Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Closet
For years it stood, like an untamed wilderness, boldly daring me to advance further than
the two steps it took to snatch my shoes and beat a hasty retreat. I had attempted to organize this
closet many times before but without success. In the end, it held fiercely to its disarray while I
sat, defeated, exhausted, and surrounded by relics of the battle, knowing it would take days to
Effective planning
Project management, like closet cleaning, is not for the faint of heart. Risks and
challenges abound, unexpected events can disrupt operations, and inattentive planning cause
stress, mismanagement, and project failure. Such outcomes are costly, and Project Management
Institute (2013) points out that “low performers risk wasting 14 times more money on projects
than high performers” (p. 6). For a $1 billion project, this waste could exceed $280 million.
Organizations that adequately train, support, and recognize project managers, however, create an
Managers have the greatest control over their projects during the planning stage where
they can determine how to meet objectives, particularly those related to scope and schedule.
While budget is also a top priority, according to Heldman (2010) it is the easiest to manage and
therefore requires the least amount of attention in the planning stages. However, risks inherent in
Scope risks
To address scope-related risks, Heldman (2010) states, “Goals should be realistic, should
be measurable, and should have a time element” (p. 96). Like the popular goal-setting technique
these elements allow the project manager to determine its relevance and achievability, estimate
how long it will take, see progress and measure achievement, and above all communicate goal
requirements. Heldman (2010) states, “Clearly defined requirements tell everyone exactly what
they’re going to get once the project is implemented” (p. 98), whereas ambiguous or misleading
language can lead to assumptions and disappointed stakeholders. Heldman asserts project
managers should “define your requirements and document your assumptions about the
requirements” (p. 101), because, while you many know what you mean, someone else may not.
Terminology
Using unclear verbiage is more common than we think. Regarding ambiguity, Brad
Egeland (2020) comments, “Terminology is a funny thing. We hear something over and over
again and we end up never wondering why it’s called that or what a certain term means...we may
assume everyone knows and we’d look stupid for asking” (para. 3). English, especially, is a
colorful language, and expressions often have various, unusual meanings. When my mom’s feet
hurt, she would complain, “My dogs are barking.” Yet, my one-time use of that phrase in the
presence of my teenage daughter earned me a long, hard stare. She didn’t get it, and for the first
time in my life, neither did I. I knew what it meant but had never wondered where it came from.
The dolly
Sometimes, however, phrases are well-known but lack context. My neighbor’s young
daughter once showed up on our doorstep asking for a dolly. Her mom wanted it. All I could
think of, as my neighbor loved to decorate, was a large, pink and white knitted doll that perched
atop an antique chair in my front room. Mystified, I gave it to her and she skipped across the
CLARIFYING SCOPE AND SCHEDULE 4
street, only to return a short time later with an important clarification—her mother needed the
kind of dolly that could move their new refrigerator into place.
While no one seems to know why a furniture mover, handcart, or hand-truck came to be
called a dolly, many people know what it is. Its context was confusing for me, however, when
coming from a 6-year-old girl. For managers who must define project requirements with
precision, context is an especially important consideration since, without it, they risk being
Autism, literally
Setting expectations for stakeholders is another key area where precise communication is
required. One summer at the adult autism center where I work, we hosted a three-week summer
camp for high-schoolers as a fun, boredom-buster activity. During this two-days-per-week event,
participants would engage in various activities and art projects. On the first day, one young man
shyly approached to ask what we would be doing. After my brief description, he was puzzled. He
then showed me his backpack with his canteen, flashlight, and matches—and my heart sank.
While individuals with autism exhibit different characteristics, many share a common
trait of interpreting language in its most literal sense. To this young man, Summer Camp meant
outdoor camping, not indoor arts and crafts. Once I explained in more detail what our "camp"
would entail, his face fell and he asked earnestly, “Why do you call it Summer Camp, if we’re
not camping?” He had come anticipating an outdoor adventure (which, admittedly, would have
been difficult to arrange during Arizona's brutal summer) only to find he would stay indoors,
sitting at a table, working with paint, paper, and glue. His disappointment was clear.
When stakeholders don't have an accurate understanding of the finished product they
don't know what to expect and will often form assumptions that are both idyllic and unrealistic.
