Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Analysts
Neelkanth Mishra, Neelkanth.Mishra@credit-suisse.com /
Abhay Khaitan, Abhay.Khaitan@credit-suisse.com /
Akriti Swaroop, Akriti.Swaroop@credit-Suisse.com
December 2020
DISCLOSURE APPENDIX AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST
CERTIFICATIONS, LEGAL ENTITY DISCLOSURE AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure:
Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result,
investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this
report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Agenda
Timeline for the PLI schemes: the first three run FY22-26 and the next ten FY23-27
Sectoral split of likely MEIS outgo in FY20 Rs1.2-1.3tn of Rs2tn PLI spend from MEIS savings
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
MEIS rollback effective Jan-21: fiscal cost ~Rs0.5 tn/yr (2.4% of exports); was WTO non-compliant
For PLI, total funds allocated to the last set of 10 sectors over five years, i.e. Rs1.46 tn, was likely
decided based on the savings from replacing MEIS with WTO compliant schemes
The sectoral split though is different: Jewellery/chemicals lose; autos, food gain
Design Principle 1: • A 5-8% incentive on output value is 50-70% of assembly value-add: very attractive
• Assumption: scale downstream will encourage upstream value-addition
Build Scale Downstream
• Upstream firms/industry likely to respond without incentives; pushed by customers
Design Principle 3: • Instead of giving Re1 each to 100 firms, give Rs10 each to 10 firms
• Selected mainly on the basis of size: larger firms given preference
Rely on “champions”
• A 1-2% incentive may not drive investments; 4-8% does
Likely split of RoTDEP and RoSCTL annual outgoings Policy objectives differ for various sectors
600 PLI Sector PLI amount Imports Exports Net Imports Basic principle
Annual outgo of Government (Rs Bn) (Rs bn) (5 Years) Annual Annual Annual
Mobile 410 74 272 -198 Export boost
500 277
Pharma- KSMs* 69 68 24 44 Import substitution for security
Medical Devices 34 237 104 133 Import substitution for cost
400
Battery 181 4 1 3 Export boost
Automobiles 570 371 1,184 -813 Technology transition
300 Pharma Drugs 150 165 1,155 -989 Export boost/Import substitution
Telecom 122 140 20 120 Import substitution for security
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
The MEIS scheme is to be replaced by WTO compliant RoSCTL primarily for textiles, and RoTDEP for
other sectors. Expected payout for these to be smaller than MEIS, resulting in savings
Policy objective differs for various sectors, for mobile, textile, pharma (net exporters), it could be to
boost exports, while for rest, it could be to substitute imports for cost or security
China’s labour force to continue to shrink Industrial workforce has shrunk by 30mn in 7 years
850 105 China industrial employment
China Labour Supply (mn) Forecast 100
100 98 98
95
800 95
90
90
750
85
79 79
80
700
75 72
70
650
65
600 60
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18 Dec-19 Oct-20
mn
peop
Source: International Labour Organisation (ILO), Credit Suisse Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse estimates
A structural change in global manufacturing is driven by the demographic shift in China: the after-
effects of the one-child policy mean that the labour force is expected to shrink by 50 mn by 2030
A large drop is showing up in industrial employment which has fallen by 28 mn since December 2014,
and down 28% from the peak, mostly in low-wage industries (textiles, toys, footwear, etc)
Given the scale of the decline, India has a chance Weak productivity growth in SSA/MENA
12%
RoW Sub-Saharan Africa Mid-East, N Afr, AFG, PAK India
CHN 10%
EUR
RUS 2018-2030 Change in Labour Force (mn) 8%
JPN
NPL
PER 6%
IRQ
VNM 4%
AFG
BRA 2%
USA
PHL
MEX 0%
BGD
N Afr -2%
IDN
PAK -4%
IND
Sub S Afr
-6%
(50) - 50 100 150 200 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
Given the scale of the drop in labour force, India’s size stands out
Sub-Saharan Africa, MENA, PAK & AFG together add 229m of the 360m global addition till 2030
But they have seen muted and near-zero growth in per-worker output in the past five years, meaning a
sharp increase in manufacturing may not be an attractive option in these geographies
Changes in import duties over the years Most sectors has seen increase in import duties in past 2Y
60% Import Duty 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
% of products (HS code 6 digits)
seeing change in import duties Mobile 0 0 0 0 20 20
40%
Pharma- KSMs 8 8 8 8 10 10
Battery 10 10 10 10 14 14
0%
Electronic components 2 2 2 2 2 2
-20% Automobiles 29 25 25 33 42 42
Pharma Drugs 10 10 10 10 10 10
-40%
Telecom Equipment 7 7 7 7 8 9
-60% Textile 10 10 10 10 25 25
Food Processing 42 42 42 42 47 47
-80%
1996-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2014 2014-2019 Solar Panels* 0 0 0 0 0 0
White Goods 8 8 8 9 10 12
Increase Decrease
Specialty Steel 5 5 10 10 15 15
Source: WTO, Credit Suisse estimates Source: WTO, Credit Suisse estimates
Several of these sectors have been on the government radar for a while, as seen in the imposition or
hiking of import duties over the past few years.
