You are on page 1of 15

Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

Texts: “Juno and the Paycock” “I’m Not Scared” (INS)


(JP) by Sean O’Casey by Gabriele Salvatores

Paragraph Comparisons and Contrasts


Introductions

Par. 1: Background  JP depicts human  INS also depicts human


and setting suffering as a result of suffering as a result of
violence. It explores violence.
The theme of
the ways in which .
violence and its
individuals and groups .
destructive influence
can use violence as a .
on societies and
means to an end. .
individuals is
dramatically
presented in both
 JP is set against a  INS is not set against a
texts. Violence can
backdrop of violence backdrop of war but
often be linked to a
and war. there is violence.
society’s political or
social background
and both texts occur
during times of  Ireland was in a period  There was also serious

unrest. JP takes of serious unrest with internal political and

place against the the War of social unrest in Italy in

background of war Independence and the the 1970’s, similar to

and violence. While Civil War. Ireland

INS is different in
that there is no
ongoing war, there is  Unrest came from the  Unrest came from the
a similarity in that it fact that old comrades fact that criminals from
was a time of social who were once united in southern Italy terrorised
unrest for Italy. fighting against the some of the wealthier
Both Johnny in JP British, had turned on families of the North by
and Pino in INS turn each other and engaged kidnapping adults and
to violence to in acts of treachery and children and demanding
achieve their violence. huge ransoms.
different goals.

 Johnny Boyle is  Pino Amitrano is


Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

motivated by political motivated by providing


idealism. for his family and greed.

 Johnny turns to violence  Pino turns to violence to


in order to achieve his achieve his financial
political ideals. ideals.

 The violence in the play  The violence in the film


comes from military does not come from
action and war. military action or war.

 This violence is a result  The appalling violence


of deprivation, a perpetrated on the
dissatisfaction with the innocent victims, in this
conditions of their lives case Filippo, was often as
and a frustration with horrific as some of the
those running their atrocities of war and
country. included maiming and
. murder, even of young
. children.

 The play depicts the  The film also depicts a


degeneration of a society which is
society into chaos and degenerating into chaos
violence. and violence.

Par. 2: Poverty and  Poverty is a clear  Poverty is a clear feature


Violence feature of life for the of life for the Amitrano
Boyle family. family.
Poverty is a fact of
life for both the
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

Boyle family and the  The family live in a tiny  The family live in a tiny
Amitrano’s. In JP 2 bedroom flat within a remote village in southern
and INS their lack packed tenement Italy where the buildings
of wealth is initially building in Dublin. are old and run-down.
evident through
their homes and
becomes more  The flat is described as  The house seems bare
pronounced as both shabby and the and the basic furnishings
texts progress. The furniture is packed in to of their home and the
poverty appears to the small space. lack of toys highlight
fuel the majority of . their poverty.
violence in both of
the texts. In both
JP and INS poverty  The Boyle’s are clearly  The Amitrano’s are also
makes the struggling for money, struggling for money. Pino
engagement with which Juno complains works far from home to
violence worse. about early in the play earn a living and food
and there is little food does not seem plentiful in
in the flat. the house.

 Poverty seems to fuel  Poverty also fuels the


the engagement with engagement with violence
violence in the play. in INS. Again, the
However, violence does violence makes the
not relieve the poverty, poverty worse rather
it makes it worse. than better.

 Johnny sees military  Pino sees kidnapping


action as the only way Filippo as the only way
to combat poverty and out of poverty.
gain freedom. .

 Johnny achieves no  Pino achieves no freedom


freedom through his through his involvement
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

involvement with with violence and the


violence. Rather he ends kidnapping. Rather he
up with an injured hip, ends up accidentally
missing an arm and is shooting his son and being
ultimately executed. arrested.

 There is a belief that  There is also a belief


increased wealth will that wealth will bring
bring happiness and happiness and harmony.
harmony to the family. The frustration of
poverty is a motivating
factor for violence in
both texts.

 Poverty and degradation  Poverty and degradation


fuels much of the fuels much of the
violence but makes it no violence but makes it no
better. better.

