You are on page 1of 7

Effect of Temperature on Air-Water Transfer of

Hydrogen Sulfide
Chaturong Yongsiri, S.M.ASCE1; Jes Vollertsen2; and Thorkild Hvitved-Jacobsen3

Abstract: The extent of hydrogen sulfide transfer across the air-water interface plays a major role for odor and corrosion problems in
sewer networks. One significant physical factor affecting the air-water transfer process is temperature. This study describes the tempera-
ture dependence of air-water transfer of hydrogen sulfide in terms of a temperature correction factor 共temperature coefficient兲. The
air-water transfer rate was found to increase with increasing temperature at a constant turbulence level. A mathematical expression for the
transfer rate versus temperature was addressed following the Arrhenius equation. The temperature coefficient for air-water transfer of
hydrogen sulfide was observed under acidic and neutral conditions 共pH 4.5, 6.5, and 7.0兲, i.e., under conditions where only the molecular
form of hydrogen sulfide was present 共pH 4.5兲 and under conditions where both the molecular form and the ionized form existed 共pH 6.5
and 7.0兲. The effect of temperature on air-water transfer of hydrogen sulfide decreased with increasing pH. The temperature coefficients
found in this study were within the range reported in the literature for other substances transferring across the air-water interface such as
oxygen, ozone, and krypton-85.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲0733-9372共2004兲130:1共104兲
CE Database subject headings: Hydrogen sulfide; Sewers; Temperature effects; Air-water interactions; Hydraulic networks.

Introduction such adverse consequences is associated with sulfide formation


Transfer of substances across the air-water interface is of environ- and its subsequent emission in sewer networks, leading to odor,
mental concern in a number of cases. Important examples are health, and corrosion problems. In addition to the sources and
release of odors, emission of substances that affect human health sinks that determine the total level of concentrations for sulfide,
and cause corrosion, and in case of reaeration and aeration. Pre- the H2 S/HS⫺ equilibrium 共dissociation兲 and the emission process
diction of air-water transfer of transferable substances is, there- 共air-water transfer兲 are thereby related and influenced by the fol-
fore, important and should be taken into consideration together lowing environmental factors: pH, temperature, and conductivity
with sources and sinks for such substances that exist in both the 共U.S. EPA 1974; Hvitved-Jacobsen 2002兲. The combined effect of
water phase and the air phase. Numerous studies have focused on these factors—not including the turbulence effect—on the emis-
the transfer of oxygen (O2 ), resulting in a better understanding of sion process is depicted in Fig. 1.
the reaeration process for self-purification in receiving waters or Study on sulfide formation and its corresponding modeling in
sewer networks as well as the aeration process in wastewater sewers has been performed for many years 共Pomeroy and Bowlus
treatment plants. Another vital study refers to the exchange of 1946; Thistlethwayte 1972; Boon and Lister 1975; Nielsen and
carbon dioxide (CO2 ) between the ocean and the atmosphere as a Hvitved-Jacobsen 1988兲. Recently, Yongsiri et al. 共2002兲 have ex-
central component for global climate dynamics. Other transfer- perimentally quantified the transfer of H2 S across the air-water
able substances that are usually absent in the atmosphere—e.g., interface focusing on the importance of pH that is directly related
hydrogen sulfide (H2 S), ammonia (NH3 ), and volatile organic to the presence of the exchangeable molecular form of H2 S. This
compounds 共VOCs兲—also gain more attention because of their knowledge can be employed as a tool in evaluating odor and
adverse consequences to the environment. An obvious case of corrosion problems when integrated with modeling of sulfide for-
mation in the water phase. To the writers’ knowledge, the effect of
1 temperature on the H2 S-transfer process has, however, not been
PhD Student, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg Univ.,
Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. E-mail:
investigated and quantified.
cy@bio.auc.dk It is the objective of the current study to describe the effect of
2
Associate Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg temperature on the air-water transfer process of H2 S including
Univ., Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. E-mail: those temperature-related factors that affect the relative amount of
jv@bio.auc.dk the volatile molecular form of H2 S. This study also determines
the temperature correction factor 共temperature coefficient兲 of H2 S
3
Professor, Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg Univ.,
Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. E-mail: transfer across the air-water interface.
thj@bio.auc.dk
Note. Associate Editor: George A. Sorial. Discussion open until June
Theoretical Background
1, 2004. Separate discussions must be submitted for individual papers. To
extend the closing date by one month, a written request must be filed with
the ASCE Managing Editor. The manuscript for this technical note was Fundamentals of Air-Water Transfer of Hydrogen
submitted for review and possible publication on May 22, 2002; approved Sulfide in Sewer Networks
on February 20, 2003. This technical note is part of the Journal of En-
vironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 1, January 1, 2004. ©ASCE, The physicochemical process of hydrogen sulfide (H2 S) transfer
ISSN 0733-9372/2004/1-104 –109/$18.00. across the air-water interface 共i.e., the emission process兲 in sewer

