See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/286956568

Relationship between Interpersonal Communication Skills and Organizational

Commitment (Case Study: Jahad Keshavarzi and University of Qom, Iran)

Article  in  European Journal of Social Sciences · March 2010

CITATIONS READS

23 5,047

4 authors, including:

Gholamreza Jandaghi
University of Tehran
124 PUBLICATIONS   659 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

analysis of efficiency View project

dissertation View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Gholamreza Jandaghi on 11 January 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

Relationship between Interpersonal Communication Skills and

Organizational Commitment (Case Study: Jahad Keshavarzi
and University of Qom, Iran)

Hassan Zarei Matin

Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Iran

Golamreza Jandaghi
Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Iran

Fateme Haj Karimi

Graduate, Public Management, University of Tehran, Iran

Ali Hamidizadeh
Graduate, Public Management, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify the interpersonal communication skills that enhance
organizational commitment. To do so in a descriptive survey, the models provided by
Robbins and Hunsaker and by Allen and Meyer were used to measure interpersonal
communication skills and organizational commitment respectively. The used tool was
questionnaire. The statistical community included public organizations in Qom city among
which two organizations were selected randomly. Sampling was also conducted randomly
in both organizations. Finally, 106 individuals responded to questionnaire items. The
findings of the research show that among existing skills in the model, just team building
skill has a significant relation with organizational commitment.

Keywords: Interpersonal Communication Skill, Organizational Commitment, Robbins

and Hunsaker, Team building

1. Introduction
The need for thoughtful, effective communication in the workplace is paramount. Seldom does an
employee work in absolute isolation, instead, workers interact with consumers, peers, and management
on a daily basis; this makes interpersonal communication an essential skill for today's employees.
Today's employers look for quality skills in interpersonal communication, critical thinking, and
problem-solving, not just the ability to complete job duties (Un ange passé, 2008 :3-4). Consequently
in the absence of effective communication, organizational goals will succumb to individualistic and
personal goals (Magnus, 2009 :3). Effective interpersonal communication skills are essential to social
interaction, and to the building and maintenance of all relationships. Poor communication skills can
cause irrevocable damage to relationships; affecting productivity, satisfaction, performance, morale,
trust, respect, self confidence, and even physical health (Un ange passé, 2008 :1-2). In any
organization, the success of achieving its goals depends largely on the manager's communication
ability and skills (Magnus, 2009 :4).
In an era of apparent constant change and “erosion of corporate loyalty” interpersonal
communication skills in managers are vital to promoting employee attachment to the organization
387
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

(Brunette and Farr-Wharton, 2004) However, researchers have paid little attention to the interpersonal
communication skills that managers need to enhance their subordinates’ commitment to the
organization. (Bambacas and Patrickson, 2008: 52). The aim of this paper is to identify the
interpersonal communication skills that enhance organizational commitment.

2. Literature
2.1. Interpersonal Communication
Communication is the transmission of meaning from one person to another or to many people, whether
verbally or non-verbally. Communication from one person to another is commonly depicted as a
simple triangle consisting of the context, the sender, the massage, and the receiver (Barrett, 2006: 386).
Communication skills have great importance in the work area just as they have in all areas of
life. For most of the professions, communication skills such as being able to express one or to
understand the others correctly are required for success and satisfaction at least in elementary level
(unalan and Tengilimoglu, 2009, 245). Even though an organization performs its tasks more efficient
than expected, one should know that this success will not continue so long if it lacks the same efficacy
in communication (Totar, 2000). The success of communication depends on several factors.
Transmission of message by the process of encoding and decoding the message, which may result in
short-term perception, is not adequate for the success of communication. Communication should be in
such a way that will give opportunity for the respondent or receiver to take decision with regard to the
message he perceived (master, 2008 :5).
The concept of interpersonal communication skills was firstly introduced in 1950s (Berko et al.,
1998/1378: 58). Interpersonal communication skills have been defined as ability to work well with
people, and involve your acceptance of others, without prejudice. This does not always mean that you
like the person, but you are able to overcome your dislike in order to achieve your tasks (Smith, 2009b :
1).
Interpersonal communication skills are ability to respond to staff's needs positively, fostering a
non-discriminatory work environment where staff can develop to their full personal potentials, and
delegating authority (Avkiran, 2000 :656).
Interpersonal communication competence consists of a set of skills, knowledge about
communication, and self-evaluation. Competent interpersonal communication skills include self-
disclosure, owned feelings and thoughts, and descriptiveness and support. (Robinson, 2006: 1).
Robbins and Hunsaker (2003) reviewed a large number of studies and synthesized the
interpersonal skills that surfaced on most lists .Most of these skills belong to three categories –
leadership, the process of communication and motivation .Interpersonal skills under leadership relate to
leadership style, handling conflicts, running meetings, team building and promoting change. The
process of communication includes sending messages, listening and providing feedback .Similarly,
motivating is broken down into goal setting, clarifying expectations, persuading and empowering .
Other interpersonal skill include negotiating (Bambacas and Patrickson, 2008: 52-53).
In this paper, this model is applied to examine and measure managers' interpersonal
communication skill variable. The dimensions and components of above model are shown in the
following table:

