Professional Documents
Culture Documents
● Read: History
● Define unknown terms
● Pertinent info (+,-) in order, explain why it is pertinent
○ Positive: important in ruling in a ddx
○ Negative: important in ruling out a ddx
● Ask: other pertinent questions not answered which may lead us to a diagnosis, explain the reason for asking
You can opt to do this per paragraph or as one whole lump of history
● Read: HPI
● Define unknown terms
● Pertinent info (+,-) in order, explain why it is pertinent
○ Positive: important in ruling in a ddx
○ Negative: important in ruling out a ddx
● Ask: other pertinent questions not answered
○ OLD CARTS
○ And other impt questions
HO 3: PE
● Read: PE
● Define unknown terms
○ Describe special maneuvers
○ What is positive for that test
● Pertinent info (+,-) in order, explain why it is pertinent
○ To rule in or rule out ddx
● Ask: other pertinent PE not done
● Hypothesis: rerank working diagnosis based on new information
○ Make table to compare ssx for each ddx
■ Makes it cleaner and easier to understand similarities and differences bw differentials
■ Doctors also like it when we make tables
○ Cross out unlikely dx
■ Some doctors wouldn’t want us to cross them out completely but just put them lower in the ranking
○ Give possible LAB work up
■ How would said labs help in ruling in or out certain dxx
■ Anticipated findings for each ddx
■ Definitive and supportive labs
■ Specificity and accuracy
■ Cost-benefit: if px doesn't have enough funds for all requested labs, which ones would be the most important to get?
HO 4: LabsHO 4: Labs
HO 5: Patient Outcome
● Discuss management
● Would you agree with how the patient was managed?
○ If not, give alternative mgt
● Discuss: other management not mentioned
○ Follow up labs, consult
● Summarize case
HO 6: Mini Cases