You are on page 1of 8

Johnston

ORIGINALand
ARTICLE
Vieira

Caries Experience and Overall Health Status

Lindsay Johnstona/Alexandre R. Vieirab

Purpose: The aim of this work was to evaluate whether self-reported systemic diseases were associated with caries
experience.

Materials and Methods: Medical history data and caries experience (DMFT and DMFS; Decayed, Missing due to car-
ies, Filled Teeth/Surface) were obtained from the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine dental registry and
DNA repository. Information on 1,281 subjects was evaluated (839 with primary caries and 492 with secondary caries
experience). Regression analysis was used to test for association between caries experience and disease status.

Results: Associations were found between caries experience and specific conditions: stroke (R2 = 0.007, P = 0.001),
asthma (R2 = 0.003, P = 0.025), hepatitis (R2 = 0.009, P = 0.0001), liver disease (R2 = 0.009, P = 0.00001), high
blood pressure (R2 = 0.072, P = 0.00001) and diabetes (R2 = 0.03, P = 0.00001). We found primary caries to be as-
sociated with hepatitis (DMFT with R2 = 0.011, P = 0.002 and DMFS with R2 = 0.008, P = 0.006). We also found an
association between secondary caries and asthma (DMFS with R2 = 0.006, P = 0.04), high blood pressure (DMFT with
R2 = 0.014, P = 0.005 and DMFS with R2 = 0.043, P = 0.00001) and diabetes (DMFT with R2 = 0.013, P = 0.007 and
DMFS with R2 = 0.023, P = 0.00001).

Conclusion: Hepatitis, asthma, high blood pressure, stroke, liver disease and diabetes are associated with higher car-
ies experience.

Key words: AIDS, asthma, cardiovascular diseases, caries, diabetes, epilepsy, hepatitis, high blood pressure, HIV,
kidney disease, liver disease, stroke, tuberculosis

Oral Health Prev Dent 2014;2:163-170 Submitted for publication: 25.08.12; accepted for publication: 26.02.13
doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a31670

O ver the last decade, the possible role of oral


health as a risk factor for systemic disease has
been highlighted in multiple instances. Evidence
ed that every individual should visit her/his dentist
at least once a year (Kay, 1999). However, poor and
minority individuals, who experience greater levels
from paleopathology, medical explorers’ accounts, of both dental and systemic disease, frequently face
population migration data, World Wars I and II and cost and other system-level barriers to obtaining
epidemiology suggests caries and systemic chron- care in the private practice dental delivery system
ic non-communicable diseases are associated. (Manski et al, 2001; Green et al, 2003; Riley et al,
Dental and systemic disease associate based on 2003). For these individuals, non-traditional sources
geography, genetics, history and cluster within indi- of dental care, such as physicians’ offices, other
viduals and within populations (Hujoel, 2009). medical settings and the hospital emergency room,
Family physicians commonly encounter patients have been alternative options (Cohen and Manski,
with caries (Nguyen and Martin, 2008). It is suggest- 2006). Unfortunately, according to a cross-section-
al, random-digit telephone survey sponsored by the
a
CDC and all US states and territories in 2003 (Lutfiy-
System Analyst, Health Information Management, School of
Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, ya et al, 2008), although periodic medical examina-
Pittsburgh, PA, USA. tions of healthy individuals aiming to foster patients’
b
Associate Professor, Department of Oral Biology, University of good health is proposed (American Medical Associa-
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. tion, 1983), only 2.6% of 97,001 healthy adults re-
Correspondence: Alexandre R. Vieira, 614 Salk Hall, Department of ported have received primary prevention.
Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh,
3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 15261. Tel: +1-412-383- Even though the issues related to access to care
8972, Fax: +1-412-624-3080. Email: arv11@pitt.edu need to be addressed, dentistry has an important