104 / JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004


Fig. 2. Dissociation of hydrogen sulfide 共H2 S/HS⫺ equilibrium兲 at
different pH and temperatures. Values of pK a1 共at a conductivity
value of 0.2 mS cm⫺1 at 25°C兲 are obtained from U.S. EPA 共1974兲
and APHA et al. 共1995兲.

from a strongly acid solution having the same dissolved sulfide


content. At pH 9.0, it will escape only 1% as fast as from an acid
solution.’’ This is also the case for air-water transfer of other
Fig. 1. Overview of combined effect of pH, temperature, and con- dissociable substances such as ammonia (NH3 ) through its
ductivity on dissociation and emission of hydrogen sulfide in sewers NH3 /NH⫹ 4 equilibrium 共Stratton 1968, 1969; Pano and Middle-
brooks 1982兲.
Because of the small variation of conductivity in typical do-
networks is basically expressed by the transfer of the molecular mestic wastewater 共about 0.7–1.2 mS cm⫺1 at 25°C兲, the effect of
共aqueous兲 form (H2 S共aq兲) into the gaseous form (H2 S(g) ) as fol- conductivity on pK a1 and thereby on the amount of the H2 S共aq)
lows: fraction is of minor significance 共Fig. 3兲. For instance, when com-
paring the effect of conductivity between 0.4 and 2.0 mS cm⫺1,
H2 S共aq) →H2 S共 g兲 (1) the difference in H2 S共aq) present—at pH 7.0 and 20°C—is only
It is important to notice that only the H2 S共aq) fraction—not the 1.7%. Temperature, on the other hand, plays a more significant
ionized form (HS⫺ )—can be transferred across the air-water in- role for the pK a1 value. Its effect 共10– 40°C兲 on the pK a1 value is
terface 共Thistlethwayte 1972; U.S. EPA 1974; Matos and de described as a linear function 共U.S. EPA 1974; APHA et al.
Sousa 1992; Gostelow et al. 2001; Hvitved-Jacobsen 2002兲. 1995兲. For example, at a conductivity value of 0.7 mS cm⫺1, pK a1
Owing to the existence of the acid-base equilibrium of H2 S/HS⫺ , decreases from 7.12 to 6.84 when temperature increases from 15
the air-water transfer process is, thus, largely dependent on the to 35°C. As a result, the amount of H2 S共aq) at pH 7 decreases with
dissociation process 共Fig. 1兲. The sulfide ion (S2⫺ ) is practically increasing temperature from 40.9 to 56.7% of the total sulfide
negligible since it exists in insignificant amounts in typical do- concentration. In conclusion, it is crucial to understand that—
mestic wastewater 共Thistlethwayte 1972; U.S. EPA 1974; Steudel when determining the effect of temperature on emission of
2000兲. The dissociation process of H2 S is described to be a func- H2 S—taking into consideration the effect of temperature on the
tion of pH and K a1 共equilibrium constant兲 where K a1 is a function air-water transfer process itself as well as that on the dissociation
of temperature and conductivity 共Fig. 1兲. Conductivity 共at 25°C兲 process of H2 S is needed 共Fig. 1兲.
is recommended to be a substitute for ionic strength by U.S. EPA
共1974兲 and APHA et al. 共1995兲. For a practical convenience, Model Formulation
pK a1 , the negative logarithm of K a1 , is preferably used when
calculating the proportions of H2 S共aq) and HS⫺ . To account for the effect of temperature on process kinetics in
Dissociation of H2 S共aq) and HS⫺ can be expressed by Eq. 共2兲 many chemical and microbial contexts, the temperature coeffi-
cient 共␪兲 based on the Arrhenius equation 共i.e., the logarithmic
关 HS⫺ 兴
log ⫽pH⫺pK a1 (2)
关 H2 S共aq兲 ]
Figs. 2 and 3 show the dissociation of H2 S on the basis of H2 S共aq)
relative to total sulfide (H2 S(aq) plus HS⫺ ), caused by the effects
of pH, temperature, and conductivity in reference to pK a1 values
suggested by U.S. EPA 共1974兲 and APHA et al. 共1995兲. Taking
into account the relevant variations of these parameters 共pH, tem-
perature, and conductivity兲 in typical wastewater, pH is consid-
ered to be the most dominating factor for the amount of H2 S共aq)
being present and hence the most important factor determining
air-water transfer of H2 S. Therefore, it can be noted that the air-
water transfer rate of H2 S for this practical application is propor-
tional to the concentration of H2 S共aq) . It is clear from Fig. 2 that
Fig. 3. Dissociation of hydrogen sulfide 共H2 S/HS⫺ equilibrium兲 at
acidic conditions favor the amount of H2 S共aq) being present. As an
different conductivity and pH. Values of pK a1 共at 20°C兲 are obtained
example stated by U.S. EPA 共1974兲, at 25°C, conductivity of 0.2
from U.S. EPA 共1974兲 and APHA et al. 共1995兲.
mS cm⫺1, and pH 7.0, ‘‘H 2 S will escape about half as fast as

