Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jeremy Stewart, MD,* Tracy McCallin, MD,* Julian Martinez,† Sheebu Chacko, MD,‡ Shabana Yusuf, MD, MEd‡
*Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
†
Office of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
‡
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX
Practice Gaps
1. The US Preventive Services Task Force recently gave screening an “I,”
which is insufficient evidence for recommending universal screening
for hyperlipidemia in children.
2. Pediatricians need guidance on causes, screening, and treatment
options in the era of a childhood obesity epidemic.
3. Pediatricians need to be aware of the latest recommendation on
screening tests, treatment, prevention, and dietary counseling.
LDL
hypercholesterolemia
low-density lipoprotein
Abstract
LDL-C low-density lipoprotein
Cardiovascular disease remains the top cause of morbidity and mortality
cholesterol
LPL lipoprotein lipase
in the United States. Atherosclerotic plaques are known to start in
NHLBI National Heart, Lung, and Blood adolescence, and, therefore, young adults can be affected by coronary
Institute artery disease. Children with known risk factors, such as genetic
TG triglyceride
predisposition, including familial hyperlipidemias, diabetes, and renal
USPSTF United States Preventive Services
Task Force diseases, are at higher risk. With childhood obesity becoming an epidemic
VLDL very low-density lipoprotein in certain parts of the United States, this problem is further highlighted as
VLDL-C very low-density lipoprotein an important issue affecting children’s health. There are unclear
cholesterol
TABLE 1. Lipid Cutoff Levels for Pediatric Patients Established by the 2011
Expert Panel Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health
and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents
CUTOFF LEVEL
CATEGORY, mg/dL (mmol/L)
LIPID ACCEPTABLE BORDERLINE HIGH/LOW
Heterozygous familial 1 in 200 to 1 in 500 Asymptomatic Diet and exercise for 6 mo, add statins
hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous familial 1 in 160,000 Xanthomas Diet, exercise and statins, bile acids,
hypercholesterolemia cholesterol absorption inhibitors
Primary hypertriglyceridemia <0.2% Identified by pancreatitis Fibrates
Nicotinic acid
Plasmapheresis
Secondary hypertriglyceridemia 10.7% Other secondary diagnosis, Fibrates
such as diabetes, renal dysfunction Nicotinic acid
Omega fatty acids
Familial combined hyperlipidemia 0.5%–1% May be obese Diet, exercise, statins
Finally, dysbetalipoproteinemia is a disorder with a has previously been recommended by the American Academy
homozygous mutation in apoE that binds chylomicrons, of Pediatrics (AAP) based on recommendations from the
intermediate-density lipoprotein, and VLDL to the surface of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Some
hepatocytes. This leads to increased levels of chylomicron would recommend performing these screenings during health
and VLDL remnants as well as an increase in TG and total supervision visits when children receive their immunizations
cholesterol levels. Palmar crease xanthomas have been at regular intervals. (23) However, the US Preventive Services
shown to be pathognomonic in the pediatric population. Task Force (USPSTF) in 2016 reported an “I” recommendation
Although LDL-C levels and apoB levels are low, patients with (not for or against universal screening) and concluded that
dysbetalipoproteinemia have an elevated risk of CVD; ele- there was insufficient evidence to make recommendations
vated levels of b-VLDL have a powerful action on monocyte- regarding benefits and harms of cholesterol screening in
macrophage cells and rapidly transform these cells into childhood. (20)(21) The USPSTF does recommend screening
foam cells activating the atherosclerosis pathway. (17) Com- for obesity at 6 years of age (B recommendation), which would
pared with FH, dyspbetalipoproteinemia can lead to earlier include evaluation of lipid panels and other laboratory values as
development of hypercholesterolemia, with resulting CAD, discussed later herein. (20) A study found that 0.3% of 10,095
peripheral artery disease, and a great risk of developing children tested had positive screening results. (5)
glomerular nephritis and pancreatitis. (17)
Universal Screening
MANAGEMENT
The USPSTF has assigned an “I” (insufficient evidence) to
Management of hyperlipidemia should be centered around recommend cholesterol screening, whereas the NHLBI and
the underlying cause of elevated cholesterol levels. It should the AAP recommend screening patients at 9 to 11 years of age
be determined whether patients have a primary cause for (B rating) (7)(22)(24)(25) and again at 17 to 21 years, with
hyperlipidemia, such as FH, or whether the cause is inci- testing at other ages indicated for positive family history, high-
dental or secondary. (18)(19) It is important to monitor for level risk factors, or new high-risk medical conditions. (21)(26)
the secondary causes of hyperlipidemia, namely, nephrotic Concerns exist that targeted approaches to cholesterol screen-
syndrome, hypothyroidism, diabetes, cholangiolithic hepa- ing for those with CVD risk factors may miss some children
titis, obesity, anorexia nervosa, diet-related (excessive intake and adolescents, but the USPSTF argues that the abnormal
of dairy products), or drug-induced (oral contraceptive pills, lipid levels used for screening are based on population distri-
corticosteroids, cyclosporine, etc). (4)(7)(8) butions rather than on health outcomes. (8)(24) The USPSTF
also recognizes that the long-term outcome of cholesterol-
Hyperlipidemia Screening lowering medication has not been fully evaluated. (24)
Routine screening of pediatric patients for elevated cholesterol Regarding targeted versus universal screening, a cost analysis
levels remains controversial because it involves testing for a using a simulated cohort of 4.1 million children from the
risk factor of atherosclerosis and not for the disease itself. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found that
(5)(20)(21)(22) Universal screening of the pediatric population universal screening, rather than targeted screening based on
1. A 17-year-old boy is seen in the clinic for a sports preparticipation evaluation. You learn REQUIREMENTS: Learners
that many of his family members have “high cholesterol,” but he does not know anything can take Pediatrics in Review
more specific. Several of his family members have had recurrent episodes of pancreatitis. quizzes and claim credit
You perform targeted screening and obtain a lipid panel, which showed the following online only at: http://
values: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), 105 mg/dL (2.7 mmol/L) (acceptable: pedsinreview.org.
