You are on page 1of 8

Canadian

Psychiatric Association

Association des psychiatres


Original Research du Canada

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry /


La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie
Psychotropic Drug Use before, during, and 2017, Vol. 62(8) 543-550
ª The Author(s) 2017
after Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0706743717711168
in a Canadian Cohort (2001-2013) TheCJP.ca | LaRCP.ca

Christine Leong, BSc, BScPharm, PharmD1,


Colette Raymond, BScPharm, MSc, PharmD, ACPR, FCSHP2,
Dan Château, PhD2, Matthew Dahl, BSc2, Silvia Alessi-Severini, PhD1,
Jamie Falk, BScPharm, PharmD1, Shawn Bugden, BScPharm, MSc, PharmD1,
and Alan Katz, MBChB, MSc, CCFP2

Abstract
Objective: To describe the extent of increase in use and the rate of continuation versus discontinuation of psychotropic
agents before, during, and after pregnancy.
Methods: Rates of psychotropic use (antidepressants, anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, lithium,
stimulants) among women with a hospital-recorded pregnancy outcome were assessed using databases at the Manitoba
Centre for Health Policy. Rate of use was defined as 1 prescription over the total number of pregnancies in the 3-12 months
before pregnancy, 0-3 months before pregnancy, during pregnancy, or 3 months after pregnancy. Continued use was defined
as 2 prescriptions with gap 14 days. Poisson regression was used to analyze trends.
Results: Over the study period, a psychotropic drug was used before, during, or after pregnancy in 41,923 of 224,762
pregnancies. From 2001 to 2013, psychotropic use increased 1.5-fold from 11.1% to 16.2% (p < 0.0001) in the 3-12 months
before pregnancy, 1.6-fold from 6.4% to 10.5% (p < 0.0001) in the 3 months before pregnancy, 1.8-fold from 3.3% to 6.0% (p <
0.0001) during pregnancy, and 1.5-fold from 6.2% to 9.5% (p < 0.0001) in the 3 months postpartum. Among the 13,579 women
who received at least 1 psychotropic agent in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, 38.5% stopped the agent prior to pregnancy
and only 10.3% continued use throughout pregnancy. Continued use throughout pregnancy was higher (56.9%) among the
6693 women who received at least 2 prescriptions for a psychotropic agent and were at least 80% adherent in the 3 months
prior to pregnancy.
Conclusion: The use of psychotropic agents increased over 12 years. The safety of continuing versus discontinuing these
agents during pregnancy remains uncertain, but we observed a decrease in psychotropic drug use during the pregnancy period.

Keywords
drug use, pregnancy, pharmacoepidemiology, psychotropic drugs

As many as 10% of women of childbearing age experience challenging for many clinicians. It is therefore important to
mental illness and may be exposed to a psychotropic medi- study the pattern of psychotropic exposure in order to
cation prior to becoming pregnant.1-4 However, the relative address the clinical implications associated with the use of
risk of continuing versus discontinuing drug therapy during
pregnancy on maternal and child health outcomes remains 1
College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University
uncertain.5 Although not treating mental illness in pregnant of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
women may pose a higher risk of maternal relapse, poor 2
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Department of Community Health
obstetric care, and pregnancy complications,6 the perceived Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba
risk of psychotropic drug use during pregnancy may contrib-
ute to nonadherence and discontinuation of these agents.5,7 Corresponding Author:
Christine Leong, BSc, BScPharm, PharmD, College of Pharmacy, Rady
Clinicians are provided with limited guidance on how to Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 McDermot
best manage patients who are stable on medication during Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T5, Canada.
the perinatal period, and this decision is controversial and Email: christine.leong@umanitoba.ca
544 The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 62(8)

these drugs. To date, only a few observational studies have

(99.8)

(0.04)

(0.01)

(0.02)
(0.1)

(0.1)
Stimulant
examined the impact of continuing versus discontinuing psy-

(n,%)
chotropic agents during pregnancy, and findings on the risk

288
82
104
25
<6*
<6*
45
224,197
of continuing drug therapy during pregnancy are conflict-
ing.8-11 Surveys have reported that up to 60% of women had
poor adherence to chronic medication therapy during preg-

(99.0)

(0.03)
Antiepileptic

(0.4)
(0.1)
(0.3)
(0.1)