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004 / 105


temperature effect兲 is generally used. The Arrhenius equation, Eq. k H2S 共 T 兲 共 1⫹10pH⫺pKa1 共 T 兲 兲 ⫽k H2S 共 20兲 共 1⫹10pH⫺pKa1 共 20兲 兲 ␪ 共 T⫺20兲
共3兲, quantifies the temperature dependence of chemical reactions. (8)
Looking at the diffusion coefficient in water as a factor that leads
where k H2S(T) ⫽air-water transfer rate of H2 S 共h⫺1 ) at temperature
to gas transfer across the air-water interface, its dependence on
T in °C; k H2S(20) ⫽air-water transfer rate of H2 S 共h⫺1 ) at 20°C.
temperature has—for many years—experimentally been shown to
Eq. 共8兲 can be rearranged as follows:
follow the Arrhenius equation for a number of gases such as O2
共Davidson and Cullen 1957; Wise and Houghton 1966; Ferrell 1⫹10pH⫺pKa1 共 20兲
and Himmelblau 1967兲. Considering the gas-transfer rate across k H2S 共 T 兲 ⫽k H2S 共 20兲 ␪ 共 T⫺20兲 (9)
1⫹10pH⫺pKa1 共 T 兲
the air-water interface, several investigators such as Streeter
共1926兲, Elmore and West 共1961兲, and Bewtra et al. 共1970兲 used Within the temperature range of interest for in-sewer pro-
the Arrhenius equation to describe the temperature dependence of cesses, Eq. 共9兲 can—with good accuracy—be approximated by
O2 transfer. Jensen 共1991兲 and Wu and Masten 共2001兲 also ap-
plied the Arrhenius equation for the temperature dependence of k H2S 共 T 兲 ⫽k H2S 共 20兲 ␪ 共cT⫺20兲 (10)
krypton-85 ( 85Kr) transfer and ozone (O3 ) transfer, respectively. where ␪ c ⫽temperature coefficient due to the lumped effect 共com-
Following the results from these investigations, the Arrhenius bined兲 of temperature on the dissociation and emission processes.
equation is selected for the empirical description of the tempera-
ture dependence of H2 S transfer across the air-water interface