Par. 3: Violence and  The violence and  Violence and inhumanity


inhumanity of war is inhumanity of war is are also portrayed in
portrayed vividly portrayed from INS. However, there is a
the beginning of the difference because it is
Throughout JP the
play. not a result of war.
violence and
inhumanity of war is
clearly shown.
 The description of the  Graphic images of the
Johnny himself is a
death of Robbie physical violence inflicted
victim of the
Tancred is graphic in its on Filippo arouse the
violence of war and
horrific detail. (Give same sense of horror and
also inflicts violence
specifics) revulsion as that aroused
on others. There is a
. in JP. However, there is a
key difference
. difference in that the
between JP and INS
. violence is worse in INS
in this respect
. because it is directed
because there is no
. against a vulnerable,
ongoing war in INS.
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

However, there are . innocent child.


many similarities
between the two
texts because  Johnny reacts violently  This is similar to Pino and
violence and to the details of the Anna who react by
inhumanity are also a death, however Mary’s threatening or slapping
key feature of the comment that “he’s Michele when he talks
world of INS. In gettin’ very sensitive all about Filippo. Neither
both texts there are of a sudden’ suggests Johnny, nor Pino and Anna
gory descriptions and Johnny was once want to be reminded of
images of violence. capable of such violence the violent crime they are
Both JP and INS himself. involved in.
portray the cruelty
and violence humans
inflict on one  The cruel and vicious  The pathetic conditions in
another. nature of the violence which Filippo is kept
of war is exposed in Act represent extreme
III and we cannot help cruelty. We have a similar
but feel sorry for reaction of sympathy to
Johnny when he is his imprisonment, but
dragged away to his there is a difference in
execution. that Filippo, unlike
. Johnny, is wholly
. innocent.

 Johnny Boyle can be  This is unlike Filippo’s


seen as a misguided situation as he is simply a
young man caught up in small child who has no
the violence of civil comprehension of what is
unrest and war. happening to him or why.
However, Johnny has He does not understand
willingly placed himself why he is being kept in
in an environment of the hole and comes to
violence through his accept that he and his
involvement with the entire family must have
war. died.
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

 Johnny’s executioners  This is in contrast to INS


may be cold and callous where Filippo’s agony is
when they come to take made worse because his
him away but they at keeper is the vicious,
least show some sadistic Felice who has
element of humanity absolutely no humanity
when they let him take and shows no compassion
his rosary beads to pray for the young boy.
before his death. .

 The gory descriptions  This is similar to a key


of Robbie Tancred and moment in INS when
Johnny Boyle’s deaths Michele is accidentally
highlight the vicious shot by his own father.
cruelty that exists in This moment blasts the
the world of the play. viewer with a blinding
. flash of light and a loud
. explosion. It shocks us as
. much, if not more, as
. Robbie and Johnny’s
. deaths.

 The play shows the  The film may not deal


realities of war and with war, as in JP,
graphically depicts the however,like O’Casey’s
physical violence which play, it does show the
humans inflict on disturbing reality of the
others. violence humans to do to
each other.

Par. 4: Men resort  Captain Boyle resorts to  This is similar to INS


to violence to threats of violence to where violence is also
establish authority establish his authority seen as a means of
as the head of the asserting authority over
In both JP and INS
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

men use violence as a household. others. Sergio, the


means of . gangster from Milan, also
establishing their . holds a commanding
authority. We can . position in the film.
see this in INS when
the gang members
struggle for power  Boyle struggles to earn  Likewise, Sergio does not
which often explodes authority any other way appear to garner any
into violence and Pino because he neither respect or admiration
teaches Michele that provides for the family, from the men of the
being a man beings nor seems to take any village who work for him.
being strong and interest in them. He has to exert his
capable of violence. . authority through
However, the best . threats of violence and
example of this in . using his gun.
INS is Sergio who
uses violence as a
way to gain control.  Boyle threatens both  This is comparable,
This is comparable his son and his daughter though to a much greater
to Boyle in JP, in the final act of the extent, with Sergio
though to a much play. When he hears threatening to cut off
lesser extent, who Mary is pregnant we see Filippo’s ears off and
threatens his son the ugly side to his threatening to shoot
and daughter with personality when he Felice if he doesn’t carry
violence at the end explodes with rage, out his orders.
of the play. threatening his .
daughter with violence. .

