The simulation will be produced using PVsyst, as quoted from the user help
booklet of the program, "PVsyst is a PC software package for the study, sizing and
data analysis of complete PV systems. It deals with grid-connected, stand-alone,
pumping and DC-grid (public transport) PV systems, and includes extensive
meteorological and PV systems components databases, as well as general solar
energy tools."(PVsyst., 2012) Comparison between both calculations will be
presented.
3.1.1 Process of progression:

The system to be proposed will be installed in Kingston University London,
Roehampton campus. The campus is positioned at 15° 26ˈ and -00° 15ˈ latitude and
longitude. The system proposed is to integrate a photovoltaic system with the
existing electrical system.
The main objective of the project is to, fully or partially; supply the facility’s
electrical demand throughout the year. This will be done by:
 This chapter:
- Calculating the system demand and electric system review,
- Calculating the hourly solar radiation on the system,

36
- Hand Calculation the hourly electrical power produced annually,

- Optimising the area used and evaluating the available options, system sizing,
 Next Chapters:
- Calculating the monthly power production, losses and shading effect using a
simulating program,
- Electrical consideration and power layout,
- Economical Evaluation of the project,
- Comparison of the hand calculation and the simulation results,
The integration of a PV system with a building will be carried out while carefully
considering all the aspects.
3.1.2 Overview, System Demand and Electrical System Review:

The site consists of a main building, which is composed of a library, lecture
rooms, and engineering laboratories, and a secondary building, which mainly
consists of lecture rooms. The building’s total area is approximately 4730 m2, the
total useful area, which is above the main building, is around 3030 m2. The electrical
load main consumptions are air chillers, laboratories machines, wind tunnel; which is
used for experimental purposes and derived by two main electrical motors, lights,
personal computers and printers.
Similar to all the building's systems in the UK, the facility has 240 Volt/ 50 Hz
electrical systems, which will be supplied through a three phase main incomer
connected on the main board with electrical meters. The main electrical board is
located at the east gate of the building. This main incomer is supplying both buildings
through two sub-boards and connected to monitoring system.
The calculation of the electrical demand of the facility had been carried out
based on electrical monthly bill readings over a period of three years. This monthly
bills had been converted from kWh consumption to kW consumption. The final
monthly demand is shown in figure 17 and table 1. For the sake of comparison, the
electrical demand is kept in kWh in later sections.

37
400
300 Monthly
200 Average
System
100
Demand
0
January
March
February
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Figure 17 system demand in kW
Table 1 System Demand kW
Month Electrical Demand (kW)

January 345.4943727
February 324.6823017
March 264.0997798
April 200.4881069
May 182.0981522
June 152.2148372
July 156.0801467
August 164.6080031
September 219.5328399
October 287.221441
November 355.4871879
December 341.3481184
The data in both the figure and the table above shows the variation of the
electrical demand from one month to another. It can be shown that the highest
demand had been consumed in November while the least consumption takes place
in June. This situation, unfortunately, contradicts with the incident solar radiations
during each month, i.e. the highest measured incident solar radiation occurs in June
and July when the lowest electrical consumption takes place, and the lowest
measured incident solar radiation occurs in November, December and January. This
is why system sizing should be carried out with cautious consideration of all the
aspects, since the main purpose of the project is only to supply the facility
consumption. Not taking this into account would lead to an unnecessary increase of
the investment cost. This point shall later be discussed in detail.

38
3.2.1 Hand Calculation:

The hand calculations have been done using a Microsoft Excel data sheet. All
the data and the codes can be found in appendix A. The calculations have been
done for all the days in the same method; therefore, one-hour example will be
presented to demonstrate the methodology of the power output calculation followed.
Power output calculation for a specific site will predict the long term system
performance. Many methods have been developed to calculate the power output of a
PV system. (Duffie and Bickman, 2006) demonstrated many theories, (the reader
can refer to this reference for further reading). For the purpose of this project, one
method has been selected for implementation, with occasional adjustments from
other theories.
3.2.2 Summary and Assumptions:

The aim of this calculation is to estimate the total irradiance on a tilted surface
with knowledge of only one value of, average monthly radiation on a horizontal
surface. Location latitude and the slope angle are primarily data in addition with the
monthly average radiation. Knowing that solar constant is equal to 1367 W/m2 will
make it possible to find the extraterrestrial radiation on a horizontal surface and
likewise, the clearness index.
Ideally, the building should be oriented to the south to optimally make use of
the direct (beam) and diffuse radiation throughout the year. However, as the system
is planned to be installed on an already built building's surface azimuth angle might
be considered if the building conditions does not allow a south facing system. The
buildings for the proposed system do not face south, but south-east (SE) with an
angle estimated to be approximately 23.2˚ from the south or 156.8˚ from the north.
The surface azimuth angle is calculated from the south, thus the used angle in the
calculation will be 23.2˚. The average daily monthly radiation on September is 2800
Wh/m2. The selected day is the 3rd of September and the selected hour is between
12:00 and 13:00 (day time). The ground reflectance can be found in the NASA solar
database and its average for September is 0.09. Monthly ground reflectance
(Albedo) can be seen in table 2.

39
Table 2. Monthly Ground Reflectance, (Albedo)
Month Albedo Value Month Albedo value

January 0.1 July 0.11
February 0.1 August 0.1
March 0.09 September 0.09
April 0.10 October 0.08
May 0.11 November 0.10
June 0.11 December 0.10
3.2.3 Calculating the hourly solar radiation on the system:

The hourly solar radiations that fall on the system will be calculated using the
methodology mentioned in previous sections of this paper. The calculation for one
hour in one day will be presented. The selected day is the 3rd of September and the
selected hour will be between 12:00 and 13:00 (day time).Table 3 shows the monthly
global irradiation data on the proposed location and its general information, while
table 4 shows the day information. All the metrological data is taken from European
Commission (EC) solar database.
It should be established that this calculation is done to find the maximum

power production in this specific day and hour based on the final total useful area
calculated later in area assessment section, 408 m2. The optimal area is found after
many iteration calculations to size the system.
Table 3 illustrates the basic information about the day of the study and the
specific hour, which has been carried out as follows.

40
Table 3 Monthly average meteorological data (EUROPEAN COMMISSION)
Month H Wh/m2 Day Time Ave. Temperature C˚ Ave. Temperature C˚ Albedo
Jan 736 5.9 5.2 0.1

Feb 1360 6.5 5.8 0.1
Mar 2210 8.2 7.2 0.09
Apr 3680 10.4 9.4 0.1
May 4650 13.5 15.6 0.11
Jun 4820 16.4 15.6 0.11
Jul 4860 18.7 17.8 0.11
Aug 4140 19.2 18.2 0.1
Sep 2800 16.7 15.5 0.09
Oct 1690 13.3 12.2 0.08
Nov 902 9 8.1 0.1
Dec 527 6.1 5.4 0.1
Year 2697.916667 12 11.1 0.099
Table 4 Site Data and Calculated information for one hour of the year
Global Irradiation On
13.174 Equals to
Horizontal Plane 2800 Day Length
13h 27m
(Wh/m2)
Day of Month 3 H0 (J/m2) 28688146
Month 9 H (J/m2) 10080000
Day of Year 246 Kt 0.351365
Declination Angle 6.958˚ Hd/H 0.593271
Latitude Angle 51.43˚ Hd (J/m2) 5980176
Tilt Angle 51˚ Sunrise (hours) 06:16
Azimuth Angle -23.2˚ Sunset 19:43
Cos (Ws) -0.153079527 Solar Noon 13:00
Sunset Angle Ws 98.80543208˚ Hour Angle W 7.5˚

41
3.2.4 Calculation:
All the calculation is done on the 3rd day of September thus the day number
is 246. Latitude angle is 51.43˚. Declination angle can be calculated from equation 2
as following:
To find out the sunset angle equation 5 can be used as the following:
The daily extraterrestrial radiation on a horizontal surface has been calculated using
the following:
To find the clearness index, equation 8 can be applied. However, before, the
value of the average radiation on a horizontal surface, should be calculated in J/m 2,
thus, the value in Wh can be multiplied by 3600 to be 10.08 MJ/m 2. Now, the
clearness index can be found as following:
Now, to find the percentage of diffused radiation to the global radiation,

equation 10 or equation 11 can be applied depending on ws. In the studied hour case
equation 10 should be used.

