DEA Report of AMS Knitwear LTD 24-09-2022

DS C DESIGN SOLUTION CENTER
+Consultation+ +Commitment + +Quality+
Detail Engineering Assessment (DEA)

OF
Existing 6 storied (Proposed 8 storied) Factory Building
AT PLOT-B/(468-469), BSCIC, Shasongaon, Enayetnagar, Fatullah,
Narayangonj, Bangladesh.
Factory Name: AMS Knitwear Ltd.
September, 2022
Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

e-mail: enggmahbub@gmail.com, Cell: +8801924502349.+8801879-994502 (office)
Report On Detail Engineering Assessment of Existing 6 storied

(Proposed 8 storied) factory building at Plot-
B/(468-469), BSCIC, Shasongaon, Enayetnagar,
Fatullah, Narayangonj, Bangladesh.
Assessment carried out by Engr. Mahbubur Rahman Khan
B.Sc.Engr. (Civil), (DUET)-2010
Member of IEB-31252,
DMINB-0408
CEO
Engr. Abdul Jabber Miah

B.Sc. Engr. (Civil), (DUET)-2010
Member of IEB-31825,
DMINB/CE-0460
Principal structural engineer
Engr. Emran Hosain Numen

B.Sc. Engr. (Civil), (DUET)- 2010
Member of IEB (Partner)
Engr. Shahinur Islam
B.Sc. Engr. (Civil),DUET)
Engr. Ronok Islam
B.Sc. Engr. (Civil), (DUET),
Date of submission of report: September 24, 2022

e-mail: enggmahbub@gmail.com, Cell: +8801924502349.+8801879-994502 (office) 2
Contents
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
CHAPTER I .................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 About this Report..................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Existing Drawing Document........................................................................................ 6
1.3 Present Conditions and Basic Information of the Buildings ........................................ 7
CHAPTER II ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
DESIGN CRITERIA.................................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8
2.2 Building Classification................................................................................................. 8
2.3 Code and Standard ....................................................................................................... 8
2.4 Type of Foundation ...................................................................................................... 8
2.5 Structural Form ............................................................................................................ 9
2.6 Material and other properties ....................................................................................... 9
2.7 Loads .......................................................................................................................... 11
2.8 Story Drifts................................................................................................................. 15
2.9 Maximum Lateral displacement: ............................................................................... 18
2.10 Torsional Irregularity ............................................................................................... 22
2.11 Stiffness Irregularity ................................................................................................ 23
2.12 Design Method ......................................................................................................... 23
2.13 Software and Computer Program............................................................................. 23
CHAPTER III .............................................................................................................................................................................. 24
FINITE ELEMENT COMPUTER MODELING ........................................................................................................................... 24
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 24
3.2 Finite Element Model ................................................................................................ 24
CHAPTER IV.............................................................................................................................................................................. 28
Feasibility Check of structural member................................................................................................................................ 28
4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 28
4.2 Feasibility check of Foundation ................................................................................. 28
4.3 Column Adequacy check ........................................................................................... 33
4.4 Adequacy check of beam ........................................................................................... 39
4.5 Adequacy check of Shear Wall: ................................................................................. 46

4.6 Flexural Adequacy check of slab: .............................................................................. 48

CHAPTER V............................................................................................................................................................................... 49
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION ................................................................................................................................. 49
5.1 Conclusion & Recommendation: ................................................................................................................................... 49

ABSTRACT
The Factory building for A.M.S. Knitwear Ltd is a six storied building which is occupied on all floors and
used for garment production. It is six storied reinforced concrete building with two way slab except 5th floor
which have flat plate slab. This structure already approved by RSC. Now factory authority wants to extend
this building vertically from six story to eight story. Design solution center (DSC) work on the Detailed
Engineering Assessment (DEA) considering vertically extension up to 8 th floor and found the followings
observation:
 Lateral displacement limit of this structure are not within allowable limit.
 Existing foundation are not adequate to resist the applied load.
 In as built condition some column already retrofitted.
 In As built condition flexural reinforcement of all grade beams & floor beams are sufficient to carry
proposed load. Proposed load should be posted in all story maintained by factory authority.
 Floor slab are capable to carry applied live load.
Detailed calculation and analysis has been described in the rest of the report.