Vol 12, No 2, 2014 163


Johnston and Vieira

role in promoting overall health. While physicians role of the School of Dental Medicine is to educate
are missing opportunities to provide primary pre- dental health professionals, and students depend
vention, the promotion of oral health has been sug- on the patients’ commitment to complete neces-
gested as a way to promote overall health, since sary educational requirements. For the most part,
there is a possible role of oral infections as a risk patients treated are from the greater Pittsburgh
factor for systemic disease. Caries remains the area; individuals with lower socioeconomic status
most prevalent non-transmissible infectious dis- and hence higher risk for all oral and overall health
ease in the USA and in the rest of the world (World problems tend to be over-represented in the pa-
Health Organization, 2003). Research on the rela- tient pool. However, the population treated at the
tionship between caries and systemic diseases has School of Dental Medicine and the individuals par-
provided evidence that caries may be associated ticipating in the registry well represent the distribu-
with cardiovascular diseases (Holm-Pedersen et al, tion of individuals from Pittsburgh, which is com-
2005; Sugihara et al, 2010), esophageal cancer prised of approximately 65% Whites, 26% African
(Dye et al, 2007), asthma (Stensson et al, 2008; Americans with the remaining consisting of Hispan-
Anjomshoaa et al, 2009) and epilepsy (Anjomshoaa ics, Asians and other groups. Since September of
et al, 2009). At least some of these associations 2006, all individuals seeking treatment at the Uni-
are proposed to be related to dietary habits. It has versity of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine
been postulated that prevention of caries through have been invited to be part of the registry. These
fermentable carbohydrate restriction helps reduce individuals give written informed consent authoris-
the burden of diabetes, myocardial infarction and ing the extraction of information from their dental
other chronic non-communicable diseases (Yudkin, records and collection of a saliva sample. Saliva
1972a,b; Cleave, 1974; Hujoel, 2009). samples are stored for future genetic studies. This
In this study, a population from Pittsburgh, Penn- project is approved by the University of Pittsburgh
sylvania was examined, since this population is at Institutional Review Board. In January 2012, data
particularly high risk for both oral and overall chron- from 1,281 individuals with complete information
ic diseases (Anjomshoaa et al, 2009). Pittsburgh is on medical history and caries experience were ex-
the largest city in the Appalachian region of the tracted from the registry for this project. Medical
United States and one of the poorest in the coun- history data are obtained from a standard form
try. Despite the fact that Pittsburgh has had fluori- used at the dental clinics. Patients are asked to fill
dated water since 1953, nearly half of the children out the medical history form and information is
in Pittsburgh between 6 and 8 years old have had then revised by the dentist with the patient. The
cavitated carious lesions according to a 2002 severity of self-reported conditions is not described
State Department of Health report (Pennsylvania in more detail unless it impacts potential dental
Department of Health, 2002). More than 70% of treatment; variables related to the severity of self-
15-year-olds in the city have had cavitated carious reported medical conditions could not be included
lesions, the highest percentage in the state. Close in the present study.
to 30% of the city’s children have untreated cavi- To detect any confounders, ANOVA and Student’s
tated carious lesions. That is more than double the t-test were employed to determine sex and ethnicity
state average of 14%. differences in caries experience. Further, simple
A better understanding of the possible relation- chi-square tests were used to determine sex and
ships between caries experience and systemic dis- ethnicity differences in each of the diseases re-
eases may provide new insight into the influences corded in the medical history. Caries experience
of oral health on overall health. The purpose of this was defined by the DMFT (Decayed, Missing teeth
study was to investigate whether caries experience due to caries, Filled Teeth) and DMFS (Decayed,
indicators are associated with concomitant sys- Missing teeth due to caries, Filled Surfaces) scores.
temic disease in a high-risk population. These scores were generated from the information
from the last dental visit and were based on a mod-
ified World Health Organization protocol that also
MATERIALS AND METHODS included evaluations of radiographs and incipient
enamel (white spot) lesions. In other words, both
All subjects were participants in the Dental Regis- lesions in dentin (D3) and lesions in enamel (D1)
try and DNA Repository (DRDR) of the University of contributed to the DMFT and DMFS scores. Caries
Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine. The primary experience data were recorded at the dental office