42
The diffused radiations can be found by multiplying this ratio by the global irradiation
on a horizontal surface.
Sunrise hour and sunset hour has been calculated for this day to be 6:16 and
19:43 consequently. The length of this day is found to be 13 hours and 27 minutes.
The solar noon takes place at 13:00. (Note that all those values are at the local time,
and consider the one hour shift forward to start at 25th of March and ending at 28th
of October).
To calculate the hour angle, as mentioned before, the hour angle is -15˚ for
each hour before noon and +15˚ for each hour after the solar noon. In the case of
the example, the hour intended to find the power output at, is between 12:00 and
13:00, local time. While the time used is local time and is shifted one hour forward,
the solar noon should be calculated according to one hour earlier. The solar noon
occurs at 12:00 exactly, 13:00 at the local time, thus the hour angle between 12 and
13 becomes the hour angle between 11 and 12. It is thus calculated to be -15/2,
which is -7.5˚.
Now, Collares-Pereira's equation can be used to break the daily radiation into
an hourly global irradiance. The equation applied in the hand calculation is as
follows:
So rt is found as follows
Constant (a) and constant (b) is found as follow, noting that the angles are used in
radians. For ws = 98.81˚, the angle in radians equals to 1.724, thus:

43
And (b) found as follow:
So, rt can be found to be:
The hourly diffused irradiance can be broken down using the Jordan and Liu
equation:
So,
And:
The final irradiance on a tilted surface can now be found using equation 19,
introduced by Jordan and Liu (Duffie and Beckman, 2006) mentioned. Considering
the slope angle of the PV panel to be 51˚, this can be used as following:
Where thus,

44
And,
Then, this value can be found in Watt as the following:
This is the maximum power that can be extracted from the sun at the latitude
mentioned and the specifications stated. Now the electrical power output depends on
the efficiency of the PV panel and its efficiency variation with the ambient
temperature. Furthermore, the electrical connection and the electrical losses will take
an effect on the power output mentioned. Those calculations were done using a
simulation program which will help to design the system's specification more
accurately.
Finally, it is important to show the effect of the temperature on the PV panel's

efficiency, thus calculations were carried out, whilst consider the power output. It can
be presented for the case study stating that the efficiency is going to change
according to the internal temperature T c of the PV cells. Each material and each
manufacturer type PV will vary differently according to its internal temperature. The
ruling coefficient for this change is the , the temperature coefficient for efficiency.
The PV used in this project has a maximum power point voltage equal to 24 Volts.
The temperature coefficient for open circuit voltage is equal to -104 mV for each ˚C
degree. From this data the efficiency temperature coefficient can be found, due to
the relationship between the voltage and efficiency being linear. Thus the efficiency
coefficient is:

45
The relationship between the efficiency and the internal temperature is stated
in equation 26. Applying it to the studied hour will need to find the value of T c which
in its place will vary according to the ambient temperature. The average ambient
temperature of September is 16.7 ˚C. The reference PV efficiency is found under
Standard Testing Conditions (STC), while under those conditions, the temperature is
known as Nominal Operation Cell Temperature (NOCT). The slope angle that used
in calculation does not equal to the latitude angle minus the declination angle. In this
case a correction factor should be used by applying equation 28, the optimal angle
for Cf is equal to 44.0421˚, so:
The PV selected has a NOCT equals to 47.5 ˚C. Equation 26 can be applied to find
Tc as following but the first part, excluding T a, has to be multiplied by Cf as following:
Now, efficiency equation that relates the temperature with the reference temperature
can be applied:
Finally, the final power (W/m2) can be found. The power produced between 12:00
and 13:00 on the 3rd of September, when using the specified PV panel, is:

46
The system will produce, at the specified time, 22708.4047 Wh when the
optimal area is used. The optimal area is calculated for the site to be 408 m 2. (see
the area assessment section for more details about the system size and area
assessment).
3.2.5 Hand Calculation Results and Analysis:

The hand calculations offer a great material for study and analysis. The site
data is available with the exception of some sophisticated calculations such as
shade assessments, which will be conducted using a simulation program and will be
presented in later sections.
The day length has an impact on the produced power throughout the year,
and the variation of the day length is going to affect the delivered demand. In
summer months of longer days, the production is expected to increase. The change
in day length is shown in figure 18.
The relation between the clearness index and the diffuse radiation ratio is
shown in figure 19. The relationship between the clearness index changes
throughout the year and diffused radiation ratio is taking a linear shape. See figure
19. It can be seen that the clearness index is governing the diffuse ratio since the
diffuse radiation amount is affected by the amount of dust, gases and water vapour.
As mentioned before, the hourly irradiance on a tilted surface was calculated.

Its profile alongside the day changes with the day hours. Average irradiance H t for
each hour can be seen in table 5 and figure 20.
In table 5, the maximum average irradiance occurs at 12:00 in August. The

irradiance average acts according to the day hours as expected. This, thus, indicates
that the results are correct.

47
Monthly Average Daily Daylight Hours

17 16.30805395
16
15 15.38278881 15.86715824
14 14.31161552
13.62388931
13
Hours/day
12 12.33584107
11.59721747
11
10 10.31258186
9.685236872
9 8.567491142
8.187874362
8
7 7.687702537
6
Month
Figure 18 Day Length for each month
1
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55 0.504399652
0.5
Kt
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3 0.256432765
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75
Kt vs.
Hd/H Hd/H
Figure 19 Clearness Index and the diffused radiation ratio

48
Table 5 Irradiance Ht according to day hours for each month along the year.
Janua Febru Marc Augu Septe Octo Nove Dece

Hour April May June July
ry ary h st mber ber mber mber
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 2.75 1.92 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
113.7 113.0 102.0
6.00 0.00 0.00 95.39 85.27 83.51 39.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 1 8
176.4 195.5 196.2 233.7 222.3 220.8 207.8 168.7 118.3 127.7
7.00 0.00 71.96
5 3 1 8 7 9 9 8 1 5
169.3 239.5 280.8 308.5 342.5 322.1 329.7 323.0 274.3 244.5 230.4 166.6
8.00
9 3 0 9 5 0 7 7 0 9 2 6
215.5 310.2 346.3 402.2 432.5 405.3 421.3 419.5 361.5 322.8 279.1 190.2
9.00
4 7 4 9 8 8 0 1 9 6 4 2
246.6 350.0 387.6 470.9 497.7 466.5 489.2 490.6 424.7 376.8 304.4 195.9
10.00
5 4 7 3 3 3 2 3 1 2 8 2
256.4 362.8 401.9 509.8 533.5 501.3 528.8 531.5 459.3 402.7 304.7 183.3
11.00
2 3 8 1 6 7 9 6 4 9 1 6
244.1 347.7 388.2 516.2 537.6 507.5 537.6 539.5 463.1 399.0 279.8 153.4
12.00
8 6 7 8 1 3 2 2 1 0 2 0
210.7 305.8 347.5 489.8 509.6 484.5 514.7 513.9 435.7 365.6 231.5 108.0
13.00
6 7 0 9 1 7 9 6 7 9 0 9
158.4 240.0 282.4 432.4 451.4 434.0 461.9 456.6 379.1 305.1 163.0
14.00 53.71
5 1 4 5 6 8 7 1 9 5 6
154.6 197.5 347.8 367.1 359.5 382.7 371.4 297.2 221.5
15.00 89.38 79.17 0.00
9 3 8 5 0 6 1 2 1
241.9 262.4 265.9 282.5 264.1 195.4 122.3
16.00 24.37 57.18 98.58 2.77 0.00
5 2 1 8 6 6 8
121.8 144.4 159.7 168.2 142.1
17.00 0.00 7.15 12.81 80.86 25.04 0.00 0.00
9 2 1 6 9
18.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.60 21.22 48.14 47.59 17.76 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

49
550.00
500.00
450.00
400.00 January
February
350.00 March
April
300.00
Ht W/m2
May
June
250.00
July
August
200.00
September
October
150.00
November
December
100.00
50.00
0.00
4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 21.00
Day Light Hours
Figure 20 total irradiance on a tilted surface per hour for each month.