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 About this Report
This report presents the structural evaluation of the building; including overall structural behavior of the building as
well as code based design review of the building. The first chapter describes introduction of the project. The second
chapter presents the design review criteria. The third chapter describes the finite element analysis of the structure.
The fourth chapter discusses the feasibility check of the structural member. The fifth chapter includes conclusions
and recommendations.
1.2 Existing Drawing Document
Collected from approved DEA.

1.3 Present Conditions and Basic Information of the Buildings
The consultant team visited the building and took notes on its structural features. The visual appearance of the
structure was found good. There is no significant sign of distress on the visible portion of the structural members.
The basic information of the building-is as follows:
 Building Usage Type : Garments Industry Building
 Structural System : RC Beam-Column frame except fifth floor which has flat slab and
column.
 Floor System : RC beam slab except fifth floor which has flat slab with column.
 Floor Area : 3756 sft (Approx.)
 No. of Stories : Existing 6 storied (proposed 8 storied)
 Floor Load : 63 psf on working space, 84 psf on stair & 84 psf on storage areas.
 Foundation Type : Shallow foundation.
 Design Drawings : Available.
 Geotechnical Report : Available.
 Construction Materials : Reinforced Concrete (brick)
 Material Test Report : Available (Tested from CATS-MIST & BUET)
 Occupancy
Ground floor : U.G. Water Reserved Tank, Fire Pump Room.
1st Floor : Cutting Section.
2nd Floor : Finishing Section.
3rd Floor : Finishing Section
4th Floor : Finishing Section
5th Floor : Sewing Section.
Roof Floor : Open to sky

CHAPTER II
DESIGN CRITERIA
2.1 Introduction
A structure shall ordinarily be described as an assemblage of framing members and components arranged to support
both gravity and lateral force. Structure may be classified as building structure and non-building structure. Structure
that enclose a space and are used for various occupancies shall be called building structure (BNBC). The chapter
deals with the analysis and design criteria of the building.
2.2 Building Classification
Occupancy Classification:
Occupancy G: Industrial Building.
According to Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC 2.1.7), 2006, the building is lightly loaded industrial
building (occupancy G).
2.3 Code and Standard
 Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC), 2006

 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-99)
 American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM)
 “Structural Welding code –Reinforcing Steel’’ (AWS D1.4) of the American Welding Society.
 Uniform Building Code (UBC), 1994
 United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNDO), 1983
 ACCORD, 2013 Standard
Note: Assessment has been prepared based on BNBC-2020 load combinations.
2.4 Type of Foundation
The foundation system consists of individual column footing. Depth of foundation from EGL = 10’-0”.

2.5 Structural Form
This structure is a beam column connected RCC moment resisting frame structure with shear wall. According to
detailing of existing structure it has been adopted that this structure is a Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame (IMRF)
structure.
2.6 Material and other properties

The material strength plays a vital role in design of building structure. And the strength-deformation characteristics
of the building structures depend largely on the stress strain characteristics of the materials. The materials strengths
are considered in the design of the building structure are as follows:
Strength of concrete: Equivalent compressive strength of compressive strength of concrete is 1938 psi.

USING ACI 214R-03 Coreection factors for Concrete Core

Correction factor for diameter 1.04
Correction factor for Disturbance due to drilling 1.06

Total Correction factor 1.1024
Sample Compre l/d ratio correction Corrected
Number ssive of core factor for Compressive Variation Modification
strength sample l/d ratio strength (PSI) Factors (Kc) table
(Psi)
1 2060 1.84 0.998 2266.40 n Kc
2 2030 1.90 0.999 2235.63 2 2.4
3 2180 1.88 0.997 2396.02 3 1.47
4 4 1.28
5 5 1.2
6 6 1.15
7 7 1.125
8 8 1.1
n 3.00 10 1.08
Average f'c 2299.35 12 1.06
Sigma 85.12 16 1.05
V 0.04 20 1.03
Kc 1.47
Equivalent concrete strength (fceq) 1938 Psi
Table: Strengths of concrete and steel reinforcement
Existing Structure Proposed Structure

Material property
Value (psi) Value (psi)
Equivalent compressive strength of concrete

(column) f ceq 1938 3500
Compressive strength of concrete (beam & slab)