388
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)
Table 1: Conceptualization of interpersonal communication skills

Concept dimension Component

Interpersonal communication skills Leadership Leadership style
Handling conflicts
Running meeting
Team building
Promoting change
Process of communication Sending message
Listening
Providing feedback
motivation Goal setting
Clarifying expectations
Persuading
Empowering
Negotiating

Below, each dimensions and components is investigated. Among interpersonal communication

skills, one point out such skills as talking, well guiding and ordering, requesting (Berko et al.,
1998/1999), proper treatment with critics (Berko et al, 1998/1999; Golman, 1995), nonverbal
communications (Isonza, 2008; Master, 2008; Robbins, 1989; Berko et al, 1998/1999; Smith, 1996),
examining individual's conception (Courtois, 2007), cross-social skills and sympathy (Un ange passé,
2008; Farhangi, 1995), convincing (Decker, 1989), openness, supporting, positivism and equality
(Farhangi, 1995) which are not mentioned in this model.

2.2. Commitment
Two approaches to define organizational commitment are found in the literature .First, commitment is
understood as an employee’s intention to continue working in the organization (e.g., Meyer,
1997.)Second, organizational commitment may be defined as an attitude in the form of an attachment
that exists between the individual and the organization, and is reflected in the relative strength of an
employee’s psychological identification and involvement with the organization) e.g., Mowday et al.,
(1979). This research concurs with the first definition.
Meyer and Allen (1997) defined the general concept of organizational commitment as “a
psychological link between the employee and his or her organization that makes it less likely that the
employee will voluntarily leave the organization”(p .252).
More recently, several researchers have categorized the concept of organizational commitment
into three major themes :affective, normative, and continuance commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1997;
Laschinger et al., 2000; Fields, 2002; Manion, 2004) .Affective commitment is the “employee’s linking
for an organization, and related to involvement with the organization” (Fields, 2002, p .43):
[. . .]normative commitment designates the feeling of obligation of needing to
continue employment; and continuance commitment is created by high costs associated
with leaving the organization, and creates a feeling of needing to continue employment
(Van de Hooff and de Ridder, 2004, p .119).
Meyer and Allen’s three-factor concept and instrument of organizational commitment was used
for the current research to measure the perceived levels of employee commitment in the organization.

2.3. Communication Links to Commitment

Managers communicate daily with their subordinates typically giving feedback on performance,
executing performance appraisals, providing information and so forth. These actions in turn facilitate
developing or negating subordinate organizational commitment as it is the way these practices are

389
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

perceived that influences levels of commitment (Meyer and Herscovitch, 2001; Tansky and Cohen,
2001).
The organizational commitment concept is multidimensional in nature (Allen and Meyer, 1990;
Angle and Lawson, 1993; Hackett et al., 1994; Meyer et al., 1990; Somers, 1993) and Frequently in
researches (Meyer and Smith, 2001‫ ؛‬Francis-Smythe and Smith, 1997‫ ؛‬Beck and Wilson, 1997‫؛‬
Varona, 1996‫ ؛‬Guzley, 1992; Van den Hooff and de Ridder, 2004‫ ؛‬Thornhill et al., 1996‫ ؛‬Jacobs, 2006‫؛‬
Ng et al., 2006‫ ؛‬Putti et al., 1990‫ ؛‬Morgan and Hunt, 1994) These dimensions are examined separately.
In this research, this variable is not investigated in dinemsion level to examine the relationship between
organizational commitment and interpersonal communication skills.

