This case involved a claim filed by Luzon Surety Co. against the Estate of Hemady based on twenty indemnity agreements where Hemady acted as a surety guarantor. The issue was whether the obligations and responsibilities of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs. The court ruled that based on Articles 1311, 774, and 776 of the Civil Code, the obligations of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs, but the heirs' responsibility cannot exceed the value of the inheritance received.
This case involved a claim filed by Luzon Surety Co. against the Estate of Hemady based on twenty indemnity agreements where Hemady acted as a surety guarantor. The issue was whether the obligations and responsibilities of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs. The court ruled that based on Articles 1311, 774, and 776 of the Civil Code, the obligations of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs, but the heirs' responsibility cannot exceed the value of the inheritance received.
This case involved a claim filed by Luzon Surety Co. against the Estate of Hemady based on twenty indemnity agreements where Hemady acted as a surety guarantor. The issue was whether the obligations and responsibilities of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs. The court ruled that based on Articles 1311, 774, and 776 of the Civil Code, the obligations of a decedent as a surety are transmitted to their heirs, but the heirs' responsibility cannot exceed the value of the inheritance received.
Estate of Hemady v. Luzon Surety Co., Inc., GR L-8437
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The Luzon Surety Co. filed a claim against the Estate based on twenty different indemnity agreements that was subscribed by a distinct principal and by the deceased, K.H. Hemady, a surety solidary guarantor, the various principals in favor of different creditors. The Luzon Surety Co. prayed for an allowance, as a claim of the value of the twenty bonds it had executed in consideration of the counterbonds. The further asked for judgment for the unpaid premiums and documentary stamps affixed to the bonds with 12 percent thereon. ISSUE OF THE CASE: Whether or not the obligations and responsibilities of a decedent as a surety or guarantor be transmitted to their respective heirs. RULING: The order appealed form is reversed, and the records are ordered reprimanded. RATION DECIDENDI: It was stated in the Article 1311 of the Civil Code that, Contracts only take effect as between the parties, their assigns, and heirs, except in the case where the rights and obligations arising from the contract are not transmissible by their nature, or by stipulation or by provision of law. While in our successional system, it is the sole responsibility of the heirs for their debts of their decedent cannot exceed the value of the inheritance they receive from him. It is further stated in the Articles 774 and 776 of the New Civil Code expressly provide, thereby confirming Article 1311 of the Civil Code.
Law School Survival Guide (Volume I of II) - Outlines and Case Summaries for Torts, Civil Procedure, Property, Contracts & Sales: Law School Survival Guides