1938 3000
according to construction drawing
Yield strength of steel reinforcements, f y 60,000 60,000

10
Note: Concrete cylinder test report & yield strength test of reinforcement has been attached in attachment.
2.7 Loads
The following loads are considered to review the building design:
2.7.1 Dead Loads

Dead load is the gravitational load due to the self-weight of structural and non-structural components of a building
e.g., Columns, beams, structural walls, floors, ceilings, floor finishing, permanent partitions and fixed service
equipment etc.
Permanent dead loads are:
a) Self-weight of structural members

b) Floor finish = 25psf
c) Permanent Partition wall = as per architectural drawings
d) Outer beam line load (wall load) =as per architectural drawings
Unit weight of materials and the calculation of design dead load shall be according to Section 2.2, Chapter- 2, and
Part – 6 of BNBC 2006.
2.7.2 Live Loads

The exact use of machines and number of workers were considered to fix the live loads. However, for industrial floor
the live load has been considered 63 psf (3.0kN/m2) in working space, 84 psf (4.0kN/m2) on stair, 84 psf (4.0kN/m2)
on storage area and live load on roof has been considered as 30 psf (1.5kN/m2).
2.7.3 Wind Loads
The calculation of Wind Load as per Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) the following equation will be
used to estimate sustained wind pressure on the building:
Sustained Wind pressure, qz = Cc CICzVb2
Where, qz = Sustained Wind Pressure at height z, kN/m2
CI = 1.0 (structural importance coefficient, table 6.2.9 of BNBC)
Cc = Velocity-to-Pressure conversion coefficient = 47.2x10-6

11
Cz = Combined height and exposure coefficient
Vb = 195 km/h for Narayanganj, basic wind speed in km/h.
The design Wind Pressure, pz = CgCp qz
Where, pz = design wind pressure at height z , kN/m2
Cg = gust coefficient which shall be Gz , Gh, or G
Cp = pressure coefficient for structures or components
qz = sustained wind pressure
Calculation of Wind Load Coefficient

X- Direction Y- Direction
h (ft) 94 h (ft) 94
B (ft) 44.1667 B (ft) 75.6667
L (ft) 75.6667 L (ft) 44.1667
h/B 2.13 h/B 1.24
L/B 1.71 L/B 0.58
Windward, Cp 1.25 Windward, Cp 1.54
2.7.4 Earthquake Load:

Earth quake Load:
As per specifications of BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, section-2.5.51, Equivalent Static Force Method can be applied to
calculate the earth quake force of this structure.
Design Base Shear, V=ZICW/R (Ref. Sec2.5.6.1, Chapter-2, Part-6, BNBC)
Where,
Z (Seismic Zone coefficient factor)=0.15
I (Importance factor)=1.0
12
C=Numerical Co-efficient,
R (Response Modification factor)=8 (Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame)
Site co-efficient, S=1.5
Base shear check:

V=ZIC/R*W
Where, C=1.25S/T(2/3)
T=Ct*(hn)(3/4)
=0.073*(31.3944)(3/4)=0.981 sec
So, C=1.25*1.5/(0.981)(2/3)
=1.89
V=0.15*1.0*1.89/8*W
=0.0354W
Total seismic load, W=DL=5816.6 kip
So, V=0.0354*5816.6 =205.91 KIP
Program calculated base shear, V(program)=210.116 kip
2.7.5 Load Combinations

The following Load combinations are considered for structural design
Name Load Case/Combo Scale Factor Type

BNBC2006-1 DEAD 1.4 Linear Add
BNBC2006-2 LIVE 1.7
BNBC2006-3 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-3 WX 1.275
BNBC2006-4 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-4 WX -1.275
BNBC2006-5 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-5 WY 1.275

13
BNBC2006-6 LIVE 1.275

BNBC2006-6 WY -1.275
BNBC2006-7 WX 1.275
BNBC2006-8 WX -1.275
BNBC2006-9 WY 1.275
BNBC2006-10 WY -1.275
BNBC2006-11 WX 1.3
BNBC2006-12 WX -1.3
BNBC2006-13 WY 1.3
BNBC2006-14 WY -1.3
BNBC2006-15 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-15 EQX 1.4025
BNBC2006-16 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-16 EQX -1.4025
BNBC2006-17 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-17 EQY 1.4025
BNBC2006-18 LIVE 1.275
BNBC2006-18 EQY -1.4025
BNBC2006-19 EQX 1.4025
BNBC2006-20 EQX -1.4025
BNBC2006-21 EQY 1.4025
BNBC2006-22 EQY -1.4025
BNBC2006-23 EQX 1.43
14