164 Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry


Johnston and Vieira

with the use of proper illumination and with the gen- DMFT scores ranged from 0 to 28, while DMFS
tle use of the explorer. Missing teeth due to perio- scores ranged from 0 to 140.
dontal disease, trauma or orthodontic treatment Table 3 shows the results from the univariate lo-
were not counted in the DMFT/DMFS scores to gistic regression for individuals with primary caries.
avoid inflating these indexes. Also, dental prosthe- Primary caries was found to be associated with
ses involving sound teeth as bases for pontics were hepatitis (DMFT with R2 = 0.011, P = 0.002 and
not counted as filled teeth to avoid inflating the DMFS with R2 = 0.008, P = 0.006). No other dis-
DMFT/DMFS scores. These data were revised by a ease showed a statistically significant association
calibrated dentist from a team of 12 professionals. with primary caries.
Calibration is performed annually before the start Of the 1,281 participants listed in the DRDR,
of every school year but no inter- or intra-examiner 492 had secondary carious lesions, a 38.4% preva-
agreement rate data are generated. Individuals lence rate. The subjects’ ages ranged from 11 to
were also defined as having primary disease experi- 89 years, with a mean age of 50.48 years (median
ence (individuals with no evidence of failed restora- 52 years, standard deviation 17.18 years). The
tive treatment) or secondary disease experience mean DMFT score was 18.35, while the mean
(individuals with evidence of recurrent carious le- DMFS score was 61.74. DMFT scores ranged from
sions and previous restorations that failed). Logis- 1 to 28, while DMFS scores ranged from 1 to 128.
tic regression was used to analyse main-effect Table 4 shows the results on secondary caries
models to predict caries status based on self-re- from the univariate logistic regression. An associa-
ported past and current disease status collected tion was found between secondary caries and asth-
from the medical history included in the registry. ma (DMFS with R2 = 0.006, P = 0.04), high blood
The confounding variables included age, sex, eth- pressure (DMFT with R2 = 0.014, P = 0.005 and
nicity, tobacco use, alcohol use and medication in- DMFS with R2 = 0.043, P = 0.00001) and diabetes
take. All analyses were adjusted for these variables. (DMFT with R2 = 0.013, P = 0.007 and DMFS with
R2 = 0.023, P = 0.00001).

RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Table 1 provides frequencies of self-reported sys-
temic conditions by sex and ethnicity. A total of This cross-sectional analysis of a population from
1,281 subjects were studied, with ages ranging Pittsburgh, PA, USA at high risk for caries experi-
from 6 to 94 years and a mean age of 47.71 years ence and systemic diseases provides evidence
(median 48 years, standard deviation 17.68 years). that supports an association between caries expe-
The univariate logistic regression analysis of all rience and specific systemic conditions, namely
data provided statistical evidence of an associa- hepatitis, asthma, high blood pressure, stroke, liv-
tion between caries and stroke (DMFT with er disease and diabetes.
R2 = 0.006, P = 0.004 and DMFS with R2 = 0.007, Asthma is one of the most common chronic ail-
P = 0.001), asthma (DMFT with R2 = 0.003, ments in children and its frequency has steadily in-
P = 0.03 and DMFS with R2 = 0.003, P = 0.025), creased in the last two decades (Mannino et al,
hepatitis (DMFT with R2 = 0.008, P = 0.001 and 1998; Steinbacher and Glick, 2001). A number of
DMFS with R2 = 0.009, P = 0.0001), liver disease studies have investigated oral health in individuals
(DMFT with R2 = 0.009, P = 0.00001 and DMFS with asthma, but the results are conflicting. Meta-
with R2 = 0.008, P = 0.001), high blood pressure analysis suggests that being affected by asthma
(DMFT with R2 = 0.038, P = 0.00001 and DMFS doubles the risk of caries in both primary and per-
with R2 = 0.072, P = 0.00001) and diabetes (DMFT manent dentition (Alavaikko et al, 2011). The pre-
with R2 = 0.019, P = 0.00001 and DMFS with sent results confirm a previous analysis of a dataset
R2 = 0.03, P = 0.00001). from Pittsburgh (Anjomshoaa et al, 2009) and the
839 participants out of 1,281 in the DRDR had meta-analysis by Alavaikko et al (2011) which sug-
primary carious lesions, a 65.5% prevalence rate. gested an association between higher caries experi-
Subjects’ ages ranged from 6 to 94 years, with a ence and asthma in adults. Individuals with asthma
mean age of 46.10 years (median 45.13 years, appear to accumulate higher amounts of dental bio-
standard deviation 17.77 years). The mean DMFT film, as well as present with higher salivary levels of
score was 17.08, while the mean DMFS was 56.58. mutans streptococci (Botelho et al, 2011). `2 ago-

