Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question 1 - MCOD
Question 1 - MCOD
Subsystems
OverHead As Bima was unable to align Micro Issues were the lack of Technology
Structures issue with the constantly changing cost-efficient processes that Subsystem,
market/sector, the traditional Bima employed. Another External Interface
method that it employed for its micro issue can be the subsystem
operations caused overhead technology that the company
structures employed.
Poor Customer Customers are not in a position The non-availability of External Interface
Experience, to invest (Downfall in online stores made it a bit SubSystem.
Customers are Economy), Short-Term Interest cumbersome for employees.
not satisfied Rates, Other cause could be
incompetent sales employees.
The apps designed are not
user-friendly. There is less
transparency and low ease of
process
Poor Market Industry Growth, Number of Practices were not Agile, Goals SubSystem,
Share Competitor, Competitors Poor Adaptability with Technology
Strategy Changing Environment, Subsystem,
Tasks not aligned with Structural
strategic goals Subsystem
Poor Financial Fluctuating Interest Rates, The Gross Written Premium, Tasks SubSystem,
Benchmarks GDP also plays a significant Claim Incurred, Management Goals Subsystem
role Expense, Poor Choice of
Capital Structure,
Poor Decision Lack of analysis on the macro Not able to put forth multiple People Subsystem
Making level. The data should have solutions. This would have Goals Subsystem
been compiled and analysed enabled them to choose the Task Subsystem
thoroughly best solution from the lot.
This is an assumption. Apart
from this complex layer in
the organization would have
made it difficult to get a
consensus over a particular
decision
Since the health insurance sector is basically going through a digital transformation,
using AI and chatbots, MR for enhanced customer experience, handling customer
queries, educating customers would give BIMA a major competitive advantage.
Since the areas where customer value is given a lot of importance, customer
interaction has also increased. In the insurance industry, customer service and the
customer experience are becoming important competitive differentiators. Bima focus
on meeting consumer demands at each stage of the customer journey in order to
establish a successful relationship between insurers and customers.
The hierarchical operating models are failing to deliver strategies set by their
executive committees. The enterprise agility will give the upper hand in meeting
customer expectations, improving time to market, creating efficiency, and increasing
employee engagement.
These alternative solutions would be prudent to incorporate based on the major issues
the company was facing like poor customer satisfaction, lack of accountability,
complex layer of management, ineffective cost structures and also in improving the
position among competitors.
DIAGNOSTIC MODEL
Our team would have used the Force Field Analysis diagnostic model given by Kurt Lewin.
According to this model, there are two types of forces acting on a system, which are driving
forces and restraining forces. The driving forces push for change whereas the restraining
forces resist change in the current system. The change is characterised by imbalance between
these two types of forces. The driving and restraining forces can be both internal and
external. In the merged Bima Insurance Co. the preliminary diagnosis reveals following
driving and restraining forces:
Internal driving forces:
(a) Poor efficiency as company had large overhead structures
(b) Change of leadership, as new CEO Dr. A took charge in 2018.
Restraining forces:
(a) The resistance by employees to whole process of delayering can be a restraining
force.
(b) Shareholders can be averse to any change because of company’s relatively good
financial health. This can act as restraining force.
The methods our team would use in conducting diagnosis will be questionnaires which will
be given to employees to fill; interviews of selected employees that were working in Bima
and Janbima before the merger and interviews of customers; analysis of hard data of the
organisation; reporting and examining critical incidents pertaining to customer experience.
Type of Data
Hard Data
1) Annual financial statements and budget of the company will be required to
analyze the operating cost, insurance prices, employees’ expenditure, sales and
marketing expenditure etc. This data will help to improve the cost position of the
company and will give insights where the company can reduce its expenditure.
2) Annual financial statements of competitors will be required to analyze the areas
where they are doing better job in comparison to Bima.
3) Sales or profit per employee needs to be collected which will give direct insights
about employees’ performance and indirect insights about customer relationships.
4) Secondary research on best client service models in the industry.
5) Government reports like census, Reserve Bank of India reports, reports on
international organsations like World Bank and IMF to analyse the trends in
demographics and income levels of the population. This will help in optimizing
products and services according to the needs of customers of Bima. This will also
help in analyzing the density of the company branches and how easily accessible
they are for the customers living in different locations.