2.4. Dimensions and Components of Robbins and Hunsaker's Model

In this section, along with dimensions and components of the model, research assumptions are also
introduced.

2.4.1. Leadership
A leader should know the skills in group leadership and that includes the need to accomplish the
common task, how to discourage group frustration, disharmony, mutual criticism and eventual
disintegration of the group. The leader should maintain a cohesive social unity through group high
morale and team spirit. Finally, the manager should understand the individual needs of his workers, his
choice and appropriateness of words and language (Magnus, 2009 :3). Leader communication consists
of layered, expanding skills from core strategy development and effective writing and speaking to the
use of these skills in more complex organizational situations. As the manager's perspective and control
expand, he or she will need to improve the core communication skills to become effective in the large,
more complex organizational situations (Barrett, 2006: 386). Leadership dimensions includes
following components:

2.4.1.1. Leadership Style

One can study leader's performance in two different levels. Fist, practical observation of leaders in a
macro level indicates that leadership style can impact on the output of the group and the views of its
members. In a minor level, one can introduces special skills for each leadership style. Here, leadership
style is studied in a macro level.
H1 = There is a significant relationship between leadership style and employees' organizational
commitment.

2.4.1.2. Handling Conflicts

Organization leaders are responsible for creating a work environment that enables people to thrive.
When disagreements and differences of opinions escalate into interpersonal conflict, leaders must
intervene immediately (Browning, 2007: 1). to have common mission/purpose, shared values and
goals, agreements and policies clear and in writing, fair, participatory decision-making process,
creating community spirit, buddy system, wisdom circles, staying in touch with each other
emotionally, adopting communication agreements consist of: not speaking until another person is
finished speaking, addressing each other respectfully, no hurtful physical contact, … bring in an
outside mediator, serving as kindly “fair witnesses” in meetings between community members in
conflict, active listening, nonviolent communication, process work, voice dialogue and another cases
are the ways for handling conflict (Leafe Christian, 2005: 37).
H2 = There is a significant relationship between managers' handling conflicts skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

390
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

2.4.1.3. Running Meetings

A necessary skill for most managers is the capability of running and arranging efficient meetings. One
of the important aspects of training is to help managers understand how to arrange and run fruitful
meetings (Dyer, 1983).
H3 = There is a significant relationship between running meetings skill and employees' organizational
commitment.

2.4.1.4. Team Building

If productivity levels can be impacted by an employee’s unwillingness to share information in the team
building process, it is necessary to define productivity in terms of an organization and its relationships
(Italics, 2006, 3). The early stage of team development requires clear communication of what the
project entails and how each team member will fit into the overall scope of the work. The project
manager needs to constantly communicate the need to share information, learn about fellow team
members, and de-emphasize the individual over the group (Smith, 2009a, 2-3).
H4 = There is a significant relationship between managers' team building skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.1.5. Promoting the Change

Promoting the change and creating new improving methods are not mechanical leverages rather they
are a movement relied upon material, spiritual, mental and ethical aspects that are not possible just with
technical tools and the need preparedness, belief, trust, satisfaction, enthusiasm and belonging.
Effective change management shall be base on understanding the nature of the organization as a system
as well as conceiving the interaction between structure, operation process and its culture (Sadler,1997).
H5 = There is a significant relationship between managers' promoting change skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.2. Process of Communication

It involves information receiving from listening and reading to conceive and accept and encouraging to
action which includes changes in attitude and even behavior (Decker, 1989). It include following three
components.

2.4.2.1. Sending Message

A supervisor shall be capable to send organizational aims to his/he subordinates clearly (Ibid).
H6 = There is a significant relationship between managers' sending message skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.2.2. Listening
The most effective communication can take place when all the people in the conversation are engaged
in active listening (Abercrombieb, 2007). For this purpose, Listen with an open mind - be aware of
your own preconceived notions. Listen to what the person is saying, without adapting it to what you
want to hear. Do not listen with the intent to respond, but rather to understand (Hagen, 2008, 1).
H7 = There is a significant relationship between managers' listening skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.2.3. Providing Feedback

