Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Risky Science Communication Environment For Vaccines
A Risky Science Communication Environment For Vaccines
cycloheximide withdrawal, indicating that stereotypical, and in cell culture it emerges be a good thing. Added to that, sleep disor-
the “gravitational pull” between neurons is from a circuit of less than 10,000 neurons ders are a growing problem, for both normal
compromised. Yamaguchi et al. conclude (which is the approximate number of neu- aging and various dementias, and exploiting
that this looser coupling between the cells rons of some invertebrate nervous systems), AVP signaling to tighten up the aging clock
of AVP-deficient SCN is sufficient to main- it should be possible to perform a compa- and its control over sleep may prove a useful
tain normal circadian function in a steady rable cellular and molecular analysis of tool. But there remains a final thought. After
state, but makes the SCN more responsive the system that defines our biological time. 4 billion years of circadian evolution (12),
to extreme perturbation because the cells are Beyond that, identifying how neuropepti- can you really cheat on circadian time?
no longer held back by tight phase-locking dergic cues from the SCN maintain the cir-
across the circuit. cadian coherence across the brain, which is References
1. Y. Yamaguchi, Science 342, 85 (2013).
Whether it is simply a happy accident essential for normal sleep and wakefulness, 2. S. M. Reppert, D. R. Weaver, Nature 418, 935 (2002).
that loss of AVP signals leads to this novel will provide a new level of understanding to 3. N. Koike et al., Science 338, 349 (2012).
state, or there is some deeper SCN design the greatest emergent property of all: states 4. S. H. Yoo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 5339
principle is unclear. More widely, the study of consciousness. (2004).
5. T. M. Schmidt, S. K. Chen, S. Hattar, Trends Neurosci. 34,
by Yamaguchi et al. shows how neuropepti- If developing AVP receptor antago- 572 (2011).
dergic signaling confers circuit-level prop- nists did help us to jet ever more frantically 6. A. C. Liu et al., Cell 129, 605 (2007).
erties on a population of neurons. In itself, about the planet, it would affect only a small 7. E. S. Maywood, J. E. Chesham, J. A. O’Brien, M. H. Hast-
ings, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14306 (2011).
neuropeptidergic generation of emergent minority of people. In the context of clocks 8. M. Brancaccio, E. S. Maywood, J. E. Chesham, A. S.
properties is not unusual, having been espe- and public health, however, there is a more Loudon, M. H. Hastings, Neuron 78, 714 (2013).
SOCIAL SCIENCE
Dan M. Kahan
C
ontroversy over childhood vaccina- chic pressure to conform their perceptions of to controversy over at least one childhood
tions is an instance of what might be risk to those that distinguish their group from vaccine as well. In 2006, the U.S. Centers
styled the “science communication competing ones—a bias in reasoning that can for Disease Control (CDC) recommended
problem”—the failure of compelling scien- actually intensify as the public becomes more universal immunization of adolescent girls
tific evidence to resolve public dispute over science literate (2). against the human papilloma virus (HPV),
risks and similar facts (1). This problem itself A major factor in the dispute over climate which is sexually transmitted and causes cer-
has been the focus of scientific study since the change, cultural cognition has contributed vical cancer, but political dispute blocked
1970s, when psychologists began to investi- legislative mandates in every state
gate the divergence between expert and pub- but one. Experimental evidence
lic opinion on nuclear power. Indeed, the sci- showed that individuals tended
ence of science communication that this body to selectively credit information
of work comprises can now be used not just to relating to the vaccine’s risks and
explain controversy over risk but also to pre- benefits in patterns reflecting their
dict, manage, and in theory avoid conditions cultural predispositions (one per-
likely to trigger it. The example of childhood ceived risk was that vaccination
vaccinations illustrates these points—and would lead to the engagement of
teaches an important practical lesson. unsafe sex). The resulting polariza-
One recurring source of risk controversy tion was amplified when individu-
is a dynamic known as “cultural cognition.” als were exposed to cues—whether
CREDIT: ROBERT DUPUIS
Both to avoid dissonance and to protect their explicit, such as news reports (3),
ties to others, individuals face a strong psy- Shots of controversy. Conflict over childhood vaccinations or tacit, such as fictional advocates
reflect the inadequate attention given to understanding factors of varying appearances (4)— sug-
Yale Law School, Post Office Box 20815, New Haven, CT in the science communication environment that influence the gesting the vaccine was a focus of
06520, USA. E-mail: dan.kahan@yale.edu public understanding of science. group conflict.
The same insights that explain the con- vaccine would not have been from parti- no danger can actually enhance its perceived
troversy over the HPV vaccine, however, san news outlets. Rather, they would have riskiness (14). In addition, people tend to
imply that it need not have occurred. It was learned about the vaccine from their pedia- contribute voluntarily to public goods—such
likely inevitable that people of opposing cul- tricians. The same studies reporting that cul- as herd immunity—when they believe that
tural orientations would react divergently to turally diverse individuals would polarize if others are doing so but refrain when they per-
a high-profile campaign to enact legislation exposed to cues of group conflict showed ceive widespread free-riding (15). Thus, mis-
mandating vaccination of 11- to 12-year-old that in the absence of such cues, members of leadingly implying that increasing numbers
girls for a sexually transmitted disease. Yet all groups could have been expected to trust of parents are fearfully refusing vaccination
there was nothing inevitable about the HPV expert advice (4, 5). Parents do trust their could create exactly such fear and resistance.
vaccine being publicly introduced in a man- pediatricians on the HBV vaccine, which Also ill-advised is a popular trope that
ner so likely to generate cultural conflict. retained coverage of 90% of children during links resistance to childhood vaccination
Merck, the manufacturer of the HPV the period when HPV mandates were being with disbelief in evolution and doubt of cli-
vaccine Gardasil, sought approval from the debated in state legislatures (9, 10). The mate change as instances of public “distrust
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rate for completing the HPV immunization in science.” Critics of mandatory vaccination
through the agency’s fast-track review pro- series now stands at an anemic 33% for ado- are small in number and their hostility to vac-
cess, which is reserved for treatments of seri- lescent girls, and 7% for boys (11). cines is generally unshared by the majority of
ous diseases—in this case, for a Many experts and medical the population. Positions on evolution and cli-
female-only vaccine for cervical
cancer. After approval, the com- Online groups warned that the HPV vac-
cine was being introduced in a
mate change, by contrast, are highly charged
symbols for large cultural groups. Finding
SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2013/10/03/342.6154.53.DC1
MATERIALS
RELATED http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/56.full
CONTENT
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/47.full
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/133.2.full
REFERENCES This article cites 11 articles, 1 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/53#BIBL
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2013, American Association for the Advancement of Science