Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 1/11

Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
PROJECT
VIDA HOTEL

CLIENT
EHD
Parson
Pace

CREATED BY
Mannai Aluminium and Glass
Saeed Ahmad

Isometric

Y
X

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 2/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
MODEL

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

ORTHOTROPIC MASONRY 2D...

General Model name : GLCP
Project name : GLCP
Project description : Glass Canopy
Type of model : 3D
Positive direction of global axis Z : Upward
Classification of load cases and : According to Standard: DIN 1055-100 + DIN 18008
(Glass)
combinations National Annex: None

Options RF-FORM-FINDING - Find initial equilibrium shapes of membrane and cable structures

RF-CUTTING-PATTERN

Piping analysis

Use CQC Rule

Enable CAD/BIM model

Standard Gravity
g : 9.81 m/s2

FAILURE IF -P
General Target length of finite elements I FE : 0.305 m
Maximum distance between a node and a line  : 0.001 m
to integrate it into the line
Maximum number of mesh nodes (in thousands) : 500

Members Number of divisions of members with cable, : 10

elastic foundation, taper, or plastic characteristic
Activate member divisions for large deformation
or post-critical analysis
Use division for members with node lying on them

Surfaces Maximum ratio of FE rectangle diagonals D : 1.800

Maximum out-of-plane inclination of two finite  : 0.50 °
elements
Shape direction of finite elements : Triangles and quadrangles
Same squares where possible

Cartesian 1.1 NODES

Node Reference Coordinate Node Coordinates
No. Node Type Node System X [m] Y [m] Z [m] Comment
1 Standard - Cartesian 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 Standard - Cartesian 2.500 0.000 0.000
3 Standard - Cartesian 0.000 3.500 0.000
4 Standard - Cartesian 2.500 3.500 0.000
5 Standard - Cartesian 0.000 1.166 0.000
6 Standard - Cartesian 2.500 1.166 0.000
7 Standard - Cartesian 0.000 2.332 0.000
8 Standard - Cartesian 2.500 2.332 0.000

1.2 LINES
Line Line Length
No. Line Type Nodes No. L [m] Comment
1 Polyline 1,2 2.500 X
2 Polyline 3,4 2.500 X
3 Polyline 1,5 1.166 Y
4 Polyline 2,6 1.166 Y
5 Polyline 5,6 2.500 X
6 Polyline 5,7 1.166 Y
7 Polyline 6,8 1.166 Y
8 Polyline 7,8 2.500 X
9 Polyline 7,3 1.168 Y
10 Polyline 8,4 1.168 Y

1.3 MATERIALS
Matl. Modulus Modulus Poisson's Ratio Spec. Weight Coeff. of Th. Exp. Partial Factor Material
No. E [kN/cm2] G [kN/cm2]  [-]  [kN/m3]  [1/°C] M [-] Model
1 Aluminum EN-AW 6063 (EP,ET,ER/B) T6 | EN 1999-1-1:2007
7000.00 2700.00 0.296 26.48 2.30E-05 1.00 Isotropic Linear
Elastic
2 Steel A992 | ANSI/AISC 360-16:2016
19994.80 7722.13 0.295 76.97 1.20E-05 1.00 Isotropic Linear
Elastic
3 Thermally Toughened Float Glass | DIN 18008-1:2010-12

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 3/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
MODEL

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

1.3 MATERIALS
Matl. Modulus Modulus Poisson's Ratio Spec. Weight Coeff. of Th. Exp. Partial Factor Material
No. E [kN/cm2] G [kN/cm2]  [-]  [kN/m3]  [1/°C] M [-] Model
7000.00 2845.53 0.230 24.52 9.00E-06 1.50 Isotropic Linear
Elastic

1.4 SURFACES
Surface Surface Type Matl. Thickness Area Weight
No. Geometry Stiffness Boundary Lines No. No. Type d [mm] A [m 2] W [kg]
1 Plane Glass 3,1,4,5 3 Constant 17.5 2.915 127.53
2 Plane Glass 6,5,7,8 3 Constant 17.5 2.915 127.53
3 Plane Glass 9,8,10,2 3 Constant 17.5 2.920 127.75