50
The final electrical power, after considering the thermal effect on the
photovoltaic panel efficiency, was calculated for each hour of the month. The
average hourly electrical power is presented in table 6. It can be seen that the
change in the electrical power production starts with medium production and then
reaches the maximum at noon. The production in the afternoon drops dramatically
until it reaches zero. The hourly demand of the building is similar to production since,
the university opens its doors in the early morning, and the consumption is relatively
low. Then at the noon the consumption is estimated to be high and might drop
afternoon. The consumption of the university may continue one, two or three hours
after the production stops, depending on the month.
It is important to mention that the consumption is less in summer, because the

university is partially close and the working hours are less while it can be seen from
the demand figure that the highest consumption takes place in December. This
situation is not perfect in the case of solar electricity production since the production
is going to be higher in summer and lower in winter. This must be considered when
sizing the system, in order to avoid the over sizing or the under sizing of the system,
which will, consequently be reflected in the investment cost.
Table 6 Average kWh production per hour for each month.
Hour January February March April May June July August September October November December
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.00 0.00 0.00 5.70 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.00 0.00 0.00 11.45 4.93 6.58 6.54 6.13 4.84 2.24 0.00 0.30 0.00
7.00 0.00 10.20 16.36 11.35 13.52 12.86 12.98 12.06 9.80 6.03 4.59 0.00
8.00 9.79 13.85 20.12 17.84 19.81 18.63 19.25 18.75 15.93 13.94 13.22 7.38
9.00 12.86 17.94 22.47 23.26 25.02 23.45 24.50 24.35 20.99 18.54 15.95 9.63
10.00 14.72 20.23 23.26 27.23 28.79 26.98 28.38 28.48 24.65 21.74 17.35 10.99
11.00 15.30 20.97 22.42 29.48 30.86 29.00 30.62 30.85 26.66 23.33 17.32 11.32
12.00 14.57 20.10 20.03 29.85 31.09 29.36 31.06 31.31 26.87 23.19 15.86 10.60
13.00 12.57 17.68 16.23 28.33 29.47 28.03 29.68 29.82 25.28 21.34 13.07 8.87
14.00 9.45 13.87 11.29 25.01 26.11 25.11 26.58 26.48 21.99 17.90 9.14 6.25
15.00 5.33 8.94 5.55 20.12 21.23 20.79 21.96 21.53 17.23 13.11 4.37 3.10
16.00 1.45 3.31 0.58 13.99 15.18 15.38 16.13 15.30 11.31 7.31 0.14 0.00
17.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 7.05 8.35 9.24 9.51 8.21 4.66 1.43 0.00 0.00
18.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 1.23 2.78 2.66 0.99 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 96.05 147.51 175.46 238.82 257.40 248.27 259.63 252.95 207.64 167.87 111.32 68.14

51
35
January
30
February
25 March
April
20 May
kWh
June
15 July
August
10 September
October
5
November
December
0
Yearly Average
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Hour of the Day
Figure 21 total estimated electrical output per hour each month.
Figure 21 shows the variation of production per hour for each month. It is
observed that the highest production is estimated to be at 12:00 in August. Monthly
production is shown in figure 22.
10000
8000
6000
kWh
4000
2000
0
Month
kWh…
Figure 22 The monthly production of the system

52
3.2.6 Area optimising and assessment

Area assessment has been done on the site to consider all the possible
locations for installing the proposed solar system. The location drawings can be
found in appendix 22. The total useful area was calculated to be 3030 m2. The area
is a tilted surface with two sides, upside-down "V" shape, one side facing south with
azimuth angle of -23.2˚ SE while the other is facing north. Thus the useful area is
less since the northern side will not be useful.
The second problem of the useful area is that it contains obstacles which
might cause shading and difficulty to install the PV panels. See appendix B. Finally,
the roof top useful area is a corrugated roof with low loading withstand. See figure
23.
Figure 23 Roof Top of the Location.
Taking all those issues into consideration has led to the considerations of
other options. The suggested idea is to erect a structure above the roof top to set the
panels tilted with the optimal tilt angle. This idea has many advantages.
Erecting whole new structure above the building, will increase the power
output in a way and decrease the used area in another way due to the consideration
that the optimally tilted panels, which will perform better than the normally tilted
panels, which will allow higher solar radiations collections. Furthermore, this erection
shall decrease the effect of shading associated with existing obstacles.

53
Moreover, it is important to mention that the roof top contains some ventilation
exhausts which, by installing the panels above it, might obstruct the exit air. Those
ventilation areas are assumed to be avoidable by placing the panels away from
them. Thus, the selected option will be to erect the structure above the top roof.
3.2.7 shading consideration

The possible shading of the area is either on a higher floor next to the top
building on the southern side or by the panels shading. The building has a higher
floor on the southern side, which might contribute to annual shading.
On the other hand, the panels should be positioned in a way that their
shadows minimise the effect on performance but do not interfere with the building's
primary objects e.g. the ventilation, skylights...etc. This can be done by following
simple rules in array geometry. The main factors ruling the geometry are the latitude
and the climate of the location but the design will also include the spacing between
rows, array tilt angle and azimuth angle and in addition to the module orientation.
The standard limitation for the shading losses is between 2-4%.
For spacing the rows, a setback ration (SBR) should be assigned. For many
places the SBR is 2:1 while in the sunny locations and lower regions it is at least 3:1.
(Luque and Hegedus, 2011) defined the SBR as "the horizontal distance, or gap,
between rows, divided by the vertical distance between the high and low sides of
adjoining rows". See figure 24. According to this the SBR is the angle . In this case,
the height of the panel which is ruled by the tilt angle will waver the spacing required.
The case of this project the tilt angle is fixed. Furthermore, the Ground cover ration
GCR is correlated to the tilted angle. The GCR is defined as "the array area divided
by the ground area, or, for an array of unit depth, as the row width, c, divided by the
row spacing, d." (Luque and Hegedus, 2011) Thus, the equation ruling the spacing
ration will be:

54
Figure 24 calculating the area of shade effect
Solving for the project situation when giving that c = 1.316 m (Panel width)
. SBR = 2:1, soving for the height a:
So the pitch equals to 1.34 m. but because the area available is wide spread,
this value will be increased to 2 m.
From appendix B, the dimensions of the building can be calculated when it is

printed on (A3) paper using the scale. The dimensions found the useful area to be
only, (60.76×49.91 m). Due to the need of distancing from the southern side in order
to avoid the shadow of the higher floor, spacing of 10 m is considered to be
deducted from the total width which will make the total area, (60.76×39.91 m). By
dividing the width by pitch value, it can be found that it is possible to install
approximately 20 rows. Thus the total width available is 1.316×20 which equals to
26.32 m. If it is considered to have spacing between arrays, (along the building),
15% is considered to be a good value. Therefore, the length decreases to 51.646 m.