BNBC2006-24 EQX -1.43
BNBC2006-25 EQY 1.43
BNBC2006-26 EQY -1.43
Where, DL = Dead Load, LL = Live Load, W = Wind Load. & EQ=Earthquake load.
The following Load combinations are considered for serviceability check
Load Scale
Name Type Auto
Combination Factor
DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(+) DEAD 1 Linear Add 0

DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(+) LIVE 0.5 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(+) WX 0.7 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(-) DEAD 1 Linear Add 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(-) LIVE 0.5 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WX(-) WX -0.7 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(+) DEAD 1 Linear Add 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(+) LIVE 0.5 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(+) WY 0.7 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(-) DEAD 1 Linear Add 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(-) LIVE 0.5 0
DL+0.5LL+0.7WY(-) WY -0.7 0
2.8 Story Drifts

Section 1.5.6 part 6 of BNBC (also UBC 94) will be adapted to calculate drift. Story drift limit, Δ shall be determined
as follows:
0.04ℎ
∆≤ ≤ 0.005ℎ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑇 < 0.70 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑
𝑅
0.03ℎ
∆≤ ≤ 0.004ℎ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑇 ≥ 0.70 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑
𝑅
Where,
H =Height of the building in meter.

15
Period T is the same as used in calculation of earthquake loads.

T=Ct*(hn)(3/4)
=0.073*(31.3944)(3/4)=0.981 sec>0.70 sec
Allowable drift ratio =0.03/8=0.00375 or 0.004
EQX:
Maximum drift=0.002576<0.004; Hence okay
EQY:

16
Maximum drift=0.00266<0.004; Hence okay

17
2.9 Maximum Lateral displacement:
For lateral displacement the following load combination has been considered
Load combination= DL+0.5LL+0.70WL
Allowable displacement=h/500=103*12/500=2.472 in
DL+0.5LL+0.70WX (+)
Maximum displacement=1.236in<2.472in; Hence okay

18
DL+0.5LL+0.70WX (-)

19
DL+0.5LL+0.70WY (+)

20
DL+0.5LL+0.70WY (-)

21
2.10 Torsional Irregularity
Torsion irregularity to be considered for rigid floor diaphragms, when the maximum storey drift (Δmax), computed
including accidental torsion, at one end of the structure is more than 1.2 times the average of the storey drifts (Δavg)
at the two ends of the structure (Ref. Table 6.1.4, Chapter-1, Part-6, BNBC 2006)
Table: Torsional irregularity check
Load Max Drift Avg Drift

Story Direction Ratio Comment
Case/Combo in in
TOP EQX 1 X 0.22 0.19 1.196 Regular
ROOF EQX 1 X 0.15 0.13 1.198 Regular
7F EQX 1 X 0.22 0.20 1.127 Regular
6F EQX 1 X 0.29 0.29 1.009 Regular
5F EQX 1 X 0.31 0.31 1.004 Regular
4F EQX 1 X 0.27 0.26 1.029 Regular
3F EQX 1 X 0.26 0.26 1.010 Regular
2F EQX 1 X 0.24 0.24 1.010 Regular
1F EQX 1 X 0.28 0.26 1.083 Regular
TOP EQY 1 Y 0.16 0.16 1.02 Regular
ROOF EQY 1 Y 0.15 0.14 1.06 Regular
7F EQY 1 Y 0.22 0.22 1.00 Regular
6F EQY 1 Y 0.32 0.31 1.03 Regular
5F EQY 1 Y 0.31 0.31 1.02 Regular
4F EQY 1 Y 0.21 0.20 1.03 Regular
3F EQY 1 Y 0.10 0.10 1.01 Regular
2F EQY 1 Y 0.09 0.09 1.01 Regular
1F EQY 1 Y 0.09 0.08 1.08 Regular

