Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I’ve worked on a wide range of projects over the years. Some were simple, like
organizing a closet or cleaning a child’s bedroom; others more complex, like building a shed, or
designing a family history book for a client. While many of these produced good results, all
could have benefited from principles of effective project management. Three such principles
include effective decision-making, a strong project foundation, and meetings that encourage
management. Powell and Buede (2008) offer several guidelines for making decisions, the most
relevant of which, for me, is to “[determine] which comes first, the objective(s) or the decision”
(Powell and Buede, 2008, p. 4). This required some thought, as they didn’t identify when it
mind, leading with the objective is preferable in all decisions, even personal ones.
Powell and Buede indicate this is especially true for project management, where
objectives are clearly identified beforehand and are at the forefront of the decision-making
process. They assert the three main objectives of project management include “meeting the
budget, finishing on schedule, and meeting client specifications” (Powell and Buede, 2008, p. 2).
I would argue that, since the attitude and emotional health of workers is a key factor in meeting
the first three objectives, maintaining worker morale should be objective number four. These
objectives determine the success or failure of a project, and should thus inform the key decisions.
In making project decisions, however, even when putting objectives above other
considerations, one must be aware of the not-so-visible influence of a project manager’s values.
These values can impact a decision, whether consciously or not. In running the Harvard
ESSENTIAL PROJECT PROCESSES 3
Simulation A (Harvard Business School Publishing, 2013), I found that, even though the four
objectives were to maintain project scope, deliver on-time, keep under budget, and maintain team
morale, my values of putting people first influenced me to make decisions that favored team
morale over managing cost, and I consistently went over budget as a result. In this situation,
good decision-making would include a recognition of how values might exert influence on
decisions so one can adjust them consciously and purposefully throughout the project.
In addition, clients may emphasize one project objective over the others, such as a shorter
time frame or lower budget. This influences decisions as well, threatening the balance and
overall success of the project. Powell and Buede (2008) point out that, “Making the decision to
starve projects of time and resources is seldom helpful in meeting project objectives” (p. 9).
Rushing to finish a project, or doing so without necessary resources, can lead to mistakes and
This became apparent to me while playing the simulation (Harvard Business School
Publishing, 2013). When I tried to complete the 18-week project in 6 weeks, even though I
allocated more resources to do so, the extreme stress experienced by my workers led to
significant delays and lower productivity. In the end, the project took 18 weeks, was far over-
budget, and had excessively low worker morale. In subsequent runs, when I kept objectives in
In reviewing causes behind project failure, Powell and Buede (2008) maintain that even
though competing objectives, lack of knowledge, and unexpected risks can impact the project,
they are not the deciding factor; instead, “[the] success of a project . . . turns on the decisions that
are made, not the knowledge and not the absence of risk” (p. 9). Thus, regardless of one’s
ESSENTIAL PROJECT PROCESSES 4
personal values or the values of clients and stakeholders, the final decision should carefully
Strong foundation
A strong foundation is essential to a successful project, and it begins with good decisions.
In his blogpost, “Projects are like pizza!” Bondale (2020) teaches the importance of a good
foundation when he states, “the crust makes the pizza” (para. 4). Just as pizza without a crust is a
shapeless mass of toppings unlikely to withstand heat from the oven, a project without a good
foundation will not hold up to difficult challenges. This foundation is set through relevant
decisions made at the outset relating to principle objectives; project scope, completion, cost
When Bondale asks students why some projects struggle, they frequently point to a faulty
foundation, He states, "Just as the crust is the foundation for a great pizza, how we kick off and
initiate our projects will often determine how successful we are at the end” (Bondale, 2020, para.
5). While running Simulation A (Harvard Business School Publishing, 2013), I waged my most
successful campaigns when determining basic parameters at the start, then building upon that
Likewise, during my career designing family history books, decisions made during the
initial client meeting set the foundation of project expectations and parameters. In these meetings
we discussed scope, time frame, and cost. All too often, the client would ask for, and I would
give, a “ball-park” estimate, which was usually my best guess based on current information.
Unfortunately, many variables affecting cost only emerged after beginning the project—by
which time, the client’s expectations had become fixed. Because to increase costs at this time
ESSENTIAL PROJECT PROCESSES 5
would jeopardize the client relationship, I felt pressure to deliver as expected, while attempting
through more accurate estimates in initial client meetings. This not only protected my company
from losses, it enabled the client to make an informed decision about whether or not to proceed.
It also enhanced client relations when we finished under budget. As project managers establish a
strong foundation, they set the stage for healthier, more successful, outcomes.
including the project manager. One of the most basic methods to assess team health is through
the careful and strategic use of meetings. As I found in running the Harvard simulation (Harvard
Business School Publishing, 2013) the overuse of meetings, especially the lengthy status report
meetings, quickly became a hindrance to both team morale and productivity. However, when
In her blogpost about project meetings, Harrin (2020) discusses several types of meetings
including initial planning meetings, daily 15-minute status reports, and “The meeting that
shouldn’t have happened” (Harrin, 2020, para. 4). She describes this as, “ironically the most
relevant to project management” (Harrin, 2020, para. 9), wherein team members “sit in a meeting
room, and do the creeping death of reporting on what we had done that month” (para. 11). Harrin
explains that, as team members who worked together, they already knew what the others had
Her views changed as she realized the true value of the meeting was that it lent credibility
to their efforts, and allowed quieter members of the team to speak up. The fact that she gained
ESSENTIAL PROJECT PROCESSES 6
nothing from them, Harrin felt, “was a sign of how well the team was working together) (para.
14). Monitoring team connection and the level of camaraderie and cooperation among workers
can indicate whether meetings support the team or simply provides a status update. Managers
who monitor these meetings often find one-on-one conversations or emails work better than
Conclusion
parameters, and appropriate use of meetings that strengthens team interactions create a dynamic
framework that empowers a project to fulfill its purpose. These key elements shed light on how
successful projects are formed and prepare me for future leadership situations. While all projects
vary in scope and purpose, using these elements can help even simple projects be successful.
ESSENTIAL PROJECT PROCESSES 7
References
Bondale, K. (2020, July 19). Projects are like pizza! Easy in theory, difficult in
practice. https://kbondale.wordpress.com/page/2/
Harrin, E. (2020, August 24). 5 types of project meetings • Girl's guide to project
Management. https://www.girlsguidetopm.com/making-meetings-work/
from https://forio.com/simulate/harvard/project-management/simulation
Powell, R. A., & Buede, D. M. (2008). Good decision-making: The key to project success.
Koehler Publishers.