(0.1)
(0.1)
nancy.5,7 Previous studies have examined the extent of psy-

(n,%)
chotropic medication use and discontinuation during

880
246
666
232
73
121
125
222,419
pregnancy11-24; however, few studies have used large admin-
istrative databases that distinguished between regular and
intermittent users of these agents, and even fewer studies

224,540 (99.9)

20 (0.01)
48 (0.02)
24 (0.01)

13 (0.01)
examined these trends in a Canadian population. We also

106 (0.1)
Lithium
have limited knowledge about the intentional use of certain

(n,%)

<6*
<6*
psychotropic classes, such as stimulants, anxiolytics, and
mood stabilizers, from a population perspective. Manitoba
has one of the most comprehensive databases with which to
study psychotropic drug use from a population perspective.

221,747 (98.7)

75 (0.03)
Antipsychotic

1,284 (0.6)
273 (0.1)
494 (0.2)
395 (0.2)

361 (0.2)
133 (0.1)
We aimed to describe the extent of increase in use of select

(n,%)
psychotropic agents before, during, and after pregnancy and

Table 1. Overall psychotropic use (receipt of at least 1 prescription) before, during, and after pregnancy (N ¼ 224,762).

Drug

Note: Before pregnancy exposure is defined as 12 months before pregnancy; Post-partum exposure is defined 3 months after delivery.
to examine the rate of continued and discontinued use of
these agents during pregnancy between 2001 and 2013.

Antidepressant

197,494 (87.9)
11,417 (5.2)
2,817 (1.3)
5,424 (2.4)
3,556 (1.6)
706 (0.3)
1,371 (0.6)
1,977 (0.9)
*Values <6 could not be reported due to restrictions on reporting small cell counts by the health information privacy laws.
(n,%)
Methods
Data Sources
This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study to Sedative-Hypnotic
examine the frequency of psychotropic prescriptions dis-
196,391 (87.4)
12,795 (5.7)
2,466 (1.1)
4,210 (1.9)
3,819 (1.7)
701 (0.3)
2,839 (1.3)
1,541 (0.7)
pensed before, during, and after pregnancy between April
Anxiolytic/

(n,%)

1, 2001, and March 31, 2013. Data were obtained from the
administrative database of the Population Health Research
Data Repository located at the Manitoba Centre for Health
Policy (MCHP), which includes administrative data for 1.2
million individuals living in Manitoba.
All Psychotropics

182,839 (81.4)

The Drug Program Information Network (DPIN) database


16,913 (7.5)
4,132 (1.8)
9,084 (4.0)
4,798 (2.1)
1,012 (0.5)
2,871 (1.3)
was used to provide the outpatient prescription drug use of 3113 (1.4)
(n,%)

individuals living in Manitoba. DPIN captures the outpatient


prescription dispensing record (this includes the name and
strength of the medication, date of dispensing, days of supply,
and quantity dispensed) from community pharmacies of all
Pattern of Drug Use by Time Period Peri-Pregnancy

Manitobans regardless of drug coverage. Diagnoses were


identified by ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CA equivalent codes
Use During Pregnancy and Post Partum Only

from hospitalization (hospital abstracts) files. Prescription


data are linked to individuals with specific diagnoses from
Use Before and During Pregnancy Only

Use Before Pregnancy and Post-Partum

their contacts with the healthcare system (e.g., hospitaliza-


tions, prescriptions dispensed) through scrambled personal
health numbers. Emergency data are available from April 1,
1999, to March 31, 2013, and were used to capture emergency
Use During Pregnancy Only
Use Before Pregnancy Only

visit encounters in Winnipeg for pregnancies that occurred


No Use in All 3 Periods

Use Post-Partum Only

between April 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, to allow


Use in All 3 Periods

observation of emergency visits in the full year prior to preg-


nancy and 3 months after pregnancy. The Manitoba Health
Insurance Registry provided demographic information at the
beginning of each interval. Statistics Canada census data pro-
vided the average household income and income quintiles at
the beginning of each index interval.
La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 62(8) 545

Figure 1. Weighted percentage of pregnant women who filled at least 1 prescription for a psychotropic medication (2001-2013).