22
2.11 Stiffness Irregularity
A soft storey is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than 70% of that in the storey above or less than 80% of the
average lateral stiffness of the three storeys above (Ref. Table 6.1.3, Chapter-1, Part-6, BNBC 2006)
Table: Stiffness irregularity check
EQX
Story X- Direction Kip/in Ki/Ki+1 Comment Ki /avg (Ki-1, Ki-2, Ki-3) Comment
TOP 111 - - - -
ROOF 421 3.80 Ok - -
7F 437 1.04 Ok - -
6F 398 0.91 Ok 1.23 Ok
5F 453 1.14 Ok 1.08 Ok
4F 623 1.37 Ok 1.45 Ok
3F 704 1.13 Ok 1.43 Ok
2F 826 1.17 Ok 1.39 Ok
1F 801 0.97 Ok 1.12 Ok
GF 1972 2.46 Ok 2.54 Ok
EQY
Story Y- Direction Kip/in Ki/Ki+1 Comment Ki /avg (Ki-1, Ki-2, Ki-3) Comment
TOP 129 - - - -
ROOF 381 2.96 Ok - -
7F 388 1.02 Ok - -
6F 368 0.95 Ok 1.23 Ok
5F 450 1.22 Ok 1.19 Ok
4F 800 1.78 Ok 1.99 Ok
3F 1784 2.23 Ok 3.31 Ok
2F 2255 1.26 Ok 2.23 Ok
1F 2496 1.11 Ok 1.55 Ok
GF 7187 2.88 Ok 3.30 Ok
2.12 Design Method
R.C Structure: Ultimate Strength Design (USD) method (Chapter 6, Part 6 of BNBC 2006) will be adopted for design
/check of all R.C structural member/elements.
2.13 Software and Computer Program
ETABS 2016 will be utilized for analysis and design of structure. Moreover, customized programs for Wind using
spread sheets e.g. MS Excel will also be used for analysis and design checking of some elements.
23
CHAPTER III
FINITE ELEMENT COMPUTER MODELING
3.1 Introduction
Prior to the finite element computer modeling of the building, the original functional, structure & other drawing
geotechnical reports have reviewed. Full three dimensional finite element computer models are created to investigate
the behavior & response of the structure under applied loads.
3.2 Finite Element Model
Three dimensional (3D) finite elements model with appropriate finite element is created in ETABS 2016. The model
is comprised of frame, shell and plate elements to represent structural components.
Fig.3.1: Three Dimensional Finite Element Model

24
3.2.1 Slab model
All RCC panels are modeled as shell element.
3.2.2 Beam model
All beams are modeled as beam element connecting the column elements to produce a rigid frame.
Fig.3.2: 1st floor roof beam slab in ETABS model

25
3.2.3 Column model
All columns are modeled as column element connecting with the beams at floor level rigidly to produce frame.
Fig.3.3: Column layout in ETABS model

26
3.2.4 Foundation model
The isolated column footings are modeled as pined support.
Fig.3.4: Support points no. in ETABS model

27
CHAPTER IV
Feasibility Check of structural member
4.1 Introduction
The design review of primary structural members is performed in accordance with the code based procedure. This
chapter discusses the present condition and safety margin of the structural elements.
4.2 Feasibility check of Foundation
A sub-soil investigation report having three bore holes (based on SPT) is available for foundation checking. Allowable
Bearing capacity of shallow foundation is 2.9 ksf considering a factor of safety, FS=3.0. From the load calculation
in each supporting points, it is seen that all footing having FS with respect to soil capacity is less than 2.5. So, all
footing required strengthening. For details see retrofitting drawing. For retrofitting one mat foundation have been
proposed considering bearing capacity 2.4 ksf (FS=3.0). Also some combined footing have been proposed.

