a

Correlation Matrix
1. To access the education quality in private universities in terms of faculty resources
H0: Faculty retention is a challenge for Private University
H1: Faculty retention is a not a challenge for Private University
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Control Variables IT infrastructure

Correlation 1

Significance (2- 0.709779553

Faculty retention tailed)
IT infrastructure

Df 1
Df .709779553
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis for faculty retention exhibited that faculty retention is challenging for private
university. The R values is measured as 1 and R2 is estimated as 0.709779553. This implies that their a
lies a strong positive correlation between the faculty retention and Challenges in University. Through
correlation analysis it can be concluded that Null Hypothesis H0 is accepted and alternate hypothesis
H1 is rejected.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Standardized

Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.645732293 201.9853 12.34017 .000

Page 1
 a
Correlation Matrix

Faculty 0.666830566 198.9487 397.9834 19.94952 .

Retention .503787014

a. Dependent Variable:
Regression Analysis
The regression analysis of estimated value stated that estimated significance value of 0.503.
The negative coefficient value expressed that faculty retention is related to challenges associated within
the university. The estimated p-value is 0.053, this implies the variables are significant. This also
confirmed that Null Hypothesis H0 is accepted and alternate hypothesis H1 is rejected.
Factorial Analysis
The factorial analysis of faculty retention is evaluated and estimation is performed as follows:

Facultyonfullti Partfornext10 Environmentu

mebasis years Spouse npredictable
Correlation Selectionprocessthrougha
-.282 .528 -.480 .055
Dvertisements
Selectionprocesswelldefin
ed -.319 .623 -.251 -.081

Trainingtofaculty -.212 .316 -.261 .007

Facultyonfulltimebasis 1.000 -.419 .149 -.021
Partfornext10years -.419 1.000 -.204 .010
Spouse .149 -.204 1.000 .023
Environmentunpredictable
-.021 .010 .023 1.000

Promotionpolicy -.064 .352 -.239 .323

Universityfinancialsupport
status -.346 .404 -.161 .253

Supportforacademicachie
vements -.202 .429 -.016 .170

ITsoftwares -.322 .705 -.160 -.108

University .050 -.014 .029 -.046

The factorial analysis expressed that in retention of employees variables such as selection
process with advertisement, Well-defined selection process, faculty training, environment,.
Promotional policies, financial support and IT software are not correlated. Also, the correlation

Page 2
 a
Correlation Matrix
estimated exhibited that the opinion of employees for next year is correlated to the faculty retention in
universities.
H0: Faculty recruitment process is as per the UGC norms.
H1: Faculty recruitment process is not as per the UGC norms.
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Control Variables Faculty
Selection
process
.654622224
Correlation

Advertise of recruitment Significance (2-

tailed)
Df .067
Faculty Recruitment
Correlation -.018
.
Significance (2-
UGC norms .53816532
tailed)

Df .067
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis expressed that there exists a moderate positive correlation between the
variables. The estimated correlation is computed as 0. 0.654622224 and 0.53816532 for selection process
and UGC norms. This implies that faculty selection process is related to UGC norms. Hence, through
analysis it is concluded that null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted.

Regression Analysis
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Page 3
 a
Correlation Matrix

Unstandardized Standardized

Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.842001576 10.3610718 .000

0.177780986 7
Faculty 0.517411535 - .289621912

Selection in 159.8188 12.6419469

UGC norm 0.040928153 3

a. Dependent Variable: Recruitment Notification
Regression Analysis
The regression analysis of collected data expressed that p-value is significant with 0.289 for
selection of faculty based on UGC norm. The analysis expressed that university selection process is not
based on UGC norm. The analysis expressed that recruitment of faculty is based on UGC norms.
However, with analysis it is not able to determine. The analysis is performed with consideration of
selection process notice in private institutes and selection process.
Factorial Analysis
The factorial analysis is evaluated for estimation of variables for recruitment as per UGC
norms.