55
The final area which will be covered by the PV panels is 26.32×51.646 that
equals to approximately 1356 m2.
3.3.0 calculating the hourly electrical power produced through all the year
3.3.1 System sizing

The system sizing is done with consideration of area available, system
demand and installation cost. The area available has been assessed in a previous
section and was found to be 1356 m2. Taking into account this aspect, the system
size based on this area can be considered to be the maximum possible system. The
figures for this size of the system has been calculated and compared with the system
demand to see how much of the total demand the proposed system will supply. See
table 7 and figure 25. It can be seen that the system, if installed to the maximum will
be oversized, this is because only the building electricity demand needs to be
supplied. Thus, this system is not feasible to install and the investment cost will be
much higher than it should be.
Table 7 Maximum power system production and comparison with the system demand
System Demand
Month Maximum possible Power Produced Percentage %
kWh
January 9844.597755 10710.32555 91.92%
February 13660.27358 9091.104447 150.26%
March 17989.30002 8187.093173 219.73%
April 23695.32654 6014.643208 393.96%
May 26390.64852 5645.042719 467.50%
June 24632.79406 4566.445117 539.43%
July 26618.92997 4838.484549 550.15%
August 25875.19094 5102.848096 507.07%
September 20551.31597 6585.985196 312.05%
October 17210.73493 8903.864671 193.30%
November 11165.04505 10664.61564 104.69%
December 6986.619537 10581.79167 66.02%
Yearly or Average 224620.7769 7574.35367

56
Maximum possible Power Produced

Percentage
104.69% 66.02%
91.92% 150.26%
193.30% January
219.73%
February
March
312.05% April
393.96% May
June
507.07% July
467.50%
August
September
550.15% October
539.43% November
December
Figure 25 Monthly Percentage of the total demand when maximum power produced.
Looking to the figures, it can be inferred that the system size should be
reduced in order to cover a percentage of the demand in the lowest month of
production while taking advantage of the system in the highest month of production.
In this case, the system will cover the system demand in most of the months and will
have a very good percentage in the low months of production. The lowest production
will be in December, while the highest production will be in July. The system should
be reduce and levelized to a certain amount. It is known that the extra produced
power can be sold to the electrical grid through the Feed in Tariff (FIT) system. (This
point will be illustrated in more detail in the economical evaluation to follow later in
this paper)
Now the system will be limited to minimum level to be sure that the size of the
system will cover at least a small amount of the energy in the low months of
production. The lowest production, as seen in table 8, is in December, consequently,
the system should supply at least 20% of the system demand to be economically
feasible. To find out the minimum production, the system demand in December
should be levelled to 20% of it is actual level to ensure that the system will be able to

57
supply this amount. Then, the area needed to supply the minimum level is
calculated. The average figures must be used to estimate the area. Twenty percent
of the system demand is calculated to be 2116.36 kWh. The average efficiency of
the panels in December is 14.10% and the average daily H t is around 1180 W/m2.
This means the total monthly average is approximately 36552 W/m2 for 31 days of
the month. The final minimum area found to be 410 m2. Table 8 shows the produced
power when this area is used while figure 26 shows the percentage in each month
and figure 27 shows the demand vs. the production.
Table 8 Minimum Production considering 20% of the Demand in December.
Minimum Power to be System Demand Percentage OF THE SUPPLY OF THE

Month
produced kWh DEMAND
January 2986.443997 10710.32555 27.88%
February 4145.725021 9091.104447 45.60%
March 5455.236162 8187.093173 66.63%
April 7178.322731 6014.643208 119.35%
May 7976.504384 5645.042719 141.30%
June 7425.626379 4566.445117 162.61%
July 8016.335699 4838.484549 165.68%
August 7793.994859 5102.848096 152.74%
Septemb
6199.55965 6585.985196 94.13%
er
October 5201.836239 8903.864671 58.42%
Novemb
3380.659849 10664.61564 31.70%
er
Decemb
2116.820611 10581.79167 20.00%
er
Yearly 67877.06558 90892.24404
The main purpose of this project is to supply most of the demand of the facility
and when looking at the figures above, it can be noticed that the system with its
current sizing is capable of supplying more than 100% of the demand in some
months. The proposed system, under the mentioned conditions, is capable of
supplying the total demand and supplying the grid with the extra produced power
during months like April, May, June, July and August. In addition, the system delivers
the needed power in the building by almost 100%. The system is capable of
providing the electrical demand by around 94% in September. February, March and
October are supplied by electrical power by percentages between 45% and 66%

58
whilst the rest of the months, November, December and January, will be supplied
limitedly of values between 20% and slightly above 30% of the demand.
Percentage of the Supply to the Demand

10581.79167 10710.32555
January
February
9091.104447 March
10664.61564
April
May
8187.093173 June
8903.864671
July
August
6014.643208
6585.985196 September
October
5102.848096
5645.042719 November
4838.484549
4566.445117
Figure 26 Percentage of the Supply to the Demand
Power Produced based on 20% of …

Demand Vs. Production System Demand kWh
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
Figure 27 Monthly Demand Vs. Production.

59
The system size seems to be viable thus further study can be applied
on the system. Now, the panel area should be considered to find the optimal number
of panels based on the minimum value. The area is divided by the panel area to find
out the number of panels, and then the number of arrays can be decided. The
number of panels, based on those calculations, is found to be 313 panels. For
electrical configuration issues, this number should be reduced to 312 panels. The
total area of the panels will be 409 m2.
The final size of the system will be as follows:
 The total installed PV panels are 312 panels.

 The total area covered by the PV panels is 408.13 m2.
 The total used area to install the system will be approximately 33×26 = 858
m2.

60
Chapter Four

61
4.1.0 Project Simulation

As mentioned before, the program used to do the simulation process is
PVsyst. It is highly efficient and has most of the features needed to accurately size,
design and calculate the power output for any photovoltaic system. It contains a data
base of many locations around the world consisting of meteorological data and solar
radiation data for any location. It has the data from many meteorology centres
around the globe and data from NASA solar data base, (different source than the
one used for hand calculations).
4.1.1 Preliminary Design

The program introduces options to do preliminary design, full project design
and many tools to evaluate many aspects of the system to optimally design the
system. See figure 28. The system designed in this project started with preliminary
design after calculating the azimuth angle and deciding the slope angle. In this case
the project will be grid connected, so this option should be selected when starting the
design.
Figure 28 Program's first interface page
The selection is presented in the preliminary design step. This is important

since it is going to decide whether the system proposed is feasible or not. The

62
program has a data of solar radiation from NASA solar data base of a period of ten
years. The data of the location of the proposed system is taken during the period
between 1983 and 1993. This data is considered to be old hence, a newer data from
the European commission has been used as what was done in the hand calculation.
To setup a new location and solar radiation data, the program has a tool called
"Geographical sites" which enable the user to enter a new data and modify its
specifications.
The new location had been created and the data used in the hand calculation
was entered to the data base of the program, see figure 29.
Figure 29 Site data entry.
In the preliminary design step, the tilt angle, azimuth angle and the active area
used is entered and a visualisation/optimisation of shade option is available.
According to hand calculations and panel's data sheet the pitch distance and the
dimension of the panel were entered into a sun path which was created. (See figure
30 and figure 31.).

63
The preliminary design step shows, roughly, a promising output. The program
includes a price list in its data base which cannot be considered to be reliable
information since the market undergoing continuous change. Now, a comparison
between the global radiation on horizontal surface, tilted surface and considering the
shading effect is presented. It can be noticed that the tilted angle set for the system
is improving the system output in winter months, which is what is needed according
to the system demand figures, also, it can be seen that this increase in winter
months is a compromise on the summer months, see figure 32.
Figure 30 mutual shading Visualisation/optimisation
Figure 31 Sun Path and Mutual shading.

64
Figure 32 Preliminary Power Output, Horizontal and tilt surface comparison.
4.2.0 Full Project Design

The project is now ready to be entirely designed and many considerations
should be set to the optimal values. To design the project fully, many steps should
be taken, which may affect the power output. The project meteorology, solar data
and orientation of the panel can be modified before proceeding in the full simulation
and design.
The near shading and variant can be defined and simulated using the "Near
Shading" tool. The tool interface can be shown in figure 33.
Figure 33 Near Shading design tool interface

65
4.2.1 Shade Simulation

The first step to simulate the shade is to construct the objects which might
shade the panels, thus the following steps were done:
 Calculating the dimensions of the building where the system intended to be

installed.
 Predict any object might cause any possible shading.
 Construct the main body of buildings, shading objects and position them in the
right places and distances.
 Direct the whole built structures to the right surface azimuth angle.
 Build the photovoltaic panel with the exact dimensions
 Arrange the arrays and strings.
 Place the system built in the right pitch distance and tilt angle
 Optimise the photovoltaic system's position on the roof of the building using
hand calculation data, as previously mentioned, and the building span
distance.
The building structure can be built using object build tool in the shading
interface window, see figure 34. The tool will allow the user to choose the
shape type and ease the building of the whole body of the structure. The built
object can be modified to the orientation and the slope needed accurately.
The parameter and the dimension of any object selected can be modified to
the required shape in real life standard.
Figure 34 building a new object to simulate the shading

66
The main building and hawker wings building in the facility were the main
source of shading to the photovoltaic system. In addition trees on the southern side
of the building were considered in the shadow assessment. The final achieved
structure can be seen from the southern side in figure 35.
Figure 35 the final built structure.
Figure 36 PV panels build user interface.