 Although he has  Sergio is different from


provided much of the Boyle, in that he has
comedy in the play up to provided no comic relief
this point, Boyle’s true in the film. However, he
nature his revealed in also exhibits an
this moment. He arrogance in his own
abandons his humanity. power to administer the
punishment of death. He
has the power of life and
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

death over Filippo.

 Likewise, Sergio has no


compassion and little
 Boyle seems incapable
regard for the morality
of showing any
of his actions. He will do
compassion,
anything for money and is
understanding or
an individual who has no
concern for others.
hesitation in resorting to
violence if he feels his
authority is being
challenged.

Par.5: Emotional  Emotional violence is  Emotional violence is also


violence evident in the play, a feature of INS and like
which is born of greed JP there are many
In both JP and INS
and selfishness. examples of emotional
it is not just physical
. cruelty and violence.
violence that has a
lasting and
permanent effect on
 A key moment which  Likewise, there is also a
the characters, it is
highlights the emotional key moment in INS which
also the emotional
violence evident in the highlights the
violence that can be
play is Bentham’s intimidating and violent
witnessed in both
desertion of Mary in behaviour in the film, at
texts. There is a key
her hour of need. the beginning, in Skull’s
similarity in that this
. treatment of his
emotional violence
. companions.
appears to be born
of selfishness and
cruelty in both JP
and INS. Although  Bentham abandoning  Barbara, a young, plump

the forms of Mary and his unborn girl, is ordered by the

emotional violence child may be predictable sadistic Skull to

they endure are very but it is still revolting. indecently expose

different, Juno and Mary has been smitten herself. When she

Mary in JP are with Bentham and she objects she is viciously

similar to Michele trusts him. Bentham’s slapped across the face


Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

and Filippo in INS in callousness contributes by Skull. Although the


that they are put to Mary’s fate at the tormentor here is only a
under a huge amount end of the play. child, there is
of emotional . nevertheless a sense of
pressure and will . cruelty and emotional
undoubtedly be left . exploitation.
with deep scars.

 Though Bentham does  Skull, on the other hand,


not say anything is more vocal in his
particularly cruel to cruelty. He feels he must
Mary, like Jerry does, give orders and turns
his act of desertion nasty when challenged or
itself is a form of disobeyed. This
emotional cruelty that foreshadows the violence
will undoubtedly leave which will be later seen in
deep scars. the actions of the adults
. in Acqua Traverse.

 There are also other  There is a clear parallel


examples of emotional between this moment in
violence throughout the JP and the ridicule and
play. Joxer takes humiliation of Barbara in
sadistic pleasure in INS. Skull takes a savage
observing the pleasure in embarrassing
embarrassment and her and making her
degradation of his uncomfortable.
supposed friend Boyle. .
He relishes every .
moment of taunting .
Boyle about the will .
which he knows is worth .
nothing. .

 It is the women, Mary  In INS, on the other


and Juno, who are the hand, it is the boys,
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

key victims of emotional Michele and Filippo who


violence in JP. Mary’s suffer most emotional
own brother calls for violence. Pino puts huge
her to be driven from emotional pressure on
the house when he Michele by telling him
discovers she is that Filippo will be
pregnant and her murdered if Michele
former lover Jerry, who returns to the hole.
still claims to love her, Filippo also has to deal
cruelly rejects her at with a huge level of
the end of the play. emotional trauma which is
Likewise, Juno is left particularly evident when
with the torment of a he cries asking Michele
murdered son and a why his parents have not
failed marriage. come to rescue him yet.

 There is a sense in JP  In both JP and INS


that the inhumanity of emotional violence is
emotional violence can depicted, highlighting a
leave scars as deep as pettiness of character
any inflicted by physical which would be laughable
violence. if it were not so
destructive and nasty.

Par. 6: The effects  The effects of violence  The power of violence to


of violence on on families and on destroy families and
families and individuals are apparent individuals is also a
individuals in the play. common theme in INS.

(Write your own  The guerrilla tactics of  In the same way as the
introduction to the the Civil War in tenement families are
paragraph here) O’Casey’s play affects torn apart by the cruel
several families living in ambushes and executions,
the tenement house. so the families of Acqua
The Tancreds, the Traverse in INS are all
Mannings and the Boyles affected negatively by
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

each lose a son to the violence which they


violence. inflict and tolerate.

