Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. The USC Audit Committee shall call for a meeting to conduct a re-orientation on
the process of reviewing and evaluating.
2. The Auditors of the USC, UBOs, CSCs, and CBOs shall review the records of the
performance of their co-officers based on the accomplishment reports for the
month submitted for the evaluation period together with the work attitude.
Observations and recommendations shall likewise be included before transmitting
to the USC Audit Committee.
3. The USC Audit Committee shall disseminate officers’ performance evaluation
form to the student body for the students to rate the elected officers’ performance
in accomplishing the tasks and events held by the council/organization.
4. The USC Audit Committee shall schedule the review and evaluation of the
accomplishments of the officers.
5. The USC Auditor shall review and analyze the accomplished tasks of the events
of the USC, UBOs, CSCs, and CBOs’ officers in order to rate or give them the
appropriate points for credit.
6. The USC Audit Committee shall consolidate the performance evaluation of the
Auditors and the student body and must discuss the results with all the concerned
parties.
7. The concerned parties shall agree on the rating and shall affix their signature on
the evaluation form as proof.
8. The officer that will gain the highest rating for the month for each
council/organization will be recognized and will be given an e-certificate as the
officer of the month.
9. Comments/suggestions from the auditors and the student body will be relayed to
the officers.
Performance deficiencies are evident. Failed to meet at least half of the event
objectives.
Below average. Failed but thriving to meet all the event objectives.
RATING FORM
RESULTS:
Point/Rating Rating Definition Recommendations Remarks
COMMENTS:
What has the auditor done or innovated to improve performance as appeared in the
accomplishment report?
Approval:
USC PRESIDENT
FORMS etc.
1. Students’ Assessment on CSC Officers’ Effectivity
2. Students’ Assessment on USC Officers’ Effectivity
3. Students’ Assessment on UBO Officers’ Effectivity
4. Students’ Assessment on CBO Officers’ Effectivity
_______________________________________________________________
Students’ Assessment on CSC Officers’ Effectivity
3 Parts:
-Officer’s Platform during Election
-Officers’ Individual Performance
-CSC’s Overall Performance
I. Officer’s Platform during Election (Monitoring the Officers’ Platform/s during
election
Position Platform Attained Field Relevance Effectivity
(Check if (Education, (Rate: 5 as (Rate: 5 as
attained) leadership highest and highest and
PR, 1 as lowest) 1 as lowest)
innovation
etc.)
President
Vice-president
Secretary
Treasurer
Auditor
BM
PIO
Representatives
1
…
II. Officers’ Individual Performance (Rating the Officers’ consistency and effectivity.
Position Involvement 5 4 3 2 1
in an event
II. Officers’ Individual Performance (Rating the Officers’ consistency and effectivity.
Position Involvement 5 4 3 2 1
in an event
Criteria:
A. Organized Events/ Projects
-10 points each
Requirements:
-Proposal signed by the Dean
-Accomplishment and Financial report
-Documentation
Event 1: ______________________________
Title: _________________________________
Date of Implementation: ___________________
Field: _____________________________________
Students’ Assessment on CBO Officers’ Effectivity
2 Parts:
-Officers’ Individual Performance
-CBO’s Overall Performance
Criteria:
A. Organized Events/ Projects
-10 points each
Requirements:
-Proposal signed by the Dean
-Accomplishment and Financial report
-Documentation
Event 1: ______________________________
Title: _________________________________
Date of Implementation: ___________________
Field: _____________________________________