28

29
Table: FOS of footing (Existing condition)
Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa= 2.90 ksf (FOS= 3.00 )

Service Load Area of footing Current
Joint Label Footing ID Remarks
(DL+LL) Kip sqft FOS
1 163.105 F1 36 1.93 NOT ADEQUATE
2 237.719 F2 48 1.76 NOT ADEQUATE
3 216.2 F2 48 1.94 NOT ADEQUATE
125 50.448
F1 36 1.85 NOT ADEQUATE
123 119.502
126 115.29
124 46.888
7 216.2 F1 36 1.45 NOT ADEQUATE
8 203.482 F2 48 2.06 NOT ADEQUATE
9 215.838 F2 48 1.94 NOT ADEQUATE
10 185.265 F1 36 1.7 NOT ADEQUATE
63 35.362
87 209.18
75 253.781
76 54.659
17 272.87 F3 63 2.01 NOT ADEQUATE
16 252.549 F3 63 2.18 NOT ADEQUATE
15 202.572 F2 48 2.07 NOT ADEQUATE
14 193.07 F2 48 2.17 NOT ADEQUATE
13 241.515 F3 63 2.27 NOT ADEQUATE
12 272.567 F3 63 2.02 NOT ADEQUATE
91 219.969
93 42.283
88 219.969
92 42.283
18 354.988 F3 63 1.55 NOT ADEQUATE
33 256.645 F3 63 2.14 NOT ADEQUATE
20 209.104 F2 48 2 NOT ADEQUATE
21 202.692 F2 48 2.07 NOT ADEQUATE
22 326.63 F3 63 1.68 NOT ADEQUATE
23 348.747 F3 63 1.58 NOT ADEQUATE
32 233.443 F1 36 1.35 NOT ADEQUATE
31 299.944 F2 48 1.4 NOT ADEQUATE
30 239.691 F2 48 1.75 NOT ADEQUATE
132 51.301
127 127.021
133 129.431
131 53.324
28 285.243 F1 36 1.1 NOT ADEQUATE
27 285.243 F2 48 1.47 NOT ADEQUATE
26 311.028 F2 48 1.35 NOT ADEQUATE

30
25 176.029 F1 36 1.78 NOT ADEQUATE

Table: FOS of footing (After retrofitting)
For mat foundation (RF7) soil capacity is 2.4 ksf (FS=3.0)
Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa= 2.90 ksf (FOS= 3.00 )
Service Load Area of footing Current
Joint Label Footing ID Remarks
(DL+LL) Kip sqft FOS
1 163.105
RF2 116.5 6.22 ADEQUATE
2 237.719
9 215.838
10 185.265
63 35.362
87 209.18
75 253.781
76 54.659
17 272.87 RF6 117 3.74 ADEQUATE
12 272.567 RF6 117 3.74 ADEQUATE
91 219.969
93 42.283
88 219.969
92 42.283
18 354.988 RF6 117 2.87 ADEQUATE
23 348.747 RF6 117 2.92 ADEQUATE
32 233.443
31 299.944
26 311.028
25 176.029
3 216.2
125 50.448
123 119.502
126 115.29
124 46.888
7 216.2
8 203.482
16 252.549
15 202.572
14 193.07
RF7 1793.43 59.73 ADEQUATE
13 241.515
33 256.645
20 209.104
21 202.692
22 326.63
30 239.691
132 51.301
127 127.021
133 129.431
131 53.324
31
28 285.243
27 285.243
Table: Punching Check (After retrofitting)
f’c= 1.938 ksi
Area Factored
Column Thickness Punching Concrete
Node Footing Column of Load
size(inch) of Footing load capacity
1.4DL+1.7LL Comment
Point footing
ID ID sqft (kips) b h (inch) (kips) (kips)
1 RC2 235.37 21 23 209.45 477.04 Ok
RF2 116.5 24
2 RC3 347.71 21 26 306.8 493.68 Ok
9 RC1 316.86 21 21 283.47 465.94 Ok
RF1 116.25 24
10 RC1 268.54 21 21 240.25 465.94 Ok
63 51.42
87 303.27
RF5 SW1 170.26 NR NR NR NR NR NR
75 368.03
76 79.43
17 RF6 RC5 117 406.43 26 26 26 348.51 595.37 Ok
12 RF6 RC4 117 404.41 23 23 26 353.63 558.92 Ok
91 320.09
93 61.73
RF5 SW2 170.26 NR NR NR NR NR NR
88 320.09
92 61.73
18 RF6 RC5 117 523.98 26 26 26 449.31 595.37 Ok
23 RF6 RC4 117 514.92 23 23 26 450.25 558.92 Ok
32 RC2 339.38 21 23 311.27 477.04 Ok
RF4 154.93 24
31 RC2 439.44 21 23 403.05 477.04 Ok
26 RC4 456.89 23 23 413.66 488.13 Ok
RF3 142.08 24
25 RC1 255.99 21 21 233.92 465.94 Ok
3 317.70
125 74.31
123 175.21
SW(UGWR)
126 169.60
NR NR NR NR NR NR
124 68.91
7 317.70
8 299.99
16 377.59
15 RF7 RC3 1793.4 302.03 21 26 26 299.51 564.99 Ok
14 RC1 288.67 21 21 26 286.51 534.62 Ok
(UGW
13 361.02
SW
R)
NR NR NR NR NR NR
33 383.50
20 RC3 311.47 21 26 26 308.88 564.99 Ok
21 RC1 302.50 21 21 26 300.24 534.62 Ok
SW(UGW
22 484.08
30
R)
353.08 NR NR NR NR NR NR
132 75.39