d ln k Ea
Materials and Methods
⫽ (3)
dT RT 2
Experimental Setup and Procedures
where k⫽rate constant 共h⫺1兲; T⫽temperature 共K兲; E a ⫽activation
The experimental setup and procedures used in this study were
energy of the reaction 共J mol⫺1兲; R⫽universal gas constant 共8.314
similar to those applied by Yongsiri et al. 共2002兲. All experiments
J mol⫺1 K⫺1兲. Integrating Eq. 共3兲 between temperatures T 1 and T 2
for the determination of the H2 S-transfer rates were conducted in
yields
closed vessels at constant pH and varying temperature. The vol-
k 2 E a 共 T 2 ⫺T 1 兲 umes of the water phase and the air phase of the closed vessels
ln ⫽ (4) were 2,500 and 870 mL, respectively. The hydraulic conditions of
k1 RT 2 T 1
the water phase defined as the Reynolds number of
in which k 1 and k 2 correspond to the rate constants at tempera- the magnetic stirrer 共Ljubisavljevic 1984兲 were—for all
tures T 1 and T 2 , respectively. experiments—held constant at a Reynolds number of about
Temperature in sewer networks typically varies within a nar- 38,200. The air phase was continuously flushed with water-
row range. As such, T 1 T 2 does not change considerably in prac- saturated nitrogen gas during the emission process. Constant tem-
tice, allowing the term E a (RT 2 T 1 ) ⫺1 to be considered constant. peratures in the water phase as well as in the air phase ranging
Introducing ␪⫽exp关Ea(RT2T1)⫺1兴, the temperature dependence of from 5 to 40°C 共⫾0.3°C兲 were obtained by placing the closed
the rate constants can then be reduced to the following relation- vessels in a water bath.
ship as first used by Streeter 共1926兲 for O2 transfer in the reaera- Deionized water was used as a medium. An acetate buffer
tion process: system was employed to obtain pH at 4.5 共corresponding to a
k 2 ⫽k 1 ␪ 共 T 2 ⫺T 1 兲 (5) conductivity value of 4.8 mS cm⫺1 at 25°C兲 whereas phosphate
buffer systems were used to obtain pH at 6.5 and 7.0 共correspond-
In general, T 1 is at 20°C. Thereupon, Eq. 共5兲 can be rewritten ing to conductivity values of 13.2 and 15.3 mS cm⫺1 at 25°C,
as follows: respectively兲. To avoid loss of sulfide from chemical oxidation,
k T ⫽k 20␪ 共 T⫺20兲 (6) the medium was deoxygenated with nitrogen gas prior to conduct-
ing the experiments. Sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2 S•9H2 O)
where k T ⫽rate constant at temperature T 共°C兲 and k 20⫽rate con- was added to the medium as the source of total sulfide. The initial
stant at 20°C. It is noted that ␪ for a specific process, in practice, concentration of total sulfide for all experiments was 7–12
must be determined experimentally. gS m⫺3. Using a syringe, samples for sulfide analysis were peri-
For weak acids such as H2 S, it must be recognized that the odically drawn through a stainless steel tube 共0.8-mm diameter兲.
transfer rate for the emission process is related to the molecular Sulfide was measured by the methylene blue method as described
form alone as the ionized form cannot be transferred across the by Cline 共1969兲.
air-water interface 关Eq. 共1兲 and Fig. 1兴. Consequently, when using Since only the H2 S共aq) fraction is active in the air-water trans-
total sulfide as the reference for H2 S emission, the effect of tem- fer process of H2 S, it was assumed that the effect of different
perature on the dissociation process must also be considered to- conductivity values originating from the buffer systems on the
gether with that on the emission process. Based on the emission transfer rate was negligible. The assumption on the negligible
and dissociation processes of H2 S, the mass balance for H2 S共aq) is effect of conductivity on pK a1 within a practical range of conduc-
described as tivity was based on U.S. EPA 共1974兲 and APHA et al. 共1995兲 as
shown in Fig. 3. The independence of the transfer rate on con-
d 关 H2 S共 aq兲 兴
⫽Rate of H2 S共aq兲 transferred from HS⫺ ductivity was confirmed by an experiment carried out at pH 4.5
dt and 20°C under the conductivity range of 4.8 –20.0 mS cm⫺1
共25°C兲. Under these conditions, almost all sulfide was present as
⫺Rate of H2 S共aq兲 emitted (7)
H2 S共aq) 共Fig. 3兲. The result 共Fig. 4兲 shows a slight tendency to-
By modifying Eqs. 共2兲 and 共7兲 as well as taking into account the ward decreasing transfer rates with increasing conductivity; how-
characteristics of air-water transfer of H2 S as described earlier, ever, the tendency is not statistically significant with a P value of
Eq. 共6兲 can be reformulated as 0.18 共at the 0.05 level of significance兲. Thus, it can be concluded

106 / JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004


Table 1. Linear Regression Statistics for Temperature Dependence of
Air-Water Transfer of Hydrogen Sulfide
Correlation
Study condition ln ␪c⫾SE coefficient 共r兲
pH 4.5 (n⫽21) 0.0334⫾0.0027 ( P⬍0.001) 0.94
pH 6.5 (n⫽16) 0.0282⫾0.0026 ( P⬍0.001) 0.95
pH 7.0 (n⫽27) 0.0210⫾0.0013 ( P⬍0.001) 0.96
Note: n⫽number of data; SE⫽standard error; P⫽P value from linear
regression analysis.