Universityfina Supportforaca
Promotionpoli ncialsupportst demicachieve
cy Atus ments
Correlation Selectionprocessthrougha
dvertisements .620 .528 .523
Selectionprocesswelldefin
ed .552 .548 .555

Trainingtofaculty .488 .320 .573

Facultyonfulltimebasis -.064 -.346 -.202
Partfornext10years .352 .404 .429
Spouse -.239 -.161 -.016
Environmentunpredictable
.323 .253 .170

Promotionpolicy 1.000 .767 .666

Page 4
 a
Correlation Matrix
Universityfinancialsupport
status .767 1.000 .690

Supportforacademicachie
vements .666 .690 1.000

ITsoftwares .489 .468 .598

University .087 .100 .115
The analysis of variables exhibited that selection process through advertisement and well-
defined are concentrated on infrastructure of university. Financial performance of university is
correlated with support for academic achievements, advertisement and well-defined are concentrated
on infrastructure. The academic achievement is related to the variable selection process in
advertisement, well-defined process, promotional policies, financial support and IT software.
H0: University provide support to the faculty to enhance them academically
H1: University doesn’t provide support to the faculty to enhance them academically
Correlation Analysis

Correlations

Control Variables Faculty

Training
Correlation .192473
Significance (2-
Faculty Training 1
tailed)
Df 0
University Performance .020835
Correlation

Financial Support Significance (2- .042746

tailed)
Df 0
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis

Page 5
 a
Correlation Matrix
The correlation analysis expressed that their lies a strong positive correlation between the
variables. This implies that null hypothesis H0 is rejected and alternate hypothesis H1 is accepted,
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Standardized

Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 3.247167 0.249046 13.03843 .000
Faculty academic .717571 .397459

training 0.053212 0.062817 0.847096

a. Dependent Variable: Recruitment Notification
Regression Analysis
The regression analysis of training provided by the university towards faculty is adequate and
effective. The estimated coefficient value is measured as .397459, this implies the adequate training
provided for faculty by private universities. In this, null hypothesis H0 is accepted and alternate
hypothesis H1 is rejected.
Factorial Analysis

Factorial Analysis
The computed factorial analysis expressed that the faculty resources are highly relies on the
educational institutions. The higher the faculty retention increases the challenges in the university.
Through analysis it can be concluded that educational qualification is relies on faculty retention.
2. To explore the infrastructure facilities those are provided by the private universities

Page 6
 a
Correlation Matrix
H0: Providing quality research resources (like journals, equipment’s etc) is difficult in private
Universities
H1: Providing quality research resources (like journals, equipment’s etc) is not difficult to private
Universities
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Control Variables Financial
Resoures
Correlation 0.56834
Significance (2-
Financial Resoures .
tailed)
Df 0
University Faciities
Correlation -.146
Significance (2-
IT Resources .564
tailed)
Df 53
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis of resource availability in private universities have adequate financial
and It resources. The analysis of results expressed that significance value is >.05. Hence, it is expressed
that null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. Through analysis it can be
concluded that providing quality research is not difficult in private institutions.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Standardized T Sig.

Coefficients Coefficients
Page 7
 a
Correlation Matrix
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 589.45 144.46 19.22 .000

4
Resource 1.389 1.278 .06 0.856 .132

Availability
a. Dependent Variable: Resource Availability
Factorial Analysis
The factorial analysis expressed that the quality of research resources are estimated in terms of
resource availability.

Universityhav
eadequateam AccesstoInter
ountofvolume Libraryjournal naationaljourn
sandissues Libraryspace s als
Correlation Universityhaveadequatea
mountofvolumesandissue 1.000 .482 .633 .578
S
Libraryspace .482 1.000 .570 .357
Libraryjournals
.633 .570 1.000 .866
AccesstoInternaationaljou
Rnals .578 .357 .866 1.000
Additionofbooksonyearlyb
Asis
.472 .219 .490 .482
Sufficientcomputersincom
puterlabs
.614 .613 .540 .435
ArchitectureasperUGCnor
Ms
Universityapproachablevia .559 .444 .394 .372
publictransport
Hostelfacilty .501 .406 .315 .244
Canteenfacility
-.246 -.297 -.130 -.175
Playgroundwithplayingkits
-.179 -.216 -.255 -.288
Transportfacility
-.119 -.181 -.124 -.046
MedicalRoomfacility
Laboratoriesupdationregul -.179 -.216 -.255 -.288
Arly -.104 -.176 -.173 -.228
Rampsavailabilityforspeci
allyabledpersons .727 .536 .562 .404
Universityspaciouswifiena
Bled .515 .206 .330 .226
Averagedowntimemonthly
University .434 .404 .307 .223