40% of tariff lines saw increases in import duties in the past five years. In every five year period up
until 2010, 60-70% of tariff lines used to see cuts: this has reversed since then.
Weighted average import duties on MFN & preferential rates Weighted average import duties by sector
30
Weighted average import duties Agri
MFN Rates Preferential Rates
Textiles
25
Leather
20 Jewellery
Chemicals Weighted average
15 Others import duties
Engg. Goods
10 Autos
Ores
5 Petroleum
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2019 2014 1996
The average import duty, as weighted by the value of imports in each category, fell until 2007, then
stayed mostly unchanged until 2017, but has now risen to nearly 12%.
The increase above 10% is mainly because of agriculture and textiles; the duties for other products
mostly average below 10%, broad based increase in 2014-19.
Global producers to get most of the incentives India was already an exporter: exports to rise
Electronic 5Y Production: US$153bn
Components 250
4% mn units
200
Domestic Firms
17% 150
100
50
(50)
(100)
Global Firms (invoice FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
value >US$200)
79% Imports Exports Net Imports
Source: Press Information Bureau, Credit Suisse Source: WTO, Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse
~80% of the incentive is for the global manufacturers, which by scheme design, will have higher ASPs
Domestic firms may see larger numbers, though
As India is already a net exporter of phones, incremental output likely to be exported
Two clusters are emerging, one near Chennai (Sri City in AP, Sriperumbudur in TN, Kolar in Karnataka
and one near Delhi (Greater Noida).
India’s share of global smartphone production India phone production ASPs could rise sharply
- -
- 0%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21e FY22e FY23e FY24e FY25e
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21e FY22e FY23e FY24e FY25e
Production (Rs Bn) Implied ASP (Rs)
Global India India as % of Total (RHS)
Source: Ministry of Electronics, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Electronics, Credit Suisse estimates
We expect production to reach 600mn by FY26, taking volume share for India to 40%. This is much
lower than the government’s aspirational target of 1 bn units, but still a large increase
Shifting of global brands like Apple and Samsung (higher-end phones), will also raise ASPs of
handsets produced in India
Global smartphone share by company ASPs of different brands: Apple and Samsung lead
Others Apple
900
17% 15%
ZTE 800
0%
700
Smartphone ASP (US$)
Lenovo 600
3%
vivo 500
9% Samsung
20%
400
300
OPPO
8% 200
100
Xiaomi Huawei+Honor
12% 16% 0
Apple Samsung Huawei OPPO vivo Lenovo Xiaomi Others ZTE
Smartphone market share (2020) +Honor
Source: Ministry of Electronics, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Electronics, Credit Suisse estimates
Indian firms do not own global brands and production shift would depend on global OEMs. Apple and
Samsung shifting production to India is a win
These firms are also likely to shift their component suppliers (already underway), as they plan for the
post-subsidy environment. These vendors can then be accessible to local firms as well
Bill of Materials for a high-end smartphone Bill of Materials for a low-end smartphone
Supporting Test/Assembly Application
Supporting Test/Assembly Application 8%
materials Processor
materials 3% Processor
4% 19%
Mechanicals 5% 17% Mechanicals
7% 9%
Battery Other
Other 2% Battery
Electronics Sensor Electronics 4%
7% 3% 2%
Power/Audio Power/Audio Sensor
2% 2% 1%
Cameras
Mixed 13% Mixed Cameras
Signal/RF Signal/RF 16%
8% 10%
Memory Memory
12% 14% Display
Display 11%
21%
BoM of $195 of Redmi 10X 5G
BoM of $420 of Galaxy S10+
Source: TechInsight, Credit Suisse estimates Source: TechInsight, Credit Suisse estimates
