You are on page 1of 26

In the Honorable Court of Illaka Magistrate,

Faridabad

ARUN KUMAR GOYAL Age about 34 years


S/o Sh. JAGDISH GOYAL
R/o MCF 3 GARG Colony
Near AAKASH Cinema Hall
BALLABGARH,(121004)
Faridabad
Mobile 95825 81044 Complainant

Versus

NARINDER Singh
S/o Ram Singh,
Village DEEG, PO FATHEPUR BILLOCH,
Tehsil BALLABGARH (121004)
District- Faridabad (HR).
Mobile 9582024610 Accused

P.S. City BALLABGARH


Sub: Complaint against accused NARINDER U/s 138 & 142 of NI
Act 1881 read with U/s 406,420 IPC 1860 & further read with
U/s 357 CRPC 1973 against Bounced Cheque No.085908 dated
17.12.2017 of Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rs. Two Lac Fifty Thousand
only) drawn on Bank of India, BALLABGARH Branch (121004)
from SB A/c No.670210100018062 of the accused.

Respectfully Submissions

That the Complainant Sh. ARUN Kumar GOYAL S/o Sh. JAGDISH

GOYAL, Age 34 years, Resident of House No MCF 3, GARG Colony


Near AAKASH Cinema Hall BALLABGARH, Faridabad (HR) Mobile

No.9582581044 submit its Complaint through its Counsel Sh.

V. K. GARG, Chamber No. 479(A), District Court Faridabad

against the Accused on account of Dishonoring & Bounce

Cheque No.085908 dated 17.12.2017 U/s 138 (2) of Ss (B) of

NI Act 1881 as defined it U/s 6 & U/S 142 of the said Act.

(An Affidavit duly sworn by the complainant has been

exhibited at CW-01/A).

1. That the father of Complainant Sh. JAGDISH GOYAL who

has been the Classmate of the accused in AGGARWAL

College, BALLABGARH about 37-38 years earlier. Since

then, all the family members of both families have

personal & family relationship of each other due to old

childhood friend of the father of Complainant. The

Accused is attending all Social gatherings, rituals,

Marriages, functions of the complainant along with his

family Members. The Complainant, ARUN GOYAL, who is a

Professional Engineer & working in some Private

company, is very well known to the accused since his

birth through his father only. Accused is mainly in

Agricultural Farming as well as accused is doing as a

Part-time business in Property Sell & purchase


business. During the month of June 2017, the accused

NARINDER Singh has visited the House of Complainant,

approached & requested the father of Complainant Sh.

JAGDISH GOYAL with his pre- plan conspiracy that

Accused is in dire need of some money & he has

requested that he may be advanced as a personal loan

about 05 to 06 Lac, as he has incurred his heavy loss

in some Property Dealing matter with some client. In

case, if the accused could not return his signing

amount to the Creditor, then he would insult him.

Further, his client may file a criminal case against

the accused. The accused, further abetted Complainant &

his father that in case his deal has not been

finalized, then he would invest the borrowed money

which would be taken from Complainant in some other

business. Then, the Complainant would get three times

money from his Principle amount.

2. That the father of Complainant has expressed his

inability to advanced a personal loan to the accused.

The father of Complainant has further told that the

marriage of his younger son has already been fixed in

the month 2nd July 2017. Due to reason, he is not in


position to spare money to help him either for

investment or personal requirement. Then, the accused

has further pressurized & lured the Complainant as well

as his father also. But Complainant has also again

expressed the same. The Complainant & his father both

have told that they would require money for the

marriage of his younger brother & son, though the

complainant has some money balance in the saving bank

account of his younger brother PAWAN but the

complainant cannot spare & advance the money for the

requirement of the accused. Then the accused has again

pressurized the father of Complainant to give him as a

Personal Loan to advance him Rs. 05.0 Lac form his sons

for the sake of save of the respect & social image in

the society of the accused. (A self attested Bank

Statement of real brother of the complainant Sh. PAWAN

KUMAR GOYAL is annexed at MARK- 01)

3. That after repeated requests & pressure created by the

accused on all the family Members, the father of

Complainant has agreed that he would request their sons

ARUN Kumar GOYAL & PAWAN Kumar GOYAL whether they are

in position to give him a personal & friendship loan


without charging any interest from the accused. The

father of the complainant wanted an affirm assurance &

a condition that he would certainly return the whole

principle amount in the month of December 2017.

4. That Complainant ARUN KUMAR GOYAL & his younger brother

Sh. PAWAN Kumar GOYAL both have agreed to advance a

personal friendly loan a total sum of Rs. 4.75 Lac as

per request of their father & considering the family

relationship. The complainant ARUN KUMAR GOYAL & his

younger brother PAWAN KUMAR GOYAL both have agreed to

give a personal friendly loan to the accused. Since

Complainant ARUN Kumar GOYAL is also contributing some

money to the account No.008301042845 of his younger

brother for his marriage which was fixed on 02.07.2017,

he has agreed to give a loan of Rs. 2.5 Lac to the

accused. The Complainant has requested his younger

brother to withdraw a cash of Rs. 3.0 Lac on

06.06.2017. The Complainant has given a personal loan

of Rs. 2.50 Lac on 06.06.2017 to the accused at his

residence in the presence of his whole family Members.

Further, to win the faith of the family members of the

complainant, the accused has issued a Post Dated cheque


of Rs. 2.50 Lac in the name of Complainant Sh. ARUN

Kumar GOYAL bearing No.085908 dated 17.12.2017 drawn on

Bank of India at MOHNA ROAD, BALLABGARH Branch. At the

time of handing over this cheque, the accused has

assured Complainant in case he would be in position to

repay debt & loan earlier or he can pay cash at any

earlier time. The Complainant & his father both have

trusted upon the assurance of the accused.

5. That the accused has assured the Complainant that the

whole amount would be refunded to him either in cash or

through cheque. Accordingly, the accused has attended

the marriage of younger brother of Complainant on

02.07.2017.

6. That the other complainant who is the younger brother

of the Complainant has also given a personal loan of

Rs. 2.25 Lac on 13.06.2017 Cash to the accused from his

A/c No.008301042845 which he has withdrawn from the

Bank on 13.06.2017 a sum of Rs. 4.0 Lac. The rest of

the amount was utilized by the complainant in other

Marriage purposes.

7. That Complainant along with his father has reminded the

accused on 20.11.2017 & asked him to refund his Loan


amount at the Mobile No.9582024610 of the accused.

Accordingly, the accused has assured that the due loan

amount of Rs. 2.50 Lac has already been deposited by

him in his account & the said cheque would be encased.

The Complainant has again contacted the accused on

15.12.2017 at the Mobile of the accused, whether he may

present the cheque before his Bankers. But the accused

has requested to Complainant & his father that they may

wait for a month or two as he is arranging money.

Further, the accused has pressurized & contacted the

father of Complainant to wait for a month or two. But

the Complainant has no option & has to wait for a month

or two. The Complainant& his father both were in touch

with the accused & after passing & he has given an

assurance to the Complainant on 31.01.2018 that he may

present the cheque no.085908 dated 17.12.2018 of Rs.

2.5 Lac before his Bankers & the issued cheque would be

honored by his Bankers i e Bank of India, BALLABGARH

Branch.

8. That Complainant has presented cheque No.085908 dated

17.12.2017 before his Banker ICICI, BALLABGARH Branch,

on 02.02.2018 but it was shocked to him that the said


cheque has been returned to him unpaid and it has

become bounced on 3.2.2018 due to the reason, “Funds

Insufficient”. (An Original Cheque No.085908 dated

17.02.2017 has been exhibited at CW/02). Further,

Banker’ Return Memo dated 02.02.2018 has been exhibited

at CW/03)

9. That Complainant& his father both have contacted the

accused but he has made an excuse & expressed his

ignorance & he was non awareness of about any bouncing

of cheque. The Complainant & his father tried to meet

the accused in person but he was escaping from the

complainant. The Complainant has met the accused at his

residence. During the meeting, the accused has assured

the Complainant that he has already withdrawn cash from

his account & he would return whole debt & loan in

cash. The accused has further requested the

Complainant& his father that he may wait for a couple

of days. The accused would return the whole amount

either in cash or he would put cash in his account so

that his issued cheque may be honored by the Bankers.

10. That Complainant has again contacted the accused

on 26.02.2018 & the accused has given his clearance &


his consent that the said cheque no o85908 may be

presented before his Bankers & it would be encased.

Accordingly, Complainant has presented the cheque No.

085908 on 02.03.2018 before his Bankers ICICI

BALLABGARH Branch on 02.03.2018. But it was again

disgraceful & breach of Trust to Complainant that the

Cheque No.085908 dated 17.12.2017 of Rs. 2.5 Lac has

become bounced again on 02.03.2018. The Banker has

intimated to Complainant that, “Kindly contact

Drawer/Drawee Bank & present Again.” Thus, you have

committed an offence U/s 138 (b) of N. I. Act 1881 as

well as U/s 406 & 420 of IPC 1860. It is to intimate

that Bank has deducted their Bank charges both the

times. (A Bankers Return Memo dated 03.03.2018 has been

exhibited at CW/o4).

11. That it is very clear that the accused had

willfully, knowingly and deliberately, issued a cheque

of amounting Rupees 2.5 Lac (Rs. Two Lac Fifty Thousand

only) to the complainant with the foul motives of

Dishonesty, Cheating, Fraudulently and Criminal Breach

of Trust. One hand, the accused has issued a cheque of

Rs. 2, 50,000/- to discharge his Liability towards the


complainant but on the other hand, he does not have

Sufficient Balance in his account. By doing this act,

the accused has betrayed and failed to respect the

purpose of Legislative to promote the efficacy of

Banking and ensuring in commercial and contractual

transactions of the cheque are not to be dishonored and

creditability of business through cheque have to be

maintained.

12. That, Complainant has sent a Legal Notice through

her Counsel on 21.3.2018 under Reference No.

G&C/LN/NIA/2018/0129 to all the known addresses of the

accused. (The original Legal Notice & the Proof of

Dispatch are here with Exhibited at CW/05). The Legal

Notice was sent through Registered AD Post from Sector-

12, Faridabad. (An original Postal Receipt has been

exhibited at CW-06). Accordingly, the accused came at

the residence of the complainant & requested him the he

would return the whole debt latest by 30.04.2018. But

the accused did not return the money of the

complainant. With this conduct & by doing this act, the

accused has committed an offence under section 406, 420

of IPC 1860, in addition to committing an offence under


section 138 of N.I. Act. That the accused has received

the Legal Notice but neither has he replied of the

Legal Notice nor has he returned the whole loan amount

to the Complainant. (An original acknowledgement from

Postal Department is exhibited at CW/07)

13. That the complainant is entitled in defraying the

expenses like Legal Consultations, Cost of Legal Notice

etc. incurred by him at this stage as well as to face

and bearing of his Physical torture, Financial and

Mental Agony which he has caused due to his unwarranted

actions. Due to these reasons he is also entitled to

claim for compensation under section 357 of CRPC 1973

to file a complaint against him.

14. That under these circumstances, the Complainant is

entitled to get payment of Rupees 2, 50,000/- (Rs. Two

Lac Fifty Thousand Only) against the aforesaid cheque

No. 085908 dated 17.12.2017 along with the actual Bank

Miscellaneous charges which it had been deducted from

the account of the complainant. In addition to this,

the accused has to pay an interest @ of 18% per annum

or 2% above on BLR prevailing at the time whichever is

higher from the due date of the actual payment.


15. That the Complainant is also entitled to recover

his Legal Consultation, Notice Charges & Legal Trial

Charges as mentioned below in the Complaint.

16. That the complainant has the right to institute

other legal remedies against the accused under the

various provision & sections of 406, 420 of IPC 1860 at

Faridabad Court through registering an FIR at the

entire Risk, Cost & Responsibility.

17. That the Complainant has reserved its right to

take Civil Actions through filing a Civil Suit as well

as registering a Criminal Complaints or both against

the accused in person for recovery of the loan amount

as mentioned in Serial number 04 & 05 above. In case,

any legal proceedings are initiated against the accused

then he will be held responsible for payment of all

these costs, Expenses & Compensation which would be

incurred by the complainant as well as all consequences

resulting thereupon apart from all other dues from the

accused

Cause of Action

I. That the first Cause of action has arisen that the

issued cheque No. 085908 amounting Rs. 2, 50,000/-


dated 17.12.2017 has been bounced on 02.02.2018 due to

reasons “Insufficient Funds”. The Accused was informed

but he had further made different excuses & pretext &

he did not return the money.