Page 8
 a
Correlation Matrix
-.184 -.392 -.291 -.296
.080 .052 .011 .010

Page 9
 Additionofboo Sufficientcom
ksonyearlybas putersincomp Architectureas
is uterlabs perUGCnorms
Correlation Universityhaveadequatea
mountofvolumesandissue .472 .614 .559
S
Libraryspace .219 .613 .444
Libraryjournals
.490 .540 .394
AccesstoInternaationaljou
Rnals .482 .435 .372
Additionofbooksonyearlyb
Asis
1.000 .454 .319
Sufficientcomputersincom
puterlabs
.454 1.000 .553
ArchitectureasperUGCnor
Ms
Universityapproachablevia .319 .553 1.000
publictransport
Hostelfacilty .610 .505 .448
Canteenfacility
-.170 -.241 -.338
Playgroundwithplayingkits
-.124 -.018 -.246
Transportfacility
.092 .097 -.055
MedicalRoomfacility
Laboratoriesupdationregul -.124 -.018 -.246
Arly -.115 .136 -.309
Rampsavailabilityforspeci
allyabledpersons .539 .518 .590
Universityspaciouswifiena
Bled .701 .359 .419
Averagedowntimemonthly
University .700 .366 .452

-.215 -.188 -.242

-.030 .100 .080
 The factorial analysis of variable expressed that the availability of international journal and
availability of computer labs are highly correlated with the journal infrastructure.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis of variable provides the positive coefficient values with p-value of 0.132. This
demonstrates that null hypothesis 0.132 is not significant and accepted. This is concluded that in
private institutes it is not difficult to conduct quality research.
H0: The Private Universities in UP have adequate infrastructure
H1: The Private Universities in UP doesn’t have adequate infrastructure
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Control Variables IT Resources
Correlation 0.579
Significance (2-
Infrastructure 1
tailed)
Df
Facilities
Correlation .404
Significance (2-
IT Resources .735
tailed)
Df .404
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The analysis of results expressed that their exists a moderate correlation between the variable.
In this it is observed that infrastructure is minimal for financial constraints. The correlation level is
significant hence null hypothesis H0 is accepted and Alternate hypothesis H1 is rejected.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa
 Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.795712 0.279501 6.424699 3.83E-10
Infrastructur 76.6261

e 0.556819 0.06361 8.753634 6.24E-17

a. Dependent Variable: Infrastructure
Regression Analysis
The regression analysis expressed that estimated coefficient value is negative and significant
value of 0.5. This implies that null hypothesis H0 is accepted and alternate hypothesis H1 is rejected.
Through analysis it can be concluded that infrasture is adaeqaute.
Factorial Analysis

Universityappr
oachableviapu Canteenfacilit Playgroundwit
blictransport Hostelfacilty y hplayingkits
Correlation Universityhaveadequatea
mountofvolumesandissue .501 -.246 -.179 -.119
S
Libraryspace .406 -.297 -.216 -.181
Libraryjournals
.315 -.130 -.255 -.124
AccesstoInternaationaljou
Rnals .244 -.175 -.288 -.046
Additionofbooksonyearlyb
Asis
.610 -.170 -.124 .092
Sufficientcomputersincom
puterlabs
.505 -.241 -.018 .097
ArchitectureasperUGCnor
Ms
Universityapproachablevia .448 -.338 -.246 -.055
publictransport
Hostelfacilty 1.000 -.296 -.215 -.057
Canteenfacility
-.296 1.000 -.028 -.042
Playgroundwithplayingkits
-.215 -.028 1.000 .675
Transportfacility
-.057 -.042 .675 1.000
MedicalRoomfacility
Laboratoriesupdationregul -.215 -.028 1.000 .675
Arly -.098 -.047 .596 .385
Rampsavailabilityforspeci
allyabledpersons .509 -.228 -.339 -.228
Universityspaciouswifiena
Bled .595 -.155 -.252 -.153
Averagedowntimemonthly
University
.769 -.294 -.214 -.048

