Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wimber’s both/and
The wider church has often suffered from the paralysis of disagreement between Pentecostals
and conservative evangelicals over the biblical language about this, or what Wimber called the
problem of labels.
Evangelicals believe regeneration is the same as being baptised in the Holy Spirit (1
Corinthians 12:13). Following Paul, and reading Paul into the narrative of Acts, they
teach that receiving the Spirit is simultaneous with conversion.
Pentecostals, using the narrative of Luke-Acts, believe the baptism in the Spirit is an
empowering experience “subsequent” to regeneration.
Wimber argued that Paul and Luke use language differently, and do not mean the same thing
by this term. This was his conclusion:
It is a simple fact: God has a work of conversion; God has a work of empowerment. It
can occur simultaneously, it can occur sequentially, it can occur with a long
intermission in between the two, or it can occur in a short period of time, but the
bottom line is that it needs to occur. It is the infilling empowering of the church and
we need it in order to accommodate the work of God. Conversion is truly a baptism in
the Holy Spirit. There is no reason that we cannot use baptism to refer to subsequent
fillings of the Spirit as well, and I do.
This is a both/and statement.
Since Wimber wrote, many reputable biblical scholars have underlined what he said.
It is a fundamental principle of biblical interpretation that words have meaning in context,
that biblical writers each have their own language game, and one cannot force the language
use of one writer onto another.
Craig Keener says that in Luke, baptism in the Spirit refers to “his own special emphasis in his
narrative” which “usually lies on the more particular dimension of empowering for service”.
“Luke allows that, in some cases, people experienced this prophetic-empowerment dimension
shortly after, or (from a different perspective) as a later stage in their conversion process.”
Luke also uses the term “gift of the Spirit” differently.
Surveying the context of the references in Paul and (for the most part) John suggests
that the expression refers to conversion, which initiates a person into the continuing
1
life by the Spirit; by contrast, the context of the passages in Acts suggests especially
prophetic empowerment.
2 Bible Study
7. The day of Pentecost is described by Peter as a phenomenon of the “last days” and the
Day of the Lord (Acts 2:17-21).
If we ask, is there “subsequence” here, the answer is yes, there are a whole series of moments,
each subsequent to the other.