67
Now the structure of the building is ready. To build the photovoltaic system a
new PV plane in shade can be added from the object menu, see figure 36. The user
interface window allows the user to specify the panel dimensions, the pitch distance,
the tilt angle and the number of sheds.
The colour of each object and component can be modified to visualise the
scene easily. As well, the program will assist and give the user advice to optimally
design the objects.
The panel's positions and directions on the scene can be modified to be

positioned in the most optimal situations. The shadowing simulating will allow the
user to find the shadow ratio and the sun path specification and it will show the time
where the plane will be in shadow. Much iteration approaches can be done to
optimally decide the best positions of the panels. The shading simulation can be
done for any day of the year and output will defer from day to another due to the
change in the sun position, figure 37, 38 and 39 shows this process. The simulation
was applied on two possible positions and the results made it possible to decide
which position is optimal for placing the photovoltaic system. See figure 40 and 41 to
compare the results.
Figure 37 Final system before the shade simulation

68
Figure 38 Top View, photovoltaic generator position
Figure 39 Shading process
There were two possible positions, one near the eastern edge of the main
building and the other possible position is near to the western edge. When the shade
simulation was applied to those two positions the results showed that the system will
be behind the plane at 5:00 p.m. when the system is placed at the eastern side of

69
the building whilst the system will be start to be behind the plane at 6 p.m. which will
give the system more time to produce electricity from the beam radiations.
On the other hand, the losses due to the shading where almost the same for
both sides. The attenuation factors for diffused and Albedo radiation were slightly
deferent, the attenuation is higher at the western side of the building. In general, both
results are almost the same, keeping in mind that the effect of reducing the diffuse
and the Albedo radiations is much less than the effect of decreasing the beam
radiations. Therefore, the selected position was to install the system at the western
side of the building. The shading factor for the beam radiations at different heights of
the sun and different azimuth angle can be seen in table 9. The table shows where
the system will be behind the plane corresponding to the sun positions and
movements during the day.
Figure 40 shading when the system is placed at the eastern side of the building.

70
Figure 41 shading when the system is placed at the western side of the building.
Table 9 Shading factor for the beam radiation at different sun positions.
4.2.2 Electrical Layout

Furthermore, the system will be designed, electrically, with two different
options, either the required peak power of the system (kWp) or by stating the
available area. In the case of this project the area is an important issue since the

71
system will be mostly restricted by the area. The total useful area and the system
area are already calculated by hand calculation and the area assessment as mention
in previous section, therefore, the system was built according to the area calculated
on the area assessment section. The area used is 409 m 2. System design interface
page is shown in figure 42
The data of the selected components, Sharpe PV-NU-S5E3E and Siemens

inverter Sinvert 60M, were selected from the options given by the program in the
system design window. The optimisation of number of modules in series and parallel
was done using the array graph drawing tool in the program.
The graph showed the better results than any other condition when the twenty
four panels are connected in series and when thirteen arrays placed in parallel. All
the possible options were limited by both the inverter's MPP tracking voltage and
current. The optimisation graph can be seen in figure 43. The graph shows a
comparison between the power at the STC and the array arrangement used.
The final configuration of the system is to use 312 panels with peak power of
57.7 kWp. Twenty four panels will be placed in series and 13 arrays in parallel. The
voltage and the current of the photovoltaic generator with the suggested
configuration will be around 576 V and 102 A, before considering the losses. The
nominal PV power is 51.6 kWdc while the AC nominal power is 57 kWpac.
4.2.3 Panel Layout Design

panel's layout was designed using the program's tool for building layouts. The
area calculated in the area assessment section was used. The tool will use the
dimensions of the PV panel used in the system design and will place automatically
the maximum possible panels on the given area. The tool will not consider the pitch
distance, thus, this process must done by placing "inactive area". When creating
inactive area, the tool will avoid placing any panel on this area. The total area used
for placing the system was calculated to be 858 with dimensions of 33×26 m. The
active area calculated for the system is 409 m2. Thus, the layout was configured to
have only 312 panel with the arrangement suggested in the system design array, 24
panels in series and 13 arrays in parallel. The designed layout is shown in figure 44.

72
Figure 42 System Design interface
Figure 43 Array power optimisation graph.

73
Figure 44 Module Layout design and layout tool interface.
Now, the system is ready to be Simulated. All the data for the design have
been entered and all the configurations and optimisation have been done. Before
running the simulation, all the data have been review to make sure that the enter
data, specification and configurations are stated as required from the design. Any
required graph or table, other than the default, can be added before running the
simulation. The simulation had been done and the results are presented in the next
section.
4.2.4 Simulation Results and Review

The results of the simulation consider mostly all the aspect of the system
design. The data given to the program is the same data used in the hand
calculations. The program will produce a short report of five pages summarising the
project done.
Table 10 shows the output data after the simulation. E_Grid is the total
electrical power produced to the building and the electrical network. It shows the total
kWh produced by the suggested system for each month. Thus, a comparison
between the demand and the produced kWh is shown in figure 45.

74
The produced kWh using simulation program found to be less than that
calculated by hand. The main reason is that the hand calculation did not consider
any losses and only considered the variation in the efficiency with the change in the
temperature. The output energy by the simulation might indicate that the result
produced is accurate since all the losses are calculated. This cannot be true for
many reasons. The main reason that those data output is provisional data and the
simulation has an error percentage that might increase or decrease the results.
Table 10 Simulation Data Output.
12000
10000
8000
6000 D (kWh)
sim kWh
4000
2000
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Figure 45 Simulation Production vs. Demand

75
Figure 46 loss Diagram of the whole system along the year.
The simulation program will build a loss diagram for the whole year. The loss
diagram shows all the possible losses along the year and deducts it from the total
production. The losses of the shading and AM factor are shown to be 20%. The
module losses are around 13.2% of the total energy supposed to be produced by the
photovoltaic generator. Finally, the inverter losses are equal to 8.2%. All the details
of the mentioned losses above can be seen in figure 46. The net energy generated
from the system to either the building network or the electrical network will be 37490
kWh. It can be seen that the shading has a very great impact on the energy output
with approximately 17% losses. This is why an accurate study on the shading must
always be done.

76
Figure 47 shows the daily input/output diagram of the suggested system. It

can be seen that the does not exceed 300 kWh for any day while the global incident
radiation on the system does not exceed seven kWh/m2.
Figure 47 Daily input/output diagram
Figure 48 shows the Voltage distribution for the array along the day. The
maximum voltage is recorded to be around 620 V while the minimum is around 450
V.
Figure 48 Array voltage distribution

77
Figure 49 Daily Power output along the year.
Figure 49 shows the daily power output along the whole year. It can be seen
that the energy produced in the summer months are much higher than that produced
in the winter.
Performance Ratio (PR) is calculated to be 64.6% yearly. The highest

performance ratio recorded is on April to be around 70%. Figure 50 shows the
performance ratio for each month.
Figure 50 Performance Ratio for each month.
The system has been built and now ready to be evaluated economically. Further
calculation will present how the project evaluated economically and how the
economical models help to size the system in its current conditions. Final models of
both hand and simulation calculation should be presented.

