Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development Team
Prof. R.K. Kohli
Principal Investigator
& Prof. V.K. Garg &Prof. Ashok Dhawan
Co- Principal Investigator
Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
Dr Babita Khosla
Paper Coordinator
Mahrashi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Dr Kiran Bala
Content Writer
Indian Institute of Technology Indore
Content Reviewer Dr. Sunil Mittal,
Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
Module Id EVS/EP-XV/37
Pre-requisites
Introduction
Features of bioremediation
Limitations of bioremediation
Concluding remarks
Introduction:
particularly microbes such as bacteria, algae, yeast, fungi etc. to clean our environment.
Amongst various microbes, bacteria play an important role in this process. They can digest or
break down various toxins such as organic or inorganic, released from various
activity. Microbes can utilize different grouping of electron donors and acceptors to initiate
their metabolism. Additional to these oxidation/reduction reactions, they are certain other
microbial community, electron donor / acceptor / pollutant and various additional physical
and useful parameters are applied under bioremediation for remediation of polluted site
(Cassidy et al. 2015; Garcia-Delgado et al. 2015; Martı´nez-Pascual et al. 2015). The
pollutants break down into organic matter and nutrients. Heavy metals are non-biodegradable
3
in cleaning up of chlorinated pesticides and oil spills. In addition to it, wastewater can also
be treated using algae which can take up most of nitrogen and phosphors present in
Microorganism used for such process should be healthy and active i.e. must be
present in their active or exponential phase so that they can perform their work efficiently.
condition, microbes need oxygen to perform their activity. Oxygen quantity will decide the
Some microbes have capacity to perform in anaerobic conditions i.e. in the absence of
oxygen. For example, soil contaminated with different types of chemical compounds can be
amount of energy for the survival of microbes. Bioremediation has been effectively evaluated
and used for cleaning up of surface water, soil, groundwater, and sediments etc. It has been
human efforts. Furthermore, adding of natural or engineered microorganisms can enhance the
Bioremediation
In Situ Ex Situ
Phytoremediation Biosparging
Land Farming
This involves treatment of polluted substances at polluted site itself. This technique
does not disturb soil structure as does not require excavation. Further these procedures seems
procedures but cost of designing and installation of sophisticated instruments on-site for
used for treatment of heavy metals, dyes, hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents at polluted
sites (Folch et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2014; Frascariet al. 2015; Roy et al.). There are certain
parameters which affect the performance such as electron acceptor, nutrient availability,
moisture content, soil porosity, temperature and pH (Philp and Atlas 2005).
a) Bioventing
harmless product (Philp and Atlas 2005; Hohener and Ponsin 2014). Further additional
bioremediation. Although rate of airflow and air interval are the most important factors of
bioventing, still accomplishment depend on number of air injection points for uniform
distribution of air.
b) Bioslurping
alongwith bioventing is used for remediation of soil and groundwater providing indirect
2007; Kim et al. 2014). This technique can also be used for remediation of semi volatile and
volatile organic compounds from contaminated soils. This method is not appropriate for
remediation of soil having little permeability but it is less costly due to less amount of
groundwater generated from process minimizing cost involved in storage, treatment and
disposal.
c) Biosparging
Like bioventing, in this technique also air is inoculated into earth subsurface for
stimulation of microbial activities to remove pollutants from contaminated sites. But in this
technique air is added at saturated zone to result in ascending movement of VOCs to the
unsaturated zone to stimulate biodegradation. Main factors i.e. permeability of soil and
another method identified as in situ air sparging (IAS) leading to pollutant volatilization with
used for treatment of aquifers polluted through petroleum products, particularly kerosene and
diesel.
d) Phytoremediation
In this method, plants interact with pollutants for mitigation of noxious effects.
organic. Elemental contaminants include lethal heavy metals and radionuclides which are
Organic pollutants such as hydrocarbons and chlorinated mixtures are mainly removed by the
some important characteristics to act as phytoremediator i.e. rate of pollutant removal, growth
rate of plant, tolerance and survival of plant, fibrous or tap root system on basis of pollutant
depth, minimum above ground biomass to be accessible for animal ingestion, plant resistance
to diseases and pests etc (Meagher 2000; Kuiper et al. 2004; Lee 2013; Miguel et al. 2013).
precious metals can also bioaccumulate during remediation which can be recovered
operation, preservation of soil structure, better soil fertility due to addition of plant organic
In this method, role of microorganisms is to enhance the process rather than to act as
independent technology. Other terms viz. biological PRB, passive bioreactive barrier,
bioenhanced PRB are also proposed for this technique. This is an in situ technique mainly
polluted with heavy metals and chlorinated compounds. As contaminated water pours via.
barrier pollutants get stuck and experience sequence of reactions subsequently cleaning this.
