Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures or

films) in whichever ways they wish. There should be no government restriction on what they do. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
Outline:
1. Disagree
+ There still have a couples of creative products are unsuitable for community
+
2. Agree
+ Everyone has their freedom for making impression by their own
+ If creation had not been express, It would have been wasted.

Nowadays, People who work as creative artists do not have available freedom on doing their own
works. Because their ideas are limited by the government’s regulation or social prejudices.
It is unquestionable that they should be let do their right without the control of the
government.
On one hand, there are many opinions that in social life, it still has many of the creative products
unsuitable for the community, so it has to compel artists to do their job under supervision by
government. In addition, People, the elders, think the creative job is not making money and other
jobs. Therefore, they always want to give restrictions to limit creative artists in order that they
cannot continue their work.
Everyone has their self's freedom to shine their light, which should respect by the community. If
it had not existed an inventive job, it would have been an enormous failure of one country. Since,
for many generations, creative people often provide important human inventions. For example,
Newton finds out his law of universal gravitation with just an apple. It can be seen that, this is
invented by his creation, but also his encouragement when he dares to say aloud his idea. Last but
not least, if it does not allow creative artist to do their work without rule, their country has wasted
people’s talent.
In conclusion, there are many arguments that creative artist should be given their own freedom to
develop their idea. It is better to have no rule for creative works and artists, which would help
contribute to our world.