Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Let’s look at a common tank configuration: an un-baffled cylindrical tank. If a mixer is center-mounted in this tank, what we see is a very inefficient flow pattern: the tangential
velocities coming from the impeller cause the entire fluid mass to spin (Fig. 1). Basically, the entire fluid (and its solids) moves like a merry-go-round. In solid suspension
applications, the solid particles will swirl around at the bottom of the tank: no axial (top to bottom) flow is created to lift them up and suspend them in the fluid.
There are three ways swirling can be prevented, and we’ve listed them by preference:
Using baffles or offset mounting techniques will generate unbalanced loads that will act on the mixer shaft. When these unbalanced loads become significant, a heavier-duty agitator
gearbox and bearing are needed. As a result, the mixer is more expensive.
Baffles are our first choice because the loads generated are much less than those generated by offset angle or vertical mounting techniques. For smaller tanks (<10′ diameter), offset
mounting will work just fine, and the extra cost associated with compensating for unbalanced load is minimal. For larger tanks, however, it becomes expensive to go with the heavier-
duty mixer, and installing baffles is more cost effective.
BAFFLE DESIGN
Baffles are long, flat plates that attach to the side of the tank to prevent swirling & promote top to bottom fluid movement. They are most commonly used for blending and solid
suspensions because these applications often use vertical, cylindrical tanks that tend to create swirling patterns, regardless of the type of impeller being used.
The flow pattern illustrated here shows that the use of baffles results in excellent top-to-bottom circulation and great radial mixing.
BAFFLE CONFIGURATION
Baffles should be designed using the following guidelines (Fig 3):
Number of baffles = 3 to 4 (4 is ideal, but 3 will result in sufficient mixing). Adding any more than 4 baffles will not result in any significant mixing improvement.
Width = 1/12 of the tank diameter (i.e. for a 12’ diameter tank, the baffle width will be 1’)*
Length = starts approximately 6 inches from the bottom and ends just above the maximum liquid level
Mount Position = 1/6 of the baffle width off the tank wall**. (i.e. a 1’ wide baffle will be mounted 2” off the tank wall)
* For medium viscosity mixing (ie. viscosities over 3,000 cps or Reynolds Numbers from 10 to 10,000), we often reduce the width of the baffle to 1/2 of standard width
** When agitating slurries, baffles are often located up to 1/2 of their width from the vessel wall to minimize accumulation of solids on or behind them.
GOING BAFFLE-LESS
There are instances were baffles are not required
Square or Rectangular Blending Tanks: Most blending applications that use square/rectangular tanks don’t need baffles because these tanks are self-baffling.
However, they are less suitable for solid suspension because “dead spots” are formed in the corners.
High Viscosity Mixing: For high viscosity mixing (viscosities over 5,000 cps or Reynold’s Numbers < 10), the same power is consumed by the impeller, with or without
baffle, so they’re seldom used.
MIXER MOUNTING
Offset Angle Mounting
With axial-flow impellers, an angular off-center position where the impeller is mounted approximately 10-15° from the vertical, can be used (Fig. 4). It’s worth noting that the angular
off-center position used with axial impeller units is usually limited to those delivering 3 HP or less. The unbalanced fluid forces generated by this mounting can become severe with
higher power.
FIGURE 4. Offset angle mounting
As you can see, baffle configuration and mixer mounting have a significant impact on the mixing process. When engineered correctly, the right application of these techniques can
decrease costs & increase equipment life while optimizing the mixing process.
17 0 1
17 0 1
Dynamix Agitators incorporates over 45 years of industrial mixing experience into its industrial mixer models and the processes they are part of. Our mixers and agitators are
configured to suit your process and application.
1. Vincent says:
May 12, 2015 at J2015055Vam51234
Hi,
I dont know if someone can answer this technical question. First, your BAFFLED
BY BAFFLES paper is very interesting. I’m trying to improve an angle mounting 7
degres pitch blades mixer for a reactor where it is not possible to install baffles.
That’s an ALUN refractory lined reactor. We have reliability trouble with the blades.
We need to investigate for the bolts material and also for the stress reduction at the
hub connection where cracking is initiated. My question is about stabilizing fins that
we have under the blades. That is part of the original design but I never been able
to validate if this produce a real positve impact for vibration and stress reductions.
Let me know if you can comment on that. Regards
Reply
Brian James says:
The stabilizing fins on the impellers are there to reduce the vibration of the
shaft. They do not reduce the forces on the impeller blades themselves. If
the blades are falling off the hub it could be for a few reasons:
1. Too much stress in the blades from the upward hydraulic force of the
liquid
2. The product is abrasive so it wears out the blades
Once one of the blades falls off, the mixer becomes extremely unstable and
will vibrate a lot (as I’m sure you know).