Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Method To Evaluate The Degradation Condition of Transformer Insulating Oil - Establishment of The Evaluation Method and Application To Field Transformer Oil
Method To Evaluate The Degradation Condition of Transformer Insulating Oil - Establishment of The Evaluation Method and Application To Field Transformer Oil
ABSTRACT
To operate power transformers long-term, as well as ensuring their insulating
reliability, it is important to study age-related decline in various insulating oil
characteristics and the method used to evaluate the same adequately. Previous studies
showed that age-related decline in insulating oil characteristics was caused by trace
components in oil produced during oxidation degradation. To maintain and manage
aged insulating oil rationally, a specific diagnostic method must be studied, based on
measurement of the trace components in oil that cause degradation in these insulating
oil characteristics. The present study evaluated the sensitivity to detect various
components based on the amount of trace components produced in oil during oxidation
degradation for field-aged insulating oil for 34 transformers in various degradation
conditions. A study was also conducted to evaluate the degradation condition based on
the ratio of trace components produced in oil. Consequently, the detection sensitivity
levels were in the order of carbonyl value, saponification value, peroxide value, and
total acid value. As the ratio of the saponification value – the so-called final product –
increased, the degradation of insulating oil developed further. With the above study
results, methods of evaluating the dissociation property in the preceding study and the
breakdown voltage with the degree of water saturation taken into consideration were
combined to establish a comprehensive method of evaluating aged oil. This was then
applied to field-aged insulating oil as an example, whereupon the need to replace
insulating oil could be evaluated.
Index Terms - Insulating oil, aging, dissociation property, breakdown voltage,
dissipation factor, volume resistivity, evaluation method.
DOI 10.1109/TDEI.2014.004633
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 22, No. 2; April 2015 1267
their influence on various characteristics. Consequently, it was comparison of the detection sensitivity (measurement
concluded that characteristics which were satisfactory when value/determination limit value) of the trace components in oil.
the oil was new had declined over the years due to the A study will also be conducted on the influence of the
oxidation degradation of various components (source increase in the substance used to indicate the electrical
components: hydrocarbons, sulfur compounds, etc.). This was characteristics (dissipation factor, volume resistivity, and
attributable to the influence of, for example, heat and oxygen breakdown voltage). Subsequently, Section 4 will establish a
during the transformer operation and the change in quality of diagnostic flow for degraded oil, based on an overview of the
components adversely affecting the insulating oil methods used to evaluate the degraded oil obtained in the
characteristics (degradation causing components: carbonyls, preceding studies in addition to the study in Section 3, and
organic acids, etc.) [8, 9]. also show examples of its application. The evaluation methods
obtained in the preceding studies refer to the method used to
To maintain and manage aged insulating oil rationally, a
evaluate whether there is a thermal dissociation property and
specific diagnostic method must be studied by measuring the
that to evaluate the influence of water content in oil on the
trace components in oil that cause these insulating oil
breakdown voltage. Three patterns of insulating oil following
characteristics to decline. To this end, focusing on the
different operational periods (12, 27, and 37 years) sampled
dissociative and hydrophilic properties of trace components in
from 66 kV class distribution transformers at primary-side
oil, their influence on breakdown voltage, dissipation factor,
voltages are used as example applications of the diagnostic
and volume resistivity was studied as well as methods of
flow for degraded oil.
evaluating the same. Consequently, based on measurement
values of the dissipation factor (80 qC value) and volume
resistivity (normal temperature), an indicator to determine 2 OXIDATION DEGRADATION PROCESS
whether thermal dissociation had occurred was derived. In OF COMPONENTS IN INSULATING OIL AND
addition, the influence of the water content in oil on the METHOD TO EVALUATE THE SAME
breakdown voltage was reviewed with respect to the 2.1 CHANGE IN OIL COMPONENTS DUE TO AGING
correlation with the degree of water saturation and it was OF INSULATING OIL
found likely to decline within a certain bandwidth; regardless Figure 1 demonstrates the oxidation degradation reaction of
of the oil type [10]. hydrocarbons, or the main insulating oil components. Here,
The present paper studies a method to comprehensively RH indicates hydrocarbons, while the symbol · indicates
evaluate aged oil based on previous studies on the degradation radicals. Heat, light, or similar phenomena activate
development mechanism and the influence of trace hydrocarbons to break the C-H bonds and produce free
components in oil on the decline in insulating oil radicals, which then react with oxygen to produce peroxides.