<110 mg/dL [<2.9 mmol/L]); apolipoprotein B, 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) (acceptable: <90
To successfully complete
mg/dL [<2.3 mmol/L]); and triglycerides, 450 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) (acceptable: <90 mg/dL
2020 Pediatrics in Review
[<1.0 mmol/L]). This clinical presentation and the laboratory data are most consistent with
articles for AMA PRA
which of the following diagnoses?
Category 1 CreditTM, learners
A. Dysbetalipoproteinemia. must demonstrate a minimum
B. Familial combined hyperlipidemia. performance level of 60% or
C. Familial hypertriglyceridemia. higher on this assessment.
D. Lipoprotein lipase deficiency. If you score less than 60%
E. Familial hypercholesterolemia. on the assessment, you
2. You are evaluating a 9-year-old boy with abnormal lipid values (LDL-C level of 550 mg/dL will be given additional
[14.2 mmol/L]). His initial presentation included xanthomas around his knees and elbows, a opportunities to answer
systolic heart murmur heard best at the right upper sternal border, and intermittent chest questions until an overall 60%
pain. The patient has a strong family history of hypercholesterolemia. Genetic testing is or greater score is achieved.
ordered and is most likely to show which of the following genetic patterns of inheritance in
This journal-based CME
this patient?
activity is available through
A. De novo mutation. Dec. 31, 2022, however, credit
B. Heterozygous (autosomal recessive). will be recorded in the year in
C. Homozygous (autosomal dominant). which the learner completes
D. X-linked recessive. the quiz.
E. X-linked dominant.
3. An 11-year-old boy with familial hypercholesterolemia has failed lifestyle modification
management, and his LDL-C level remains greater than 250 mg/dL (>6.5 mmol/L). In
consultation with the child and his parents, the decision is made to initiate drug therapy.
You counsel the family regarding statins as the preferred medication class you will
prescribe and discuss statin adverse effects. Which of the following adverse effects could 2020 Pediatrics in Review is
potentially be attributable to this class of medication? approved for a total of 30
A. Constipation. Maintenance of Certification
B. Diarrhea. (MOC) Part 2 credits by the
C. Flushing. American Board of Pediatrics
D. Glucose intolerance. (ABP) through the AAP MOC
E. Myopathy. Portfolio Program. Pediatrics in
Review subscribers can claim
4. A 19-year-old woman is followed in a healthy lifestyles program for adolescents. At a
up to 30 ABP MOC Part 2
follow-up visit she has a BMI greater than the 95th percentile, hypertension (blood
points upon passing 30
pressure >95th percentile), and acanthosis nigricans on physical examination. She denies
quizzes (and claiming full
smoking but is sexually active, with no consistent method of contraception. Her lipid
credit for each quiz) per year.
profile continues to demonstrate elevated levels of LDL-C (200 mg/dL [5.2 mmol/L]) and
Subscribers can start claiming
triglycerides (350 mg/dL [4.0 mmol/L]). You decide to initiate drug therapy. Which of the
MOC credits as early as
following drug classes will require a negative pregnancy test result and a long-acting
October 2020. To learn how
contraceptive method before initiation of treatment in this patient based on her history?
to claim MOC points, go to:
A. Bile acids. https://www.aappublications.
B. Cholesterol absorption inhibitors. org/content/moc-credit.
C. Fibrates.
D. Nicotinic acid.
E. Statins.
Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/41/8/393
Supplementary Material Supplementary material can be found at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/suppl/2020/07/22/41
.8.393.DC1
References This article cites 37 articles, 6 of which you can access for free at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/41/8/393.full#ref-list
-1
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Endocrinology
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/endocri
nology_sub
Metabolic Disorders
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/metabo
lic_disorders_sub
Preventive Medicine
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/prevent
ative_medicine_sub
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
in its entirety can be found online at:
https://shop.aap.org/licensing-permissions/
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://classic.pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/reprints
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/41/8/393
Pediatrics in Review is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
publication, it has been published continuously since 1979. Pediatrics in Review is owned,
published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca,
Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0191-9601.