Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CFRA PROJECT:
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ULTRATECH CEMENTS
Submitted by
Group 10
Ashwin K.P. 0090/55
Adithya S Bhat 0080/55
Sitakanta Mohanty 0134/55
Rizwan Deshmukh 0122/55
S Radhika 0124/55
2018-19
Corporate Financial Reporting and Analysis Project Summary
Financial Analysis
Executive Summary
Repayment of borrowings of JAL and JCCL of ₹ 10,686 Cr and Non-current borrowings of ₹ 6160 Cr led to
financing cash outflows. However, the company raised ₹ 15,772 Cr. for the acquisitions to maintain liquidity and
cash reserves to maintain solvency
Ultratech raised ₹ 5574 Cr. and ₹ 2031 Cr. by sale of investments and redemption in bank deposits in order to
generate cash required for the acquisition
Group 10
Common Size
Trend Analysis
Long term liabilities have increased from
Current Assets ratio fell (1900 Cr. dec) largely due to redemption 18.54% to 32.02% reflecting the mode of
of Investments in Mutual Funds and Cash Balance from Banks funding for acquisitions. Non-current assets
while non-Current assets increased due to PPE increase of ₹ have gone up from 68.24 to 80.53% reflecting
11320 Cr. from acquired assets the poor inventory and asset management of
the distressed companies acquired
Net sales and COGS have both increased by close to 12%, but
operating Expenses and other expenses have both increased by COGS is the largest constant contributor to
16% and 25% respectively, resulting in a lower 13% growth in expenses at 67%, while exceptional items grew
EBIT 16x mainly due to unexpected costs from
acquisitions. However their contribution is
• However, finance costs have increased by 107%, causing a negligible at 0.74% of sales.
3% YoY drop in EBT. Though tax expenses have
decreased by 7%, the effects of the expense increases have An increase in finance costs, other expenses,
caused a decline in PAT by 16% and tax has caused a decrease in PAT to 7.27%
from 9.67%
Detailed Analysis of
Ultratech Financial Reports
1 Introduction
1.1 Company Background
UltraTech Cement Ltd. is the largest manufacturer of grey cement, Ready Mix Concrete
(RMC) and white cement in India. The company has an installed capacity of 96.5 Million
Tonnes Per Annum (MTPA) of grey cement. UltraTech Cement has 19 integrated plants,
1 clinkerisation plant, 25 grinding units and 7 bulk terminals. Its operations span across
India, UAE, Bahrain, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
Businesses Involved:
UltraTech provides a range of products that cater to the various aspects of construction, from foundation to
finish. The company's subsidiaries are Dakshin Cements Limited, Harish Cements Limited, UltraTech Cement
Lanka (Pvt.) Ltd and UltraTech Cement Middle East Investments Limited.[2]
Company performance:
The cement sector saw an impressive pickup at over 7.5%, ending a 7 year down cycle attaining net revenues of
US$ 4.87 billion (` 31,411 crores) and EBITDA of US$ 1.04 billion (` 6,729 crores). Ultratech successfully
completed the acquisition of the 21.2 MTpa capacity cement plants of Jaiprakash Associates Limited enabling
entry into high growth markets. It has also commissioned a greenfield clinker capacity of 2.5 MTpa at Dhar, M.P.,
coupled with a cement grinding facility of 1.75 MTpa capacity commissioning the plant in less than 365 days has
set a global benchmark.
ACC Limited has 17 modern cement factories, more than 62 ready mixed concrete plants, sales
volume of 26.21 million tonnes and a network of over 10,000 dealers and a countrywide spread
of sales units. It currently has a net worth of 9365 Cr and EBITDA 1909 Cr (29% increase)
Ambuja Cement has a cement capacity of 29.65 million tonnes with five integrated cement
manufacturing plants and eight cement grinding units across the country. Cement production
increased by 8% from 21.2 million tonnes to 22.98 million tonnes. The domestic cement sales
volume increased from 21.1 million tonnes in 2016 to 22.95 million tonnes in 2017.
Cement industry grew ~6% in the year 2017 as against 5.1% in the previous year. The largest share of demand
came from the housing sector (~66%), followed by the infrastructure (~18%) and commercial (~16%) sectors.
The total capacity of the cement industry in India is ~465 million tonnes (MT)[4] making it the 2nd largest producer
in the world and is estimated to touch 550 MT by 2020[3] The industry is producing ~301 MT for domestic demand
and ~4 MT for its export requirement. Cement sector’s growth in 2017 was largely on account of support from
the Government led infrastructure initiatives along with elimination of local taxes and flexible inter-state
movement of cement due to implementation of GST. With expected pick-up in affordable and rural housing
segments, demand is likely to grow by 4-5% in FY 2019. A large number of foreign players are also expected to
enter the cement sector, owing to the profit margins and steady demand.[3] However, capacity overhang and
moderate demand will continue to keep utilisation levels between 60 and 65% over the medium term.