 The desperation of the  Likewise, by the end of


mothers left behind INS it is clear the
highlights the destructive role violence
destructive impact has played in the
violence has on families. Amitrano family’s lives.
They are left Their family, as well as
heartbroken, grieving others in the village, has
and like “paupers”. been ripped apart by
. their involvement with
. the kidnapping.

 In JP the family unit is  Unlike Boyle, Pino is a man


kept together through who does love and support
Juno’s sheer will. Boyle his family and wants to
appears to have no improve their quality of
interest in either his life. Unfortunately, he is
wife or his children. He prepared to engage in a
sees the money as a way horrific act of violence to
to improve his own achieve this end.
quality of life rather .
than his family’s lives.

 Although the father-son


 Johnny questions what relationship in INS seems
right Boyle has to make quite different from that
any decisions in the in JP, it becomes more
house when he provides strained as the film
nothing and is continues. Michele, like
completely apathetic to Johnny, is forced to
his family. question his father, the
. man he once looked up to,
. when he realises his part
.
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

. in Filippo’s kidnapping.

 Whatever respect may  The involvement in a


have existed between violent crime also
Johnny and his father destroys the father-son
at one point, it is clear relationship in INS. Pino’s
it no longer exists. It is threat that he will beat
possible this lack of a Michele “silly” if he
decent father figure is returns to the hole puts a
what motivated Johnny strain on his relationship
to become more with his son, who is
involved in violence. already questioning the
. true nature of the father
. he once loved and
. admired.

 Individual characters in  This is comparable to


the play are also INS where individuals are
profoundly affected by also affected by the
being involved directly violence going on around
in violence. them.

 Juno is a loving mother  Anna Amitrano, like Juno,


who, more than is a loving mother who is
anything, longs to see so burdened with
her family stay stresses that she tends
together and be happy. to be snappy and
However, the stress she aggressive when problems
is under to provide for disrupt her family. She
her family means she is becomes angry with the
rarely allowed the children when they
luxury of relaxing or wander far from home
enjoying herself. and slaps Michele across
. the face when he asks if
.
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

Filippo is dead.

 Johnny’s agitated
nature puts a strain on
 This is very similar to
the entire household
INS where the tension in
and builds tension
the household is obvious
amongst the Boyle
in many scenes and grows
family. (Examples?)
in intensity throughout
the film. (Examples?)

 The indifference to
suffering and violence in
 Likewise in INS, the gang
the play is shown clearly
members have lost sight
when Bentham remarks
of the fact that it is a
that “The only way to
small child they are
deal with a mad dog is
tormenting. They are
to destroy him”. Men
cruel and careless in
have become
their treatment of
desensitised by
Filippo.
violence.
.
.

 Mrs. Tancred and Mrs.


Boyle in JP are innocent
 This is a very similar
victims of violence. Both
situation to INS where
of their sons end up
Filippo’s family are also
murdered and they are
innocent victims of the
the ones left behind to
violence of others. The
pick up the pieces.
effects of the threat of
.
such violence on their
.
family will undoubtedly be
.
felt for the rest of their
lives.

 The individuals and


families in JP are
 As in JP, the families of
seriously affected by
the main characters in
violence.
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

INS are affected, if not


destroyed, by violence.
 Johnny is taken away by
cruel, callous men who
are indifferent to his
 Pino shoots Michele by
desperate cries for
accident and almost loses
mercy. Johnny is
the son he loves. In that
offered one cruel
moment he realises his
comfort when he is
family are more
allowed to bring his
important to him than the
rosary beads with him
wealth he foolishly tried
to his place of
to acquire. His
execution.
engagement in a violent
.
crime brings about the
destruction of the family
unit.
 However, despite this
moment of humanity,
the general message is
 This is similar to INS
that violence
where Michele’s family,
dehumanises those who
like all the other families
are in daily contact with
in Acqua Traverse who
it and who see it as a
were involved, are torn
means to a desired end.
apart.

 By the end of the play


Mary and Juno face a
future without any male  This deprivation of a
support. husband and a father is
mirrored in INS where
families will have to fend
for themselves without
husbands or fathers.

 The violence of war and


the violence of the
Comparative Studies – Theme (Violence)

criminal world leave


families fractured and
damaged in both of these
comparative texts.

You might also like