1.7 NODAL SUPPORTS

Support Column Support Conditions
No. Nodes No. Axis System in Z uX uY uZ X Y Z
1 1-8 Global X,Y,Z

2.1 LOAD CASES

Load Load Case Self-Weight - Factor in Direction DIN 1055-100 + DIN 18008 (
Case Description Action Category Active X Y Z Load Duration
LC1 Self-weight Permanent 0.000 0.000 -1.000 Permanent

2.1.1 LOAD CASES

Load Load Case
Case Description Calculation Parameters
LC1 Self-weight Method of analysis : Geometrically linear analysis
Method for solving system of : Newton-Raphson
nonlinear algebraic equations
Activate stiffness factors of: : Cross-sections (factor for J, Iy, Iz, A, Ay, Az)
: Members (factor for GJ, EIy, EIz, EA, GAy, GAz)

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 4/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RESULTS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

4.0 RESULTS - SUMMARY

Description Value Unit Comment
Load Case LC1 - Self-weight
Sum of loads in X 0.00 kN
Sum of support reactions in X 0.00 kN
Sum of loads in Y 0.00 kN
Sum of support reactions in Y 0.00 kN
Sum of loads in Z -3.75 kN
Sum of support reactions in Z -3.75 kN Deviation 0.00%
Resultant of reactions about X 0.000 kNm At center of gravity of model (X:1.250, Y:1.750, Z:0.000 m)
Resultant of reactions about Y 0.000 kNm At center of gravity of model
Resultant of reactions about Z 0.000 kNm At center of gravity of model
Max. displacement in X 0.0 mm
Max. displacement in Y 0.0 mm
Max. displacement in Z -7.2 mm FE Mesh Node No. 99 (X: 1.250, Y: 3.500, Z: 0.000 m)
Max. vector displacement 7.2 mm FE Mesh Node No. 99 (X: 1.250, Y: 3.500, Z: 0.000 m)
Max. rotation about X 1.2 mrad FE Mesh Node No. 25 (X: 1.250, Y: 0.000, Z: 0.000 m)
Max. rotation about Y -9.4 mrad FE Mesh Node No. 4 (X: 2.500, Y: 3.500, Z: 0.000 m)
Max. rotation about Z 0.0 mrad
Maximum surface strain 0.000 ‰ FE Mesh Node No. 0 (X: 0.000, Y: 0.000, Z: 0.000 m)
Method of analysis Linear Geometrically linear analysis
Reduction of stiffness Cross-sections, Members, Surfaces
Number of load increments 1
Number of iterations 1
Maximum value of element of stiffness matrix on 2.468E+09
diagonal
Minimum value of element of stiffness matrix on 1.382E+06
diagonal
Stiffness matrix determinant 2.836E+5012
Infinity Norm 6.409E+09

Summary

Other Settings:
Number of 1D finite elements 0
Number of 2D finite elements 96
Number of 3D finite elements 0
Number of FE mesh nodes 117
Number of equations 702
Max. number of iterations 100
Number of divisions for member results 10
Division of cable/foundation/tapered members 10
Number of member divisions for searching 10
maximum values
Subdivisions of FE mesh for graphical results 3
Percentage of iterations according to Picard 5 %
method in combination with Newton-Raphson
method

Options:
Activate shear stiffness of members (Ay, Az)
Activate member divisions for large deformation or
post-critical analysis
Activate entered stiffness modifications
Ignore rotational degrees of freedom
Check of critical forces of members
Nonsymmetric direct solver if demanded by
nonlinear model
Method for the system of equations Direct
Plate bending theory Mindlin
Solver version 64-bit

Precision and Tolerance:

Change default setting

4.1 NODES - SUPPORT FORCES

Node Support Forces [kN] Support Moments [kNm]
No. LC/CO PX' PY' PZ' MX' MY' MZ'
1 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
2 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
3 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
4 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
5 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
6 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
7 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
8 LC1 0.00 0.00 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Self-weight
 Supp. LC1 0.00 0.00 -3.75
 Loads LC1 0.00 0.00 -3.75

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 5/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RESULTS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

GLOBAL DEFORMATIONS u
LC1 : Self-weight Isometric

Global Deformations
|u| [mm]