Companies are incentivised only to grow assembly, where the incentives are the highest: the 4-6%
incentives could be 100% of the assembly costs of high end phones and ~50% for low-end phones
Basic components such as casing, chargers and box content may be easy to do in India, but shift in
assembly of sub-modules such as cameras, acoustics, batteries and displays is likely to be next step
30 0.7% 10
GDP Impact ($ Bn) As % of GDP (RHS)
0.6% 5 Forecast
25
0.5% 0
Mobile Phones
20
-5
0.4%
15 -10
0.3% Estimated Net imports of
-15 Mobile phones ($ Bn)
10
0.2%
-20
5
0.1%
-25
0 0.0% -30
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
From a current value addition of 10-15%, the government hopes that domestic value addition reaches
35-40%: at the mid-point of that range, on our expectations of production, this scheme could add
US$25 bn of value addition, or 0.8/0.6% of FY20/ FY26 GDP
This would also imply additional $23 bn of exports by FY26
Laptop + tablets + desktops 46% of handset market India a net importer: Production share is just 1%
Desktop
Tablets 5% Share of GLobal 250 20%
7% Demand (2025) 18%
200 16%
14%
Laptops 150 12%
19%
10%
100 8%
6%
50 4%
Phones
69% 2%
0 0%
FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
Source: TechInsight, Credit Suisse estimates Source: TechInsight, Credit Suisse estimates
The global market for laptops, tablets and desktops is about US$220 bn, or 46% of the global
handset market, so growth in this market can help complement the component ecosystem
India’s global share of production in these is just 1% and that too only in desktops which continue to
shrink in market size globally
Imports of KSM/APIs in the list since 2011 Incentive high for top four fermentation products
90 14.0 25
12.0
80 12.0
23 20
70 10.0
60 15
8.0
50 6.0
6.0
40 10
4.0 10
30 2.4
5
20 2.0 1.0 0.6
4
10 0.0 0
2 2
0
Penicillin G / TIOC / Key Niche Other
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 7-ACA Clavulanic Chemical Fermentation Chemical
Total KSM imports (Rs Bn) Max incentive per product (Rs bn) Number of products
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse Source: Company Data, Credit Suisse estimates
India a net exporter of pharma API but for some (energy-intensive) molecules imports up steadily
These 41 molecules segmented into : (1) key fermentation based (penicillin) (2) fermentation-based
niche; (3) key chemical synthesis; (4) other chemical synthesis
Incentives per molecule the highest for the fermentation products: given cost difference with China it
may not be enough, but over 5 years will pay for the capital costs
CREDIT SUISSE, Equity Research, Asia Pacific December 11, 2020 18
Medical Devices: Foreign firms likely beneficiaries
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse Source: Company Data, Credit Suisse estimates
Net imports of medical devices have grown steadily even as exports have risen in some sub-segments
(Phillips for example exports to 55 countries from India). A very wide variety of products are imported
Firms are to have a 5% incentive on incremental sales above the threshold minimum with incentives
capped at Rs370mn per applicant in Y5, implying sales of Rs7.4bn per segment and firm
36
40 Electrical and
Electronics Body/Chasis
31 15% 10%
20
Drive
0 Transmission/
MEIS - Autos Autos PLI ACC PLI Imports of Auto
Sharing
components (FY20)
29%
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company Data, Credit Suisse estimates
Given that Autos were a relatively small part of the MEIS scheme, but are by a margin the largest
beneficiary of the PLI schemes, the sector should get a boost
India imports US$15bn of auto components, automotive electronics, like sensors, magnets, electric
motors and TFT screens. As are air bags and their components, and automatic transmissions.