Cohort Among those with a livebirth, stillbirth, or intrauterine


death pregnancy outcome, we identified those with at least
Pregnant women were identified based on date of pregnancy
2 consecutive prescriptions for a psychotropic agent with a
outcome (index date) using ICD-9-CM (or corresponding
gap of 14 days or less between prescription fills in the 3
ICD-10-CA) codes for livebirth, stillbirth (ICD-9-CM
months prior to pregnancy and identified patients based on
656.4 or ICD-10-CA O36.4), and in-province specific hos-
their pattern of continued or discontinued use based on 4
pitalization or healthcare database (ICD-9-CM V27 or ICD-
categories: (1) patients who did not receive a subsequent
10-CA Z37); terminations, molar, or ectopic abortions; and
psychotropic medication in the first trimester; (2) patients
molar and ectopic pregnancies. Women with more than 1
who did not receive a subsequent psychotropic medication in
pregnancy during the study period were included as multiple
the second trimester; (3) patients who received a subsequent
pregnancy observations. Date of conception was determined
psychotropic medication throughout their entire pregnancy
by subtracting gestational age at delivery from the date of
(no gap of >14 days received in every trimester); and (4)
birth. Out-of-hospital births, midwife care, and nurse practi-
patients who filled a subsequent psychotropic medication
tioner care were not included in the analysis. Only those
intermittently throughout pregnancy (may have gap >14
women registered with Manitoba Health for 365 days pre-
days). The gap of 14 days between prescription fills that was
ceding the date of conception, through to at least 3 months
used to formulate the categories was established by estimat-
following the index date (delivery or termination), were
ing the end-date of each prescription using the supply (num-
included (approximately 6.2% of all pregnancies during the
ber of days) that was dispensed. As a secondary analysis, the
study period were excluded for not meeting this criterion).
average medication possession ratio (MPR) and the propor-
tion of women who received a psychotropic agent with an
Psychotropic Medication Exposure MPR of 80% or more in the 3 months prior to pregnancy,
during pregnancy, and for each category of use (discontinued
Psychotropic agents in this study included all available for- before first trimester, discontinued before second trimester,
mulations of antidepressants (ATC N06A and N06CA), continued use, intermittent use) were also determined to
anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics (N05B, N05C, and assess a change in adherence to medication. MPR was cal-
N03AE01), antiepileptic agents (N03A except N03AE01), culated using the days-supply received divided by the num-
antipsychotic agents (N05A except N05AN), lithium ber of days in the observation period.
(N05AN), and stimulant agents (N06B). The annual rate of
psychotropic use (among women with a hospital-recorded
pregnancy outcome [2001-2013]) was assessed. Rate of use Statistical Analysis
was defined as 1 prescription received by the total number SAS software for Windows, version 9.3, was used for all
of pregnancies in the 3 to 12 months before pregnancy, 3 analyses. Summary statistics (mean and standard deviation
months before pregnancy, during pregnancy (overall and for normally distributed data; median and interquartile range
separated by each trimester of pregnancy), and 3 months for skewed data) were used to describe prescription data.
after pregnancy. Poisson regression using a generalized estimating equation
546 The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 62(8)

Table 2. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women (birth outcome of livebirth, stillbirth, or intrauterine death
only) who had 1 psychotropic drug prescription dispensed in the 3 months prior to start of pregnancy.

Intermittent use No use after Stopped before Continuous use


throughout first trimester pregnancy throughout entire Overall
Characteristic pregnancy (n ¼ 3642) (n ¼ 2519) (n ¼ 4781) pregnancy (n ¼ 1211) (n ¼ 12,153)