78
Chapter Five

79
5.1.0 Electrical Configurations

The electrical configurations are going to be decided based on both the size
and range of the inverter. As mentioned before, the selected inverter is Sinvert 60M.
This inverter has a nominal power of 68 kW, a minimum MPP voltage (DC) of 450 V
and a maximum MPP voltage of 750 V. The maximum DC current is 149 A. This
data should be taken into consideration when the array is designed.
The number of panels is 312, therefore, approximately 49% of the area used
to install the system will be covered by the PV modules while the other 51% of the
area will be used for spacing and stringing. The inverter control room can be placed
on a nearby roof of another building, hence the cable length has been estimated to
be 80 m and its cross sectional area is 35 mm2, the material suggested is copper
thus the resistance due to wiring is going to be 0.05 Ohm.
Under those considerations the array design can be set. The suggested
number of modules in series is 24 modules accumulating of 576 Volt and 13 strings
which will provide 100.23 Amp. to the inverter. The inverter has only one DC input
and the arrangements are within the inverter rating. The output power will be 400V L-L
and the current will change according to the demand and consumption. The nominal
AC power is 68 kW.
Normally, any grid connect photovoltaic system is composed mainly of

photovoltaic panels, inverter, kWh meter and switches. The electrical layout for an
integrated commercial might need some additional feature and extra considerations.
Figure 51 shows the system layout.
The layout shows the optimal electrical circuit for the system starting from the
photovoltaic panels as a power generator for the system. On the DC side of the
inverter, it is important to include a DC circuit breaker with specific protection. On the
AC side, an AC isolator is needed to isolate the whole system from the newly
integrated photovoltaic system. The output of the inverter is connected to a contactor
which is driven by a protective relay. The relay is an over current relay to protect the
circuit from any accidental rise in the current. This relay makes it possible to control
the system remotely. In case of an over current, the relay will sense the current
through a coil connected in line with the each phase, then its contactors will send a
signal to the main power contactor, 4 pole contactor. Finally, the energy will go
80
through a kWh meter to calculate the produced energy. The energy status can be
observed through a display unit installed remotely.
Figure 51 Electrical System Layout.
5.1.1 Measurement of the Energy Produced and Sold to the Grid

It is important to measure the kWh and keep it under control for both intensive
purposes and energy consumption track. The state of the kWh is:
 The electrical energy taken from the grid.

 The electrical energy fed into the grid.
 The energy produced by the PV plant.
The installation of the kWh meter in the system is shown in figure 52. U is the energy
produced by the photovoltaic system to the electrical grid, E is the energy consumed
from the electrical grid. P refers to the total production of the photovoltaic system
while C is the total consumption of the building.
During the night or during the cloudy conditions there will not be any energy
produced by the photovoltaic system. Therefore, P and U are equal to zero and the
consumed energy by the building is equal to the energy bought from the grid.

81
Figure 52 kWh meter integration with the system
On the contrary, when the photovoltaic system is producing energy,

one of the following situations may occur:
- P > C, in this case the building will be fully fed by electricity from the
photovoltaic system and the extra kWh units can be sold to the grid with the
feed in tariff stated by the government;
- P < C, in this case the building will only be fed partially by the photovoltaic
system and the rest of the building demand will be supplied by the electrical
grid.
5.2.0 Protection and Earthing of the System:

When the earthing matter is raised in a photovoltaic system, the earthing
concept ought to involve both the uncovered conductive parts, like the module frame
and supports, and the live parts, like any photocell. A PV system can be earthed only
if it is galvanically separated from the electrical network by means of a transformer. A
PV insulated system would seem apparently safer for the people touching a live part.
However, as a matter of fact, the insulation resistance to earth of the live parts is not
infinite and therefore a person may be passed through by a current returning through
such resistance. This current rises when the voltage to earth of the plant and the
plant size increase since the insulation resistance to earth decreases. Besides, the
physiological decay of the insulators, due to the passage of time and the presence of
humidity, reduces the insulation resistance itself. Consequently, in very big plants,
the current passing through a person in touch with the live part may cause

82
electrocution and therefore the advantage over the earthed systems is present only
in case of small plants.
5.3.0 Protection Against Over Current on AC Side:

The point of connecting the system with grid, in parallel, is usually designed to
have a higher current carrying capacity. The cable connecting the system with the
grid should be normally designed to the optimal current of the load, normally less
than the connection point to the grid. Therefore, this cable should be protected from
any short current supplied by the grid through a protective device positioned near the
point of connection with the grid. In this project case, the main circuit breaker (CB)
should be enough since the system only has one inverter. Otherwise, in case of
multi-inverters, it is mostly much wiser to use a protection circuit breaker for each
one to increase the reliability of the system, i.e. in the case of one circuit breaker, the
system will be totally off in case of a trip; on the other hand, in case of multi circuit
breakers only one part of the system will be out of service in case of fault at that part.
5.4.0 Comparison between Hand Calculation and Simulation

The system was designed using the same data source. The hand calculation
conducted calculations to find the power output of the system with many iteration
attempts. Doing many attempts led to size the system to the current size 57.7 kWp.
While on the simulation, the net power output after considering the system losses.
The values of both methods were quite different but the when considering the value
of the simulation before reducing the power output of losses, it can be seen that the
values are close. The annual power production of the hand calculation without
considering any losses is 67.6 MWh. The annual power production with near shading
losses and AM losses and without system losses is 46.75 MWh. It can be noticed
that the near shading is summing around 20% losses of the original estimated
power, therefore this last value is expected to be higher than its current value.

83
Chapter Six

84
6.1.0 Economical Evaluation

It is important to evaluate the project economically since the main purpose of
the project is to build a system to produce electricity in environmentally friendly
methods. Reducing green house gases and gas emission production became an
investment in the energy market. To build a model that reduces the energy cost and,
in the same time, reduces the impact of producing energy on the environment is a
true success.
The method to approach the economical evaluation in this project is first to

state assumption based on market observers about the cost of production for each
kW for PV panels. Then building a model to see if the suggested production is
feasible or not.
The model will help to take an economical decision when the system is being
sized. This is because it is, sometimes, easier to decide, upon engineering
prospective, whether the system is optimal to be built under certain conditions or not
but it is harder to decide if the project will be economically feasible or not.
6.1.1 Assumptions
By looking through many market analysis of photovoltaic system, the records
showed that the prices of installing PV panels are decreasing. Since the beginning of
2011 to August of this year 2012, the price index of the solar panels has dropped by
60% (Solar Panel Prices in the UK, 2012). The Feed in Tariff cut by the UK
government was the main cause of this decline. The prices is planned to change in
the near future, November 2012.
The uncertainty of the incentives accompanying the installation of photovoltaic

system for households and commercial purposes made the prices in the market to
changes continuously. Thus, there is a variation on the cost of kWp installed. A
report prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)
generated in May 2012 indicates a drop in the prices and estimating the near future
prices. It is estimated for this project to be applied in November 2012, thus the data
based on this month has been used in the calculation. The cost of installing one kWp
for photovoltaic system is £1275 including planning, panel cost, installing and any

85
other expenses. This price for the system between 50 and 150 kW installed on
retrofit building. (DECC, 2012)
This price is estimated by looking at the figures of the DECC presented from:
 Developers and installers of UK systems;

 Supply chain parties; and
 Anecdotal evidence from DECC and other sources.
The price estimated is an average of all the figures given. Operation and
maintenance cost was estimated to be 1% of the total cost yearly.
The Feed in Tariff (FIT) value, starting from November 2012, is 11.5 p/kWh.
This data is based on the latest update from DECC for photovoltaic systems ranging
between 50 kWp and 100 kWp, considering a higher rate value. The saving on the
energy bill is found to be 8.5 p/kWh. This value is found according to the tariff rates
on the university bills. The tax upon the loan stated is assumed to be 7%.
6.2.0 Sizing the System Based on Data from the Economic Model
The model made it possible to see the figures of the cost and cash flow. In
addition, it is possible to evaluate whether the system payback period is sufficient or
not. The first assumption is to install the maximum possible system size. As
suggested before, the second assumption is to produce energy enough to supply
20% of the energy consumption in December. Finally, the power output from the
simulation results were applied to the model.
6.2.1 Maximum Power Output

When apply the maximum power output size of the system, based on the area
available, the capital cost of the project was found to be £318,750 if 250 kWp system
is installed. The operation and maintenance cost for the system to be £3,187.5
yearly which will sum for 25 years to be £79,687. Table 11 is a summary of those
calculations and shows the cash flow of the project along 25 years. Figure 53 shows
the cash flow of the project under those assumptions. It can be seen that the
breakeven year is 16.5 years.

