Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Repositioning of Empty Containers Can Improve Brazilian Soybean Grains Exports Through Manaus Ports
The Repositioning of Empty Containers Can Improve Brazilian Soybean Grains Exports Through Manaus Ports
q Two main kinds of operations challenge the cost issue of exporting soybean grains through Manaus:
transshipments and container shipping. Transshipments force a 19% increase along the existing
routes, and extra 12% are added to the total costs in shipping containers to Porto Velho. Therefore,
overall costs reach 31% along the export route through Manaus. Both costs (12% and 19%) need to be
reduced in order to make the Manaus export route more competitive in relation to the Santos route.
Results and discussion of insights
Costs of maritime transport in 20’ and 40’ containers and total price in US$ of soybean delivered to
Shangai, China including reduced values of domestic freights (metric ton, 3rd qtr).
Source: Oliveira (2015); Salin (2020).
Route 1 Route 2 Route 3 Route 4
Containers
(SP) (AM) (SP) (AM)
20’ 112.06 140.91 109.07 143.05
Cost in national transport
40’ 112.06 154.68 109.07 156.82
20’ 44.83 22.72 44.83 22.72
Cost in ocean transport
40’ 44.83 24.07 44.83 24.07
20’ 156.89 166.63 153.90 165.77
Transport total cost
40’ 156.89 178.75 153.90 180.89
20’ 536.00 542.74 533.01 544.88
Soybean cost in the receiving country
40’ 536.00 557.86 533.01 560.00
Transport % of landed cost 20’ 29.27 30.70 28.90 30,42
Transport % of landed cost 40’ 29.27 32.04 28.90 32.30
Results and discussion of insights
q Routes associated to the use of empty containers and Manaus Private Port Terminals, aimed
at Brazilian soybean exports, appear viable and more generally advantageous than those
leading to Santos port. Advantages can be represented, for example, by the achievement of a
53% waterway soybean transport, leading to a considerable carbon footprint decrease; a four-
day reduction in total transit period; and the possibility opened to producers to negotiate
deadlines and soybean prices due to a faster flow along the harvest transportation chain.
q The 2,8% increase in the costs of the route to Manaus are subjected to reduction, provided
that optimizations are made along the transportation chain. Such increase, it should be
reminded, is minimal when compared to the benefits generated to all the actors involved in the
transport of soybean grains. This in turn opens the perspective to engender satisfactory profits
that can be distributed in a more balanced way along the chain.
Conclusions and future research
The proposition of a new export route through Manaus can be advantageous to the purchaser, the importer and the
ship-owner. The first does not need to pay the demurrage, a type of tax frequently charged in Santos port; the second
faces reduced costs along this route since the cost of maritime transport, for instance, is 45% lower than the one
observed along the route to Santos; the third benefits from the possibility of directing the ship straight to China (or
other country of destination), increasing productivity and avoiding the search for freights in other ports in the long
way back to China carrying empty containers, a trip that takes approximately 90 days. The port agent also benefits
from this route because productivity parameters can get close to optimum levels due to the increased movement of
containerized cargoes.
Conclusions and future research
The loading of empty containers in the city of Manaus would permit a considerable increase of soybean
exports through the ports of North Brazil: around 1.6 tons/year. Such figure equals in volume to the
highest numbers held by southern soybeans export ports, confirming the growth of Manaus exports and
the advancement of navigation in “Arco Norte” with no significant demands of investments in port and
waterway infrastructure (OLIVEIRA, 2015).
Conclusions and future research
Future research shall deal with the logistics bottleneck highlighted in the present study:
transshipment. Therefore, simulation of two different practices is potentially demanded:
1 – transference procedures and mechanisms of soybean grains from trucks to containers using the
force of gravity; 2 – transporting soybean grains in barges from Porto Velho to Manaus supported by
the corresponding cost assessment of such an operation.
Cargill. (2015). Relatório anual 2015. Os 150 anos de história no mundo e 50 anos de Brasil. Retrieved from http
s://www.cargill.com.br/pt_BR/doc/1432101667412/relat%C3%B3rio-anual-2015-pdf-pt-br.pdf.
Dupuit, J. 1848. Études théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux courantes. Paris, France: Carilian-
Goeury.
Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Intergrated Cost System to Drive Profitability and Perfor
mance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Oliveira, B. D. (2015). Análise dos custos de transporte de soja por meio de contêineres e os terminais portuários
de Manaus como uma nova rota para exportação da soja brasileira. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade
Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Salin, D. Soybean Transportation Guide: Brazil 2019. August 2020. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketi
ng Service. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.9752/TS048.08-2020>
• Authors
brunoduarte@ufam.edu.br augusto@ufam.edu.br