7.2

6.6

5.9

5.3

4.6

3.9

3.3

2.6

2.0

1.3

0.7

0.0
Max : 7.2
Min : 0.0

7.2

Factor of deformations: 7.38

Max u: - Min u: -

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 6/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

RF-GLASS Glass Canopy

1.1.1 GENERAL DATA

Calculation of individual glass surfaces

Surfaces to design 1-3

Design according to Standard DIN 18008:2010-12 (Germany)

Ultimate Limit State

Load cases to design
LC1 Self-weight Persistent/transient

1.1.2 DETAILS
Equivalent stresses according to: Von Mises, Huber, Hencky - Shape modification hypothesis

1 - Composition 1
Surfaces assigned to composition: 1-3

Method of Analysis First Order Theory - Linear

Calculation 3D

Layer Coupling

Define FE mesh refinement

Target FE Length 0.305 m

1.1.3 DATA FOR STANDARD

Partial Factor M
For thermally toughened glass: 1.50
For other glass: 1.80
Shock load: 1.00

Construction factor kc
for thermally toughened glass: 1.00
for other glass: 1.00

Modification Factor kmod

Permanent 0.25
Medium-term 0.40
Short-term 0.70
Shock Load - For thermally toughened glass 1.40
Shock Load - For other glass 1.80

Serviceability Limits (Deflections)

Combination of actions: Cantilevers

Characteristic L / 100 Lc / 50
Frequent L / 100 Lc / 50
Quasi-permanent L / 100 Lc / 50

Border Strength Reduction

Strength reduction (80%) at the border of the surface for
not thermally toughened glass, acc. to 18008-1, 8.3.8
Distance from the surface border (for grid points) 0.050 m

1.2 LAYERS
Comp. Layer Layer Material Description Thickness Material Parameters
No. No. Type t [mm] Description Symbol Value Unit
1 Composition 1
1 Glass Thermally Toughened Float Glass 8.00 Modulus of Elasticity E 70000.000 N/mm2
Shear Modulus G 28455.300 N/mm2
Poisson's Ratio  0.230 -
Specific Weight  24.52 kN/m3
Coeff. of Th. Exp. T 0.0 1/K
Limit Stress limit 120.000 N/mm2
Thermal Conductivity  1.00 W/m/K
Thermally Toughened
Laminated Safety Glass
2 Foil PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min 1.52 Modulus of Elasticity E 3.000 N/mm2
Shear Modulus G 1.001 N/mm2
Poisson's Ratio  0.499 -
Specific Weight  10.49 kN/m3
Coeff. of Th. Exp. T 0.0 1/K
Thermal Conductivity  1.00 W/m/K
3 Glass Thermally Toughened Float Glass 8.00 Modulus of Elasticity E 70000.000 N/mm2
Shear Modulus G 28455.300 N/mm2
Poisson's Ratio  0.230 -
Specific Weight  24.52 kN/m3
Coeff. of Th. Exp. T 0.0 1/K

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 7/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

1.2 LAYERS
Comp. Layer Layer Material Description Thickness Material Parameters
No. No. Type t [mm] Description Symbol Value Unit
Limit Stress limit 120.000 N/mm2
Thermal Conductivity  1.00 W/m/K
Thermally Toughened
Laminated Safety Glass

1.2.1 LAYER DIAGRAMS

1 | Composition 1
1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass

Local z-Axis
Direction

Bottom

1.4 NODAL SUPPORTS

Comp. Support On Nodes Support Layer/ Location Sequence Rotation  [°] Support Conditions
No. No. No. Type Packet X Y Z Condition Nonlinearity Value
1 Composition 1
1 1-8 Hinged - 1 Centerline XYZ 0.00 0.00 0.00 ux None
type 1
uy None
uz None
X None
Y None
Z None
3 Centerline XYZ 0.00 0.00 0.00 ux None
uy None
uz None
X None
Y None
Z None

1.8 LOAD DURATION

Load- LC, CO, RC or DC Load case type Classification Factor Comment
ing Description of load duration kmod [-]
LC1 Self-weight Permanent Permanent 0.25