Vol 12, No 2, 2014 165


Johnston and Vieira

Table 1 Total* individuals affected by selected systemic conditions by sex and ethnicity and mean DMFT and DMFS
by sex and ethnicity
Primary Secondary Disease status by Primary Secondary
Disease status by sex (N) caries caries ethnicity (N) caries caries
Females 79 44 White 82 48
Asthma Males 38 18 Black 26 11
Other 9 3
Females 35 29 White 42 34
Diabetes Males 39 24 Black 27 13
Other 5 6
Females 18 9 White 25 14
Epilepsy Males 18 12 Black 7 5
Other 4 2
Females 13 6 White 24 15
Hepatitis Males 17 11 Black 5 2
Other 1 0
Females 97 72 White 129 105
High blood
Males 95 68 Black 52 28
pressure
Other 11 7
Females 0 0 White 6 3
HIV/AIDS Males 8 4 Black 2 1
Other 0 0
Females 9 6 White 9 6
Kidney disease Males 5 4 Black 4 3
Other 1 1
Females 4 3 White 12 9
Liver disease Males 12 8 Black 4 2
Other 0 0
Females 8 9 White 14 11
Stroke Males 12 8 Black 5 5
Other 1 1
Females 6 4 White 8 5
Tuberculosis Males 6 3 Black 2 1
Other 2 1
Primary Secondary Caries experience Primary Secondary
Caries experience by sex caries caries by ethnicity caries caries
Females 17.08 18.12 White 17.93 18.69
DMFT Mean Males 17.07 18.62 Black 15.88 17.7
Other 13.65 39.16
Females 56.58 60.93 White 60.15 62.78
DMFS Mean Males 56.67 62.63 Black 52.94 60.88
Other 39.16 53.05
* Some individuals reported more than one disease, hence totals from this table are larger than the number of subjects studied.

166 Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry


Johnston and Vieira

Table 2 Summary results of the analysis with caries


Medication Tobacco Alcohol
  Statistic Age Sex Ethnicity use use use DMFT DMFS
2
Adjusted R -0.001 -0.001 -0.001 0.01 0.002 0.012 0.00 0.00
Epilepsy
P-value 0.666 0.566 0.937 0.0001 0.056 0.0001 0.407 0.392
2
Adjusted R 0.008 0.00 0.001 0.013 0.001 -0.001 0.006 0.007
Stroke
P-value 0.0001 0.526 0.168 0.0001 0.117 0.649 0.004 0.001

Adjusted R2 -0.001 0.019 0.00 0.016 -0.012 -0.001 0.003 0.003


Asthma
P-value 0.725 0.00001 0.272 0.00001 0.317 0.958 0.03 0.025

Adjusted R2 0.00 -0.001 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001


Tuber-
culosis
P-value 0.461 0.892 0.399 0.297 0.157 0.087 0.118 0.168

Adjusted R2 0.001 0.001 -0.001 0.001 0.016 0.017 0.008 0.009


Hepatitis
P-value 0.097 0.137 0.71 0.104 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.0001
2
Adjusted R 0.005 0.004 0.00 0.003 0.00 0.025 0.009 0.008
Liver
disease
P-value 0.007 0.008 0.217 0.018 0.468 0.00001 0.00001 0.001
2
High Adjusted R 0.194 -0.001 0.009 0.17 0.004 -0.001 0.038 0.072
blood
pressure P-value 0.00001 0.938 0.0001 0.00001 0.01 0.99 0.00001 0.00001
2
Adjusted R 0.051 -0.001 0.006 0.042 0.004 0.00 0.019 0.03
Diabetes
P-value 0.00001 0.869 0.003 0.00001 0.016 0.44 0.00001 0.00001
2
Adjusted R -0.001 0.009 0.00 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.00 -0.001
HIV/AIDS
P-value 0.737 0.00001 0.315 0.016 0.037 0.007 0.423 0.673