-.170 .214 .345 .123

.032 .000 -.019 -.015
 Correlation Matrix

Laboratoriesu
Transportfacili MedicalRoomf pdationregular
ty acility ly
Correlation Universityhaveadequatea
-.179 -.104 .727

-.216 -.176 .536

-.255 -.173 .562

-.288 -.228 .404

-.124 -.115 .539

-.018 .136 .518

-.246 -.309 .590

-.215 -.098 .509

-.028 -.047 -.228

1.000 .596 -.339
.675 .385 -.228
1.000 .596 -.339
.596 1.000 -.293

-.339 -.293 1.000

-.252 -.275 .767

-.214 -.088 .567

.345 .188 -.262

-.019 .041 .070

The factorial analysis is computed based on consideration of education institute infrastructure. The
estimation expressed that private institutions has significant infrastructure.

3. To examine the research status of the Private Universities

H0: Funding of the research Project from funding agencies is a challenge for Private University
H1: Funding of the research Project from funding agencies is not a challenge for Private University
Correlation Analysis

Page 14
 Correlation Matrix
Correlations
Control Variables Financial
Resources
Correlation 0.552536
Significance (2-
1
Funding Agencies Financial Resoures tailed)
Df 0
Df .55
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The correlation level is higher than the .0.55. This concluded that null hypothesis H0 is accepted and
alternate hypothesis is accepted. This implies that financial funding for project is not a challenge in
private universities.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Standardized

Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.71E-

2.389507 0.154422 15.47388 42

Funding 172.2689 7.13E-

Agencies 0.48935 0.037283 13.12512 33

a. Dependent Variable: Recruitment Notification
Regression Analysis
The R-square is estimated as 0.305296, where regression analysis expressed that null hypothesis is
accepted and alternate hypothesis H1 is rejected. This implies that financial funding for project is
challenge in private universities.
Page 15
 Correlation Matrix
Factorial Analysis
The factorial analysis is performed for funding of project in private universities.

Universityhavi
ngseperatese Supportivepoli Honestyinrese
ctionforresear cyforresearch archprocedure s
chwork activity
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
Ectionforresearchwork 1.000 -.070 -.084
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity -.070 1.000 .852
Honestyinresearchproced
ures -.084 .852 1.000
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects -.203 .674 .823
Universityappliesforfundin
g
-.251 .683 .691
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch -.079 -.220 -.069
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
-.402 .464 .434
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee -.008 .428 .474
Providessimulators
-.141 .668 .643
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside -.261 .646 .700
Collaborations
-.148 .415 .502
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt -.103 .445 .437
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals -.084 .480 .520
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations -.165 .547 .722
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork -.164 .693 .799
Universities
-.075 .275 .266

-.037 .007 .048

Page 16
 Universitycan Numberofrese
conductindus Universityappl archprojectsfu
govtprojects iesforfunding nded
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.203 -.251 -.079
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .674 .683 -.220
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .823 .691 -.069
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects 1.000 .860 .025
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.860 1.000 .013
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .025 .013 1.000
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.553 .514 .302
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .377 .369 .201
Providessimulators
.571 .669 -.046
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .529 .491 .160
Collaborations
.681 .758 .210
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .472 .396 .138
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .523 .610 .028
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .732 .520 .102
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .798 .721 -.044
Universities
.278 .384 .364