Age (y), mean (SD) 28.4 (5.6) 27.5 (5.8) 27.0 (5.8) 29.7 (5.1) 27.8 (5.8)
Age group, n (%)
20 years 311 (8.5) 303 (12.0) 721 (15.1) 45 (3.7) 1380 (11.4)
21-29 years 1801 (49.5) 1260 (50.0) 2434 (50.9) 547 (45.2) 6042 (49.7)
30-39 years 1449 (39.8) 915 (36.3) 1551 (32.4) 584 (48.2) 4499 (37.0)
40 years 81 (2.2) 41 (1.6) 75 (1.6) 35 (2.9) 232 (1.9)
Year of start of pregnancy, n (%)
2000 125 (3.4) 121 (4.8) 281 (5.9) 27 (2.2) 554 (4.6)
2001 174 (4.8) 140 (5.6) 371 (7.8) 50 (4.1) 735 (6.0)
2002 211 (5.8) 175 (6.9) 371 (7.8) 67 (5.5) 824 (6.8)
2003 260 (7.1) 201 (8.0) 373 (7.8) 84 (6.9) 918 (7.6)
2004 280 (7.7) 200 (7.9) 376 (7.9) 75 (6.2) 931 (7.7)
2005 326 (9.0) 205 (8.1) 405 (8.5) 84 (6.9) 1020 (8.4)
2006 282 (7.7) 192 (7.6) 409 (8.6) 87 (7.2) 970 (8.0)
2007 320 (8.8) 211 (8.4) 424 (8.9) 98 (8.1) 1053 (8.7)
2008 346 (9.5) 220 (8.7) 407 (8.5) 122 (10.1) 1095 (9.0)
2009 367 (10.1) 245 (9.7) 381 (8.0) 143 (11.8) 1136 (9.3)
2010 392 (10.8) 262 (10.4) 408 (8.5) 158 (13.0) 1220 (10.0)
2011 432 (11.9) 272 (10.8) 461 (9.6) 174 (14.4) 1339 (11.0)
2012a 127 (3.5) 75 (3.0) 114 (2.4) 42 (3.5) 358 (2.9)
Income quintile, n (%)
Quintile 1 1272 (34.9) 879 (34.9) 1487 (31.1) 375 (31.0) 4013 (33.0)
Quintile 2 717 (19.7) 508 (20.2) 946 (19.8) 247 (20.4) 2418 (19.9)
Quintile 3 590 (16.2) 460 (18.3) 879 (18.4) 213 (17.6) 2142 (17.6)
Quintile 4 531 (14.6) 376 (14.9) 772 (16.1) 200 (16.5) 1879 (15.5)
Quintile 5 507 (13.9) 280 (11.1) 664 (13.9) 168 (13.9) 1619 (13.3)
Not found 25 (0.7) 16 (0.6) 33 (0.7) 8 (0.7) 82 (0.7)
Rural, n (%) 1397 (38.4) 1085 (43.1) 1912 (40.0) 405 (33.4) 4799 (39.5)
Primiparous, n (%) 1041 (28.6) 823 (32.7) 1654 (34.6) 378 (31.2) 3896 (32.1)
Health care utilization in year prior to
start of pregnancy, n (%)
Psychiatric services hospitalization 218 (6.0) 120 (4.8) 156 (3.3) 77 (6.4) 571 (4.7)
Inpatient hospitalization 870 (23.9) 561 (22.3) 1009 (21.1) 279 (23.0) 2719 (22.4)
Emergency visitb 1124 (30.9) 657 (26.1) 1179 (24.7) 401 (33.1) 3361 (27.7)
Co-medication in 3 months prior to start
of pregnancy, n (%)
Anxiolytic/sedative 1057 (29.0) 650 (25.8) 386 (8.1) 428 (35.3) 2521 (20.7)
Antipsychotic 194 (5.3) 75 (3.0) 42 (0.9) 98 (8.1) 409 (3.4)
Antidepressant 1702 (46.7) 1114 (44.2) 937 (19.6) 753 (62.2) 4506 (37.1)
Lithium 14 (0.4) 11 (0.4) s (s) s (s) 38 (0.3)
Antiepileptic 202 (5.5) 44 (1.7) 44 (0.9) 156 (12.9) 446 (3.7)
Stimulant 19 (0.5) 37 (1.5) 20 (0.4) 13 (1.1) 89 (0.7)
Opioid 768 (21.1) 439 (17.4) 333 (7.0) 271 (22.4) 1811 (14.9)
Psychiatric diagnosis in 3 yearsc prior to
start of pregnancy, n (%)
Mood/anxiety 3184 (87.4) 2130 (84.6) 3288 (68.8) 1062 (87.7) 9664 (79.5)
Schizophrenia 95 (2.6) 37 (1.5) 33 (0.7) 41 (3.4) 206 (1.7)
Substance use disorder 669 (18.4) 444 (17.6) 656 (13.7) 234 (19.3) 2003 (16.5)
Self-harm 81 (2.2) 50 (2.0) 68 (1.4) 35 (2.9) 234 (1.9)
Nonpsychiatric comorbidities in 3 yearsc
prior to start of pregnancy, n (%)
Cancer 21 (0.6) 23 (0.9) 36 (0.8) 17 (1.4) 97 (0.8)
Diabetes 190 (5.2) 110 (4.4) 167 (3.5) 43 (3.6) 510 (4.2)
Headache 530 (14.6) 352 (14.0) 543 (11.4) 156 (12.9) 1581 (13.0)
Epilepsy 181 (5.0) 29 (1.2) 34 (0.7) 121 (10.0) 365 (3.0)
a
2012 includes data only up to March 31, 2012.
b
Emergency department database only for Winnipeg emergency department visits from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2013. Population for characteristics was
limited to those whose start of pregnancy was on or after April 1, 2000, and end of pregnancy was on or before December 31, 2012.
c
There are 4.3% (523 pregnancies) with less than 3 years of coverage prior to start of pregnancy.
La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 62(8) 547

Figure 2. Comparison of discontinued (before first trimester and before second trimester), intermittent, and continued users among
pregnant patients (birth outcome of livebirth, stillbirth, intrauterine death only) who had 1 psychotropic drug prescription dispensed in the
3 months prior to start of pregnancy. Denominator is population who received at least 1 prescription for each class of drug in 3 months prior
to conception (shown in parentheses). Continuous use was defined as no gap greater than 14 days.

to account for repeated observations was used to analyze Results


trends in rates of psychotropic drug use. Poisson regression
During the study period, there were 41,923 of 224,762 preg-
models were used to compare the percentage of weighted
nancies in which at least 1 psychotropic drug was used in the
pregnancies from 2001 to 2013 with at least 1 psychotropic
12 months before pregnancy, during the pregnancy, or 3
medication for the 3-month prior period, for the during-
months after pregnancy. The rate of psychotropic use in the
pregnancy period, and for the 3-month postpartum period.
12 months before pregnancy was higher (7.5%) than use in
Weighted number of pregnancies was used since not all
the other periods (Table 1). Anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics
women complete all trimesters. The weighted value was cal-
and antidepressants were the most common psychotropic
culated by summing the actual number of days each woman
drugs used among these women. From 2001 to 2013, the
contributed during a time period for all pregnancies, and the
weighted percentage of pregnant women who received at
total number of days all pregnancies contributed to a time
least 1 psychotropic medication prescription increased 1.5-
period was then divided by the possible number of days in
fold from 11.1% to 16.2% (p < 0.0001) in the 3 to 12 months
that time period as the denominator (e.g., 91 days for each
before pregnancy, 1.6-fold from 6.4% to 10.5% (p < 0.0001)
trimester). Patient characteristics of psychotropic medication
in the 3 months before pregnancy, 1.8-fold from 3.3% to 6.0%
users overall and by category of continued and discontinued
(p < 0.0001) during pregnancy, and 1.5-fold from 6.2% to
use were described with descriptive statistics. Characteristics
9.5% (p < 0.0001) in the 3 months postpartum (Figure 1).
included maternal age (mean and proportion per age group
While an increase in the use of psychotropic agents was
[20, 21-29, 30-39, and 40 years]), income quintile, rural or
observed from 2001 to 2013, the rate of use was always high-
urban residence, primiparous versus multiparous, healthcare
est in the 3- to 12-month period before pregnancy and lowest
use in the year prior to start of pregnancy (psychiatric, inpa-
in the second and third trimester of pregnancy (Figure 1). For
tient hospitalization, emergency visit), co-medications in the 3
further information on the trend in use peripregnancy by drug
months prior to pregnancy (anxiolytic/sedatives, antipsycho-
class over time, see the online supplement.
tics, antidepressants, lithium, antiepileptics, stimulants,
The study identified 12,153 pregnant women with a birth
opioids), psychiatric diagnosis in 3 years prior to pregnancy
outcome of livebirth, stillbirth, or intrauterine death who had
(mood/anxiety, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, self-
at least 1 prescription for a psychotropic agent dispensed in
harm), and nonpsychiatric comorbidities in 3 years prior to
the 3 months prior to the start of pregnancy. Mean age was
pregnancy (cancer, diabetes, headache, epilepsy).
28 years (SD, 5.8 years). Baseline characteristics for patients
overall, and for those who were categorized as discontinued,
intermittent, and continued users of psychotropic agents, are
Ethics described in Table 2.
This study was conducted in compliance with the Privacy of Among those who filled at least 1 prescription for a psy-
Health Information Act of Manitoba and was approved by chotropic drug in the 3 months prior to pregnancy, 10.3%
the Research Ethics Board of the University of Manitoba and (n ¼ 1401) of pregnant patients continued their psychotropic
the Manitoba Health Information Privacy Committee. agent throughout pregnancy, and 38.5% (n ¼ 5226) and
548 The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 62(8)