Share of exports in total production Cost curve of ICE ownership vs EV for diff. subsidies
60
50% 46% Gasoline EV (2 lakhs) EV (4 lakhs)
45% EV(6 lakhs) EV(8 lakhs)
50
40%
35% 40
30%
25% 30
20% 18%
15% 20
15%
10% 10%
10% 6% 10
5%
Average daily drving distance in India
0% -
LCV Tractors MHCV 2W PV 3W 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Share of Exports-FY19, FY20 Average Average daily distance in km
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company Data, Credit Suisse estimates
Incentives may be split between incentivizing: i) EVs; ii) PV exports; iii) substituting component imports
Auto OEMs have grown exports, and several like Suzuki/Toyota already have export plans
EVs: significant gap between the TCO for EVs and those with ICE. Even at Rs0.5mn subsidy per car
the gap may remain meaningful if batteries cost US$200/kwh
50 GWh likely enough for ~20% EV penetration Key Suppliers and their plans for manufacturing
140 130 Company Plans
The scheme targets to can fund capacity 50GWH of battery capacity at US$80mn/GWH cost, which
according to CS India Auto analysts can support up to 20% penetration.
As EV demand rises (more “when” than “if”), battery demand to rise.
Several large firms had expansion plans even before the PLI scheme, which could get expedited.
Cotton apparel production moving to Bangladesh Synthetic apparel production moving to Vietnam
50% 50%
45% 45%
40% 40%
CN
35% CN 35%
30% 30%
25% 25%
20% 20%
15% BD 15%
VN
10% 10%
5% BD
5%
VN IN
0% 0% IN
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
China Bangladesh Vietnam India China Bangladesh Vietnam India
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: TradeMap, Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
In a labour intensive industry as apparel, it is surprising that India has not benefited from
manufacturing shift from China, given India’s low labour costs and historically strong record
Cotton apparel exports seem to have moved to Bangladesh and synthetic apparel to Vietnam with
India's share marginally down in synthetic and unchanged in cotton
China dominates fabric production and exports India lags in synthetic yarn and fabric
60% 60%
China exports as % of global exports India exports as % of global exports
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% 30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017
Cotton Fiber C. Yarn C. Fabric Synth Yarn S. Fabric
Cotton Fiber C. Yarn C. Fabric Synth Yarn S. Fabric
Source: TradeMap, Credit Suisse Source: TradeMap, Credit Suisse
Apparel supply chains are complex and availability of raw material close by is important.
Whereas China dominates both the cotton and synthetic fabric markets, India’s vertical integration in
cotton fibre, yarn and fabric is much better than in synthetic yarn and fabric
It is possible that the government chooses to incentivise the production of man-made apparel
India’s food exports, and segments covered by PLI In these segments, India’s global share is very low
Ready to
Eat/Ready to Could be
Cook part of the Marine Products
1% Marine scheme
Products
Honey
22%
Organic eggs
Fruits &
Vegetables
11% Desi Ghee
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: TradeMap, Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
Scheme details not known, but focus areas: ready-to-eat/ready-to-cook (RTC/RTE), marine products,
processed fruits and vegetables (F&V), honey, desi ghee (rarefied butter), mozzarella cheese, organic
eggs and poultry meat
They account for 34% of India’s food exports and India’s share of global trade in these is very low
A very small part of India’s food is processed Marine exports have grown meaningfully
40% 500
35% 450
400
30%
350
25%
300
20% 250
15% 200
150
10%
100
5%
50
0% 0
Dairy Fruits & Vegetables Poultry Marine 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Currently, only 3% of India's food is processed and this should rise naturally going forward. In many
cases, the lack of supply chain infrastructure is the bottleneck, such a cold chain for flavoured yoghurt
Given the natural demand growth for processed food, and the pre-incentive growth in marine exports.
the government may keep a minimum investment threshold to ensure more domestic value add.