Soft Data
1) Customer surveys and interviews will be taken to take into account their
experiences with company’s products, whether the current insurance plans are
simple to understand and to get insights on their buying pattern.
2) Employee surveys and interviews will be taken to find out if there is any
communication gap in the organization.
3) Collecting critical incidents pertaining to customer experience.
Competitor Greater market share Opponent The initiatives to increase the number
Customer Loyalty of customers through improved
Development and customer satisfaction will capture the
growth market share from a particular rival or
reinforce the loyalty of the customers.
Negative attitude They will have high antagonism and
low synergy.
Resistance is a natural part of the change process and there would be challenges in
communicating the change during the process. Similar challenges is faced by Bima, and it
requires effective communication to drive change in the company and reduce resistance.
Rational individuals will question the change need and process, but here the role of senior
management becomes very vital to tackle resistance. They need to confront the reality,
articulate a compelling need for change and demonstrate faith. Leadership team of Bima,
should first identify people who can drive a change and have a positive impact on the people.
Then they identifies people have to come up with a strong and honest business case that
change is the only way to keep the business viable. They then need to craft a compelling
vision to give direction to the company. By confronting reality and helping employees,
leadership team can motivate employees to follow new direction in the midst of delayering
and other transformational processes. This case for change and vision should be developed by
the top management, but they need to identify change agents in the middle management, who
will design company wide change programs.
Communication challenge can be handled in a better way, if the company does contextual
analysis and audience analysis. Contextual analysis is important to understand the history of
past internal communications, readiness etc. On the other hand, programs should be
customised as per audiences and for that the company needs to do audience analysis.
Company should follow simple, clear and consistent mechanism to communicate change to
customers and shareholders. Multiple forums should be used to communicate and more
formal forums like webinars, meetings and newsletters etc must be used for shareholders.
Following communication strategy should also be adopted
1) Communicate 2) Communicate as early as 3) Reinforce and build upon
frequently possible the trust
- Repetition will reduce - Early communication to - Employees trust their
resistance and increase the provide relevant information direct heads more, leverage
likelihood of retention and and reduce uncertainty as this relationship to
demonstrate importance of early as possible. communicate change.
change to all stakeholders. - Formal dialogue is vital, - Focus on reducing
- Take time to communicate and grapevine information uncertainty and
how the change will benefit sharing must be reduced for communicate on facts
stakeholders change information - Speak the truth and change
- What’s in it for me factor - Rumours need to be agents must design
must be explained stopped customised communication
programs
After implementing plans, company should collect feedbacks to validate that messages are
received and understood by stakeholders. Feedback supports 2-way communication and
increases effectiveness. Feedback can be collected through small online surveys and special
review measures must be developed as per programs. Exchange of dialogues is vital.
Company should use a community discussion group for customers to share all the relevant
information about the change and invite customer feedback if any. The views can be positive
or negative but company should take all the points into consideration. Meetings can be held
and also surveys can be conducted so that the information is passed onto the shareholders,
and their feedback can be taken. The communication with all the stakeholders must be
constant, so that change communication progress can be monitored.
Thus a proactive communication and feedback strategy should be adopted by the company
and they should also keep in mind the emotional state of stakeholders like anger, stability,
denial, depression etc.
APPENDIX
SUBSYSTEMS
AGILE ORGANIZATION
Stakeholder Mapping
References
Fresoldt, Tonia ((April, 2018). Evolving insurance cost structures. McKinsey.com. Retrieved
from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/evolving-
insurance-cost-structures
Kelley and Conner's Emotional Cycle of Change (2018). MindTools. Retrieved from
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/kelley-conner-cycle.htm
Model of How People Respond to Change. Retrieved from
http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/302581/Change_37_-_Factsheet_-
_Model_of_how_people_respond_to_change.pdf
Grant, Annett (2016). 4 strategies for communicating change in your organization.
Bizjournals. Retrieved from https://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/how-to/human-
resources/2016/12/4-strategies-for-communicating-change-in-your.html
Connelley, Mark (2020). Force Field Analysis - Kurt Lewin. Change Management Coach.
Retrieved from https://www.change-management-coach.com/force-field-analysis.html