20.7% (n ¼ 2812) stopped their psychotropic medication

Restricted to women who filled at least 2 consecutive prescriptions for the psychotropic agent in the 3 months prior to pregnancy with a medication possession ratio of at least 80% based on the additive day
Stimulant,

22 (24.4)

35 (38.9)

29 (32.2)
n (%)
prior to their first and second trimesters, respectively.
Approximately 30.5% (n ¼ 4140) of patients were consid-

<6
ered intermittent users of these agents throughout pregnancy.
Antidepressant, Antipsychotic, Lithium, n Antiepileptic, The proportions of patients who continued, discontinued,

51 (11.1)

66 (14.4)

293 (63.7)
50 (10.9)
n (%) and intermittently used their agents by psychotropic drug
class are shown in Figure 2. When the population was
restricted to only those who filled at least 2 consecutive
Table 3. Pattern of continued and discontinued psychotropic use among pregnant women resulting in a livebirth, stillbirth, or intrauterine death (n ¼ 6693)a.

prescriptions (gap 14 days apart) in the 3 months prior to

12 (36.36)
10 (30.3)
pregnancy who were at least 80% adherent (80% MPR) (n ¼
(%)

6693), a higher proportion of women continued use through


<6

<6 the entire pregnancy (56.9%, n ¼ 3808), and only 16.5% (n


¼ 1105) and 15.2% (n ¼ 1020) stopped their psychotropic
54 (16.4)

59 (17.9)

159 (48.3)
57 (17.3)

medication prior to the first and second trimesters, respec-


n (%)

tively. Only 11.4% (n ¼ 760) were considered intermittent


users of these agents throughout pregnancy (Table 3). Anti-
epileptic drugs were among the psychotropic agents that
Drug

were most likely to be continued throughout pregnancy.


821 (20.1)

820 (20.1)

1837 (44.9)
610 (14.9)

Among the 460 women who received at least 2 prescriptions


n (%)

for an antiepileptic drug and were 80% adherent in the 3


months prior to pregnancy, 63.7% continued their treatment
throughout pregnancy (Table 3).
Anxiolytic/sedative-

Discussion
hypnotic, n (%)

201 (11.3)

448 (25.2)

745 (41.9)
384 (21.6)

This study presents population-based, real-world patterns of


psychotropic medication use before, during, and after preg-
nancy. While an increasing trend in the use of psychotropic
drugs was observed in all periods from 2001 to 2013, the use
of these agents decreased considerably during the pregnancy
period. However, the majority of women who were more
All psychotro-

1105 (16.5)

1020 (15.2)

3808 (56.9)
760 (11.4)

likely to be adherent to their psychotropic medication prior


pic, n (%)

to becoming pregnant were observed to continue their treat-


ment with good adherence throughout pregnancy. This
reflects current practice guidelines that recommend women
who are stable on needed treatment to continue their therapy
trimester
Pattern of drug use by time period before and during pregnancy

if the benefit of continuing outweighs the risk of discontinu-


Third

N/A

N/A

ing that agent.25-27 This pattern of use could also be an


indication that women with more severe disorders or better
controlled disorders are more likely to continue their
trimester
Second

medications.
N/A

N/A

Our findings were consistent with previous studies that


Continuous use throughout entire pregnancy

examined the extent of psychotropic drug use and the rates of


continuation and discontinuation of these agents during
0-3 months before pregnancy trimester

pregnancy.11-24 While antidepressants,20,23,24 antipsycho-


First

N/A

tics,15,20,21 lithium,18,23 and anticonvulsants16,17,20,23 are


Stopped before second trimester

commonly received before and during early pregnancy in


Use before and intermittently
Stopped before first trimester

the United Kingdom, Quebec (Canada), and the United


States, a similar decrease in use was observed in late preg-
throughout pregnancy

nancy in these studies. However, it is not known whether the


N/A ¼ not applicable.