Global wireless telecom capex: less hardware now Global wireless hardware capex flattish for a decade
70 25%
50%
200
60 20%
40%
150 50 15%
30% 40 10%
100
30 5%
20%
20 0%
50
10%
10 -5%
0 0% 0 -10%
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020E 2022E 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020E 2022E
Global wireless capex ($Bn) Hardware as % of Total (RHS) Global Wireless Hardware Capex ($Bn) Growth YoY (RHS)
The quantum of funds made available to manufacturing telecom equipment is meaningful and if the
incentives were 5-8% of incremental sales, this would imply Rs 534 bn of sales in Y5
But hardware share of telecom capex has dropped from 40%+ to 30-33%, keeping the global
wireless telecom equipment hardware flat. The use of software is expected to rise further
Estimated GDP impact from the PLI schemes Sector-wise split of annual value-add in FY27
Annual Investment (GFCF)
$Bn Domestic Value Addition from Incremental Sales
80 As % of GDP (RHS) 2.0% As in FY27 Incremental Sales Domestic Value Addition Success Rate
1.8%
70
US$ Bn As % of GDP US$ Bn As % of GDP
Estimated GDP Impact from the 13 PLI 1.6%
60 schemes announced Mobile 66 1.5% 25 0.6% 216%
1.4%
50 Autos 16 0.4% 12 0.3% 70%
1.2%
Feedback from industries targeted by these PLI schemes has mostly been positive so far
Further to the value-added by the industries, the capex done by winners of PLI schemes can also add
to GDP FY22-27
Incremental sales by sector due to PLI scheme Increase in value-add (i.e. GDP) by sector
80 As % of GDP 1.8%
160
70 1.6%
140 1.4%
Incremental Sales due to PLI Scheme ($ Bn) 60 Incremental Domestic Value
120 addition due to PLI Scheme ($ Bn) 1.2%
50
100 1.0%
40
80 0.8%
30
0.6%
60
20
0.4%
40
10 0.2%
20
0 0.0%
0 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27
Mobile Autos Battery Pharma Food Textile Telecom Others
Mobile Autos Battery Pharma Food Textile Telecom Others
Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: Credit Suisse estimates
We estimate that the schemes can generate US$144bn in incremental sales by FY27 and US$70bn
of GVA 1.7% of FY27 GDP.
Bulk of this production is likely to be exported, trade deficit can shrink by US$55bn as well.
Estimates are likely to get recalibrated as details emerge for the ten schemes announced 15-Nov
Split of potential direct employment of 2.2 mn Split of potential direct capex of US$21 bn
Pharma
8%
Textile
53% Split of incremental Battery
Split of incremental
17%
direct jobs direct capex
Barring a few sectors such as chemicals where the incentives may just fund capacity, asset turns in
sectors such as handset, electronics and apparel are higher than normal: very likely by design
The direct impact on jobs would be most significant in textiles and mobiles. Sectors driving the bulk of
the capex would be autos, batteries, handsets and pharmaceuticals.
The annual direct wage bill would be ~Rs550 bn This is still a small part of estimated value addition
Mobile
Others 15%
20% Textile
Autos
7%
Others
Battery Pharma
Telecom
2%
3% Direct Wage Bill as %
Battery of Estimated Value add
Pharma
3%
Telecom
Food
8% Food
Mobile
Textile
42% Autos
Split of incremental
wage bill
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Even at an average wage rate of Rs20k/month, with 20% added for managerial/other overhead
costs, the total direct wage bill would come to only Rs550 bn.
The capex and employment generated in these upstream sectors could be a multiple of the direct
employment and capex.
Change in India’s trade balance (more exports) Aggregate trade deficit can shrink US$55 bn in FY27
25 0.6% 60
0.3%
10 30
0.2%
20
5
0.1%
10
0 0.0%
Battery Pharma Telecom Textile Others Food Autos Mobile
0
Change in Trade Balance As % of GDP
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Some of the incremental output from these schemes is going to be for domestic demand, but the
choice of sectors and the design of schemes suggests that a big chunk would improve trade balance.
The largest impact can come from handsets, followed by autos and then textiles and by FY27, the net
impact on the trade balance could be 1.4% of GDP
Industrials
Autos
Pharma
Food Processing
69 70 75 66 9
0
Government Incentive Industry Capex Incremental Sales/yr. EBITDA/yr.
3 PLI schemes – Formulations (incentive of Rs 150bn), Bulk Drugs (Rs 69.4bn) and Bulk Drug Parks (support of Rs 30bn)
Bulk Drugs PLI aims at import substitution (74% imported from China); Formulations PLI -> export augmentation
Incentives = capex. Peak incremental sales ~US$5bn and EBITDA of US$750-1,000mn adding 10-15% to industry profits
IRR: 10-15% in Bulk Drugs PLI and ~20% in Formulations PLI; Bulk Drug Parks can further improve IRR
Cost differential vs China of ~25% can be addressed through deployment of superior technology and existing import duty.