2.1 MAX STRESS RATIO BY LOADING

Load- Surface Point Point Coordinates [m] Layer Stresses [N/mm2], [°] Ratio
ing No. No. X Y Z No. z [mm] Side Symbol Existing Limit [-]
LC1 Self-weight
1 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 3 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08
3 3 0.000 3.500 0.000 3 9.52 Top y 5.15 88.00 0.06
1 2 2.500 0.000 0.000 1 4.00 Middle yz 0.10
3 85 0.313 3.500 0.000 3 13.52 Middle xz -0.09
3 7 0.000 2.332 0.000 1 8.00 Bottom xy -7.68
3 4 2.500 3.500 0.000 3 9.52 Top 1 13.74 88.00 0.16
1 38 2.188 0.583 0.000 1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
1 13 0.625 0.583 0.000 3 9.52 Top  90.00

Maximum Ratio 0.16

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 8/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

2.2 MAX STRESS RATIO BY SURFACE

Surface Point Point Coordinates [m] Load- Layer Stresses [N/mm2], [°] Ratio
No. No. X Y Z ing No. z [mm] Side Symbol Existing Limit [-]
1 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top y 5.14 88.00 0.06
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 1 4.00 Middle yz 0.10
10 0.313 0.000 0.000 LC1 1 4.00 Middle xz -0.09
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top xy -7.67
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top 1 13.73 88.00 0.16
38 2.188 0.583 0.000 LC1 1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
13 0.625 0.583 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top  90.00

2 5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08

7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top y 5.14 88.00 0.06
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 1 4.00 Middle yz -0.10
49 0.313 2.332 0.000 LC1 1 4.00 Middle xz -0.09
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top xy -7.67
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top 1 13.73 88.00 0.16
51 0.313 1.749 0.000 LC1 1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
22 1.250 1.166 0.000 LC1 1 8.00 Bottom  90.00

3 4 2.500 3.500 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08

3 0.000 3.500 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top y 5.15 88.00 0.06
3 0.000 3.500 0.000 LC1 1 4.00 Middle yz -0.10
85 0.313 3.500 0.000 LC1 3 13.52 Middle xz -0.09
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 1 8.00 Bottom xy -7.68
4 2.500 3.500 0.000 LC1 3 9.52 Top 1 13.74 88.00 0.16
112 2.188 2.916 0.000 LC1 1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 1 8.00 Bottom  90.00

Maximum Ratio 0.16

2.3 MAX STRESS RATIO BY COMPOSITION

Comp. Surface Layer Point Point Coordinates [m] Load- Layer Stresses [N/mm2], [°] Ratio
No. No. No. No. X Y Z ing z [mm] Side Symbol Existing Limit [-]
1 1 1 22 1.250 1.166 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top x 5.41 88.00 0.06
115 0.000 0.583 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top y 4.67 88.00 0.05
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle yz 0.10
10 0.313 0.000 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle xz -0.09
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom xy 7.67
22 1.250 1.166 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 1 5.41 88.00 0.06
38 2.188 0.583 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
21 1.250 0.874 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom  90.00
3 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top y 5.14 88.00 0.06
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle yz 0.10
10 0.313 0.000 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle xz -0.09
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top xy -7.67
2 2.500 0.000 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 1 13.73 88.00 0.16
13 0.625 0.583 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 2 0.82 88.00 0.01
13 0.625 0.583 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top  90.00
2 1 63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top x 5.41 88.00 0.06
50 0.000 1.749 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top y 4.67 88.00 0.05
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle yz 0.10
37 2.188 1.166 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle xz 0.09
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom xy 7.67
63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 1 5.41 88.00 0.06
51 0.313 1.749 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
22 1.250 1.166 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom  90.00
3 5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top y 5.14 88.00 0.06
6 2.500 1.166 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle yz 0.10
37 2.188 1.166 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle xz 0.09
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top xy 7.67
5 0.000 1.166 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 1 13.73 88.00 0.16
56 0.625 1.749 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 2 0.82 88.00 0.01
22 1.250 1.166 0.000 LC1 17.52 Bottom  90.00
3 1 63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top x 5.41 88.00 0.06
86 0.000 2.916 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top y 4.67 88.00 0.05
3 0.000 3.500 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle yz -0.10
49 0.313 2.332 0.000 LC1 4.00 Middle xz -0.09
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom xy -7.68
63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 1 5.41 88.00 0.06
112 2.188 2.916 0.000 LC1 0.00 Top 2 1.66 88.00 0.02
63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 8.00 Bottom  90.00
3 4 2.500 3.500 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top x 6.88 88.00 0.08
3 0.000 3.500 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top y 5.15 88.00 0.06
3 0.000 3.500 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle yz -0.10
85 0.313 3.500 0.000 LC1 13.52 Middle xz -0.09
7 0.000 2.332 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top xy 7.68
4 2.500 3.500 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 1 13.74 88.00 0.16