.055 .059 -.005

 Implementatio
nofresearchfin
dingforunivers
ityimproveme Universitypubl Ethicscommitt
nt ishownjournal ee
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.402 -.008 -.141
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .464 .428 .668
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .434 .474 .643
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .553 .377 .571
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.514 .369 .669
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .302 .201 -.046
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
1.000 .451 .439
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .451 1.000 .638
Providessimulators
.439 .638 1.000
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .584 .626 .693
Collaborations
.557 .307 .412
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .590 .361 .491
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .369 .442 .645
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .565 .340 .558
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .542 .402 .685
Universities
.413 .487 .332

.056 .066 .071

 facultiesunder
takeresearchi
Providessimul nhouseoroutsi
ators de Collaborations
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.261 -.148 -.103
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .646 .415 .445
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .700 .502 .437
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .529 .681 .472
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.491 .758 .396
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .160 .210 .138
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.584 .557 .590
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .626 .307 .361
Providessimulators
.693 .412 .491
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside 1.000 .328 .472
Collaborations
.328 1.000 .360
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .472 .360 1.000
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .285 .613 .481
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .648 .363 .768
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .544 .576 .619
Universities
.278 .439 .434

.080 .064 .027

 Researchpolic publicationpro journalsavaila
yfollowedbyth motedforUGCj bleasperreco
egovt ournals mmendations
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.084 -.165 -.164
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .480 .547 .693
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .520 .722 .799
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .523 .732 .798
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.610 .520 .721
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .028 .102 -.044
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.369 .565 .542
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .442 .340 .402
Providessimulators
.645 .558 .685
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .285 .648 .544
Collaborations
.613 .363 .576
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .481 .768 .619
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals 1.000 .501 .743
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .501 1.000 .803
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .743 .803 1.000
Universities
.499 .319 .355

.039 .041 .040

 Correlation Matrix

separatebody
avalilableforre
searchwork Universities
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
-.075 -.037

.275 .007

.266 .048

.278 .055

.384 .059

.364 -.005

.413 .056

.487 .066

.332 .071
.278 .080

.439 .064

.434 .027

.499 .039

.319 .041

.355 .040

1.000 .035

.035 1.000

H0: The state needs separate body to regulate higher education in UP

H1: The state doesn’t need any separate body to regulate higher education in UP
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Control Variables Regulation

Page 21
 Correlation Matrix
Correlation 0.224355
Significance (2-
.
Education Quality Regulation tailed)
Df 0
Df 0.224355
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis expressed that their lies a significant correlation between the regulations and
higher education. The alternate hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 3.105065 0.232993 13.32688 1.11E-33
Regulation 20.77711
0.244991 0.053747 4.558192 6.9E-06
a. Dependent Variable:
The regression analysis expressed that their lies a significant correlation between the regulations and
higher education. The alternate hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.

H0: The universities have separate research committee

H1: The universities doesn’t have separate research committee
Correlation Analysis
Correlations
Financial Resoures Financial
Resoures

Page 22
 Correlation Matrix
Correlation 0.701294
Significance (2-
.00
Research Committee Financial Resoures tailed)
df 1
df 1
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation Analysis
The correlation analysis expressed that private universities have separate committee, which means null
hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is accepted.
Regression Analysis

Coefficientsa

Unstandardized Standardized

Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 2.06E-

1.356568 0.15239 8.901931 17

Financial 379.3698 1.38E-

Resoures 0.668514 0.034323 19.47742 59

a. Dependent Variable: Recruitment Notification
Regression Analysis
The regression analysis expressed that private universities have separate committee, which means null
hypothesis is accepted and alternate hypothesis is accepted. The analysis consists of negative
coefficient with significant p-value of 0.05.
Factorial Analysis