Fig. 4. Effect of conductivity on transfer rate of hydrogen sulfide at


20°C and pH 4.5. Number of measurements is 17. Level of signifi- that what is seen here is the effect of temperature on the transfer
cance applied is 0.05. rate 共emission process兲 alone owing to the insignificant effect of
temperature on the amount of the H2 S共aq) fraction 共dissociation
process兲 that is present at pH 4.5. In contrast, the effect of in-
that conductivity 共an estimate for ionic strength兲 plays no signifi- creasing temperature on the dissociation process 共i.e., a linear
cant role on the transfer rate of H2 S within the range of conduc- decrease in pK a1 with increasing temperature兲 becomes larger at
tivity relevant in this study. pH 6.5 and 7.0 caused by decreasing amount of the H2 S共aq) frac-
tion. Decreases in sulfide present as H2 S共aq) in percent were esti-
mated to be 77.6 –71.5% 共15–25°C兲 at pH 6.5 and 56.3–32.9%
Determination of Temperature Coefficients 共10– 40°C兲 at pH 7.0 共Fig. 5兲. This exemplifies the fact that the
Air-water transfer rates of H2 S were determined at varying tem- effect of temperature on H2 S transfer at conditions where both
perature and constant pH values of 4.5, 6.5, and 7.0. The transfer H2 S共aq) and HS⫺ coexist 共e.g., pH 7.0兲 is the lumped effect on
rates were calculated based on the measured sulfide loss 共due to both increased air-water transfer 共emission兲 and decreased
emission兲 in the water phase with time. The temperature coeffi- amounts of H2 S共aq) 共dissociation兲.
cient due to the lumped effect of temperature on dissociation and According to the collision theory and kinetic theory of gases,
emission (␪ c ) was determined by relating the transfer rates to Eq. the molecular fraction of collisions that has a minimum energy of
共10兲. By applying a natural logarithmic function, a linear relation- E a increases with increasing temperature as the molecular speed
ship can be obtained with ln ␪c being the slope of the linear equa- becomes greater. As proposed by Krenkel and Orlob 共1962兲, the
tion. gas-transfer process of O2 is dependent upon E a necessary for
reacting molecules to pass through the interface. A similar inter-
pretation must be true for H2 S, i.e., an increase in the transfer rate
Results and Discussion with temperature is theoretically expected within practical ranges
as the number of H2 S共aq) possessing a minimum energy of E a
increases. Despite the fact that increasing temperature will de-
Effect of Temperature crease the amount of the H2 S共aq) fraction and hence reducing
The logarithmic plots of the transfer rates and temperature 共as T transfer rates, a net increase in the transfer rates with temperature
⫺20) with reference to Eq. 共10兲 are shown in Fig. 5 for pH 4.5, within the range investigated 共5– 40°C兲 is observed. This refers to
6.5, and 7.0. Increases in the transfer rate with temperature were the two processes 共dissociation and emission兲 working in the op-
observed for all pH values investigated. At pH 4.5 where almost posite direction. The effect of increasing temperature plays a
all sulfide is present in the form of H2 S共aq) , there is no significant more influential role in air-water transfer of H2 S than in de-
effect of temperature on the amount of the H2 S共aq) fraction being creased amounts of H2 S共aq) , which implies that the number of
present 共Fig. 2兲. The amount of the H2 S共aq) fraction at pH 4.5 was H2 S共aq) possessing a minimum energy of E a still increases within
calculated to be 99.8 and 99.6% at 10 and 25°C, respectively this temperature range.
共shown in the brackets in Fig. 5兲. Therefore, it can be considered A linear regression analysis was used to fit the data for each
pH investigated. Table 1 summarizes regression statistics of the
results shown in Fig. 5. Using t-tests, each of the three slopes
(ln ␪c) is linear at a P value ⬍0.001 共statistically significant兲. It is,
therefore, concluded that there exists a linear relationship between
the natural logarithm of the transfer rate and temperature. This
indicates that the Arrhenius equation describing the temperature
dependence of chemical reactions can be applied for the air-water
transfer process of H2 S even though the effect of the dissociation
process is lumped into the description. From the slopes given in
Table 1, the temperature coefficient (␪ c ) for air-water transfer of
H2 S was calculated to be—with its 95% confidence interval—
1.0340⫾0.0057 共at pH 4.5兲. It must be recognized that this is
under the conditions where almost all sulfide is present in form of
H2 S共aq) , i.e., there are no significant effects of temperature and
conductivity on the amount of the H2 S共aq) fraction 共99.6 –99.8%兲.
Fig. 5. Effect of temperature on air-water transfer of hydrogen sul-
As a result, ␪ is approximately equal to ␪ c . However, when pH
fide at different pH. Numbers in brackets are calculated amounts of
was raised to 6.5 and 7.0, the ␪ c values due to the lumped effect
molecular hydrogen sulfide in percent.
of the transfer rate and the dissociation process, as expressed by