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 9/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

2.3 MAX STRESS RATIO BY COMPOSITION

Comp. Surface Layer Point Point Coordinates [m] Load- Layer Stresses [N/mm2], [°] Ratio
No. No. No. No. X Y Z ing z [mm] Side Symbol Existing Limit [-]
92 0.625 2.916 0.000 LC1 9.52 Top 2 0.82 88.00 0.01
63 1.250 2.332 0.000 LC1 17.52 Bottom  90.00

Maximum Ratio 0.16

4.1 PARTS LIST

Surface Material Description Thickness No. of Area Coating Volume Weight
No. t [mm] Layers [m2] [m2] [m3] [t]
1 Thermally Toughened Float Glass 8.00 2 2.915 5.830 0.047 0.117
PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min 1.52 1 2.915 0.000 0.004 0.005
 17.52 3 2.915 5.830 0.051 0.121

2 Thermally Toughened Float Glass 8.00 2 2.915 5.830 0.047 0.117

PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min 1.52 1 2.915 0.000 0.004 0.005
 17.52 3 2.915 5.830 0.051 0.121

3 Thermally Toughened Float Glass 8.00 2 2.920 5.840 0.047 0.117

PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min 1.52 1 2.920 0.000 0.004 0.005
 17.52 3 2.920 5.840 0.051 0.122

 Total 8.750 17.500 0.153 0.364

4.2 STRESS DIAGRAMS

Stress - x 5.41 N/mm 2
Surface No. 1 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 1.250 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 1.166 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -6.88 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 6.88 N/mm 2 -5.41 N/mm 2

Stress - y 4.67 N/mm 2

Surface No. 1 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 0.000 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 0.583 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -5.14 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 5.14 N/mm 2 -4.67 N/mm 2

Stress - xy 1.28 N/mm 2

Surface No. 3 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 0.000 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 2.332 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -7.68 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 7.68 N/mm 2 -1.28 N/mm 2

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 10/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

4.2 STRESS DIAGRAMS

Stress - 1 -0.55 N/mm 2
Surface No. 1 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 2.500 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 0.000 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -1.66 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 13.73 N/mm 2 4.69 N/mm 2

Stress - 1 -0.54 N/mm 2

Surface No. 3 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 2.500 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 3.500 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -1.66 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 13.74 N/mm 2 4.69 N/mm 2

Stress - 1 5.41 N/mm 2

Surface No. 2 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 1.250 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 2.332 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -1.66 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 13.73 N/mm 2 -0.06 N/mm 2

Stress - 2 1.11 N/mm 2

Surface No. 1 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 0.625 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 0.583 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -13.73 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 1.66 N/mm 2 -3.63 N/mm 2

Stress - 2 1.66 N/mm 2

Surface No. 2 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 0.313 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 1.749 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -13.73 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 1.66 N/mm 2 -1.83 N/mm 2

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com

 Mannai Aluminium and Glass Page: 11/11
Sheet: 1
Glass Canopy at VIDA HOTEL
RF-GLASS

Project: GLCP Model: GLCP Date: 10/04/2021

Glass Canopy

4.2 STRESS DIAGRAMS

Stress - 2 1.12 N/mm 2
Surface No. 3 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 0.625 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 2.916 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -13.74 N/mm 2
Bottom
Max: 1.66 N/mm 2 -3.63 N/mm 2

Angle -  0.00 °
Surface No. 3 1: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
LC1 2: PVB 22 °C loading until 3 min
X: 1.250 m 3: Thermally Toughened Float Glass
Y: 2.332 m
Z: 0.000 m

Local z-Axis
Direction

Surface Extremes
Min: -90.00 °
Bottom
Max: 90.00 ° 90.00 °

RFEM 5.25.01 - General 3D structures solved using FEM www.dlubal.com