nists in asthma medication decrease the salivary Asthma is unlikely to be a single disease but
secretion rate, and patients using these products rather a series of complex, overlapping individual
have increased levels of lactobacilli and mutans diseases or phenotypes, each defined by its unique
streptococci (Ryberg et al, 1987, 1991). Although it interaction of genetic and environmental factors.
is possible that medication use increases suscepti- These conditions include syndromes characterised
bility for caries, the present data does not suggest by allergen-exacerbated, non-allergic and aspirin-
that medications are associated with higher caries exacerbated factors along with syndromes best
experience in asthmatics. Genes in the immune distinguished by their pathological findings (eosino-
signaling pathway are differentially expressed in philic, neutrophilic, pauci-granulocytic), response
asthmatic individuals (Schmidt-Weber, 2006) and to therapy (corticosteroid resistant) and natural his-
could underlie the association between asthma and tory (remodeling prone) (Borish and Culp, 2008).
high caries experience. One of these genes is CD- The data available for this study were taken from
14, which is described as a classical example of a self-reported medical histories and none of the de-
gene-environment interactive factor in asthma tailed descriptions listed above were available. Al-
(Simpson et al, 2006). Variation in CD-14 has been lergic sensitisation can be detected by a positive
also associated with resistance to abscess or fistu- skin-test result to at least one common allergen in
la formation in children with four or more caries le- 93.5% of cases with severe asthma (Expert Panel
sions (De Soet et al, 2008). Immune response regu- Report 3, 2007). Non-allergic asthma has a more
lators may be the common factors that underlie the likely onset during adulthood, and shows female
association between asthma and caries. predominance and a higher degree of severity

Vol 12, No 2, 2014 167


Johnston and Vieira

Table 3 Summary results of the analysis with primary caries

Medication Tobacco Alcohol


  Statistic Age Sex Ethnicity use use use DMFT DMFS
2
Adjusted R -0.001 -0.001 -0.001 0.013 0.009 0.001 0.00 0.00
Epilepsy
P-value 0.473 0.994 0.787 0.001 0.004 0.186 0.265 0.311
2
Adjusted R 0.012 0.00 0.00 0.012 0.00 0.003 0.002 0.007
Stroke
P-value 0.001 0.363 0.439 0.001 0.405 0.059 0.128 0.008

Adjusted R2 -0.001 0.019 0.00 0.015 0.002 -0.001 -0.001 0.002


Asthma
P-value 0.502 0.00001 0.414 0.00001 0.113 0.805 0.880 0.099

Adjusted R2 0.000 -0.001 -0.001 -0.001 0.002 -0.001 0.00 0.001


Tuber-
culosis P-value 0.442 0.997 0.490 0.473 0.100 0.594 0.295 0.191

Adjusted R2 0.001 -0.001 -0.001 0.004 0.020 0.004 0.011 0.008


Hepatitis
P-value 0.163 0.454 0.789 0.034 0.00001 0.034 0.002 0.006

Adjusted R2 0.006 0.004 0.00 0.003 0.022 -0.001 -0.001 0.010


Liver
disease P-value 0.017 0.043 0.288 0.059 0.00001 0.885 0.541 0.002

Adjusted R2 0.196 -0.001 0.100 0.135 -0.001 0.015 0.002 0.053


High blood
pressure P-value 0.00001 0.884 0.002 0.00001 0.996 0.00001 0.087 0.00001

Adjusted R2 0.053 -0.001 0.011 0.039 -0.001 0.001 0.001 0.021


Diabetes
P-value 0.00001 0.619 0.002 0.00001 0.903 0.233 0.226 0.00001

Adjusted R2 -0.001 0.008 -0.001 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.003 -0.001