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004 / 107


and Dobbins 1967; Metzger 1968; Matsuo and Hirayama 1982兲,
the turbulence level in this study was kept constant as its extent
from an application point of view in sewer networks is expected
to be of minor importance for air-water transfer of H2 S.
From Eq. 共4兲, the E a value of the air-water transfer process of
H2 S was calculated to be 23,198 J mol⫺1 based on the observed ␪
at pH 4.5. In comparison with air-water transfer of O2 , a value of
16,719 J mol⫺1 was calculated based on data presented by Elmore
and West 共1961兲 whereas Krenkel and Orlob 共1962兲 estimated the
E a value to be 20,938 J mol⫺1 as the same order of magnitude for
water vaporization.
Fig. 6. Comparison of temperature coefficient for air-water transfer
of hydrogen sulfide observed at pH 4.5 as well as temperature coef-
ficients due to lumped effect observed at pH 6.5 and 7.0 and literature
values for other transferable substances 共cf. text兲. Error bars represent Conclusions and Perspectives
95% confidence intervals.
The effect of temperature on air-water transfer of hydrogen sul-
fide was studied. Increases in the air-water transfer rates of hy-
drogen sulfide with increasing temperature were observed for all
pH values investigated 共pH 4.5, 6.5, and 7.0兲. The Arrhenius
Eq. 共10兲, were found to be—with their 95% confidence equation can be employed to express the increase in the air-water
intervals—1.0286⫾0.0057 and 1.0212⫾0.0027, respectively, i.e., transfer rate with temperature, resulting in a temperature coeffi-
lower than that of pH 4.5. cient ␪⫽1.034 for the transfer process of molecular hydrogen
Using Eqs. 共9兲 and 共10兲 together with the ␪ c values obtained at sulfide at pH 4.5. The effect of temperature on air-water transfer
pH 6.5 and 7.0, the ␪ values for the air-water transfer process of of hydrogen sulfide as referred to total sulfide was smaller when
H2 S were calculated to compare with the directly observed value both species of hydrogen sulfide, i.e., the molecular and ionized
of 1.034 共at pH 4.5兲. The calculated ␪ values were 1.036 and forms, are present. The observed temperature dependence de-
1.037 corresponding to the observed ␪ c values at pH 6.5 and 7.0, creased significantly with increasing pH as satisfactorily ex-
respectively. Both of the calculated ␪ values were well within the plained by the importance of temperature on the dissociation pro-
error range found for ␪ at pH 4.5. It indicates that Eqs. 共9兲 and cess of hydrogen sulfide, i.e., ␪ c ⫽1.029 at pH 6.5 and ␪ c
共10兲 can be applied to describe the measured value well. When ⫽1.021 at pH 7.0. The temperature coefficient for air-water trans-
using total sulfide as the reference for H2 S emission, it is obvious fer of hydrogen sulfide is in a similar range to those reported for
that the effect of increasing temperature toward decreasing transfer of oxygen, ozone, and krypton-85.
H2 S共aq) concentrations and thereby decreasing transfer rates plays It is strongly suggested that the effect of pH on the emission
a significant role for the effect of temperature on air-water trans- process of hydrogen sulfide and the effect of pH on the tempera-
fer of H2 S. For example, applying Eqs. 共9兲 and 共10兲 on pH 8.0 ture dependence of the same process are taken into account when
will lead to the lumped effect on the transfer rate with ␪ c equal to concerned with odor and corrosion problems in sewer networks.
1.005, i.e., a remarkable decrease in the observed temperature The information obtained in the present study should be applied
dependence compared to what would be seen under more acidic when modeling the emission process of hydrogen sulfide for man-
conditions. In consequence, it is strongly suggested that this effect aging anaerobic sewer networks.
is taken into account when applying the temperature dependence
of H2 S emission.