In communications, many problems arise due to misunderstandings. These problems will likely arise
less if the manager can use networking in communication process (Robbins, 1989)
H8 = There is a significant relationship between managers' feedback providing skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

391
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

2.4.3. Motivation
The third dimension of the model is motivation. Motivation is an inner action and one can not enforce
it outside. One of the most importand task of managers is provide conditions by creating
infrastructures, systems, proper environment and communication development in which people feel
motivation (Smith, 1996). Its dimension include

2.4.3.1. Goal Setting

The one goal oriented person usually draws the actual steps in his plan of action which contains exactly
how much and when to work, what amount of time should be dedicated for his work as well as his
family and other activities, where should he take rest and often calculate the rate of success by taking
into account the amount of progress he has accomplished in his goal setting (Wilson, 2008:1). The act
of goal setting compels us to focus our energy and attention towards a specific outcome, which makes
it a very powerful process as we plan for the things we want from life (Tensteps, 2009: 1-2).
H9 = There is a significant relationship between managers' goal setting skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.3.2. Clarifying Expectations

Clarifying the aims and expectations, managers can remove ambiguities. It is sufficient that they talk
their employees honestly.
H10 = There is a significant relationship between managers' clarifying expectations skill and
employees' organizational commitment.

2.4.3.3. Persuading
It means persuading communications and the capability of sending the message in a manner that
people understand and accept them easily (Hersey and Blanchard, 1989: 305).
When one communicate others though propensity, the will be more prepared to follow their
managers. Since managers or parent have often posts and power, they can first conduct them and then
accompanying them to achieve an effective communication (Rezaian, 2004, 323).
H11 = There is a significant relationship between managers' persuading skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.3.4. Empowering
It is an accepted macro strategy to improve continuously. It is like an abstract sign for all types of
individuals' merits applications in new and creative methods for all aspects of organizational
performance (Kinlaw, 1995). The main task of management with regard to workplace communications
is to use the utmost usage of communicational skills for empowering (Smith, 1996).
H12 = There is a significant relationship between managers' empowering skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

2.4.4. Negotiating
Discussion mean and individual's efforts to meet his/her own needs. Discussion is a kind of bargaining
to achieve an agreement and to find a solution for problems. Both parties should be aware of what they
are going to say as well as its logic. If you can't find a solution, you should expect its consequences
(Berko et al., 1998/1378: 219).
H13 = There is a significant relationship between managers' negotiating skill and employees'
organizational commitment.

392
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

3. Method
3.1. Sample
Population of the research was public offices in Qom city of which two Jahad keshavarzi office and
Qom University were selected randomly. Then, 102 employees were selected randomly and after
answering the questionnaires, their opinions were analyzed. 52 respondents were from jahad
keshavarzi office and 50 were from Qom University.

3.2. Participant Characteristics

Respondents were mostly men (68%). Nearly half of the respondents (57%) were B.A, 13 %M.A and
30% with Associate of Arts. The organizational status of 13% of respondents was manager and 87%
were expert. The working background of 28% of them was under 5 years, 37% from 5 t0 15 years,
24% from 15 to 25 years and 11% were above 25 years.

3.3. Instruments
3.3.1. Interpersonal Communication Skills
As mentioned in previous sections, the model of Robbins and Hunsaker is used in this research to
measure interpersonal communication skills. By utilizing the conceptual framework of the model, the
authors designed a questionnaire and its validity was confirmed after disseminating the questionnaire
among elites. The final questionnaire includes 39 items and utilized scale is Likert's five-degree range
(5 = very high and 1 = very low). To examine the reliability of the questionnaire, split – half and
Chronbach-alpha methods were used. The alpha coefficient is 0.96 and the reliability from split-half is
0.93.

3.3.2 Organizational Commitment

In order to measure the perceived levels of organizational commitment, the three-factor commitment
scale of Meyer and Allen (1991, 1997) was used. The measure is based on a conceptualization of
commitment that includes affective, continuance, and normative dimensions. Six items with
Likert-type responses inquire into each dimension.The Chronbach alpha coefficient for this
questionnaire is 0.72.

4. Results
The results of the research are shown in two sections. In first section, the results of descriptive statistics
and in the second one, the results of deductive statistics are provided.
In table 2, the mean and standard deviation of components, dimensions and variables are
indicated.