HIV/AIDS
P-value 0.545 0.004 0.455 0.184 0.018 0.021 0.048 0.572

(Bell, 2004). This is noteworthy, since the results one year since the last dental visit in patients with
of this study show more women affected by asth- liver disease (Guggenheimer et al, 2007). These
ma (Table 1). patients have high rates of edentulism when older,
Our initial work also suggested epileptic individu- which may inflate DMFT and DMFS scores despite
als have a higher caries experience (Anjomshoaa et the fact that the current sample is not enriched
al, 2009), but these findings were not confirmed in with the very elderly, who are particularly less likely
the current analysis. With respect to high blood to have had a recent dental evaluation (mean of 88
pressure and stroke, association with higher caries months since the last dental appointment).
experience may be influenced by medication intake This study has several weaknesses that deserve
and older age. Chronic use of medication to control consideration. Caries data were extracted from clini-
blood pressure may decrease salivary flow, which cal patient records which presumably have a good
can then increase caries activity (Tuominen et al, level of standardisation in the description of the
2003). A link between active root caries and cardi- presence of caries lesions, fillings and extracted
ac arrhythmias may exist in individuals older than teeth due to the fact that the records belong to the
80 years (Holm-Pedersen et al, 2005) but our study same educational institution and thus follow a single
population was not enriched with individuals from philosophy; nevertheless, the data could be influ-
that age group. Similarly, diabetes is associated enced by variation in the way caries is described. The
with older age and medication intake in the present definitions used here for systemic diseases – de-
data; these factors may lead to the loss of caries- spite being comprehensive – are based on self-re-
protective effect of saliva (Collin et al, 1998). Car- ported information, and may lack precision in some
ies is also associated with intervals of more than instances. Regarding the DMFT and DMFS scores,

168 Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry


Johnston and Vieira

Table 4 Summary of the results of the analysis with secondary caries

Medication Tobacco Alcohol


  Statistic Age Sex Ethnicity use use use DMFT DMFS
2
Adjusted R -0.002 0.00 -0.001 0.005 0.004 0.016 -0.002 -0.002
Epilepsy
P-value 0.813 0.350 0.589 0.058 0.090 0.003 0.960 0.998
2
Adjusted R 0.002 -0.002 0.001 0.012 -0.001 -0.002 0.001 0.002
Stroke
P-value 0.179 0.994 0.197 0.009 0.505 0.818 0.248 0.183

Adjusted R2 -0.002 0.017 -0.001 0.017 -0.001 -0.001 0.003 0.006


Asthma
P-value 0.632 0.002 0.466 0.002 0.527 0.424 0.111 0.046

Adjusted R2 -0.002 -0.002 -0.002 -0.001 0.00 -0.001 -0.001 -0.001


Tuber-
culosis P-value 0.832 0.819 0.628 0.427 0.339 0.477 0.388 0.452

Adjusted R2 0.00 0.002 -0.002 -0.002 0.024 0.015 0.007 0.006


Hepatitis
P-value 0.346 0.141 0.792 0.868 0.00001 0.009 0.340 0.051

Adjusted R2 0.001 0.004 -0.001 0.002 -0.002 0.026 0.006 0.003


Liver
disease P-value 0.204 0.086 0.510 0.165 0.692 0.00001 0.045 0.101

Adjusted R2 0.184 -0.002 0.005 0.142 0.006 -0.002 0.014 0.043


High blood
pressure P-value 0.00001 0.692 0.068 0.00001 0.046 0.926 0.005 0.00001

Kidney Adjusted R2 0.003 -0.002 -0.001 0.006 -0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001
disease or
dialysis P-value 0.132 0.648 0.454 0.048 0.452 0.370 0.204 0.211