Notation
Comparison with Other Transferable Substances
The following symbols are used in this paper:
Fig. 6 illustrates a comparison of the ␪ 共at pH 4.5兲 and ␪ c 共at pH E a ⫽ activation energy of reaction 共J mol⫺1兲;
6.5 and 7.0兲 values obtained in this study for air-water transfer of K a1 ⫽ equilibrium constant 共⫺兲;
H2 S and those for other transferable substances from the litera- k ⫽ rate constant 共h⫺1兲;
ture. Literature values of ␪ for O2 transfer vary from 1.006 to k H2S(T) ⫽ transfer rate of H2 S at temperature T (h⫺1 );
1.047 共Streeter 1926; Streeter et al. 1936; Downing and Truesdale k H2S(20) ⫽ transfer rate of H2 S at 20°C 共h⫺1兲;
1955; Truesdale and Vandyke 1958; Elmore and West 1961; k T ⫽ rate constant at temperature T (h⫺1 );
Metzger and Dobbins 1967; Metzger 1968; Barnhart 1969; Be- k 1 , k 2 ⫽ rate constants at temperatures T 1 and T 2 (h⫺1 ),
wtra et al. 1970; Parkhurst and Pomeroy 1972; Matsuo and respectively;
Hirayama 1982; Jensen 1991兲. Wu and Masten 共2001兲 and Jensen k 20 ⫽ rate constant at 20°C 共h⫺1兲;
共1991兲 found the ␪ values of 1.031 and 1.0352 for air-water trans- pK a1 ⫽ negative logarithm of equilibrium constant 共⫺兲;
fer of O3 and 85Kr, respectively. R ⫽ universal gas constant 共8.314 J mol⫺1 K⫺1兲;
It can be seen that the ␪ value for air-water transfer of H2 S is T ⫽ temperature 共K or °C兲;
in a similar range to those for transfer of O2 , O3 , and 85Kr 共Fig. T 1 , T 2 ⫽ temperatures 1 and 2 共K or °C兲, respectively;
6兲. In spite of some reports on gradual changes in ␪ as a function ␪ ⫽ temperature coefficient 共⫺兲; and
of turbulence for O2 transfer 共Elmore and West 1961; Metzger ␪ c ⫽ temperature coefficient due to lumped effect 共⫺兲.