Bulk Drugs PLI – 41 KSMs/DIs - 50% of incentives for top four fermentation products
Good industry response– 215 applications from 83 manufacturers (160 would be eventually selected)
Autos accounted for 6% spend in erstwhile MEIS Autos + Batteries combined to account for ~38%
scheme spend under the new PLI scheme
Autos is >40% of domestic manufacturing Unless focused, PLI to amount to ~3.4% of new sales
EV break even needs high subsidy and lower costs % of PLI spend that needs to be on EVs
India could be exports base for sub US$15k ASP India could be driver of domestic PV growth globally
Amber now makes ~25% of ACs sold in India and has built/acquired capabilities for inverter PCB
assemblies, motors, and mobility (rail/bus) applications.
Dixon has a presence with dominant capacity market share across multiple categories such as TVs,
mobiles, washing machines, LEDs, set-top boxes and CCTV cameras, among others, with its own
designs/higher margins in washing machines and LEDs.
60 57
53
50
41
38 43
40
30
20
8.8
10 6.2 5.9 5.9 6.4
0
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019
Source: MEITY, Credit Suisse estimates
Mobile phone mfr has picked up sharply to Rs2.3 tn in FY20
India imported US$57 bn of electronics products 2.50 2.25 FY2008 (Rs tn)
in FY2019, produced ~US$70 bn electronics FY2012
2.00
and exported US$9 bn of products. FY2015
1.50 FY2020
The US$70 bn number can be further broken
0.84 0.92
down into various sub segments like mobile 1.00 0.76
players, Apple has a relatively small share in India (1.6%) Apple, 1.60% Samsung, 24%
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
7% revenue CAGR in the last -3
decade. Global EMS players recorded ~7% revenue CAGR in last decade (indexed)
Margins are in the low single digit 100000 Flextronics Hon Hai
7% CAGR
range and have had a trend of Jabil
Pegatron
Wistron
Sanmina-SCI
contracting. This can be a key risk 1%
10000 3%
for Indian contract manufacturers. 7%
Dixon also makes just 2-3%
margins in several categories such 4%
1000
as TVs and mobile phones, etc.
11%
P/E is in single digit range in the
vicinity of 10x or so (is double digits) 100
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Source: Bloomberg, Credit Suisse estimates
Amber and Dixon trade in line with historical averages on a FY23E basis (EV/EBITDA and P/E)
40 37.0
35 EV/EBITDA (CY22/FY23e)
28.0
30 24.6 23.4 24
25 21.1 21.9
16.0
20 8.5 9.8 17.1 13.7 13.7
15 8.5 11.5 8.2 6.4
6.2 5.4
10 7.3 5.4
5
0
Thermax
(CY22)
ULTC
L&T (EPC)
PowerGrid
Indigo
Cummins
Dixon
Shree
Voltas
Amber
Ambuja (S)
BEL
HUL
TCS
NTPC
Concor
BHEL
Maruti
ACC
Siemens
ABB
50 45.0
P/E (CY22/FY23e)
39.0
40 34.5 34.8 34.0
28.5
30 18.8 21.7 28.0
17.9 23.3 22.2
20.1 21.6 17.0
20 15.6 12.3
5.9 7.0 11.6
10 8.5
0
PowerGri
ULTC
(EPC)
Indigo
Cummins
TCS
Thermax
Amber
Concor
Ambuja
Voltas
Dixon
HUL
NTPC
Shree
BEL
(CY22)
ACC
BHEL
Maruti
Siemens
L&T
ABB
(S)
d
20 2.0
0 0.0
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21e FY22e FY23e
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
etc. 20%
4%
12%
6% 9% 6%
in FY23e. -
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
We build Rs 336 EPS/share in FY23, aided Consumer Durables Lighting Solutions Home Appliances
by below EBITDA leverage. Mobile Phones Mobile Phones - PLI Set top box
Strong EPS growth momentum from better asset turns Security Surveliiance Systems Reverse Logistics
400 7,000
EPS Dixon EBITDA Mobile EBITDA to
350
6,000 (Rs mn) reach Rs1.9 bn
300
5,000
250
4,000
200
3,000
150
100 2,000
50 1,000
- -
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
(50) (1,000)
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates