Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/266676332
CITATION READS
1 3,447
2 authors, including:
Shigeru Yoshikawa
Kyushu University
50 PUBLICATIONS 420 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Shigeru Yoshikawa on 10 October 2014.
Summary
The Japanese longitudinal bamboo flute, shakuhachi, has only five tone holes. Cross fingerings are
thus very important to play it. Conventionally, cross fingerings are considered to yield pitch
flattening because tone hole(s) below the top open tone hole are closed and the resulting pressure
recovery, which gives a longer end correction, is brought about. Conversely, cross fingerings in
the shakuhachi produce pitch sharpening in many cases, particularly in the second register. This
pitch sharpening by cross fingerings is called intonation anomaly, whose phenomena are measured
and analyzed. In general, cross fingerings yield inharmonic spectra of the input admittance.
However, the input admittance spectra on cross fingerings are significantly affected by the lower
bore below the top open tone hole. Therefore, it is essential to identify and discriminate the
spectra between the upper and lower bores. This bore-mode spectrum identification is effectively
carried out by measuring or calculating the pressure standing-wave patterns along the whole bore.
A spectrum switching between the upper and lower bores is a clue to cause the intonation anomaly.
This is illustrated by considering stepwise shifts of tone holes while keeping the hole-to-hole
distance and by comparing the resulting changes in input admittance spectra. When the spectrum
switching occurs, a docking of the upper and lower bores makes up a higher resonance mode
throughout the whole bore and then leads the intonation anomaly.
PACS no. 43.75.Qr, 43.75.Ef, 43.20.Ks
Figure 2. Calculated input admittances (fingerings D-G). Figure 3. Standing-wave patterns (fingerings A-C).
3.3 Results on standing-wave patterns
The calculation results on internal standing-wave
patterns show a very good agreement with the
measurement results on fingerings A to G [7, 12].
In this subsection, results on fingerings A to C are
just displayed in Fig. 3.
As shown in Fig. 3 (a) on the first mode, the pres-
sure recovery along the lower bore below the open
third tone hole becomes stronger as the second and
first tone holes are closed in succession on
fingerings B and C. Also, a weak discontinuity of
the pressure magnitude is seen at the closed tone
hole. On the other hand, fingering C produces a
very deep trough near the closed second tone hole
as shown in Fig. 3 (b) on the second mode. At this
time the third mode is formed along the whole bore
and the intonation anomaly is caused. It may be
then understood that the lower bore is strongly
docking with the upper bore instead of being
separated at the top open tone hole.
Figure 4. Dependence of intonation anomaly on overall
Although the third modes form the fourth modes tone-hole shift in the shakuhachi. (a): 2nd mode fre-
along the whole bore as shown in Fig. 3 (c), into- quencies on fingerings D, F, and G. (b): changes in input
nation anomaly does not occur. In this case all admittance spectra on fingering G. Spectrum switches
patterns indicate the appreciable discontinuity are indicated by arrows.
(phase change) at the top open tone hole. However, change in the resonance frequency is followed by
cross fingerings B and C easily yields the higher the switching between the modes of the upper and
third mode f3++ as shown in Fig. 3 (d) (cf. Table 1). lower bores. For example, on fingering G the locus
This mode forms fifth mode along the whole bore of f2 switches to f’2 at x = 255 mm and to f’3 at x =
and the intonation anomaly occurs. Both patterns 190 mm. This mode switching is confirmed by
display the continuity (no phase change) at the top checking the internal standing-wave patterns
open tone hole. The docking between the upper and involved (not shown here). The mode switching
lower bores is then much stronger than that in the observed in Fig. 4 (a) is seen as the spectrum
second mode on fingering C. This is probably switching in the input admittance spectra shown in
because the open third tone hole does not function Fig. 4 (b). This spectrum switching on fingering G
as an open tone hole when the resonance frequency occurs in the first and third modes as well as in the
is higher than a kind of cutoff frequency [2, 4, 5] second mode. The spectrum order in the original
defined by a lattice of open tone holes. tone-hole configuration (x = 220 mm) is f’1, f1, f’2,
f2, f’3, and f3. However, when all tone holes are
4. Dependence of intonation anomaly on shifted by 50 mm toward the bore end (x = 270
tone-hole positioni mm), this order is switched to f1, f’1, f2, f’2, f3, and
f’3. At this configuration the second mode on cross
4.1 Overall tone-hole shift fingering G does not bring about the intonation
The correlation between the tone-hole position and anomaly as known from Fig. 4 (a).
the resulting intonation anomaly is discussed by
4.2 Non-adiabatic transition in physics
considering effects of overall tone-hole shift (while
keeping the hole-to-hole distances unchanged). Very interestingly, the spectrum switching demon-
Figure 4 (a) displays the frequency change of the strated in Fig. 4 seems to be an example of the non-
second mode when fingerings D, F, and G are used. adiabatic transition at the crossing of the energy
Positions of all tone holes are shifted upward and level in quantum mechanical systems [13]. A con-
downward in steps of 5 mm. The original position ceptual sketch is depicted in Fig. 5. The abscissa x
of the fifth tone hole is indicated by the dashed line. denotes the parameter controlling an interaction
between two energy states, e. g. molecular configu
It should be noted that a large (discontinuous)
cross fingerings. The spectrum switching due to
cross fingering in the shakuhachi is a good
example of the diabatic transition widely observed
in quantum and classical physics and theorized as
the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg formula in 1932.
