Name : Adi Surya Abdi

ID : 1813440001
Class : Chemistry Education ICP

TASK 1 BASIC CHEMISTRY

1. Do you think any of these atomic models are wrong or more correct than others?
= No, I didn’t think so

2. Why must these atomic models exist.... Why not only one atomic model to be studied?
= As we know there are many models of atoms of some scientists. why we did not learn
a single model for all the atomic model proposed by scientists of the early discovery of
interconnected atoms to the discovery of atomic constituent parts. it goes hand in hand
with advanced technology and knowledge of previous researchers. be very unfortunate
if we study only one model of the atom that has a very long history of previous
scientists

3. Write down the background and experiments that support each of these atomic models
= Democritus as the first scientist credited with the invention of the atom. The question
is, what will happen if you continue to take something (like a tree) and splitting into
portions getting smaller? Will it always be a piece of tree? Can you continue to break it
down into smaller parts and smaller? Democritus that said if you continue to break it
down, you will reach a size that can no longer be broken. This will be the invisible part.
In Greek, atomos = can not be shared.
a. Dalton model’s
Dalton made some statements that contain. First, the stuff can be broken down
into elements (things that are listed on the periodic table). Secondly, the element are
atoms with different masses. And finally, the compound is a combination of
elements. Basically, Dalton only expand the Greek idea of the atom. Atoms are small
objects, and have different masses with different properties.
b. J. Jonah Jameson Thomson
Thomson took the idea of the atom and tried to enter proof of electrons. In this
model, electrons are small objects and the rest are positive material. This is
commonly called perpendicular pudding model for electrons as objects in positive
pudding.
c. Rutherford Scattering
Rutherford experiment induce changes in the atomic model. If the positive alpha
particles mostly pass through the foil, but a few bounces back. And if they already
know that it is small and negative electrons, the atoms must have a small positive
nucleus with electrons in the vicinity.
d. Bohr Model
An important point is that this model according to the following evidence. First,
Small and negatively charged electrons. Second, Proton is located in the nucleus
with a smaller size compared to the size of an atom. And last, To a certain element,
only the frequency (color) of certain light absorbed or emitted.
4. Make a conclusion from the previous three questions
= So we concluded there was no atomic model is wrong because scientists build models
when new evidence is collected then the model changed. And these scientists get new
discoveries to aid the discovery of the old models so that these models are
interconnected.
 Atomic Model’s

As we know there are many models of atoms of some scientists. Why we did not learn a
single model for all the atomic model proposed by scientists of the early discovery of
interconnected atoms to the discovery of atomic constituent parts. it goes hand in hand with
advanced technology and knowledge of previous researchers. Be very unfortunate if we study
only one model of the atom that has a very long history of previous scientists.

Democritus as the first scientist credited with the invention of the atom. The question is,
what will happen if you continue to take something (like a tree) and splitting into portions getting
smaller? Will it always be a piece of tree? Can you continue to break it down into smaller parts
and smaller? Democritus that said if you continue to break it down, you will reach a size that can
no longer be broken. This will be the invisible part. In Greek, atomos = can not be shared.

The development of the atomic theory is done to enhance the previous theory. In 1800
began to be found some of the findings related to the new atomic theory. The following figures
present in the development of the atomic theory.

1. Dalton model’s
Dalton made some statements that contain. First, the stuff can be broken down
into elements (things that are listed on the periodic table). Secondly, the element are
atoms with different masses. And finally, the compound is a combination of
elements. Basically, Dalton only expand the Greek idea of the atom. Atoms are small
objects, and have different masses with different properties.
2. J. Jonah Jameson Thomson
Thomson took the idea of the atom and tried to enter proof of electrons. In this
model, electrons are small objects and the rest are positive material. This is
commonly called perpendicular pudding model for electrons as objects in positive
pudding.
3. Rutherford Scattering
Rutherford experiment induce changes in the atomic model. If the positive alpha
particles mostly pass through the foil, but a few bounces back. And if they already
know that it is small and negative electrons, the atoms must have a small positive
nucleus with electrons in the vicinity.
4. Bohr Model
An important point is that this model according to the following evidence. First,
Small and negatively charged electrons. Second, Proton is located in the nucleus
with a smaller size compared to the size of an atom. And last, To a certain element,
only the frequency (color) of certain light absorbed or emitted.

So we concluded there was no atomic model is wrong because scientists build models
when new evidence is collected then the model changed. And these scientists get new
discoveries to aid the discovery of the old models so that these models are interconnected.