women in these studies, whose use was based on the receipt


of pregnancy

of pregnancy

of at least 1 antidepressant prescription, were adherent users


of these agents prior to pregnancy. Moreover, our findings
will build on the limited detailed data on the pattern of
supply.

sedative-hypnotic and stimulant medication during


pregnancy.
a
La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 62(8) 549

Our study had a number of strengths, including a large Funding


sample size and comprehensive database not restricted to The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support
income or age, which adds to the existing literature on psy- for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Fund-
chotropic use during pregnancy. We also made a distinction ing for this study was provided by the Canadian Network for Obser-
between those who filled only 1 prescription prior to preg- vational Drug Effects Studies (CNODES), a collaborating centre of
nancy and those who had good adherence to medication the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network funded by the Canadian
prior to pregnancy. There were a few limitations worth not- Institutes of Health Research.
ing. We were unable to determine whether the decision to
stop medication was based on the decision of the physician, Supplemental Material
patient, or both. We also did not identify the indication for See the supplemental figures and tables at http://journals.sagepub.
the psychotropic agent. The number of patients who received com/doi/full/10.1177/0706743717711168.
lithium and stimulant medication in our sample was small.
We also did not look at specific agents within each class of References
psychotropic agents, which warrants further investigation 1. Mental Illness and Addiction in Canada, 3rd edition. Mood
due to some inherent differences within each class. Data Disorders Society of Canada; November 2009 [cited 2015 Sep
from these administrative databases do not capture those 23]. Available from: http://www.mooddisorderscanada.ca/doc
who do not use medical services during pregnancy or who uments/Media%20Room/Quick%20Facts%203rd%20Edition
deliver outside a hospital setting. We are only able to calcu- %20Referenced%20Plain%20Text.pdf
late the rate of use based on the dispensing of medications 2. Depression among women. Centre for Disease Control and
captured within these databases, which may not reflect Prevention (CDC) [cited 2017 Feb 15]. Available from:
actual drug consumption. However, the use of administrative https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/depression/.
databases is not prone to recall bias and encompasses pre- 3. Fisher J, Cabral de Mello M, Patel V, et al. Prevalence and
scription use for the entire population. Moreover, we did determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women
attempt to determine the rates of use based on patients who in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic
received at least 2 prescriptions with an MPR of at least 80% review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(2):139-149.
to capture those more likely to have consumed these agents. 4. Pregnancy and women’s mental health in Canada. Public
Further investigation is warranted to examine the impact of Health Agency of Canada. Last updated October 9, 2014 [cited
continuing versus discontinuing psychotropic agents during 2015 Sep 23]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/
pregnancy on maternal mental health. rhs-ssg/factshts/mental_health-sante_mentale-eng.php
In conclusion, while the use of psychotropic agents 5. Stevenson F, Hamilton S, Pinfold V, et al. Decisions about the
increased over 12 years, we observed a decrease in use dur- use of psychotropic medication during pregnancy: a qualitative
ing the pregnancy period among women in a Canadian pop- study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e010130.
ulation; this is similar to the patterns of use observed in other 6. Bonari L, Bennett H, Einarson A, et al. Risks of untreated
countries. Continued use of psychotropic drug treatment was depression during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2004;
more likely in those who had good adherence to medication 50(Jan):37-39.
before pregnancy. These findings will provide the basis for 7. Lupattelli A, Spigset O, Bjornsdottir, et al. Patterns and factors
future research examining the clinical implications of con- associated with low adherence to psychotropic medications
tinuing versus discontinuing these agents during pregnancy. during pregnancy—a cross-sectional, multinational web-
based study. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(6):426-436.
8. Swanson SA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Palmsten K, et al. Methodologi-
Acknowledgements cal considerations in assessing the effectiveness of antidepressant
The authors acknowledge the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, medication continuation during pregnancy using administrative
University of Manitoba, for the use of data contained in the Popu- data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(9):934-942.
lation Health Research Data Repository (Health Information Pri- 9. Yonkers KA, Gotman N, Smith MV, et al. Does antidepressant
vacy Committee [HIPC] No. 2013/2014-35). The results and use attenuate the risk of a major depressive episode in preg-
conclusions are those of the authors, and no official endorsement
nancy? Epidemiology. 2011;22(6):848-854.
by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba Health,
10. Cohen LS, Altshuler LL, Harlow BL, et al. Relapse of major
Seniors and Active Living, or other data providers is intended or
should be inferred. Data used in this study are from the Population depression during pregnancy in women who maintain or dis-
Health Research Data Repository housed at the Manitoba Centre continue antidepressant treatment. JAMA. 2006;295(5):
for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, and were derived from 499-507.
data provided by Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living. 11. Kulaga S, Sheehy O, Zargarzadeh AH, et al. Antiepileptic drug
use during pregnancy: perinatal outcomes. Seizure. 2011;
20(9):667-672.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests 12. Kallen B, Borg N, Reis M. The use of central nervous system
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect active drugs during pregnancy. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6(10):
to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. 1221-1286.
550 The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 62(8)