32
127 186.53
133 190.13
131 78.52
28 418.99
27 418.99
4.3 Column Adequacy check
Fig.3.3: Column layout in ETABS model
TABLE 3 : Concrete Column PMM Envelope

Label Story Section Location PMM Combo PMM Ratio or Rebar % Comment
C5 TOP NC3 Bottom BNBC2006-16 0.766 Ok
33

C1 ROOF NC2 Bottom BNBC2006-17 0.636 Ok
C1 7F NC2 Bottom BNBC2006-5 0.837 Ok

34

C1 6F C2-10X12 Bottom BNBC2006-5 0.758 Ok
C5 6F RC3-A Bottom BNBC2006-17 0.328 Ok

35

C7 5F RC1 Bottom BNBC2006-5 0.427 Ok

36


37


38

C1 GF BGRC2A Bottom BNBC2006-2 0.293 Ok
C2 GF BGRC3 Bottom BNBC2006-2 0.396 Ok
Comments: All columns are adequate.
4.4 Adequacy check of beam
Table: Beam adequacy check
As Top (in2) As Bottom (in2)

Label Story Beam ID Location
Required Provided Remarks Required Provided Remarks
B14 GF GB-10X18 End-I 0.2425 1.55 Adequate 0.1568 0.93 Adequate
B14 GF GB-10X18 Middle 0.0711 0.62 Adequate 0.1101 0.93 Adequate
B14 GF GB-10X18 End-J 0.2284 1.55 Adequate 0.1657 0.93 Adequate
B35 GF GB-10X18 End-I 0.4833 1.55 Adequate 0.4833 0.93 Adequate
B35 GF GB-10X18 Middle 0.1859 0.62 Adequate 0.2152 0.93 Adequate
B35 GF GB-10X18 End-J 0.4833 1.55 Adequate 0.4833 0.93 Adequate
B14 1F FB-10X15 End-I 0.5008 1.55 Adequate 0.3207 0.93 Adequate

39
B14 1F FB-10X15 Middle 0.1574 0.62 Adequate 0.4363 0.93 Adequate

B14 1F FB-10X15 End-J 0.4716 1.55 Adequate 0.3028 0.93 Adequate
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) grade beam

40
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of 1st floor beam
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of 2nd floor beam

41
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of 3rd floor beam
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of 4th floor beam

42

43

44
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of roof floor beam
Fig: Required Flexural reinforcement (in2) of stair top beam

45
4.5 Adequacy check of Shear Wall:
P3
P1 P2
P4
Fig: Shear Wall Pier Level
Table: Shear wall pier section adequacy check
Story Pier Label Station Pier Section D/C Ratio Remarks

3F P1 Bottom Pier1 0.145 Adequate
GF P1 Bottom BGBPier1 0.63 Adequate

46


47
4.6 Flexural Adequacy check of slab:

Adequacy of two way beam-slab:
Slab Panel 2-3/C-E (Interior Panel)
Slab Size, La (ft) = 11.67 f'c (psi) = 1938

Lb (ft) = 14.50 fy (psi) = 60000
Floor Finish (psf) = 25
Partition Wall (psf) = 45
Live Load (psf) = 63
Approximate Slab Thickness (in) = 3.49
Provided Slab Thickness (in) = 5
Effective Slab Thickness (in) = 4
Factored Dead Load, ωdl (psf) = 159
Factored Live Load, ωdl (psf) = 100.8
m = 0.80
Reinforcement Check (Case-2)

