Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract~The effecr of de testing on the life of crosslinked Ab s t r ait-s-Cet article traite de l'effet du test C.C. sur
polyethylene (XLPE)insulated cab les is discussed in this paper. l'espérance de vie de câbles isolés. au po lyéthylêne réticulé
The cab les were aged in the laboratory under accelerated chimiquement (PRC). Les câbles futant vieillis de fagon
conditions until failure. The effect of de testing on cable life accélérée, en laboratoire, jusqu'au claquage.. L'influence du test
prior to aging, during aging, and after aging to failure was c.c. sur la vie des câbles avant et apre1 vieillissement, et aussi
investigated. Results infer that de testing at40 kV has a après vieillissement jusqu'au claquage a été étudié. Les résultats
deleterious effect on the life of aged XLPE insulated cables. A indiquent que le test c.c. li 40 kV a une influence néfaste sur la
hypothesis is presented which explains the effect of de testing vie de câbles PRC vieillis. Une hypothêse est avancée pour
on XLPE insulated cables. It states that the effect of de will expliquer l'effet du test c.c. sur les câblesPRC. Elle établit que
depend upon the dielectric strength of the cable after aging, at l'effet du test c.c. dépend de la rigidité diélectrique du câble après
the time of de application. vieillissement au moment de son application.
with de voltage. Of course, in the field the fault is often located TABLE 1: TESTS Ta DETERMINE EFFEcr OF
via a thumping procedure. This technique was not utilized in OC TESTlNG ON SPLICED CABLES
the laboratory for this study; the failures in the samples were
detected by visual examination. OC Tested
Sample preparation is explained in [2]. Samples were aged Samp1e New Specimen After
to failure and subsequent to the failure, the failure area (3 Days(A) ID Identity Splicing DaysCB) Loc
inches, 7.5 cm) was eut out for microscopie examination. The
remaining two sections were joined with two new sections of 311 DC 52 01+S+N-1 Yes 69 01
identical (never energized) cable from the original manufactur- 02+S+N-2 No 215 02
ing run. 316 OC 81 01+S+N-1 Yes 36 01
Commercially available premolded splice kits were used to 02+S+N-2 No 775 02
join the two cable pieces. The result was two samples, each 362 OC 33 05+S+N-5 Yes 95 05
comprised of failed cable + splice + new cable. Figure 1 06+S+N-6 No 116 06
explains test sample preparation. One sample (set) was 384 OC 42 01+S+N-1 Yes 310 01
subjected to de testing of 40 kV negative for 15 minutes. DC 02+S+N-2 No 321 02
voltage was applied to the conductor with the neutrals 396 DC 93 01+S+N-1 Yes 298 01
connected to the ground. The sample was then drained for at 02+S+N-2 No 342 02
least one hour. Both samples were placed back in the aging 527 OC 91 03+S+N-3 Yes 308 03
test. None of the samples were subjected to de prior to failure 04+S+N-4 No 691 04
and splicing. 539 DC 30 011+S+N-11 Yes 163 011
012+S+N-12 No 751 012
failure Yes 263 01
627 DC 29 01+S+N-1
v: 02+S+N-2 No 305 02
636 DC 106 07+S+N-7 Yes 0.5 07
gnf_-_ _ 636
08+S+N-8
OC 99 09+S+N-9
No
Yes
686
129
08
09
01O+S+N-1O No 812 010
s lice 1036 OC 38 01+S+N-1 Yes 103 01
aged pieee unaged piece 02+S+N-2 No 267 02
subjeeted ta
de test It is apparent from these eleven 'matched pair' studies that
aged pieee unaged pieee failure always occurs first (after continued aging after splicing)
in the old section that hadbeen de tested, relative to theold
no de test
section that was not de tested. The pattern is consistent for this
data set despite the wide variability in actual failure times
Figure 1: SampIe Preparation
between cable segments. In attempting to qualitatively
estimate this difference, the ratio of days to failure for non-de
tested to de tested cables was calculated for each of the eleven
For this present study, two aging test protocols were data sets and is shown in Table 2. This variation is extremely
employed; samples were aged to failure, as described above, and wide and is only a qualitative estimate of this phenomenon.