393
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)
Table 2: Descriptive statistics

Mean SD
Leadership style 3.43 0.98
Handling conflict 3.48 0.92
Running meeting 3.45 0.87
Components Team building 3.16 0.98
Promoting change 3.31 1.02
Sending message 3.7 0.72
Listening 3.51 0.98
Providing feedback 3.01 0.99
Goal setting 3.25 0.92
Clarifying expectations 3.45 0.85
Persuading 3.48 1.15
Empowering 3.65 0.81
Negotiating 3.44 0.89
Dimensions Leadership 3.39 0.75
The process of communication 3.4 0.71
Motivation 3.42 0.77
Variables Interpersonal communication skills 3.39 0.7
Organizational commitment 3.09 0.55

Among interpersonal communication skill components, "sending message" (M = 3.7) has the
highest and "providing feedback" (M = 3.01) has the lowest mean. In examining the dimension of
interpersonal communication skills, there is no significant difference between means. The mean of
motivation is 3.42, communication process is 3.4 and leadership is 3.39. Finally, interpersonal
communication skill variable (M = 3.39) has higher mean than organizational commitment variable (M
= 3.9).
In examining the relationship between components of interpersonal communication skill and
organizational commitment, since there is a high correlation between the components of interpersonal
communication skills, the correlation among each components and organizational commitment is
calculated by using partial correlations, provided that other components are stable. In table 3, results
are indicated.

Table 3: Partial correlations

Components of ICS Commitment P- value

Leadership style 0.085 0.527
Handling conflicts -0.024 0.859
Running meetings 0.077 0.565
Team building 0.267 0.043
Promoting change -0.186 0.163
Sending message -0.015 0.912
Listening -0.074 0.581
Providing feedback -0.038 0.775
Goal setting 0.08 0.548
Clarifying expectation 0.152 0.254
persuading 0.222 0.093
Empowering -0.232 0.08
negotiating -0.102 0.445

The results show that among various components, only team building has a significant relation
with organizational commitment. The achieved significance level for this component is 0.043. The
achieved significance level for the relations of other components and organizational commitment is
more than 0.05 which shows that there is no significant relationship. In reviewing the relationship

394
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

between two variables of interpersonal communication skills and employees' organizational

commitment, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. Its amount is 0.304 (p – value = 0.011) which
shows a direct and significant relation between these two variables.
In addition to study the relations among variables, we are planning to fit organizational
commitment model through multiple linear regression and to identify those components which increase
organizational commitment. The results of model fitness are shown in table 4 Stepwise model is used
to enter the variables.

Table 4: Linear regression

Model Beta coefficients p

(Constant) 2.381 0.000
Leadership style 0.025 0.889
Handling conflicts -0.001 0.992
Running meetings 0.115 0.346
Team building 0.229 0.002
Promoting change -0.210 0.193
Sending message 0.094 0.425
Listening 0.033 0.804
Providing feedback -0.046 0.735
Goal setting 0.070 0.629
Clarifying expectation 0.092 0.503
Persuading 0.140 0.368
Empowering -0.139 0.252
Negotiating -0.058 0.691

In addition to intercept(p=0.000), among entered variables, only team making component

(p=0.002) was remained in the model and other components were eliminated. Thus, final model has an
intercept (B=2.381) and team building coefficient(B=0.229). Attained model is significant (p=0.002)
and the amount of R Square is 0.135.

5. Discussion
The results of the research show that among hypotheses, only H4 namely the relationship between
team building skill and organizational commitment is confirmed. In doing so, partial correlation was
used. Besides, multiple linear regression was also used and its results confirmed the results of previous
method and H4 was supported. Hence, in answering the first main question of the research, one can
conclude that improving employees' organizational commitment is expected if managers improve their
team building skill. Another important point is the amount of determination coefficient(R Square =
0.13). Considering the significant relation between two interpersonal communication skills and
organizational commitment, the amount of this coefficient indicates that just 13% of organizational
commitment changes are the result of components defined in the model provided by Robinson and
Hansaker. In the meantime, there were other components that are not considered in measuring
interpersonal communication skills. Therefore, subsequent authors are recommended to use another
model or add other components to existing model in order to investigate the relationship between these
two variables.
The rate of correlation between two variables of interpersonal communication skill variable and
organizational commitment is 0.304 which indicates that the relation between these two variables is not
so intense. According to observations and other researches, it was determined that there are other
factors in studied organizations which affect organizational commitment and they are further rooted in
meeting preliminary needs. Therefore, it is recommended to study the factors which impact
organizational commitment.