Short Direction Long Direction
Positive Positive
Negative Negative
dl ll dl ll
Moment Co-efficient 0.065 0.026 0.041 0.027 0.011 0.019
Mu (Ib-ft) 2299.82 1125.85 1474.82 770.40
Area of Steel, As (in2) 0.13 0.06 0.08 0.04
Assume, a 0.41 0.19 0.26 0.13
Check, a 0.41 0.19 0.26 0.13
Minimum As (in2) 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Bar Size #3 #3 #3 #3
Spacing (in) 9.80 10 10 10
Note: Provided steel area is adequate

48
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion & Recommendation:
The following conclusions can be drawn from the design review:
 Lateral displacement limit of this structure are not within allowable limit, so we proposed some
shear wall to control the lateral displacement. For details see the retrofitting drawing.
 Existing foundation are not adequate to resist the applied load so they required strengthen.
 In as built condition some column already retrofitted. For vertical extension more column required
strengthen. For details see retrofitting drawing.
 In As built condition flexural reinforcement of all grade beams & floor beams are sufficient to carry
proposed load. Proposed load should be posted in all story maintained by factory authority.
 Floor slab are capable to carry applied live load.
______________
Engr. Abdul Jabber Miah
DMINB/CE-0460; MIEB-31825
Principal Structural Engineer
Design Solution Center (DSC)
Attachment
 Core test report
 Rebar test report
 Soil test report
 Ferro-Scan Report
 Company profile.

49

DEA Report of AMS Knitwear LTD 24-09-2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DEA Report of AMS Knitwear LTD 24-09-2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DS C DESIGN SOLUTION CENTER

+Consultation+ +Commitment + +Quality+

Detail Engineering Assessment (DEA)

Factory Name: AMS Knitwear Ltd.

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

Report On Detail Engineering Assessment of Existing 6 storied

Engr. Abdul Jabber Miah

Engr. Emran Hosain Numen

Engr. Shahinur Islam

B.Sc. Engr. (Civil),DUET)

Engr. Ronok Islam

B.Sc. Engr. (Civil), (DUET),

Date of submission of report: September 24, 2022

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

4.6 Flexural Adequacy check of slab: .............................................................................. 48

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

1.1 About this Report

1.2 Existing Drawing Document

Collected from approved DEA.

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

1.3 Present Conditions and Basic Information of the Buildings

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

2.2 Building Classification

2.3 Code and Standard

 Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC), 2006

Note: Assessment has been prepared based on BNBC-2020 load combinations.

2.4 Type of Foundation

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

2.5 Structural Form

2.6 Material and other properties

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

USING ACI 214R-03 Coreection factors for Concrete Core

Correction factor for Disturbance due to drilling 1.06

Equivalent concrete strength (fceq) 1938 Psi

Table: Strengths of concrete and steel reinforcement

Existing Structure Proposed Structure

Equivalent compressive strength of concrete

Compressive strength of concrete (beam & slab)

Yield strength of steel reinforcements, f y 60,000 60,000

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

2.7.1 Dead Loads

a) Self-weight of structural members

2.7.2 Live Loads

2.7.3 Wind Loads

Sustained Wind pressure, qz = Cc CICzVb2

Where, qz = Sustained Wind Pressure at height z, kN/m2

CI = 1.0 (structural importance coefficient, table 6.2.9 of BNBC)

Cc = Velocity-to-Pressure conversion coefficient = 47.2x10-6

Office Address:2nd Floor ,House-194, Road-01, DOHS Mohakali.Dhaka-1212

Cz = Combined height and exposure coefficient

Vb = 195 km/h for Narayanganj, basic wind speed in km/h.

The design Wind Pressure, pz = CgCp qz

Where, pz = design wind pressure at height z , kN/m2

Cg = gust coefficient which shall be Gz , Gh, or G

Cp = pressure coefficient for structures or components

qz = sustained wind pressure

Calculation of Wind Load Coefficient

2.7.4 Earthquake Load:

Base shear check:

2.7.5 Load Combinations

Name Load Case/Combo Scale Factor Type