You are on page 1of 3

PERSPECTIVES

cycloheximide withdrawal, indicating that stereotypical, and in cell culture it emerges be a good thing. Added to that, sleep disor-
the “gravitational pull” between neurons is from a circuit of less than 10,000 neurons ders are a growing problem, for both normal
compromised. Yamaguchi et al. conclude (which is the approximate number of neu- aging and various dementias, and exploiting
that this looser coupling between the cells rons of some invertebrate nervous systems), AVP signaling to tighten up the aging clock
of AVP-deficient SCN is sufficient to main- it should be possible to perform a compa- and its control over sleep may prove a useful
tain normal circadian function in a steady rable cellular and molecular analysis of tool. But there remains a final thought. After
state, but makes the SCN more responsive the system that defines our biological time. 4 billion years of circadian evolution (12),
to extreme perturbation because the cells are Beyond that, identifying how neuropepti- can you really cheat on circadian time?
no longer held back by tight phase-locking dergic cues from the SCN maintain the cir-
across the circuit. cadian coherence across the brain, which is References
1. Y. Yamaguchi, Science 342, 85 (2013).
Whether it is simply a happy accident essential for normal sleep and wakefulness, 2. S. M. Reppert, D. R. Weaver, Nature 418, 935 (2002).
that loss of AVP signals leads to this novel will provide a new level of understanding to 3. N. Koike et al., Science 338, 349 (2012).
state, or there is some deeper SCN design the greatest emergent property of all: states 4. S. H. Yoo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 5339
principle is unclear. More widely, the study of consciousness. (2004).
5. T. M. Schmidt, S. K. Chen, S. Hattar, Trends Neurosci. 34,
by Yamaguchi et al. shows how neuropepti- If developing AVP receptor antago- 572 (2011).
dergic signaling confers circuit-level prop- nists did help us to jet ever more frantically 6. A. C. Liu et al., Cell 129, 605 (2007).
erties on a population of neurons. In itself, about the planet, it would affect only a small 7. E. S. Maywood, J. E. Chesham, J. A. O’Brien, M. H. Hast-
ings, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14306 (2011).
neuropeptidergic generation of emergent minority of people. In the context of clocks 8. M. Brancaccio, E. S. Maywood, J. E. Chesham, A. S.
properties is not unusual, having been espe- and public health, however, there is a more Loudon, M. H. Hastings, Neuron 78, 714 (2013).

Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on February 9, 2021


cially well characterized in invertebrate sys- insidious threat. Epidemiology shows that 9. C. I. Bargmann, E. Marder, Nat. Methods 10, 483 (2013).
10. G. M. Monsees, P. Kraft, S. E. Hankinson, D. J. Hunter, E.
tems (9). What is particular about the SCN rotational shift work is a killer, increasing
S. Schernhammer, Int. J. Cancer 131, 2547 (2012).
is the time frame involved, with neuropepti- risks of cancer, and cardiovascular and met- 11. M. H. Hastings, A. B. Reddy, E. S. Maywood, Nat. Rev.
dergic signals encoding very precise infor- abolic diseases (10, 11). If the 24/7 society Neurosci. 4, 649 (2003).
mation over a span of hours and days, rather is here to stay, helping shift-workers adjust 12. R. S. Edgar et al., Nature 485, 459 (2012).
than milliseconds and minutes. Given that more rapidly to their schedules by working
the circadian phenotype is pronounced and with, rather than against, their SCN must 10.1126/science.1245474

SOCIAL SCIENCE

A Risky Science Communication Neglecting the science of science


communication puts the value of
Environment for Vaccines decision-relevant science at risk.

Dan M. Kahan

C
ontroversy over childhood vaccina- chic pressure to conform their perceptions of to controversy over at least one childhood
tions is an instance of what might be risk to those that distinguish their group from vaccine as well. In 2006, the U.S. Centers
styled the “science communication competing ones—a bias in reasoning that can for Disease Control (CDC) recommended
problem”—the failure of compelling scien- actually intensify as the public becomes more universal immunization of adolescent girls
tific evidence to resolve public dispute over science literate (2). against the human papilloma virus (HPV),
risks and similar facts (1). This problem itself A major factor in the dispute over climate which is sexually transmitted and causes cer-
has been the focus of scientific study since the change, cultural cognition has contributed vical cancer, but political dispute blocked
1970s, when psychologists began to investi- legislative mandates in every state
gate the divergence between expert and pub- but one. Experimental evidence
lic opinion on nuclear power. Indeed, the sci- showed that individuals tended
ence of science communication that this body to selectively credit information
of work comprises can now be used not just to relating to the vaccine’s risks and
explain controversy over risk but also to pre- benefits in patterns reflecting their
dict, manage, and in theory avoid conditions cultural predispositions (one per-
likely to trigger it. The example of childhood ceived risk was that vaccination
vaccinations illustrates these points—and would lead to the engagement of
teaches an important practical lesson. unsafe sex). The resulting polariza-
One recurring source of risk controversy tion was amplified when individu-
is a dynamic known as “cultural cognition.” als were exposed to cues—whether
CREDIT: ROBERT DUPUIS