tested as described; however, in addition, many samples were
aged and removed from the pipe prior to failure; they were eut in TABLE 2: EFFECT OF DC TESTlNG
half and then spliced and testing continued. Hence, both the ON FAILED & SPLICED SAMPLES
effect of de testing on spliced cables that had previously failed
and those that had not failed were examined. Life in Days
Sample ID DC Tested Not DC Tested Ratio
V. EFFECT OF DClESTlNG ON SPUCED CABLES DC 52 69 215 3.12
THATFAILED DURING PRIOR AGING DC 81 36 775 21
DC 33 95 116 1.21
Table 1 shows the results for cables .that failedduring prior DC42 310 321 1.03
aging, the failed region removed, and the cable thenspliced. In DC93 298 342 1.15
this table, days (A) is defined as the original number of days to DC91 308 691 2.24
failure before splicing, days (B) is defined as the additional days DC30 163 751 4.60
to failure after splicing. As an example, the designation 0- DC29 263 305 1.16
I+S+N-I and 0-2+S+N-2 are the new specimen identifications DC 106 0.5 686 1372
of sample DC-52, with 0-1 and 0-2 being defined as the. aged DC99 129 812 6.29
sections and N-I and N-2 being defined as unaged (new) DC38 103 267 2.59
sections. Loc. represents the location of the section where the Total = 4.80
failure occurred, for example, 01 represents the old section of
sample DC-52, etc.
Close and Return
141
L-24 - - - .- - - - - -
L-12 --- - -- = DC
= NQ DC
1-16 --- - -- -- 1 1
J -27 10-
--- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - -
J -22 ------
J-8 - - - -. - - - .- - - -. - . .• . • .
1 • 1
• T
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Days ta Failure
Fig. 2: Effeet of DC Testing on Spliccd Cables
1 No No No ...-- 0
VIII. DISCUSSION
.~
60 '- K-dc test at 40 kV <465 311 0.003
-;;; 50
> """.. " 0...\.
Il times
(After the Infleetion Point)
.;; 40
...::l •.•
ri)
0=<J.)
30
'"
•
...o
~
20
15
- Il times
L-dc test at 40 kV >465 102 0.009
•• 23 times
10
•• K-dc test at 40 kV >465 149 0.007
• Il times
5
• .
-=1
--=K
•••• = M
Il appears that the experiments M, L, and K areranked such
that (M) the samples with de applied at 50 kV 11 times during
aging, has the highest failure rate with respect to the me an life .
As far as the failure rates are eoncerned, next isexperiment L (de
1
applied 23 times) and experiment K (de applied Il times at 40
200 300 400 SOO 600 700
Days to Failure
kV). This is consistent with the expectationas far as the "lime
to failure" period is taken before the inflection point. But we
Figure 6: Weibull Plot of Survival vs. Days in
have to keep in minci that the slope decre ases faster for
Experirrents 1 (no de), K (de Il titres), and M
experiment M (de applied at 50 kV) th an the other two
(de @ 50 kV 11 times).
experiments (de appliedat 40 kV).. This possibly infers that
the samples failat a faster rate when the de voltage (40 kV) is
99 applied frequently during ac aging and the samples start to fa il
at a higher rate if de voltage is applied at a .higher voltage (50
9S • kV).
90 ~
~...... Hence it is possible that de voltage applied before aging and
80
..
• '\. once shortly after aging begins (early in life) does not have an
70
60
SO
"
['(.e. \
.........
effect on cable life. However, as the cable ages, the de voltage
application appears to increase the failure rate, particularly, for
~ 40
-, ~. "significantly aged" cables, In this study, the effect of de was
.;;
~ 30
~\ influenced by two factors: volatiles, inclucling the
ri) \ crosslinking aging by-products and ox idation of the cable
~o 20
insulation, Both of these ean influence space charge trapping.
The stored charge (that eould result from de) is probably
~ 15
influeneed more by the extent of oxidation of the insulation
10
th an by the number of cie applications [6]. Also, the
morphological changes that oecur in. extruded crosslinked
S polyethylene cable insulation due to accelerated aging in the
-=1 laboratory play a role in assessing the effect of de on XLPE
- -=K
•••• = L
insulated cables, The total freevolume in the insulation is
greatest in as-manufactured, unagecl cable and drops upon start
of accelerated aging. A single application of de voltage prior
1 to aging does not influence any free volume effect;
eonventional aceelerated aging has a greater effect [5]. An
200 300 400 SOO 600 700
Days to Failure absolute correlation between the number of cie applications to
Figure 7: Weibull Plot of Survival vs. Days in free volume cannot be established because of the oxidation of
Experirrents 1 (de once), K (de 11 times), and L the insulation (cluring accelerated aging) masking the effect, cie
(de 23 times). testing on cable life [6].