ASSETS
1. Non-Current Assets 43787.39 26806.04 19,124.96 19,139.08 9271.04 9404.97
2. Current Assets 10585.61 12468.35 5492.23 4213.63 5604.73 4032.5
TOTAL 54373 39274.39 24,617.19 23,352.77 14,875.77 13,437.47
INCOME STATEMENT
REVENUE
Revenue from operations 30683.93 27162.42 11,214.87 10,500.84 14200.19 12523.39
Cost of Goods Sold 20578.17 18335.14 7293.62 7204.34 9688.75 8554.84
Gross Profit 10106.84 8827.28 3,921.25 3,296.50 4511.44 3968.55
Operating expense 5367.89 4633.21 2261.37 1999.21 3113.66 2969.11
Operating income 4738.95 4194.07 1,659.88 1,297.29 1397.78 999.44
Other income 594.7 659.95 359.09 510.21 131.65 128.34
Other expense 619.23 492.99 292.67 453.79 128.77 148.82
Exceptional Items 226.28 13.69 0.00 0.00 0 -42.81
PBIT 4488.14 4347.34 1,726.30 1,353.71 1400.66 936.15
Interest expenses 1186.3 571.39 107.19 74.24 102.3 82.63
PBT 3301.84 3775.95 1,619.11 1,279.47 1,298.36 853.52
Tax Expenses 1070.56 1148.23 369.55 347.23 382.91 206.47
PAT 2231.28 2627.72 1,249.56 932.24 915.45 647.05
The operating cycle stated as per the company is 12 months and the same is used to classify assets and
liabilities as current and non-current on the balance sheet. Additionally, assets and liabilities held primarily for
trading are classified as current. Cash and cash equivalents are current assets unless it is restricted from being
exchanged or used to settle a liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period.
The initial cost of PPE reported includes its purchase price, import duties, non-refundable purchase taxes, direct
costs of bringing asset to working condition and location, borrowing costs, decommissioning costs, subtracting
accumulated depreciation impairment losses. Repairs, maintenance and other expenditure incurred after the PPE
is put into operation is directly charged into income statement, along with gain or loss on disposal of PPE. If
different components of PPE have different useful lives, they are accounted for separately.
The discounted cash flow model has been used to value intangible assets, and acquired tangible assets.
Research expenditure is expensed out when incurred while development is capitalised if such expenditure only if
asset creation results out of it.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives/not yet available for use are tested for impairment at least
annually. Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use which is determined
by estimating discounted future cash flows using a pre-tax discount rate (which reflects market assessment and
risk of asset). If the recoverable amount is less than carrying amount, then value is reduced to recoverable amount,
with an impairment loss recognised in Statement of Profit and Loss. In case of reversal, the value is increased, but
only up till the carrying amount that would have been determined without impairment loss.
Raw materials, fuel, stores & spare parts, packing materials, WIP, finished goods, stock-in-trade and trial run
inventories are valued at lower of cost and net realisable value (NRV) if finished products, in which they will be
used, are to be sold at or above cost. Cost is determined on weighted average basis (includes expenditure incurred
for acquisition like purchase price, import duties, taxes).
Equity share-based payments to employees are measured at fair value of the employee stock options at
grant date and are amortised over vesting period. Revisions of estimates are recognised in the Statement of Profit
and Loss such that cumulative expense reflects the revised estimate and adjustment in equity-settled employee
benefits reserve.
Government grants, related to assets, are recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss if there is
reasonable assurance that they will be received. All employee benefit programmes are accounted for as per the
Indian GAAP standards. The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured using Black-Scholes
model to determine the fair value of the liability incurred on the grant date. For foreign currency transactions, at
the end of each reporting period, they are translated at the rates prevailing at that date, while assets are reported
at the rate when fair-value was determined.
A significant contribution to the increase in assets from acquisitions can be observed in the Non-
Current Assets From the Financial statement notes, we observe that a majority of the non-current assets lie as
‘Plant and Equipment’ at ₹ 26,700 Crores. The next largest contribution is seen in the form of ‘Freehold land’ and
‘Buildings’ at ₹ 9500 Crores. Ultratech also spent ₹ 1900 Cr on capital expenditures for project in Manavar, Bara,
Chhattisgarh.