Both to avoid dissonance and to protect their explicit, such as news reports (3),
ties to others, individuals face a strong psy- Shots of controversy. Conflict over childhood vaccinations or tacit, such as fictional advocates
reflect the inadequate attention given to understanding factors of varying appearances (4)— sug-
Yale Law School, Post Office Box 20815, New Haven, CT in the science communication environment that influence the gesting the vaccine was a focus of
06520, USA. E-mail: dan.kahan@yale.edu public understanding of science. group conflict.

www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 342 4 OCTOBER 2013 53


Published by AAAS
PERSPECTIVES

The same insights that explain the con- vaccine would not have been from parti- no danger can actually enhance its perceived
troversy over the HPV vaccine, however, san news outlets. Rather, they would have riskiness (14). In addition, people tend to
imply that it need not have occurred. It was learned about the vaccine from their pedia- contribute voluntarily to public goods—such
likely inevitable that people of opposing cul- tricians. The same studies reporting that cul- as herd immunity—when they believe that
tural orientations would react divergently to turally diverse individuals would polarize if others are doing so but refrain when they per-
a high-profile campaign to enact legislation exposed to cues of group conflict showed ceive widespread free-riding (15). Thus, mis-
mandating vaccination of 11- to 12-year-old that in the absence of such cues, members of leadingly implying that increasing numbers
girls for a sexually transmitted disease. Yet all groups could have been expected to trust of parents are fearfully refusing vaccination
there was nothing inevitable about the HPV expert advice (4, 5). Parents do trust their could create exactly such fear and resistance.
vaccine being publicly introduced in a man- pediatricians on the HBV vaccine, which Also ill-advised is a popular trope that
ner so likely to generate cultural conflict. retained coverage of 90% of children during links resistance to childhood vaccination
Merck, the manufacturer of the HPV the period when HPV mandates were being with disbelief in evolution and doubt of cli-
vaccine Gardasil, sought approval from the debated in state legislatures (9, 10). The mate change as instances of public “distrust
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rate for completing the HPV immunization in science.” Critics of mandatory vaccination
through the agency’s fast-track review pro- series now stands at an anemic 33% for ado- are small in number and their hostility to vac-
cess, which is reserved for treatments of seri- lescent girls, and 7% for boys (11). cines is generally unshared by the majority of
ous diseases—in this case, for a Many experts and medical the population. Positions on evolution and cli-
female-only vaccine for cervical
cancer. After approval, the com- Online groups warned that the HPV vac-
cine was being introduced in a
mate change, by contrast, are highly charged
symbols for large cultural groups. Finding

Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on February 9, 2021


pany sponsored a nationwide lob- sciencemag.org manner likely to engulf it in con- poplular discourse with the claim that child-
bying campaign directed at state Podcast interview troversy (5, 8). Their concerns hood vaccination is part of the same package
with author Dan
legislatures to add the vaccine M. Kahan (http://scim.ag/
were not rejected. They were of partisan stances as these issues (16) need-
to the schedule of immuniza- ed_6154). simply never considered. There lessly risks provoking the same cultural cog-
tions required for school enroll- was and remains no process in the nition dynamics that impeded reasoned pub-
ment. These were profit-driven choices (5), FDA or the CDC for making evidence-based lic engagement with the HPV vaccine.
aimed at enabling Merck to establish a dom- assessments of the potential impact of their Empirically uniformed and counterpro-
inant market position for Gardasil before procedures on the myriad everyday channels ductive risk communication is the inevitable
GlaxoSmithKline could secure approval through which the public becomes apprised by-product of the absence of a systematic,
for its rival product, Cervarix. If Gardasil of decision-relevant science. evidence-based alternative. Decades of study
had not been fast-tracked, the FDA would Similar inattention to the quality of the show that the sources of public controversy
have approved both Gardasil and Cervarix science communication environment leaves over decision-relevant science are numerous
for boys and girls only 3 years later. At that other childhood vaccines vulnerable to con- and diverse. There is, however, a single factor
point, both vaccines would have become troversy too. In the United Kingdom, child- that connects them: The failure of democratic
available immediately even without man- hood vaccination rates are only now recover- societies to use scientific knowledge to pro-
dates through private insurance and a host of ing from the scare induced by the now-dis- tect the science communication environment
programs designed to assure universal access credited 1998 study of Dr. Andrew Wakefield from influences that prevent citizens from
to childhood vaccines. linking the measles, mumps, and rubella recognizing that decision-relevant science
Had the HPV vaccine taken this path, it (MMR) vaccine to autism. By contrast, the contributes to their well-being.
would have followed the uneventful course United States experienced no such decline—
that marked introduction of the hepatitis B vaccination rates for MMR, pertussis, and References
1. P. Slovic, The Feeling of Risk (Earthscan, Washington, DC,
virus (HBV) vaccine into the U.S. public polio have been at or above 90% (the target 2010).
health system. Hepatitis B, like HPV, is sex- level) for over a decade, and the proportion 2. D. Kahan et al., Nat. Clim. Change 2, 732 (2012).
ually transmitted and causes cancer (6). The of children receiving no vaccinations has 3. S. E. Gollust et al., Health Aff. 29, 2041 (2010).
4. D. M. Kahan et al., Law Hum. Behav. 34, 501 (2010).
CDC endorsed universal childhood HBV remained below 1% (9, 10). But there are
5. L. O. Gostin, C. D. DeAngelis, JAMA 297, 1921 (2007).
vaccination—for boys and girls, a much enclaves, some populated by strident oppo- 6. CDC, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 54, RR-16 (2005).
less jarring proposal—in the 1990s. There nents of mandatory immunization, where 7. Immunization Action Coalition, www.immunize.org/laws/
was no political controversy. Rather, states vaccination rates fall dangerously short of hepb.asp.
8. J. Colgrove, N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 2389 (2006).
steadily added the HBV vaccine to manda- the national average, and where local out- 9. CDC, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 57, 961 (2008).
tory vaccination schedules through the cus- breaks of childhood diseases periodically 10. CDC, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 62, 733 (2013).
tomary mechanism—not high-profile legis- occur. Evidence-informed risk communica- 11. CDC, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 62, 685 (2013).
12. P. Devorak, Washington Post, 18 October 2011,
lative enactments, but guidelines routinely tion strategies are essential to identify and http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-10-18/
promulgated by public health administrators counteract any influence that could cause local/35280317_1_andrew-wakefield-vaccines-and-
operating outside the political realm (7). The ungrounded fears of vaccines to spread to the autism-hpv-vaccine.
13. National Public Radio, Talk of the Nation, 7 January
HPV vaccine might well have been handled general population. 2011, www.npr.org/2011/01/07/132740175/paul-offit-
in the same way had it not been introduced Ironically, one such influence is empiri- on-the-anti-vaccine-movement.
as a mandatory, girls-only shot for a sexu- cally uninformed risk communication. The 14. D. J. Lanska, J. Public Health Policy 19, 160 (1998).
15. J. C. Hershey et al., Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.
ally transmitted disease in a nationwide leg- media and advocacy groups routinely lament
59, 177 (1994).
islative campaign [(religious groups were a “growing distrust of vaccinations” (12) 16. A. Frank, “Welcome to the age of denial,”New York Times,
not opposed to FDA approval of the vaccine and a resulting “erosion in immunization 21 August 2013, p. A27.
per se (8)]. But even more important, par- rates” (13), claims belied by CDC statistics.
ents’ first exposure to information on HPV Emphatic assertions that a technology poses 10.1126/science.1245724

54 4 OCTOBER 2013 VOL 342 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org


Published by AAAS
A Risky Science Communication Environment for Vaccines
Dan M. Kahan

Science 342 (6154), 53-54.


DOI: 10.1126/science.1245724

Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on February 9, 2021


ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/53

SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2013/10/03/342.6154.53.DC1
MATERIALS

RELATED http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/56.full
CONTENT
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/47.full
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/342/6154/133.2.full

REFERENCES This article cites 11 articles, 1 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/53#BIBL

PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions

Use of this article is subject to the Terms of Service

Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2013, American Association for the Advancement of Science

You might also like