Page 23
 Correlation Matrix

Universityhavi
ngseperatese Supportivepoli Honestyinrese
ctionforresear cyforresearch archprocedure s
chwork activity
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
Ectionforresearchwork 1.000 -.070 -.084
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity -.070 1.000 .852
Honestyinresearchproced
ures -.084 .852 1.000
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects -.203 .674 .823
Universityappliesforfundin
g
-.251 .683 .691
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch -.079 -.220 -.069
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
-.402 .464 .434
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee -.008 .428 .474
Providessimulators
-.141 .668 .643
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside -.261 .646 .700
Collaborations
-.148 .415 .502
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt -.103 .445 .437
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals -.084 .480 .520
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations -.165 .547 .722
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork -.164 .693 .799
Universities
-.075 .275 .266

-.037 .007 .048

Page 24
 Universitycan Numberofrese
conductindus Universityappl archprojectsfu
govtprojects iesforfunding nded
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.203 -.251 -.079
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .674 .683 -.220
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .823 .691 -.069
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects 1.000 .860 .025
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.860 1.000 .013
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .025 .013 1.000
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.553 .514 .302
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .377 .369 .201
Providessimulators
.571 .669 -.046
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .529 .491 .160
Collaborations
.681 .758 .210
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .472 .396 .138
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .523 .610 .028
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .732 .520 .102
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .798 .721 -.044
Universities
.278 .384 .364

.055 .059 -.005

 Implementatio
nofresearchfin
dingforunivers
ityimproveme Universitypubl Ethicscommitt
nt ishownjournal ee
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.402 -.008 -.141
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .464 .428 .668
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .434 .474 .643
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .553 .377 .571
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.514 .369 .669
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .302 .201 -.046
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
1.000 .451 .439
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .451 1.000 .638
Providessimulators
.439 .638 1.000
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .584 .626 .693
Collaborations
.557 .307 .412
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .590 .361 .491
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .369 .442 .645
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .565 .340 .558
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .542 .402 .685
Universities
.413 .487 .332

.056 .066 .071

 facultiesunder
takeresearchi
Providessimul nhouseoroutsi
ators de Collaborations
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.261 -.148 -.103
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .646 .415 .445
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .700 .502 .437
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .529 .681 .472
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.491 .758 .396
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .160 .210 .138
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.584 .557 .590
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .626 .307 .361
Providessimulators
.693 .412 .491
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside 1.000 .328 .472
Collaborations
.328 1.000 .360
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .472 .360 1.000
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals .285 .613 .481
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .648 .363 .768
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .544 .576 .619
Universities
.278 .439 .434

.080 .064 .027

 Researchpolic publicationpro journalsavaila
yfollowedbyth motedforUGCj bleasperreco
egovt ournals mmendations
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
ectionforresearchwork -.084 -.165 -.164
Supportivepolicyforresear
chactivity .480 .547 .693
Honestyinresearchproced
ures .520 .722 .799
Universitycanconductindu
sgovtprojects .523 .732 .798
Universityappliesforfundin
g
.610 .520 .721
Numberofresearchproject
sfunded
Implementationofresearch .028 .102 -.044
findingforuniversityimprov
ement
.369 .565 .542
Universitypublishownjourn
al
Ethicscommittee .442 .340 .402
Providessimulators
.645 .558 .685
facultiesundertakeresearc
hinhouseoroutside .285 .648 .544
Collaborations
.613 .363 .576
Researchpolicyfollowedby
thegovt .481 .768 .619
publicationpromotedforUG
Cjournals 1.000 .501 .743
journalsavailableasperrec
ommendations .501 1.000 .803
separatebodyavalilableforr
esearchwork .743 .803 1.000
Universities
.499 .319 .355

.039 .041 .040

 separatebody
avalilableforre
searchwork Universities
Correlation Universityhavingseperates
-.075 -.037

.275 .007

.266 .048

.278 .055

.384 .059

.364 -.005

.413 .056

.487 .066

.332 .071
.278 .080

.439 .064

.434 .027

.499 .039

.319 .041

.355 .040

1.000 .035

.035 1.000

The estimation of private universities and their performance exhibited that their need for
improvement in higher education. The p-value for factorial analysis is computed as 0.00 ,this
implies that research status is private institutions need to be improved further for better
functionality of the organization.