86
Table 11 Maximum power output applied on the built economical model (in £)
TOTA
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
L
15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 15,8 238,3
Turnover 0
92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 77
Initial 318,7 318,7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
investment 50 50
3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 3,18 47,81
O&M 0
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3
- -
12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7 12,7
EBIT 318,7 128,1
04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04
50 86
13,33
Tax 0 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889
9
- -
11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8 11,8
Net Income 318,7 141,5
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
50 25
7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 7,34 117,5
Savings 7,347
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 47
- -
19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1 19,1
Cash Flow 311,4 23,97
62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62
03 9
- -
Net Present 17,9 16,7 15,6 14,6 13,6 12,7 11,9 11,1 10,4 9,74 9,10 8,50 7,95 7,43 6,94 6,49 6,06 5,66 5,29 4,95 4,62 4,32 4,04 3,77 3,53
311,4 136,8
Value 08 37 42 18 62 68 33 52 23 1 4 8 1 1 5 1 6 9 8 2 8 5 2 8 1
03 81

87
Cumulative Cash Flow

£200,000.00
£100,000.00
£0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
-£100,000.00
-£200,000.00
-£300,000.00
-£400,000.00
Figure 53 Cash Flow when installing 250 kWp as maximum assumption
6.2.2 System Limited by the Minimum Demand of December

When applying the model on the system sized at 20% of December demand,
the capital cost of the project was found to be £73,567 if 57.7 kWp system is
installed. The operation and maintenance cost for the system to be £735.67 yearly
which will sum for 25 years to be around £18,391. Table 12 is a summary of those
calculations and shows the cash flow of the project along 25 years. Figure 54 shows
the cash flow of the project under those assumptions. It can be seen that the
breakeven year is 13 years.
6.2.3 Using the Data from Simulation for 20% of December System Size
When the system simulated, the power output changed from the results found
by hand calculations. This is because in the simulation, the losses were considered
while the hand calculation did not consider the losses. The capital cost and the
maintenance of the project are the same as in the hand calculation results. The
payback for this assumption is found to be 20 years which is higher than the
calculation in hand as expected.

88
Table 12 20% of December production assumption applied on the built economical model (in £)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TOTAL
1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 1,41 21,21
Turnover 0
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2
Initial 73,56 73,56
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
investment 8 8
11,03
O&M 0 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736
5
- -
EBIT 73,56 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 678 63,39
8 1
Tax 0 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 712
- -
Net Income 73,56 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 631 64,10
8 3
4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 4,72 75,64
Savings 4,728
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3
-
5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 5,35 11,53
Cash Flow 68,84
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
0
- -
Net Present 5,00 4,68 4,37 4,08 3,82 3,57 3,33 3,11 2,91 2,72 2,54 2,37 2,22 2,07 1,94 1,81 1,69 1,58 1,48 1,38 1,29 1,21 1,13 1,05
68,84 987 20,03
Value 8 0 4 8 1 1 7 9 5 4 6 9 4 8 2 5 6 5 2 5 4 0 0 6
0 4

89

£80,000.00
£60,000.00
£40,000.00
£20,000.00
£0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
-£20,000.00
-£40,000.00
-£60,000.00
-£80,000.00
Figure 54 Cash flow of system sized based on 20% of December demand.

£30,000.00
£20,000.00
£10,000.00
£0.00
-£10,000.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
-£20,000.00
-£30,000.00
-£40,000.00
-£50,000.00
-£60,000.00
-£70,000.00
-£80,000.00
Figure 55 Cash flow of System sized based on 20% of December demand. Simulation results

90
Table 13 20% of December production assumption applied on the built economical model/ simulation result (in £)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TOTAL
1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 1,15 17,25
Turnover 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial 73,56 73,56
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
investment 8 8
11,03
O&M 0 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736 736
5
- -
EBIT 73,56 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 414 67,35
8 3
Tax 0 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 435
- -
Net Income 73,56 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 67,78
8 8
3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 3,15 50,41
Savings 3,151
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
- -
3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53 3,53
Cash Flow 70,41 17,37
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
7 5
- -
Net Present 3,30 3,08 2,88 2,69 2,52 2,35 2,20 2,05 1,92 1,79 1,68 1,57 1,46 1,37 1,28 1,19 1,11 1,04
70,41 978 914 854 798 746 697 652 38,21
Value 5 9 7 8 1 6 2 8 3 8 0 0 7 1 2 8 9 6
7 0

92
Looking at the first and the second model it can be seen that the payback
period for the first model is around 16.5 years while the second model payback
period is 13 years. Upon this it can be decided that it is better to decrease the
investment cost and, in the same time, the decrease the risk.
The produced kWh in the third model is less than the second model since the
losses were calculated in the simulation process. The payback time is less as
expected. On the other hand, the calculation in the simulation, occasionally, can be
inaccurate. The savings on the energy bill for both models, the first and the second,
are shown in figure 56 and figure 57. Figures 58 and 59 shows the demand and the
produced kWh in the first and the second model.
Electricity Bill
1500
1000
Electricity bill (£)
500
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec New bill
-500
Old bill
-1000
-1500
-2000
Month
Figure 56 Saving on Electricity bill in first model
Electricity Bill
New electricity bill Old electricity bill
1000
Electricity bill (£)
500
0
-500
Month
Figure 57 Saving on Electricity bill in the second model

93
Chart Title
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Produced kWh D (kWh)
Figure 58 Demand and Production for the first model
Demand and production

New load Load
12000
10000
8000
6000
kWh
4000
2000
0
-2000
-4000
Month
Figure 59 Demand and Production for the second model
6.3.0 Analysis
It can be seen that there is a huge different between the model when no
losses is considered and when the losses is considered. Therefore, the economical
evaluation must be done according to the closest power production value.

94
Chapter Seven

95
7.1.0 Critical Review

The approach to design this project was to evaluate the project characteristics
by hand calculations and then combining the hand calculations with a simulation.
The analysis of the site in terms of demand, solar radiation, useful area
available, obstacles and shading and other related issues help to set a methodology
to decide the system. London's solar irradiances and the clearness index values
were the main dampers of the electrical production the clearness index average
value was calculated to be 0.39. This value considers low compared with clearness
index values at other locations.
The facility demand played a great role of varying the system size since there
is a gap between summer's months and winter months. Considering the estimated
electrical production in summer is higher than the estimated production in winter
whilst the demand of the facility is higher in winter and less in summer.
The area assessment was done upon site survey and as built buildings
diagrams. Many trouble-shootings were done to estimate the size of the system but
the main challenging was the obstacles on the main building roof and the loading
withstand of the roof itself. Thus, an erected structure was suggested to overcome
this issue.
Hand calculation power production value and simulation power value were
quite different because in the hand calculation no losses were considered while the
simulation program presents realistic values.
7.2.0 Further Work

Any further work can be applied is to improve the hand calculation model by
adding equations to consider the system loss and attenuation losses. In addition, the
system size can be modified using different iterations. Those iterations can be
economically evaluated by the model presented in chapter six.
Finally, more economical analysis and evaluations can be added to this

project since this project was scientific oriented more than economical one.

96
Chapter Eight

97
7.1.0 Conclusion
The paper presents a method to design, size and evaluate photovoltaic
system. Many models were built to evaluate the system by means of electrical
configuration, structure and economical configuration.
Those models were evaluated using hand calculations, simulation of different

iterations of the project and an economical model to decide the system size and its
entire configuration. The size of the system is first assumed to use the maximum
area available for production. This model was modified after looking at both the
amount of production, according to hand calculation and simulation, and the
economical feasibility.
Later, another model was presented by limiting the production to 20% of the
demand of the month with the lowest solar electricity production. After evaluating the
model by hand calculation, simulation and an economical model presented, it was
found that the system size suggested is going to partially achieve the objectives of
the project. The system size was decided according to that.
Later an electrical design, shade simulation and system configurations were

presented for the selected system size. The system size decided to be 57.5 kWp,
which is expected to be injecting to either the facility electrical network of the national
electrical grid.
Number of arrays decided was 13 arrays in parallel accumulating of a current

equal to almost 102 A. A twenty four panel is decided to be connected in series and
accumulate a voltage of 543 V after considering the wiring voltage drop.
Total area used for the system is 858 m2 including only 409 m2 active area.
Number of panels decided to be 312 modules and one inverter with rated power of
60 kWp is decided to be installed with the system. Electrical configurations and
protection methods were stated.
After calculating the capital cost and the operation and maintenance cost, the
project is found to payback the capital in 13 years according to data from hand
calculations. A longer period is predicted according to power data from the
simulation. The payback period found to be 21 years.