Adjusted R2 0.044 -0.002 -0.001 0.044 0.009 0.00 0.013 0.023


Diabetes
P-value 0.00001 0.773 0.474 0.00001 0.020 0.295 0.007 0.00001

Adjusted R2 -0.002 0.007 -0.001 0.001 -0.001 0.002 -0.001 -0.002


HIV/AIDS
P-value 0.817 0.034 0.497 0.215 0.527 0.173 0.446 0.876

one can argue that they may be inflated in adults by viduals studied. DMFT and DMFS scores from adults
the inherent deficiencies of restorative materials and provide very little insight on how the disease pro-
techniques. In addition, failed fillings are relatively gressed (active acute and chronic vs inactive peri-
common and replaced with larger ones encroaching ods) and no longitudinal data were available to allow
on more surfaces. Common periodontal and pros- evaluation of disease progression.
thetic reasons for tooth extraction as well as simple
economic choices can also inflate caries scores. Al-
though these factors were considered when extract- CONCLUSION
ing the caries data, they may still have influenced the
data. Additional modeling was performed using only Although our study is based on self-reported medi-
the number of decayed teeth and the results did not cal history and therefore cannot provide more detail
change to any relevant extent (data not shown), which on the specific types of conditions the subject re-
may partially suggest that the caries experience data ported, we had the advantage of studying a group at
used here is not heavily influenced by the variables higher risk for systemic diseases and with very high
described above. Caries incidence rates and years of caries experience. This factor likely decreased het-
systemic disease experience would have been more erogeneity and improved the ability to find associa-
desirable measures, but it was not possible to ex- tions. This study provides statistically significant evi-
trapolate this information from the majority of indi- dence that caries is associated with asthma,