To summarize these results, the effect of de testing on XLPE
insulated cab les can be explainecl by a hypothesis which states
Close and Return
144
(Unaged)
None
I.e"
(Partially aged)
Latent Effeet (Fully Aged)
Reduces Life Will Pick
Out Failure &
l Reduce ils
Remaining Life
• TIME
Figure 8: OC Effect on Cable Life
that the effect of de will depend upon the dielectric strength of 4. Several statistical techniques were used in analyzing the data.
the cable after aging at the time of de application. The results show that there appears to be an inflection point
Thedielectric strength is very high prior to aging. At this in the aging time, beyond which the cables start to fail at a
time, de does notappear to have a deleterious effect. As the rapid rate.
cable. ages, the dielectric strength normally drops, and the dc 5.It is recommended not to do de acceptance (proof or
influence begins to appear. When the dielectric strength is maintenance) testing at 40 kV on crosslinked polyethylene
reduced to what might be called an intermediate stage, this is insulated cables, failed once in service and then spliced. It
where the latent influence exists. This is represented by the is advisable not to do dc testing periodically at the level of
intermediate bar in figure 8. In this project the spliced cables 40 kV on aged (heavily treed) XLPE insulated cables.
came from a population of either previously failed samples or 6. DC voltage application on an aged cable does not fail the
aged for 525 days. The ac voltage level during aging was 150 cable during testing; however, il was observed that the cable
volts per mil. Testing these samples with de caused a reduction fails on ac aging soon after the de is removed.
in the remaining life of the cables. Also, there was no apparent
de effect on samples when dc was applied prior to aging or when X. REFERENCES
dc was applied once during the early period of aging; as the
aging continued and a higher number of de applications were [1] N.N.Srinivas, B.S. Bernstein, and R. Decker, "Effects of
performed, the samples started to fail at a higher rate after the DC Testing on AC breakdown Strength of XLPE
inflection point of 420-460 days of aging. These data points Insulated Cab les Subjected to Laboratory Accelerated
probably fall before the middle bar of figure 8. Aging," IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 3 (4),1990, pp.
This hypothesis may explain the widely divergent failure 1643-1657.
times after de application; the dielectric strength would be [2] N.N. Srinivas and B.S. Bernstein, "Effects of DC Testing
expected to very from cable to cable at the time of de on Aged XLPE Insulated Cab les with Splices,"
application (under the normal accelerated aging procedure). Proceedings liCable 91, June 1991, paperB.3.1.
Hence the foBowing can be stated: While the de effect [3] EPRI Report - TR 101245, " Effect of DC Testing on
cannot be picked out by a ten minute step rise breakdown test, Extruded Cross-Linked Polyethylene Insulated Cab les",
thehypothesis requires a relationship between the loss of N.N. Srinivas and E.K. Duffy, January 1993.
dielectric strength upon aging and the effect of dc. [4] AEIC - Association of Edison IIluminating Companies -
Specifications No. 5-82.
IX. CONCLUSIONS [5] B:S. Bernstein and N. Srinivas, "Accelerated Aging of
Crosslinked Polyethylene Cable Insulation; Positron
1. DC acceptance testing at 40 kV of crosslinked polyethylene Annihilation Spectroscopy Study", IEEE International
insulated cable that failed during ac aging reduces its Symposium on Electrical Insulation, 1992.
remaining life when subjected further to ac voltage, after [6] N. Hozumi, J. Tanaka, A. DeReggi, B. Dickens, and N.
splicing with a new piece of cable. Srinivas, "Effect of DC Tests on Induced Space Charge",
2. DC testing of a new cable at factory level (70 kV) or at field IEEE 90"CH 2727-6 Conference Record of 1990
proof level (55 kV) does not appear to cause any reduction in International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, 332
its service life. (June, 1990), Toronto, Canada.
3. DC testing at 50 kV of a cable during ac aging appears to
increase its failure rate.