characteristics. To be specific, in Section 3, trace components Subsequently, several chain reactions occur, later stopping
produced in oil during degradation will be measured for field when inert substances are produced. As the oxidation reaction
insulating oil of 34 transformers actually in operation to study develops, alcohols and water are formed, whereupon
the substances potentially indicating degradation. The aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, organic acids, esters, and
substances to be used as an indicator are determined based on others are assumed to be produced.
Except for some sulfur and nitrogen compounds, insulating from a total of 34 transformers, covering a wide variety of
oil comprises hydrocarbons, while as the oxidation units from six different manufacturers (shown by A to F) with
degradation of hydrocarbons develops, various oxidation a range of 34 manufacturing years; from 1966 to 1999 and
degradation components are produced [11]. Since the voltage classes from 66 kV to 500 kV. Insulating oil brands
oxidation degradation products of hydrocarbons are polar also vary widely by transformers from three petroleum
substances, they have a high affinity with water and function companies (shown by Į to Ȗ) with a total of six brands. For
to increase the saturated water content of insulating oil [12]. field transformer oil samples, the insulating oil characteristics
Conversely, since water and organic acids are produced in the obtained and respective test methods used are summarized in
oxidation degradation process, dissociated ions are considered Table 2. The test methods of the electrical and chemical
to decrease the breakdown voltage [13, 14]. characteristics are in accordance with their respective IEC or
JIS standards. Six types of components in insulating oil,
2.2 METHOD TO ANALYZE FIELD TRANSFORMER namely peroxide value, carbonyl value, alcohol value, total
OIL acid value, saponification value, and ester value, are used to
The specifications of the field transformer oil used in the indicate and assess the development of degradation based on
present study are shown in Table 1. Insulating oil is sampled the development process in Section 2.1.
Table 1. Transensformer specifications in field transformer oil survey and outline of data on insulating oil samples collected.
Item Outline
Number of transformers in oil sampling 34
Manufacturer Six: A (5 units), B (7 units), C (6 units), D (2 units), E (7 units) and F (7 units)
Range: 1966 to 1999
Year of manufacture
1960 to 1969 5 units 1970 to 1979 13 units 1980 to 1989 9 units 1990 to 1999 7 units
Rated voltage of 66 to 500 kV
Voltage class
500 kV 5 units 275 kV 20 units 66 kV 9 units
Oil companies: 3 (D, E, J)
Brands: 6 (D1, D2, D3, E1, E2, J1)
Insulating oil brand
11 12
D1 D2 D3 2 units E1 4 units E2 3 units J1 2 units
units units
Actual field oil temperature at sampling 3 ºC to 57 ºC
Chemical Alcohol value Tested in accordance with JIS K 6241 [20] Use gas chromatograph mass spectrometry (GCMS) for analysis.
characteristics Dissolve the sample in combined toluene and ethanol solvents,
Total acid value Tested in accordance with IEC 62021-1[21] add alkali blue 6B as an indicator and estimate the total acid
value by titration using a standard potassium hydroxide solution.
3 MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF THE peroxide value, alcohol value, carbonyl value, total acid value,
COMPONENTS OF ACTUAL FIELD and saponification value. Table 3 shows the ratios of the
detected concentrations. For total acid values, even though
INSULATING OIL one of the values may exceed the insulating oil standard value,
or 0.03 mg KOH/g or less [15], it is still less than the
3.1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF OXIDATION
oxidation stability standard [23], or 0.40 mg KOH/g.