Vol 12, No 2, 2014 169


Johnston and Vieira

diabetes, hepatitis, liver disease, high blood pres- 14. Guggenheimer J, Eghtesad B, Close JM, Shay C, Fung JJ.
sure and stroke. These results are potentially impor- Dental health status of liver transplant candidates. Liver
Transpl 2007;13:280–286.
tant because they suggest that individuals suffering
15. Holm-Pedersen P, Avlund K, Morse DE, Stolze K, Katz RV,
from these conditions should receive more individu- Viitanen M, Winblad B. Dental caries, periodontal disease,
alised attention regarding caries prevention. and cardiac arrhythmias in community-dwelling older per-
sons aged 80 and older: is there a link? J Am Geriatr Soc
2005;53430–437.
16. Hujoel P. Dietary carbohydrates and dental-systemic dis-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS eases. J Dent Res 2009;88:490–502.
17. Kay EJ. How often should we go to the dentist? Brit Med J
The authors are indebted to the individuals who participated in this 1999;319:204–205.
study. Jacqueline Noel provided administrative support. Sarah Vin-
ski revised the text for grammar and style. Data for this study was 18. Lutfiyya MN, Nika B, Ng L, Tragos C, Won R, Lipsky MS.
provided by the Dental Registry and DNA Repository of the School Primary prevention of overweight and obesity: an analysis
of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh. Financial support was of national survey data. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:
provided by the School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 821–823.
and by the NIH Grant 5TL1RR024155. 19. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Pertowski CA, Ashizawa A,
Nixon LL, Johnson CA, Ball LB, Jack E, Kang DS. Surveil-
lance for asthma – United States, 1960–95. MMWR CDC
Surveill Summ 1998;47:1–27.
REFERENCES 20. Manski RJ, Moeller JF, Maas WR. Dental services. An anal-
ysis of utilization over 20 years. J Amer Dent Assoc
2001;132:655–664.
1. Alavaikko S, Jaakkola MS, Tjäderhane L, Jaakkola JJ. Asth-
ma and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am 21. Nguyen DH, Martin JT. Common dental infections in the pri-
J Epidemiol 2011;174:631–641. mary care setting. Am Fam Physician 2008;77:797–802.
2. American Medical Association. Medical evaluation of 22. Pennsylvania Department of Health. Status of oral health
healthy persons. Council on Scientific Affairs. J Amer Med in Pennsylvania, 2002.
Assoc 1983;249:1626–1633. 23. Riley JR III, Gilbert GH, Heft MW. Socioeconomic and de-
3. Anjomshoaa I, Cooper ME, Vieira AR. Caries is associated mographic disparities in symptoms of orofacial pain.
with asthma and epilepsy. Eur J Dent 2009;3:297–303. J Public Health Dent 2003;63:166–173.
4. Bell EH. Clinical phenotypes of asthma. Curr Opin Pulm 24. Ryberg M, Moller C, Ericson T. Effect of beta 2-adrenocep-
Med 2004;10:44–50. tor agonists on saliva proteins and dental caries in asth-
matic children. J Dent Res 1987;66:1404–1406.
5. Borish L, Culp JA. Asthma: a syndrome composed of hetero-
geneous diseases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 25. Ryberg M, Moller C, Ericson T. Saliva composition and car-
2008;101:1–8. ies development in asthmatic patients treated with beta
2-adrenoceptor agonists: a 4-year follow-up study. Scand
6. Botelho MP, Maciel SM, Cerci Neto A, Dezan CC, Fernandes J Dent Res 1991;99:212–218.
KB, de Andrade FB. Cariogenic microorganisms and oral con-
26. Simpson A, John SL, Jury F, Niven R, Woodcock A,
ditions in asthmatic children. Caries Res 2011;45:386–392.
Ollier WE, Custovic A. Endotoxin exposure, CD14, and
7. Cleave TL. The saccharine disease: conditions caused by allergicdisease: an interaction between genes and the
the taking of refined carbohydrates, such as sugar and environment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:
white flour. Bristol: J. Wright, 1974. 386–392.
8. Cohen LA, Manski RJ. Visits to non-dentist health care pro- 27. Schmidt-Weber CB. Gene expression profiling in allergy
viders for dental problems. Fam Med 2006;38:556–564. and asthma. Chem Immunol Allergy 2006;91:188–194.
9. Collin HL, Uusitupa M, Niskanen L, Koivisto AM, Mark- 28. Steinbacher DM, Glick M. The dental patient with asthma.
kanen H, Meurman JH. Caries in patients with non-insulin- An update and oral health considerations. J Amer Dent
dependent diabetes mellitus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Assoc 2001;132:1229–1239.
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:680–685.
29. Stensson M, Wendt LK, Koch G, Oldaeus G, Birkhed D.
10. De Soet JJ, van Gemert-Schriks MC, Laine ML, van Amer- Oral health in preschool children with asthma. Int J Paedi-
ongen WE, Morré SA, van Winkelhoff AJ. Host and micro- atr Dent 2008;18:243–250.
biological factors related to dental caries development.
Caries Res 2008;42:340–347. 30. Sugihara N, Maki Y, Okawa Y, Hoaka M, Matsukubo T, Ta-
kaesu Y. Factors associated with root surface caries in
11. Dye BA, Wang R, Lashley R, Wei R, Abnet CC, Wang G, elderly. Bull Tokyo Dental Coll 2010;51:23–30.
Dawsey SM, Cong W, Roth MJ, Li X, Qiao Y. Using NHANES
oral health examination protocols as part of an esopha- 31. Tuominen R, Reunanen A, Paunio M, Paunio I, Aromaa A.
geal cancer screening study conducted in a high-risk re- Oral health indicators poorly predict coronary heart dis-
gion of China. BMC Oral Health 2007;17:10. ease deaths. J Dent Res 2003;82:713–718.
12. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3). Guidelines for the diagno- 32. World Health Organization. The world oral health report.
sis and management of asthma – Summary Report 2007. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;120(5 suppl):S94–S138. 33. Yudkin J. Pure, white and deadly: the problem of sugar.
13. Green BL, Person S, Crowther M, Frison S, Shipp M, Lee P, London: Davis-Poynter, 1972a.
Martin M. Demographic and geographic variations of oral 34. Yudkin J. Sweet and dangerous: the new facts about the
health among African Americans based on NHANES III. sugar you eat as a cause of heart disease, diabetes, and
Community Dent Health 2003;20:117–122. other killers. New York: PH Wyden, 1972b.

170 Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry

You might also like