108 / JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004


References Metzger, I. 共1968兲. ‘‘Effects of temperature on stream reaeration.’’ J.
Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 94共6兲, 1153–1159.
American Public Health Association 共APHA兲, American Water Works Metzger, I., and Dobbins, W. E. 共1967兲. ‘‘Role of fluid properties in gas
Association 共AWWA兲, and Water Environment Federation 共WEF兲. transfer.’’ Environ. Sci. Technol., 1, 57– 65.
共1995兲. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewa- Nielsen, P. H., and Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. 共1988兲. ‘‘Effect of sulfate and
ter, 19th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. organic matter on the hydrogen sulfide formation in biofilms of filled
Barnhart, E. L. 共1969兲. ‘‘Transfer of oxygen in aqueous solutions.’’ J. sanitary sewers.’’ J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 60, 627– 634.
Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 95共3兲, 645– 661. Pano, A., and Middlebrooks, E. J. 共1982兲. ‘‘Ammonia nitrogen removal in
Bewtra, J. K., Nicholas, W. R., and Polkowski, L. B. 共1970兲. ‘‘Effect of facultative wastewater stabilization ponds.’’ J. Water Pollut. Control
temperature on oxygen transfer in water.’’ Water Res., 4, 115–123. Fed., 54, 344 –351.
Boon, A. G., and Lister, A. R. 共1975兲. ‘‘Formation of sulphide in rising Parkhurst, J. D., and Pomeroy, R. D. 共1972兲. ‘‘Oxygen absorption in
main sewers and its prevention by injection of oxygen.’’ Prog. Water streams.’’ J. Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 98共1兲, 101–124.
Technol., 7, 289–300. Pomeroy, R., and Bowlus, F. 共1946兲. ‘‘Progress report on sulfide control
Cline, J. D. 共1969兲. ‘‘Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sul- research.’’ Sewage Works J., 13, 597– 640.
fide in natural waters.’’ Limnol. Oceanogr., 14, 454 – 458. Steudel, R. 共2000兲. ‘‘The chemical sulfur cycle.’’ Environmental tech-
Davidson, J. F., and Cullen, E. J. 共1957兲. ‘‘The determination of diffusion nologies to treat sulfur pollution—principles and engineering, P. N. L.
coefficients for sparingly soluble gases in liquids.’’ Trans. Inst. Chem. Lens and L. Hulshoffpol, eds., IWA, London, 1–31.
Eng., 35, 51– 60. Stratton, F. E. 共1968兲. ‘‘Ammonia nitrogen losses from streams.’’ J. Sanit.
Downing, A. L., and Truesdale, G. A. 共1955兲. ‘‘Some factors affecting the Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 94共6兲, 1085–1092.
rate of solution of oxygen in water.’’ J. Appl. Chem., 5, 570–581. Stratton, F. E. 共1969兲. ‘‘Nitrogen losses from alkaline water impound-
Elmore, H. L., and West, W. F. 共1961兲. ‘‘Effect of water temperature on ments.’’ J. Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 95共2兲, 223–231.
stream reaeration.’’ J. Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 87共6兲, Streeter, H. W. 共1926兲. ‘‘The rate of atmospheric reaeration of sewage
59–71. polluted streams.’’ Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 89, 1351–1364.
Ferrell, R. T., and Himmelblau, D. M. 共1967兲. ‘‘Diffusion coefficients of
Streeter, H. W., Wright, C. T., and Kehr, R. W. 共1936兲. ‘‘Measures of
nitrogen and oxygen in water.’’ J. Chem. Eng. Data, 12, 111–115.
natural oxidation in polluted streams III.’’ Sewage Works J., 8, 282–
Gostelow, P., Parsons, S. A., and Stuetz, R. M. 共2001兲. ‘‘Odour measure-
316.
ments for sewage treatment works.’’ Water Res., 35, 579–597.
Thistlethwayte, D. K. B. 共1972兲. The control of sulphides in sewerage
Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. 共2002兲. Sewer processes—microbial and chemical
systems, Butterworths, Sydney, Australia.
process engineering of sewer networks, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Jensen, N. A. 共1991兲. ‘‘Effect of temperature on gas transfer at low sur- Truesdale, G. A., and Vandyke, K. G. 共1958兲. ‘‘The effect of temperature
face renewal rates.’’ Air-water mass transfer, S. C. Wilhelms and J. S. on the aeration of flowing water.’’ Water Waste Treatment J., May/
Gulliver, eds., ASCE, New York, 106 –115. June, 9–11.
Krenkel, P. A., and Orlob, G. T. 共1962兲. ‘‘Turbulent diffusion and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 共U.S. EPA兲. 共1974兲. ‘‘Process de-
reaeration coefficient.’’ J. Sanit. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 88共2兲, sign manual for sulfide control in sanitary sewerage systems.’’ U.S.
53– 83. EPA Technology Transfer, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
Ljubisavljevic, D. 共1984兲. ‘‘Carbon dioxide desorption from the activated Wise, D. L., and Houghton, G. 共1966兲. ‘‘The diffusion coefficients of ten
sludge at the waste water treatment plants.’’ Gas transfer at water slightly soluble gases in water at 10– 60°C.’’ Chem. Eng. Sci., 21,
surfaces, W. Brutsaert and G. H. Jirka, eds., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The 999–1010.
Netherlands, 613– 620. Wu, J. J., and Masten, S. J. 共2001兲. ‘‘Mass transfer of ozone in semibatch
Matos, J. S., and de Sousa, E. R. 共1992兲. ‘‘The forecasting of hydrogen stirred reactor.’’ J. Environ. Eng., 127共12兲, 1089–1099.
sulphide gas build-up in sewerage collection systems.’’ Water Sci. Yongsiri, C., Vollertsen, J., and Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. 共2002兲. ‘‘Air-water
Technol., 26, 915–922. transfer of hydrogen sulfide—an approach for application in sewer
Matsuo, T., and Hirayama, K. 共1982兲. ‘‘Studies on oxygen transfer mod- networks.’’ Proc., WEF’s Specialty Conf. Odors and Toxic Air Emis-
els.’’ Water Sci. Technol., 14, 321–329. sions, Albuquerque, N.M., 共CD-Rom兲.

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING © ASCE / JANUARY 2004 / 109

You might also like