98
References
ABB, (2010), Photovoltaic Plants, user manual, Italy.
Baker J. A. (2004),'Development and Global Warming', Public Policy, Melbourne.
Benemann J., Chehab O. and Schaar-Gabriel E. (2001), 'Building-integrated PV

modules', Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 67, pp. 345-354 [Online].
Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024800003020
Chapman S. J. (2005), Electrical Machinery Fundamental, 4th edn, McGrawHill
Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010), Digest of United Kingdom

Energy Statistics 2010, London [Online] Available at:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/statistics/publications/dukes/348-dukes-2010-
printed.pdf
Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010), Digest of United Kingdom

Energy Statistics 2010, London [Online] Available at:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/energy_stats/source/source.aspx
Department of Energy and Climate Change (2012), Solar PV cost update, London
[Online] Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-
demand/renewable-energy/5381-solar-pv-cost-update.pdf
Duffie J. A. and Beckman W. A., 2006. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. 3 Edition.
Wiley.
Esram, T.; Chapman, P.L., (2007) "Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum

Power Point Tracking Techniques," Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on ,
vol.22, no.2, pp.439-449. [Online] Available at:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4207429&isnumber=4207
419 (Accessed: 15 July 2012)
European Commission (2010), CO2 Emissions by Sector [Online]. Available at:

http://europa.eu/ (Accessed: 13/7/2012).
European Commission (2010), Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions by Sector

[Online]. Available at: http://europa.eu/ (Accessed: 13/7/2012).
European Commission (2010), Electricity Generation from Renewable. [Online].

Available at: http://europa.eu/ (Accessed: 21/7/2012).
Fieber A. (2005), Building Integration of Solar Energy, Lund.
Great Britain, European Commission (1997), Energy For The Future: Renewable
Sources Of Energy, (COM (97) 196 final)

99
IEA, 1996. Photovoltaics in Buildings: A Handbook for Architects and Engineers . No Edition
Stated Edition. Earthscan Publications Ltd..
International Energy Agency (1996), Photovoltaic in Buildings, Bell and bain Ltd,
Glasgow.
RETScreen International, (2005), Clean Energy Project Analysis, 3rd Edition, Clean
Energy Decision Support Centre.
J. A. and Beckman W. A. (2006), Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, John

Wiley.
Kajihara, A.; Harakawa, A.T., (2005), "Model of photovoltaic cell circuits under partial
shading," Industrial Technology, IEEE International Conference, pp.866-870, 14-17
Dec. 2005 [online]. Available at:
0 (Accessed: 23 Aug. 2012)
Luque A. and Hegedus S., (2011). Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and

Engineering. 2 Edition. Wiley.
Mukund R. Patel, 1999. Wind and Solar Power Systems. 1 Edition. CRC Press.
Photovoltaic Education Network, PEN, (2012) Photovoltaic Education Network,

PVEducation. [ONLINE] Available at: http://pveducation.org/. [Accessed 23 July
2012].
PVsyst., (2012), User Manual, University of Geneva. [online]. Available at:

www.pvsyst.com (Accessed: 02 July 2012)
Richard J. K., 1995. Practical Photovoltaics: Electricity from Solar Cells. 3 Sub
Edition. Aatec Pubns.
Salas V. and Olias E. (2011), 'Overview of the state of technique for PV inverters
used in low voltage grid-connected PV systems: Inverters above 10 kW ', Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.15 [Online]. Available at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032110003382
Scharmer, . European solar radiation atlas vol.1. Edition. Presses de l'Ecole des
Mines de Paris.
Sera, D. ; Teodorescu, R.; Rodriguez, P., (2007) "PV panel model based on
datasheet values", Industrial Electronics. ISIE 2007. IEEE International Symposium ,
pp.2392-2396, [Online]: Available at:
4555 (Accessed: (02 Aug. 2012)

100
Seung-Ho Y., Eun-Tack L.,(2002), Efficiency characteristic of building integrated

photovoltaic's as a shading device, Building and Environment, Volume 37, Issue
6,Pages 615-623, ISSN 0360-1323 [Online]. Available at:
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132301000713)(Accessed: 2
Aug 2012)
Thomas R. and Fordham M., (2001), Photovoltaic and Architecture, Tyne and wear,
New York
UNESCO and NELP, 1978. Solar Technology for Building: Proceedings of the First
International Conference on Solar Building Technology, 25-29 July 1977 at the Royal
Institut. Edition. Riba Communications.
Waldau A J, Szabo M, Scarlat N., and Ferrario F. M. (2011), ' Renewable electricity
in Europe', Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 3703-3716
[Online]. Available at:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111002516
W.D.K. Clark, J.A. Eckert, Photogalvanic cells, Solar Energy, Volume 17, Issue 3,
July 1975, Pages 147-150, ISSN 0038-092X, 10.1016/0038-092X(75)90052-3.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038092X75900523)
Bibliographies
Cyril W. Lander, 1994. Power Electronics. 3 Sub Edition. McGraw-Hill Europe.
Duffie J. A. and Beckman W. A., 2006. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. 3 Edition.
Wiley.
Robert Hastings, 1999. Solar Air Systems - Built Examples (Solar Air Systems
Series). Edition. Routledge

101
Appendix A
One-hour example of hand calculation. All the data available with the attach CD.

102
Appendix B
1- Site diagram, other more detailed diagrams can be found on the attached CD.

103
2- Roof Obstacles

104
Appendix C
PV Data sheet and Inverter

105

Photovoltaic System Integration

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Photovoltaic System Integration

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Photovoltaic System Integration for

Roehampton Vale Campus, Kingston

Supervised by: Dr. Paul Wagstaff

MSc Renewable Energy Engineering

Faculty of SEC, Kingston University

The main objective of this thesis is to design a photovoltaic system to be

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

2.4.4 Component Selection, Inverter ........................................................................................... 29

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

6.2.1 Maximum Power Output..................................................................................................... 85

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Figure 44 Module Layout design and layout tool interface. .............................................................. 73

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Table 1 System Demand kW ............................................................................................................ 37

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Waldau A. J. et al, (2011) mentioned that "besides the increasing pressure on

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Renewable Power Generation is being strongly considered. The technology

In addition, the energy market in the UK is growing, according to many market

Figure 1: GHG and CO2 emissions by sector. (EC, 2010)

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Furthermore, PV systems on roof or on Façade become more challenging.

Finally, it is important to note that the UK photovoltaic market now is under

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Gross Electricity Generation of

Figure 3: Electrical PV generation (European commission, 2010)

1.2 Building Integrated PV System

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

and engineering design and using them as a demonstration or educational project

To integrate a PV system in any building, many considerations must be taken

In general, any BIPV system consists of Photovoltaic panel(s), inverter(s) and

Figure 4: Grid-connected photovoltaic system. (Luque and Hegedus, 2011).

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

1.3 Solar Radiation and Solar Constant

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

Equation 1 Extraterrestrial Radiation

Figure 5: Earth Positions around the sun (Scharmer, 2000)

1.4 Geometrical Considerations:

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

1.4.1 The Declination Angle :

Equation 2 Declination Angle

1.4.2 Solar Hour Angle :

Equation 3 Solar Time

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

1.4.3 The Latitude angle :

1.4.4 The Sunset Hour angle:

According to (RETScreen International, 2005) is the angle of the sun at the

Equation 5 Sunset Hour Angle

1.4.5 Slope Angle :

1.4.6 Surface Azimuth angle :

This is the deviation of the projection, on a horizontal plane, of the normal to

1.4.7 Angle of Incident

Equation 6 Incident Angle

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London

1.4.8 Zenith Angle :

Equation 7 Zenith Angle

Figure 6: Solar Geometry Angles (Duffie and Beckman, 2006).

1.5 Solar Radiations reaches a specific tilted surface

Omar Hamdan | Kingston University London