Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/xM07I
When people search through articles on ScienceDirect, they may look at the table of contents of a
journal or use the search function to nd relevant articles. The title should tell them whether the
article could be of interest, but to nd out more they have to click through to see the abstract.
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 1/6
29/08/2018 Bad vs. good abstract - Tips For Writing | Elsevier Webshop Blog
As an author, this is where you could either grab or lose your reader’s attention. A good abstract
will keep them reading but a bad one could put them off, even if your research is relevant to them,
which means you could miss out on a download or even a citation. Here are some notable
differences between good and bad abstracts that could help you when writing yours.
Length
Bad: Too short and readers won’t know enough about your work; too long and it may be rejected
by the journal.
Good: Depending on the journal’s requirements, 200 words is short enough for readers to scan
quickly but long enough to give them enough information to decide to read the article.
Structure
Bad: Jumping from point to point with no clear ow will confuse your readers.
Good: Follow the structure of your paper: summarize the background, motivation, methods,
results, conclusion and impact. Some journals require this to be broken down into sections, so
check the Guide for Authors.
Content
Bad: Focusing on the wrong information, such as too much content about others’ work, will put off
readers
Good: Pick the pertinent points. The content of the abstract should re ect the most important
points and main ndings presented in your article. This ensures it re ects your work accurately,
attracting the right readers.
Style
Bad: A badly written abstract will confuse or turn off readers, who will not want to read a badly
written article.
Good: Clear, concise, careful writing will help readers understand the information quickly and
enjoy reading it. Using a professional editing service, such as Elsevier’s English Language Editing
service, can help.
Language
Bad: Too much jargon makes an abstract dif cult to read and even harder to understand.
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 2/6
29/08/2018 Bad vs. good abstract - Tips For Writing | Elsevier Webshop Blog
Good: An abstract that is accessible to a wider audience – one that contains no jargon – will
encourage researchers from other disciplines to read the article.
Conclusion
Bad: A weak – or worse, no – conclusion does not re ect the impact and importance of the work.
Good: A strong, clear conclusion presented near the end of the abstract shows readers the
research in a nutshell, helping them decide to read on.
Keywords
Bad: Too few keywords in the abstract means the article is dif cult to nd in searches.
Good: Optimizing your abstract for search engines by using the most important keywords from
your research helps make it discoverable for the right readers. Again, a language service can help.
Graphical abstract
Good: If the journal you want to publish in accepts graphical abstracts, it is a good idea to submit
one, making your article more noticeable. Professional illustration, including through Elsevier’s
Illustration Service, can help make it impactful.
RELATED ARTICLES
Top language mistakes for The sentence not to start your
rejection paper with
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 3/6
29/08/2018 Bad vs. good abstract - Tips For Writing | Elsevier Webshop Blog
Your Name
Your e-mail
Subscribe Now
MOST POPULAR
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 4/6
29/08/2018 Bad vs. good abstract - Tips For Writing | Elsevier Webshop Blog
ELSEVIER AUTHORS'
UPDATE
WebShop News
中文博客
RECENT POSTS
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 5/6
29/08/2018 Bad vs. good abstract - Tips For Writing | Elsevier Webshop Blog
https://blog.webshop.elsevier.com/tips-for-writing/bad-vs-good-abstract/ 6/6