Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aditya Animal Cruelty
Aditya Animal Cruelty
Email – adityaverma233@gmail.com
Course - B.A.LL.B
ABSTRACT
Cruelty on animals is a crime in which they are inflicted with pain mostly physically which may
even cause the death of the animal. The inflicted pain is beyond the necessity for normal
discipline. It also includes withholding the necessities of the animal (food and water) which can
lead to the suffering of the animal and even death. The problem of animal cruelty is not only in
India but is a global problem that is clear from the stats of various nations.
There are several reasons for this cruelty including religious beliefs, lack of respect for animals,
etc. The Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act in India was brought to ensure that animals are
protected from such behaviour and it provides for strict punishment in case of violation. This has
been ably backed up by various case laws in India.
INTRODUCTION
Animals also are creatures that deserve respect and protection from human beings. They do not
harm people but given our encroachment in most of the wildlife space, their retaliation is
obvious. Animal cruelty comprises all activities that threaten the well being of an animal.
Generally, an animal is considered in distress if:-
The California Penal Code1 defines animal cruelty as the malicious or intentional maiming,
mutilation, torture, or wounding of a living animal or maliciously and intentionally killing an
animal.
Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 2 prohibits any person from
inflicting or causing pain on any animal. It also provides that beating, kicking, torturing,
mutilating, or cruelly killing an animal is a crime. The Act imposes an obligation on owners that
they must provide animals with sufficient food, drinks, or shelter and in case they fail to do so,
they have committed an offence.
BACKGROUND
The recent incident in Kerala is one of the lists of many inhuman happenings against animals. On
May 27 a 15-year old pregnant elephant was found dead in the Velliyar River in the Silent valley
forest in Kerala. The forest officers suggested that the reason for the death may be the unbearable
pain caused because of the broken jaw. The Environment Ministry on June 6 has tweeted that the
primary investigation has revealed that accidental consumption of a pineapple filled with
powerful crackers could be the reason for her death. More will come about the occurrence after a
detailed investigation but one thing is for sure that fruit does not automatically get filled by
powerful crackers and therefore human intervention in the scene cannot be denied. Whether the
act was accidental or intentional is a matter of investigation but it has taken two lives which
brings us to an important question that why all these laws are able to do nothing and are animal’s
life less important than a human.3
1. Seeing animals as objects – Animals are often regarded as objects not individuals of
sentiments having their own needs and emotions. They are often used by men to achieve
our purposes and this result in animal cruelty.
2. Use of animals for monetary gains – Many times animals are used for the purpose of
making profits. The very common example being the slaughter of innocent animals for
selling their meat and by-products.
3. No regards towards animals’ feelings and emotions – Research shows that in most cases
of animal cruelty the offender believes that the animals truly don’t emote. But there have
been several instances when it is shown that animals feel pleasure and pain, joy and
sorrow.
4. Religious practices – Many religions provide for sacrifices and other activities which tend
to harm them and this leaves people who follow his beliefs with no other option but to
continue with these traditions without thinking of the pain and sufferings of these
animals.
STATISTICS
The data collected by the National Incident-based Reporting System provides that in 2018 the
national average of animal cruelty offences were 4.43 cases per 10,000. 4 This is an increase in
the average of animal cruelty cases which was 0.30 per 10,000 in 2017 and 0.11 per 10,000 in
2016. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has provided in its 2018 report
that they investigated 1,30,700 cases of animal cruelty and secure 1,678 convictions by private
4 Animal Cruelty Reporting Scorecard, ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE (June 10, 2020, 10 PM)
https://awionline.org/content/animal-cruelty-reporting-scorecard
prosecutions.5 These numbers are a big issue of concern and with the graph going up, they can be
even more serious in years to come.
LANDMARK JUDGMENTS
1. State of U.P. v. Mustakeem and others6 – In this case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held
that in cases where animals are treated with a cruelty which is a violation of the provision
of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the animals will not be returned to the owner
but will be given to the nearest gaushala or pinjrapole i.e. giving the responsibility of
maintenance to the state.
2. Gauri Maulekhi v. Union of India and others 7- The Apex Court directed for several
welfare measures as well as strict implementation of the rules of the prohibition of
smuggling of animals across country borders as per section 5 of the Foreign Trade
(Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.8
3. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A Nagaraja and others 9- In this case the recognized
animal dignity and honour as part of Article 21 of the Constitution. The court was of the
view that Jallikattu is illegal because it violates section 3 and 11 of the PCA Act, 1960 as
it provides for the animal fight which is incited by humans and this case brought an
important conclusion that Animal sacrifice cannot be allowed just because they are in line
with religious belief and practices.
CONCLUSION
Animal rights are neglected because as human beings we look only for our interests. Though we
have codified laws for animal cruelty with strict punishments this does not end our