DEGRADATION COMPONENTS IN FIELD
For the alcohol and total acid values, the measurement
This section studies the validity of the degradation indicator
values did not differ significantly among samples and the
components; based on the measurement results of trace
ratios of the detected concentrations were 1.5 to 3.0. For the
components in oil for actual field transformers. To be specific,
peroxide, carbonyl, and saponification values, however, the
the ratios of the detected concentrations (measurement
measurement values differed significantly among samples,
value/determination limit value) of measurement values are
with differences in the detected concentrations ranging from
compared to study the detection capability of each component.
21.0 to 203. Since the ratio of the detected concentrations is
Figure 2 shows a comparison of the measurement results of
the value obtained by dividing the measurement value by the
2.5
Peroxide value
determination limit value, it indicates the resolution
performance of the relevant component. Consequently, the
Peroxide value concentration in oil
0.03
1.0
Average: 0.89 meq/kg
0.025
0.8
(mg KOH/g)
0.02
(meq/kg)
0.6
0.015
Average: 0.012 mg KOH/g
0.4
0.01
0.2
0.005
0.0 0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
Number of years having elapsed (years) Number of years elapsed (years)
(b) Alcohol (d) Total acid value
2.5 0.35
Carbonyl value Saponifiable compounds value
Carbonyl value concentration in oil
0.3
concentration in oil(mg KOH/g)
Saponifiable compounds value
2.0
0.25
1.5
0.2
(meq/kg)
0.15
1.0 Average: 0.16 mg KOH/g
0.1
0.0 0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
Number of years elapsed (years) Number of years elapsed (years)
(c) Carbonyl value (e) Saponifiable compounds value
Figure 2. Analysis results of oxidation degradation components in aged oil.
1270 J. Wada et al.: Method to Evaluate the Degradation Condition of Transformer Insulating Oil
Table 3. Comparison of the resolution performance obtained from each degradation of insulating oil, and the saponification value for
measurement value. the final degradation stage.
Observed value
P A C T S
(meq/kg, mg KOH/g)
3.2 CORRELATION OF THE SAPONIFICATION
Lower limit value: A 0.10 0.72 0.01 0.01 0.01 VALUE CONCENTRATION AND THE ELECTRICAL
Maximum value: B 2.1 1.1 2.03 0.03 0.29 INSULATING OIL CHARACTERISTICS
Resolution
21.0 1.5 203 3.0 29.0 The previous section analyzed various components
performance: B/A
P: Peroxide value, A: Alcohol value, C: Carbonyl value
considered produced due to the oxidation degradation of aged
T: Total acid value, S: Saponifiable compounds value insulating oil. Consequently, it emerged that relatively aged
oil had a high saponification value and that final oxidation
stage) to evaluate aged oil. However, the total acid value was degradation products were likely to be detected in abundance.
not excluded from the indicator due to concern that, once it This section studies the influence of the saponification value,
starts increasing, it may do so at an accelerated pace and assumed to indicate the final product, on the electrical
sludge may be formed when it exceeds 0.1 mg KOH/g to 0.5 insulating oil characteristics. The methods used to test the
mg KOH/g. The ester value, obtained by subtracting the total electrical characteristics match the standards listed in Table 2.
acid value from the saponification value, is also used as an The electrical characteristics obtained include the breakdown
indicator to assess the degradation tendency. voltage, dissipation factor, and volume resistivity. For the
breakdown voltage, tests repeated five times are conducted
Table 4 shows the evaluation of chemical compounds and the average value between the second to fifth times is
obtained in the preceding study (hydrophilic and dissociation determined as the test result. The dissipation factor shows
properties) with an additional resolution performance item measurement values at 80 qC, while the volume resistivity
[10]. As described in Section 2, hydrocarbons transform in a
shows one-minute values when 250 V is applied at 80 qC and
stepwise manner from peroxides to esters during oxidation
zero-minute values when 10 V is applied at room temperature
degradation. The preceding study obtained the characteristics
(25 qC).