These barriers are typically responsive adequate to capture contaminants, penetrable to only
water not contaminants, passive with slight energy involvement, cost effective, and easily
8
f) Intrinsic bioremediation
remediated with the help of aerobic and anaerobic microbial activities without any outside
force or human involvement. The absence of exterior power makes this method less costly in
comparison to additional in situ methods. To maintain the sustainability and continuity, the
Intrinsic bioremediation sometimes takes lengthier time to reach the marked pollutant level as
there is no exterior power combined to accelerate remediation practice. Thus it has been
recommended to carry out risk assessment to confirm that less time for remediation is
required.
In this excavated samples from polluted sites are transported to another site for
treatment. Some of the factors, which influence efficiency are cost; intensity, type, degree
and depth of pollution; geographical location and geology of the polluted site.
a) Biopile
This is a complete treatment technology in which excavated soils are mixed with
nutrients to enhance microbial activities and placed on a treatment bed with main components
physico-chemical parameters viz. heat, moisture, nutrients, pH and oxygen can be controlled
for further enhancement of biodegradation (Whelan et al. 2015). Filtering and ventilation of
polluted soil, addition of bulking agents like saw dust, straw, wood chips or any other organic
materials can further help in enhancement of efficiency. Biopiling can be effectively used to
control volatilization of low molecular weight pollutants and can work even under extreme
cold environments (Dias et al. 2015; Gomez and Sartaj 2014; Whelan et al. 2015).
Additionally, biopile can be used for treatment of huge quantity of contaminated soil in less
Some of major limitations of biofiling are maintenance and operation cost, robust
requirement for even supply of air in heaped soil etc. Excessive air heating can result in
drying of soil which will promote volatilization rather than biodegradation due to inhibition
of microbial activities.
b) Windrows
This periodic rotating of contaminated soil alongwith water addition results in increased
ventilation and even delivery of contaminants with speedy bioremediation through the
technique may not be the best option for remediation of soil polluted with toxic volatiles.
c) Bioreactor
10
through a chain of biological reactions. Different modes of operation are fed-batch, batch,
sequencing batch, continuous and multistage bioreactors. Various process parameters viz. pH,
controlled effectively in bioreactors which is one of the key benefits of this bioremediation
over other ex situ bioremediation techniques. Contaminated samples can be fed into
bioreactor either as dry matter or slurry. Optimum growth conditions provided in a bioreactor
are needed to maintain natural growth environment. Bioremediation time can be reduced with
between microbes and pollutants etc. Water or soil contaminated with VOCs such as BTEX
(benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes) can also be treated through this technique
d) Land farming
This method is the easiest one with very less expenses and equipment needs. In this
method, contaminated soils are typically dug and/or tilled. This can be done in both ex situ or
soil is done on-site it is known as in situ and in another case it is called as ex situ. Like other
ex situ methods, land farming also has certain drawbacks such as large area requirement,
Cerqueira et al. 2014). Additionally, land farming is not appropriate for treatment of soil
11
removal mechanism i.e. volatilization, mainly in tropical climate locations. Due to these
drawbacks and many more make land farming assisted bioremediation more time consuming
and less efficient in comparison to other ex situ methods (Khan et al. 2004; Maila and Colete
2004).
Features of Bioremediation
This is the most acceptable natural process; for waste treatment and for cleaning of
material such as soil, and water etc. In bioremediation, microbes which can degrade
Bioremediation is an effort less process and can frequently occur on site, without
site which eradicates the necessity of transport for carrying huge magnitudes of waste
to off site. Simultaneously it can prevent possible threats to human health and
This is a cost effective process as it cost less than other conventional methods.
friendly. Nutrients added for growth of microbes can be used as fertilizers on lawns
and gardens. Bioremediation converts harmful chemicals, wastewater and gases such
12
Biological processes are highly specific so there might be chance that products of
biodegradation may or may not be toxic than the parent compound. Microbes which
are in a state of exponential phase having high metabolic process, highly adaptive to
environmental growth condition are important site factors required for success of
bioremediation.
develop the appropriate area for sites which is occupied with composite combinations
bioremediation.
Concluding remarks
13
best appropriate and achievable bioremediation practice i.e. ex situ or in situ. First one i.e. ex
situ bioremediation seems to be cost intensive due to added costs for excavation and
transportation. But no doubt, these can also be utilized for treatment of varied range of
contaminants in a controlled way. On the other hand, in situ practices does not involve
additional cost for excavation but there are some other issues related to in-situ such as cost
needed for installation of equipment on-site, incapability to efficiently envisage and limit the
subsurface of contaminated site. Thus, expenses of remediation should not be the only
other factors too such as type of soil, complexity and type of pollutant, site locality in relation
to human occupancy and performance of bioremediation process which needs attention while
14