1) An arbitration can be both international and foreign if the parties are from different countries but agree to hold the arbitration in a third country.
2) An arbitration is international if the parties are from different states or the subject matter relates to more than one country.
3) An arbitration is foreign if the agreed place of arbitration is outside the Philippines.
4) The document provides an example of a dispute between a Filipino company and a Japanese company over a dealership in Malaysia, where the agreed arbitration location is Singapore - this would qualify as both an international and foreign arbitration.
1) An arbitration can be both international and foreign if the parties are from different countries but agree to hold the arbitration in a third country.
2) An arbitration is international if the parties are from different states or the subject matter relates to more than one country.
3) An arbitration is foreign if the agreed place of arbitration is outside the Philippines.
4) The document provides an example of a dispute between a Filipino company and a Japanese company over a dealership in Malaysia, where the agreed arbitration location is Singapore - this would qualify as both an international and foreign arbitration.
1) An arbitration can be both international and foreign if the parties are from different countries but agree to hold the arbitration in a third country.
2) An arbitration is international if the parties are from different states or the subject matter relates to more than one country.
3) An arbitration is foreign if the agreed place of arbitration is outside the Philippines.
4) The document provides an example of a dispute between a Filipino company and a Japanese company over a dealership in Malaysia, where the agreed arbitration location is Singapore - this would qualify as both an international and foreign arbitration.
Q: Is it possible for a certain arbitration to be classified as both
international and foreign? If yes, how? If no, why not?
A: Yes. To define Foreign Arbitration, the Rules provide that it is where the agreed place of arbitration is outside the Philippines.
The model law states that an arbitration is international if at the time
of the conclusion of arbitration agreement, the parties have their place of business in different States; or the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement relates to more than one country; or the place of arbitration if determined in, or pursuant to, the arbitration agreement is situated outside the State in which the parties have their places of business; or any place where a substantial part of the obligations of the commercial relationship is to be performed or the place with which the subject-matter of the dispute is most closely connected is situated outside the State in which the parties have their places of business.
Thus, it is necessary, to determine whether the arbitration is domestic,
international or foreign, to consider the place of arbitration, parties involved and obligation involved.
To illustrate, if Rusi Motors, a Filipino company, and Honda Motors, a
Japanese company entered into a dealership agreement of motorcycles in Malaysia, the former being the dealer and the former’s products are to be sold. And they agreed that in case of dispute, the place of arbitration is in Singapore. Now we have an instance where the arbitration can be classified as both Foreign and International Arbitration following the definition set forth in the Model Law and the Special ADR Rules.
A Simple Guide for Drafting of Conveyances in India : Forms of Conveyances and Instruments executed in the Indian sub-continent along with Notes and Tips