The increase in sales for 2018 is attributed to a higher sales volume and improvement in cement prices. Other
income saw a gain of 9% mainly due to an income of ₹ 304 Cr through government grants. The decrease in Net
profit for the year is mainly due to the 2X increase in Interest Cost due to debt acquired from the acquisition and
an unexpected expense amounting to ₹ 226 crores was seen due to stamp duty on assets acquired for JAL and
JCCL.
The total Revenue for Ultratech from operations contributes ₹ 30600 Crore out of which around 2% is realized
via Accounts Receivable. Hence we can see a healthy cash influx through the revenue.
Significant contributors to expenses are Power and Fuel, Freight and Forwarding Costs, and Cost of Materials
consumed, the breakup of which can be better visualized through fig. 2. An interesting observation shows the
Freight costs being double that of the Cost of Materials consumed.
Fig. 3 Expenses
COGS
4,318.12 3,978.36
814.37
893.83 Stock In trade
Employee Benefits
1,706.24 Finance Costs
1,186.30 Dep. & Amortization Costs
Excise Duty
5,959.50
Others
Fig. 4 YoY Cash Flow Analysis The large drain on cash flow from
6000 financing activities is offset by the
gain in Investing activities. Thus, we
4000
2016 see an overall cash flow increase by
2000 12 Cr. which is a positive sign as
-63 -25 12 compared to 2017. However, the
Cash in ₹ Cr.
2. Proceeds worth ₹ 15,772 Cr. was used for the acquisition of JAL and JCCL. This was a strategic move by
the company to ensure that they avoid a large difference in financing cash flow. This effectively avoided a
large decrease in cash and cash equivalents for 2018.
• PAT (profit as tax) have decreased to 7.27% from 9.67% on account of increase in tax and interest
expenses.
Profitability Ratios
There has been a decline in all the profitability ratios. The company has acquired many entities in the year. As a
result, their assets have increased but liabilities have increased disproportionality and that is reflected on the
balance sheet. The sales and profit haven’t been as good and hence the ratios have decreased by substantial
amounts.
• Return on Asset (ROA) has decreased by 29.67% on account of disproportionate increase in assets vis a
vis sales.
• Return on Invested Capital has decreased by 18.18 % due to large investments in the greenfield as well as
brownfield plants.
• Return on Equity has decreased by 21.86% on account of lesser margins and decrease in profit.
• Profit Margin has decreased by 31.71% on account of decrease in profit and high increase in operating
expenses.
Efficiency/Turnover Analysis
The company has achieved marginal decrease in its operational efficiency. There have been substantial increase in
the COGS. Also due to acquisition, assets and inventories from newly acquired units have been added and their
effect has shown in the various turnover ratios. Without taking into account the newly acquired less efficient
plants, it can be said the capacity utilisation has been good.
• There has been 3% increase in asset turnover despite substantial increase in assets on account of higher
increase in COGS.
• The working capital turnover has decreased by 9.42% due to increase in working capital.
• Inventory turnover has decreased by 5.23% indicating decreased production efficiency.
• Account receivable days have increased by 10.63%, indicating difficulties in revenue collection from the
various customer accounts.
• Total operating cycle has increased marginally by 2% indicating inefficient revenue collection machinery.
Liquidity/Solvency Ratios
The company has suffered a lot in the past year in the solvency and liquidity front. It has acquired loss making
entities and as a result, the liabilities have increased a lot. The total assets are even less than total liabilities due to
the increase in long term borrowings to fund the acquisitions.
• The current ratio has decreased by 38.32%, quick ratio has decreased by 47%. This has happened as a
result of increase in non-current liabilities.
• Debt to asset ratio has increased by 34% while debt to equity ratio has increased by 71.3%. This can be
explained by high increase in debts undertaken by the company.
• Times Interest Earned decreased by 57.9%, so company has improved its debt paying capacity despite its
increase in debts.
Dupont Analysis
7 Comparative Analysis
Table 7 gives a detailed ratio analysis of Ultratech, ACC and Ambuja followed by an analysis of the ratios in
table 8.
A detailed analysis of all the ratios are shown in Table 8. The ratios have been analysed according to their
broad classifications.
Key Ratios Ultratech w.r.t ACC Ultratech w.r.t Ambuja
ROE, ROA and Profit margin of the ROA is similar, ROIC is better for Ambuja,
companies are similar, however, there is a while ROE is better for Ultratech. This may
large % increase in profitability for ACC as be due to the large share of equity and low
Profitability
compared to a large decrease for Ultratech. share of liability in Ambuja’s balance sheet.
This is indicative of the low profitability due The profit margin is greater in 2018 for
to the major acquisitions undertaken by
Ultratech. Also, return on Invested Capital Ambuja largely due to low initial profitability
(ROIC) is 73% for ACC which is much of the acquisitions undertaken by Ultratech.
higher that 13% of that of Ultratech.
