PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE NAME Dil Bhadur Ayer DEPARTMENT Civil/ Surveyor
EMPLOYEE ID N/A REVIEWER NAME
DESIGNATION Surveyor REVIEWER TITLE
LAST REVIEW DATE N/A TODAY'S DATE 31/08/2017

EVALUATION FACTORS SELF RATING RATING

(BY EMPLOYEE) (BY REVIEWER)

Report to work on time 4

Dedication
Use time constructively 4

Good working knowledge of job assignment 5

Performance
Organize and perform work in a timely, professional manner 4

Cooperation Willingly accept work assignments. 5

Perform assigned duties with little or no supervision. 4

Intiative
Strive to meet deadlines. 5

Communicate clearly and intelligently in person and during

Communication telephone contacts. 5

Teamwork Work well with fellow employees without friction. 4

Character Accept constructive criticism without unfavorable responses. 4

Responsiveness Handle stressful situations with tact. 5

Demonstrate a pleasant, calm personality when dealing with

Personality customers and fellow employees. 4

Well groomed. Clean. Neat 5

Appearance
Dress appropriately for work. 5

Maintain neat and orderly workstation. 5

Work Habits
Maintain neat and orderly paperwork. 5

Overall Performance Appraisal Score: 73 0

5 = Outstanding 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2 = Need Improvement 1 = Unsatisfactory

GOALS FOR NEXT REVIEW PERIOD (BY EMPLOYEE)

1. To continue the work of survey at transmission lines, HEP, and other places as needed.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION (BY REVIEWER)

 EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE REVIEWER SIGNATURE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSE :

The performance appraisal provides an annual written review of individual performance, in the context of the ongoing performance management process. It
is designed to facilitate constructive discussion between the employee and supervisor in order to clarify performance objectives, provide feedback about the
employee’s performance with respect to skills and behaviors, provide a framework for identifying employee development plans, and to serve as a basis for
merit increase decisions. Supervisors are responsible for completing the annual performance appraisal as part of the performance management process.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

The overall performance rating is assigned to indicate the level at which the employee has performed during the entire assessment period. Assign an overall
performance rating and then provide comments in support of the rating.

Rating Performance Definitions

Outstanding – Performance at this level is clearly unique and far in excess of established expectations. The employee
5 consistently exceeds expectations in the outcomes achieved in work quality, quantity and timeliness. The employee
exhibits leadership among peers in all dimensions of the field work performed.

Very Good – Performance at this level often exceeds established expectations and standards of work quality, quantity
4 and timeliness. The employee exhibits mastery of most dimensions of the field of work performed.

Good – Performance at this level meets established expectations and standards for work quality, quantity and timeliness.
3
The employee competently achieves the requirements of the position.

Needs Improvement – Performance at this level is below the level expected of an employee in the position.
2 Improvement is required in significant dimensions of the job in order to meet the expectations and standards for work
quality, quantity and timeliness.

Unsatisfactory – Performance at this level is unacceptable. The employee often fails to achieve basic requirements of
the position and has exhibited little or no improvement in job performance. The employee performing at this level
1 should not be continued in this position; or where extenuating circumstances exist, should be retained only upon
significant improvements within a fixed period of time to be defined by the organization.