of an aldehyde concentration (carbonyl value) proportional to
the hydrophilic property. Accordingly, the carbonyl value was The electrical characteristics with respect to the
detectable with high sensitivity and is expected to have the saponification value are compared in Figure 3. Here, the
effect of limiting the decline in breakdown voltage when the dotted lines approximate the data, while the dashed lines
water content is increased. As for the dissociation property, its indicate the maintenance management standard values of
correlation can be observed with the total acid value, which insulating oil after commencing operation [5]. Since the
has a low-resolution performance. However, the dissociation maintenance management standard values differ among JEC,
property can be evaluated based on the correlation of IEC, ANSI, etc., the values for a voltage class of 420 kV or
dissipation factor and volume resistivity. more in the IEC standard, the most stringent, are shown for
Based on the above results, Section 4 will evaluate the reference. The dissipation factor tended to increase in
degradation level using a total of five indicators, including the proportion to the saponification value. When the
total acid and ester values in addition to the peroxide value for saponification value is 0.01 mg KOH/g, or the minimum
the initial oxidation degradation stage, the carbonyl value detectable level, the dissipation factor was 0.19 %, close to the
(aldehyde) related to the hydrophilic property (water maintenance management standard value of IEC.
receptivity) for the intermediate product stage during the
Both volume resistivity and breakdown voltage tended to
decline with increasing saponification value. Since the volume
Table 4. Evaluation of the property of oxidation degradation products at each
degradation stage. resistivity cannot be simply compared with the standard value
Water Dissociation Resolution
due to the difference in measurement temperatures,
Compound State measurement values at 25 qC were compared with the
receptivity property performance
standard value at 20 qC. Where the saponification value was
Hydrocarbon Initial state u u ----
0.28 mg KOH/g, the volume resistivity at 25 qC was 1.6u1012.
Initial state of Therefore, volume resistivity is likely to be lower than the
Peroxide
degradation
u u ż
standard value with the increase in the saponification value,
Intermediate
depending on the voltage class of the transformer in which oil
Alcohol state of u u u
degradation is used and the applicable standard. As for the breakdown
Intermediate
voltage, even though it does not decline to near the standard
Aldehyde state of ż u ż value level for any insulating oil, it tends to decline with the
degradation increase in the saponification value, meaning the latter is also
Final state of an important indicator of breakdown voltage. As mentioned
Organic acid ¨ ż u
degradation above, the electrical characteristics tended to decline
Final state of significantly in proportion to the increase in the saponification
Ester ¨ ¨ ¨
degradation value, meaning the latter is very likely to be an indicator
ż: High, ¨: Middle, u: Low component of the final product.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 22, No. 2; April 2015 1271
10
4 STUDY OF THE DIAGNOSTIC FLOW FOR
AGED OIL AND ITS APPLICATION
4.1 DIAGNOSTIC FLOW FOR AGED OIL
Dissipation factor (%)
1.E+15
of the zero-minute value of volume resistivity and the
dissipation factor at 80 qC. Where the dissipation factor level
1.E+14 along the vertical axis exceeds the average, thermal
25 ºC
dissipation is very likely to have occurred.
80 ºC
1.E+13 Since the breakdown voltage is affected by the water content
in oil, the former must be studied based on its correlation with
> 2u1012 (20 ºC)
water content. Even at the equivalent water content level, the
1.E+12
Volume resistivity, 1 min, 80ഒ (ȍ ዘcm)
Volume resistivity, 0 min, 25ഒ(ȍ ዘcm)
influence on breakdown voltage is less significant if the
Max. 2E+12, 20ഒ, >420 kV, IEC
Max. 1E+11, 90ഒ, >420 kV, IEC
saturated water content is high. Consequently, the breakdown
1.E+11 > 11011 (90 ºC) voltage is evaluated by correlation, not with the water content at
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
measurement but with the degree of water saturation (water
Concentration values of saponifiable compounds in oil (mg KOH/g) content at the measurement/saturated water content). Based on
the preceding study results, the breakdown voltage values with
(b) Volume resistivity with respect to the saponification value
respect to the degree of water saturation were within a certain
bandwidth [10]. Where the measurement value exceeds the
bandwidth, polar substances with non-dissociation properties
85 affecting the increase in saturated water content in aged oil may
potentially be present in abundance. Conversely, where the
80
Breakdown Voltage (kV/2.5mm)