The document discusses when a party can seek judicial relief from a ruling of an arbitral tribunal on a preliminary question regarding jurisdiction. It provides an example from a case where two parties had a construction contract that included an agreement to arbitrate disputes. When disputes arose regarding alleged damages from delays and costs, the petitioner invoked the arbitration clause, but the respondent did not agree to arbitrate. The court ruled the respondent should be compelled to arbitrate based on the agreement to arbitrate disputes in the contract.
The document discusses when a party can seek judicial relief from a ruling of an arbitral tribunal on a preliminary question regarding jurisdiction. It provides an example from a case where two parties had a construction contract that included an agreement to arbitrate disputes. When disputes arose regarding alleged damages from delays and costs, the petitioner invoked the arbitration clause, but the respondent did not agree to arbitrate. The court ruled the respondent should be compelled to arbitrate based on the agreement to arbitrate disputes in the contract.
The document discusses when a party can seek judicial relief from a ruling of an arbitral tribunal on a preliminary question regarding jurisdiction. It provides an example from a case where two parties had a construction contract that included an agreement to arbitrate disputes. When disputes arose regarding alleged damages from delays and costs, the petitioner invoked the arbitration clause, but the respondent did not agree to arbitrate. The court ruled the respondent should be compelled to arbitrate based on the agreement to arbitrate disputes in the contract.
When a party goes to court for judicial relief after arbitration
commences, what singular particular event in the arbitration triggered the necessity to go to court? – It is when the arbitral tribunal ruled on a preliminary question upholding or declining its jurisdiction. Special Rules of Court on ADR provides that “Any party to arbitration may petition the appropriate court for judicial relief from the ruling of the arbitral tribunal on a preliminary question upholding or declining its jurisdiction.”
Mindanao Portland Cement Corp. vs. McDonough Construction
Company of Florida Facts: Both parties entered into a contract for the construction by the respondent of a Portland cement plant in favor of the petitioner. On-going construction, the parties initially agreed to extend the time of completion of the project. Respondent, however, was able to finish the project a year after the extended period of its completion. By this reason, Petitioner is claiming from respondent damages allegedly occasioned by the delay in the project’s completion. Respondent in turn asked from Petitioner an amount equivalent for alleged losses due to cost of extra work. `Petitioner sent respondent a written invitation to arbitrate, invoking the provision in their contract regarding disputes. But instead of answering the invitation, respondent submitted to petitioner a final statement of work accomplished for payment. Thus, petitioner filed an action before the CFI to compel respondent to arbitrate alleging that the dispute falls under the general arbitration clause of their contract and that respondent failed to proceed to arbitration despite request thereof. Issue: w/n respondent should be compelled to submit the dispute for arbitration – Yes Ruling: It is proper for the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of their agreement since there exist a provision for arbitration as well as the respondent’s failure to comply with their agreement.