CLARIFYING SCOPE AND SCHEDULE 5
Heldman (2010) states, “Don’t assume everyone knows what you know about the project or the
deliverable” (p. 98). Setting clear expectations early on helps prevent client disappointment and
Schedule Risks
Accurately outlining product requirements also helps managers develop “better estimates
and a better ability to monitor the work and status of the project” (Heldman, 2010, p. 99). Time
estimates, especially, can and should be mastered to reduce project risks and maintain reputation.
Heldman warns, “failing to meet the published schedule dates kills credibility with stakeholders”
(p. 14). The key is to avoid giving out rough estimates until the project has been meticulously
planned, with all facts and requirements accounted for, then keep it on track. Of course,
disruptions will occur, but these should be planned for when possible, and communicated early
Scenario D in the Harvard simulation (Harvard Business School Publishing, 2013), let me
experience how schedule affects costs and is affected by other factors. I noticed that late projects
address this risk, I chose an earlier completion date, then monitored factors that could affect the
schedule, like team morale. If the target date was challenging yet achievable, team morale
remained higher and workers were more productive, allowing us to finish by the target date and
stay closer to the budget. If the target date was unrealistic, however, morale suffered, affecting
both the schedule and budget. This was a difficult aspect of the simulation, for if ever the team
CLARIFYING SCOPE AND SCHEDULE 6
became excessively stressed it was almost impossible to restore morale enough to complete the
As indicated by the Project Management Institute (2013), project managers don’t always
receive adequate support and training to manage issues associated with schedule and scope.
Rather than proactively work to amend this situation, many organizations rely on what Todd
Williams (2015) refers to as the White Knight syndrome. He states, “The problem is that our
culture reveres the square-jawed, buff, clean-cut knight, who enters in the eleventh-hour to save
the day—or the project” (para. 2). While our corporate cultures frequently thrive on crisis-mode
thinking, two basic problems arise. First, crises carry a high cost in time, money, and morale.
Second, where there’s a hero, there’s a villain—or in this case, a struggling, undertrained,
overworked, underappreciated project manager who takes the blame. Blame culture, like crisis
decreasing productivity along the way. Williams’ suggested cure to restore organizations to a
healthy culture is three-fold: turn managers into leaders through training and encouraging
humility, accountability, and trust; develop a “No-Fault Culture” (para. 11) by resisting the urge
to blame; and “slay the white knight . . . culture” (para. 14) by embracing proactive leadership
that plans projects effectively, thereby reducing the risks that lead to crisis and blame.
While scope and schedule risks exist in all projects, they were especially present with my
closet. Once I realized this, my tactics changed—I created a plan. From experience, I knew it
would take longer than one day to complete, and, for my sanity, each day had to end with a clean
room. My plan reflected these requirements by dividing the closet into seven sectors, each of
CLARIFYING SCOPE AND SCHEDULE 7
which could be completed in a single day—floor, east wall, top shelf, etc. I accounted for known
risks by developing a plan for items I had to keep but didn’t know where to put and compiled a
This attention to scope and schedule resulted in a successful, fun, and surprisingly stress-
free project. Dividing it into segments allowed me to experience daily victories, and although it
took longer than that semester break to complete (an expected and controlled risk), I enjoyed
visible evidence of my progress until the next break, when I picked up where I left off.
Conclusion
Effective project planning makes all the difference between a failed and a successful
project. Knowing the value of clearly defined goals, deliverables, requirements, and assumptions
allows a project manager to reduce confusion and risk while setting reasonable expectations for
stakeholders. Responsible estimating and scheduling likewise reduces risk and leads to higher
morale, lower costs, and happier clients. Best of all, creating an effective plan counteracts the
crisis culture and sets the stage for a successful and enjoyable project.
CLARIFYING SCOPE AND SCHEDULE 8
References
Egeland, B. (2020, September 17). Looks like a three dog night - Be careful with project
#growthacademy. https://www.bradegeland.com/blog/looks-like-a-three-dog-night-be-
careful-with-project-terminology3075380
https://forio.com/simulate/harvard/project-management/simulation
Heldman, K. (2010). Preventing scope and schedule risks. In Project manager's spotlight on
Project Management Institute. (2013). PMI's pulse of the Profession | The high cost of low
performance. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-
leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2013.pdf?v=e5272fce-15ee-4826-a106-
24d1d2eb952f
Williams, T. (2015, December 27). Back from red | Kill the white
knight. ecaminc.com. https://ecaminc.com/index.php/blog/item/457-kill-the-white-knight