Asset turnover and inventory turnover and Asset turnover and working capital turnover
in turn operating cycle are much higher for is lower indicating sub-optimal asset
ACC. This is indicative of sub-optimal utilization by Ambuja. However, their
utilization of assets and inventory by inventory and receivable turnovers are
Efficiency/Turnover
Ultratech. However, Ultratech is able to better. Also, Ultratech is able to maintain an
maintain an industry standard cash cycle due industry standard cash cycle due to large
to large payables’ days. payables’ days.
All the ratios were similar in the 2016-17 All the ratios were similar in the 2016-17
fiscal year, but due to the large debt taken by fiscal year, but due to the large debt taken by
Liquidity Ratios
company for acquisitions, the solvency of company for acquisitions, the solvency of
the company declined sharply. the company declined sharply.
The P-E ratio is much higher for ACC The P-E ratio is much higher for Ambuja
indicating undervaluation of Ultratech’s indicating undervaluation of Ultratech’s
Market related ratio equity. Dividend payout ratio is higher equity. Dividend payout ratio is higher
indicating more retained earnings are indicating more retained earnings are
invested by Ultratech to aid its growth. invested by Ultratech to aid its growth.
Table 8. Analysis on Ratios
Ultratech saw a 12.4% growth in net sales to ₹ 31,278 Crores as compared to the 7.5% growth in the
cement industry in India. The company also saw a 9% increase in other income because of the Industrial
Promotion Schemes under various states. The PBIDT for the year grew 15% to ₹ 6500 crores, however the net
profits fell due to an increase in operating costs.
The operating costs increased to ₹ 25,925 crores because of an increase in energy costs by 23%, increase
In input material costs, and an increase in freight and forwarding costs due to 7% diesel hikes. Significant increases
in costs also resulted from Depreciation and Finance costs due to the acquisition of JAL and JCCL.
The net profit took a hit by 15% and fell to ₹ 2231 crores from ₹ 2638 crores. The company saw a cash
inflow from operations as a result of higher revenues and increase in non-operating cash due to higher interest
income and sale of mutual funds. Cash drains were observed from repayment of ₹ 880 crore towards long term
borrowings, costs of ₹ 1900 crores towards capital expenditures and a dividend distribution worth ₹ 347 crores.
Ultratech is the dominant market leader in the cement industry in India. It has the highest sales, net profit,
total assets and market cap as compared to its competitors. For the year ended 2018, Ultratech had a YoY decrease
in net profit by 15% while its competitors grew by 35% on average in terms of net profit. This however is not a
reason for worry as Ultratech is predicted to grow in 2019 due to its increase in production capacity. Ultratech has
also taken on the largest amount of debt for 2017, however the debt to EBITDA is likely to trend to less than 2.5
times by march 2020.
On the downside Ultratech had a lower-than-expected ramp-up in cash accrual due to non-sustenance of
current performance. They also have a higher-than-expected debt because of sizeable acquisitions or capital
expenditure, or delay in reducing debt through surplus cash. However, we believe UltraTech will continue to
benefit from its healthy market position, geographically diverse presence in India and high financial flexibility.
Strengths
• Largest Cement company in India in terms of sales, net profit, total assets and market cap.
• Highest cement production capacity in India and NO 4 in the world at 91.5 mtpa.
• Days account payable is high due to extended credit period granted by their creditors due to their long
standing trust and credibility.
• Ultratech have a great reputation in terms of credit repayment CRISIL AAA/FAAA/Stable/CRISIL
A1+.
• Ultratech has developed a superior operating efficiency driven by strong consumption norms, captive
power capabilities and efficient logistics through a pan India presence.
• Ultratech has healthy cash liquidity of about ₹ 5400 crore which implies strong financial flexibility
Weaknesses
1. High operating cycle due to inefficient asset and inventory utilisation partly due to acquisitions of badly-
managed and distressed units
2. High exposure to industry related risks for input costs, realisations and the cement industry’s innate
cyclicality
3. Relatively lower growth in net profits over the past 4 years as compared its competitors may be a reason
for worry as it could hint towards a growth stagnation.
4. Analysts ascertain that Ultratech may have over projected cement sales for the upcoming years. This may
result in a heavy underutilization of the newly acquired capacity.
9 References
I. https://www.ultratechcement.com/about-ultratech-cement-ltd
II. https://www.ultratechcement.com/businesses
III. https://www.capitaline.com/SiteFrame.aspx?id=1
IV. https://www.ultratechcement.com/ultratech-financial-reports
V. http://www.acclimited.com/investor-relations/financial-annual-results
VI. http://www.ambujacement.com/investors/annual-reports