395
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

References
[1] Abercrombieb (2007) 3 strategies for improving communication on the job [Online]Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[2] Allen, N.J .and Meyer, J.P.(1990), “The measurement and antecedents of affective,
continuance and normative commitment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol .63, pp .
1-18.
[3] Angle, H.L .and Lawson, M.B. (1993), “Changes in affective and continuance commitment in
times of relocation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol .26 No .1, pp .3-15.
[4] Avkiran, Necmi (2000) Interpersonal skills and emotional maturity influence entrepreneurial
style of bank managers, Personal Review, Vol 29, No 5, Pp 654_675
[5] Bambacas, Mary & Patrickson, Margaret (2008) Interpersonal communication skills that
enhance organizational commitment, Journal of Communication Management, Vol 12, No 1,
Pp 51_72
[6] Barrett, Deborah J. (2006), Strong Communication Skills a must for today's leaders,
Handbook of Business Strategy, Emerald, pp: 385-390
[7] Beck, K .and Wilson, C. (1997), “Police officer’s views on cultivating organizational
commitment: implications for police managers”, Policing :An International Journal of Police
Strategy and Management, Vol .20 No .1, pp .175-95.
[8] Berko, Roy.M. Wolvin, Andrew.D & Wolvin, Darlyn.R. (1378) Communicating: A Social and
Career focous. (S.M. A'arabi and D. Izadi Trans.). Tehran:Pazhohesh'hai Farhangi. (Orginal
work published 1998).
[9] Browning, Kathy (2007) Conflict management and resolution [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[10] Brunetto, Y .and Farr-Wharton, R. (2004), “Does the talk affect your decision to walk :a
comparative pilot study examining the effect of communication practices on employee
commitment post-managerialism”, Management Decision, Vol .42 Nos 3/4, pp .579-600.
[11] Courtois, Angelika (2007) Perception and communication [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[12] Decker, Bert. (1989). How to communicate effectively. London: Kogan page.
[13] Dyer, William. G. (1983). Contemporary issues in management and organization
development. New York: Addison Wesley Longman
[14] Farhangi, Ali.Akbar. (1995), Human Communications, Tehran: Rasa
[15] Fields, D. (2002), Taking the Measure of Work :A Guide to Validated Scales for
Organizational Research and Diagnosis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[16] Francis-Smythe, J .and Smith, P.M (1997), “The psychological impact of assessment in a
development center”, Human Relations, Vol .50 No .2, pp .149-67.
[17] Goleman, Daniel. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more that IQ. U.S.A:
Bantam books
[18] Guzley, R.M. (1992), “Organizational climate and communication climate :predictors of
commitment to the organization”, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol .5 No .4, pp .
379-402.
[19] Hackett, R.D., Bycio, P .and Hausdorf, P.A. (1994), “Further assessments of Meyer and
Allen’s (1991) three component model of organizational commitment”, Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol .79 No .1, pp .15-23.
[20] Hagen, Kevin (2008) How effective listening can help you at work and in business [Online]
Available :http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[21] Hersey, Paul & Kenneth H. Blanchard.(1989) Management of Organizational Behavior:
Utilizing Human Resources. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall
[22] Isonza, Elmer(2008) Skills for conveying messages[Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com

396
European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

[23] Italics (2006) team bulding in organizations : communication & productivit y