Acknowledgement
This research has been supported by the Grants-in-
Aid for Science Research of the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science (subj. no. 25560008).
Figure 5. A sketch of the diabatic transition [13-15].
ration in chemical reactions. The ordinate denotes References
the energy of the two-level system. The dashed lines [1] A. Baines, Woodwind Instruments and Their History
(Faber and Faber Ltd., London, 1957).
indicate the unperturbed energies ω1 and ω2 in
frequency units, while the solid lines indicate the [2] A. H. Benade, Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics
(Oxford University Press, New York, 1976) Chapter 21.
perturbed energies ωA and ωB, where the de-
[3] C. J. Nederveen, Acoustical Aspects of Woodwind
generacy at the crossing is broken by an interaction Instruments (Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb,
which couples the levels. Illinois, 1998, second edition) pp. 50-53, 132-133.
The avoided crossing region is passed by staying [4] J. Wolfe and J. Smith, “Cutoff frequencies and cross
fingerings in baroque, classical, and modern flutes,” J.
on the same branch when an adiabatic transition Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2263-2272 (2003).
takes place. However, a non-adiabatic (diabatic) [5] N. H. Fletcher and T. D. Rossing, The Physics of
transition yields the jump to another branch across Musical Instruments (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2nd
the avoided crossing as shown by the arrow in Fig. ed., 1998) Sections 16.9, 15.3, and 8.2.
5. The transition probability is given by the famous [6] T. Terada, “Acoustical investigation of the Japanese
Landau-Zener formula in quantum mechanics. Fig. bamboo pipe, syakuhati,” J. College of Sci., Tokyo 21,
1-34 (1907).
4 (a) (e. g. the green line of fingering G) clearly
demonstrates the jump on the diabatic transition. [7] S. Yoshikawa, “Cross fingerings and associated
intonation anomaly in the shakuhachi,” Tech. Rep.
The embouchure-to-fifth tone hole distance x is Musical Acoust. Res. 32, MA2013-40 (2013). (in
now interpreted as the parameter controlling the Japanese).
interaction between the upper and lower bores. [8] D. H. Keefe, “Theory of the single woodwind tone hole,”
The spectrum switching on the cross fingering J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 676-687 (1982).
revealed in Fig. 4 reflects the diabatic transition. [9] Y. Ando, “Input admittance of shakuhachis and their
resonance characteristics in the playing state,” J. Acoust.
Soc. Jpn. (E) 7, 99-111 (1986).
5. Conclusions
[10] A. Lefebvre and G. P. Scavone, “Characterization of
woodwind instrument toneholes with the finite element
The acoustics of cross fingerings has been ex- method,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 3153-3163 (2012).
plored in the shakuhachi. A particular interest is [11] T. Ebihara and S. Yoshikawa, “Nonlinear effects
focused on the intonation anomaly in the second contributing to hand-stopping tones in a horn,” J. Acoust.
and third registers. The switching of the input Soc. Am. 133, 3094-3106 (2013).
admittance spectra between an upper-bore mode [12] K. Kajiwara and S. Yoshikawa, “Discussion on the
internal sound pressure distributions when cross
and a lower-bore mode is observed when the fingerings are used in the shakuhachi,” Proc. Autumn
associated tone hole positions are varied while Meeting, Acoust. Soc. Jpn. 903-906 (2013). (in
keeping the hole-to-hole distances unchanged. Japanese).
[13] H. Nakamura, “New development of non-adiabatic
This spectrum switching causes the intonation transition theory,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 829-834
anomaly by cross fingerings as shown in Fig. 4. (1996). (in Japanese).
Also, when the intonation anomaly occurs, a [14] J. R. Rubbmark, M. M. Kash, M. G. Littman, and D.
docking between the upper and lower bores is Kleppner, “Dynamical effects at avoided level
established as if the top open tone hole does not crossing: A study of the Landau-Zener effect using
Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 23, 3107-3117 (1981).
exist. As the result, a higher mode is formed along [15] L. Novotny, “Strong coupling, energy splitting, and
the whole bore as illustrated in Fig. 3. Such a level crossings: A classical perspective,” Am. J. Phys.
strong bore docking is never expected for usual 78, 1199-1202 (2010).