13. Cohen LS, Altshuler LL, Stowe ZN, et al. Reintroduction of 21. Toh S, Li Q, Cheetham TC, et al. Prevalence and trends in the
antidepressant therapy across pregnancy in women who previ- use of antipsychotic medications during pregnancy in the U.S.,
ously discontinued treatment: a preliminary retrospective 2001–2007: a population-based study of 585,615 deliveries.
study. Psychother Psychosom. 2004;73(4):255-258. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013;16(2):149-157.
14. Roca A, Imaz ML, Torres A, et al. Unplanned pregnancy and 22. Bobo WV, Davis RL, Toh S, et al. Trends in the use of anti-
discontinuation of SSRIs in pregnant women with previously epileptic drugs among pregnant women in the US, 2001–2007:
treated affective disorder. J Affect Disord. 2013;150(3): a medication exposure in pregnancy risk evaluation program
807-813. study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(6):578-588.
15. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Osborn DJ, et al. Discontinuation of 23. Petersen I, McCrea RL, Sammon CJ, et al. Risks and benefits
antipsychotic medication in pregnancy: a cohort study. Schi- of psychotropic medication in pregnancy: cohort studies based
zophr Res. 2014;159(1):218-225. on UK electronic primary care health records. Health Technol
16. Epstein RA, Bobo WV, Shelton RC, et al. Increasing use Assess. 2016;20(23):1-176.
of atypical antipsychotics and anticonvulsants during 24. Ramos E, Oraichi D, Rey E, et al. Prevalence and predictors of
pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(7): antidepressant use in a cohort of pregnant women. BJOG.
794-801. 2007;114(9):1055-1064.
17. Man SL, Petersen I, Thompson M, et al. Antiepileptic drugs 25. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
during pregnancy in primary care: a UK population based (SOGC). SOGC position statement: use of antidepressants in
study. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52339. pregnancy. Approved by the SOGC Executive: January 27,
18. McCrea RL, Nazareth I, Evans SJ, et al. Lithium prescribing 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: https://sogc.org/
during pregnancy: a UK primary care database study. PLoS wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SOGCpositionStatementAntiDe
One. 2015;10(3):e0121024. pressants_FINAL.pdf
19. Petersen I, Gilbert RE, Evans SJ, et al. Pregnancy as a major 26. Armstrong C. ACOG guidelines on psychiatric medication use
determinant for discontinuation of antidepressants: an analysis during pregnancy and lactation. Am Fam Physician. 2008;
of data from the Health Improvement Network. J Clin Psychia- 78(6):772-778.
try. 2011;72(7):979-985. 27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
20. Margulis AV, Kang EM, Hammad TA. Patterns of prescription Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and
of antidepressants and antipsychotics across and within preg- service guidance (CG192). Clinical Guideline. Last updated
nancies in a population-based UK cohort. Matern Child Health June 2015 [cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: https://www.
J. 2014;18(7):1742-1752. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192/chapter/1-recommendations

You might also like