[Online]Available :http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[24] J .Barrett, Deborah (2006) Strong communication skills a must for today s leaders HandBook
of Business, Pp 385_390
[25] Jacobs, G. (2006), “Communication for commitment in remote technical workforces”, Journal
of Communication Management, Vol .10 No .4, pp .353-70.
[26] Kinlaw, Dennis. (1995). The practice of empowerment: Making the most of human
competence. Hampshire: Gower
[27] Laschinger, H.K., Finegan, J., Shamian, J .and Casier, S. (2000), “Organizational trust and
empowerment in restructured healthcare settings :effect on staff nurse commitment”, Journal
of Nursing Administration, Vol .30 No .9, pp .413-25.
[28] Leafe Christian, Dianna (2005) 71 ways to build trust & connection or reduce & resolve
conflict Academic Research Library, No 128, Pp 37-41
[29] Magnus, Ugochukwu (2009) Success of an organization depend on the manager s
communication skills [Online] Available :http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[30] Manion, J. (2004), “Strengthening organizational commitment :understanding the concept as
a basis for creating effective workforce retention strategies”, Health Care Manager, Vol .23
No .2, pp .167-76.
[31] Master. (2008). Communicatioz complex human phenomenon [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[32] Meyer JP.(1997), Organizational commitment .In :Cooper CI, Robertson IT, editors.
International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol .12 .New York :Wiley; p .
175– 225.
[33] Meyer, J.P .and Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[34] Meyer, J.P .and Herscovitch, L. (2001), “Commitment in the workplace :toward a general
model”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol .11 No .3, pp .299-326.
[35] Meyer, J.P .and Smith, C.A. (2001), “HRM practices and organizational commitment :test of
a mediation model”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol .14 No .4, pp .319-31.
[36] Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J .and Gellatly, I.R. (1990), “Affective and continuance commitment to
the organisation :evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged
relations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol .75 No .6, pp .710-20.
[37] Morgan, R.M .and Hunt, S.D. (1994), “The commitment-trust theory of relationship
marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol .58, July, pp .20-38.
[38] Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW. (1979), The measurement of organizational
commitment .J Vocat Behav;4:224 – 47.
[39] Ng, T.W.H., Butts, M.M., Vandenberg, R.J., Dejoy, D.M .and Wilson, M.G. (2006), “Effects of
management communication, opportunity for learning, and work schedule flexibility on
organizational commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol .68 No .3, pp .474-89.
[40] Putti, J.M., Aryee, S .and Phua, J. (1990), “Communication relationship satisfaction and
organizational commitment”, Group and Organization Studies, Vol .15 No .1, pp .44-52.
[41] Rezaian, Ali. (2004). Organizational Behavior Management, 5th ed. Tehran: Samt
[42] Robbins, Stephen P.(1989)., Organizational Behavior, 4th ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall
[43] Robinson, Maisah (2006) How to improve your interpersonal communication skills [Online]
Available: http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[44] Sadler, Philip. (1997). Managing change. London: Kogan Page.
[45] Smith, Jane. (1996). Empowering People: How to bring out the best in your workforce.
London: Kogan Page.
[46] Smith, Michael (2009a) Essentiol business skills for project managers [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com

397
 European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 13, Number 3 (2010)

[47] Smith, Michael. (2009b). The important of interpersonal skills [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[48] Somers, M.J. (1993), “A test of the relationship between affective and continuance
commitment using non-recursive models”, Journal of Occupational & Organizational
Psychology, Vol .66 No .2, pp .185-93.
[49] Tansky, J.W .and Cohen, D.J. (2001), “The relationship between organizations; support,
employee development, and organizational commitment :an empirical study”, Human
Resource Development Quarterly, Vol .12 No .3, pp .285-300.
[50] Tensteps (2009) Goal setting skills for maximum success [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[51] Thornhill, A., Lewis, P .and Saunders, M.N.K. (1996), “The role of employee communication
in achieving commitment and quality in higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education,
Vol .4 No .1, pp .12-20.
[52] Un ange passé, Angel (2008) Mastering interpersonal communication skills [Online]
Available :http//:www.AssociatedContent.com
[53] Unalan, Demet & Tengilimoglu, Dilaver (2009) an empirical study to measure the
communication skills of the manager assistants، medical secretaries and office workers in
the public sector The Journal of American Academy of Business Cambridge Vol 14 Num 2 Pp
245_250
[54] Van de Hooff, B .and de Ridder, J.A. (2004), “Knowledge sharing in context :the influence of
organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing”,
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol .8 No .6, pp .117-30.
[55] Varona, F. (1996), “Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational
commitment in three Guatemalan organizations”, Journal of Business Communication, Vol .
33 No .2, pp .111-40.
[56] Wilson, Charles (2008) Goal setting _ important things to take care of [Online] Available :
http//:www.AssociatedContent.com

398
View publication stats