II. That the Second Cause of Action has arisen when the

Complainant has sent a Legal Demand Notice through his

Counsel vide its Ref. No. G&C/LN/NIA/2018/0129 dated

21.03.2018 to the Accused to all known Addresses

through AD-Post. The Accused has neither responded nor

has he returned the loan amount to the complainant.

III. That the third Cause of action has arisen when the

accused has assured the complainant that the cheque

No.085908 may be presented again. The complainant has

presented the cheque in second time but the Banker’s of

the complainant has informed that the amount of Rs. 2.5

Lac cannot be credited in his account due to the reason

as mentioned in Serial No.09. Thus, the accused has

committed an offence of US 138 of NI Act 1881 & other

provisions of IPCs & CRPC 1973.

Other Legal Averments


1. That the above Cause of actions has been arisen with

in Territorial Jurisdiction of this Honorable Court.

Hence, this Honorable Court has full Jurisdiction to

try and entertain this Complaint.

2. That there is no Unnecessary Delay has occurred to

file this Complaint.

3. That Complaint has been filed within the Limitation

Period as per Negotiable Instruments of India 1881 as

amended up to date.

4. That the Court Fee of Rs. 10/- has also been affixed

on the Plaint.

5. That all the Necessary Original Documents have been

annexed along with this Complaint. However,

Photocopies Self Attested of other Legal required

papers from the complainant has also been marked.

6. That no other similar Complaint has been filed by the

Complainant anywhere in India in any Court except

this Complaint filed before this Honorable Court.

Prayer

That the Complainant, Arun Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Jagdish

Goyal respectfully prays before this Honorable Court


that it may graciously passes the following orders in

the favor of the Complainant;

1. That this Complaint may be allowed & the accused be

charged and tried for the offence punishable U/s 138

of NI Act 1881 and also U/s 406, 420 of IPC through

to take the case on file, issue Notices, enquire the

matter and make the payment to the complainant and

punished the accused with Maximum Punishment.

2. That the complainant further prays before this

Honorable Court it may please pass an order to make

out a compensation U/s 357 of s/s (3) of Cr. P. C.

1973.

3. That the Honorable Court may please graciously pass

an order to pay make the following payments to the

complainant as per his request.

Sr. No. Particulars Amount


1 Cheque Amount Rs.2,50, 000/-
2 Bank Service Charges As per actual
3 Notices & Legal 11,000/-
Consultation Charges
4 Counsels Fees 21,000/-
5 Interest @ 18% pa or 2%
above Bank
Lending Rate up
to date of final
payment to the
complainant.
6 Compensation Payable U/s As per
357 (3) of Cr. PC Honorable Court
may pass an
Order against
the accused.
Total Rs. 2,82,000/- +
Interest & Bank
Charges+
Compensation
(Total Two Lac Eighty Two Thousand, only + Compensation

+ Actual Bank Charges + Interest)

4. That any other order where in Honorable Court may

graciously pass which may deem fit and proper in the

interest of Justice as well as in the interest of

complainant.

Date: 1.05.2018 Complainant,

Arun Kumar Goyal


S/o Sh. Jagdish Goyal

R/o MCF 3 Garg Colony


Ballabgarh, Faridabad

Through Counsel

A.K. GARG & V. K. GARG


Enrollment P/504-B/2008
vabgarg@gmail.com
Seat No. 55, Chamber No 479 (A)
Sector 12 Faridabad
9958125757 / 9818383803
Verification:
It is to certify that all contents mentioned in the

complaint from Sr. No. 1 to 17, Cause of Action, Legal

averments and in Prayer Sr. No. 1 to 4 are correct and

true from the best of my knowledge and Belief. Nothing

has been concealed & Verified on 01.05.2018 at

Faridabad.

Date: 01.05.2018 Complainant,

Arun Kumar Goyal


S/o Sh. Jagdish Goyal

R/o MCF 3 Garg Colony


Ballabgarh, Faridabad
Mobile No. 9582581044
Before the Honorable Court of Illaka
Magistrate, Faridabad, (Haryana)
In the matter of Criminal Complaint No………2018
ARUN KUMAR GOYAL Versus Narinder

EVIDENCE BY WAY OF AFFIDAVIT FROM THE


COMPLAINANT, ARUN KUMAR GOYAL

I, Arun Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. JAGDISH GOYAL, Age, 34 years,

Resident of House No. MCF 3, GARG Colony, BALLABGARH

Faridabad Mobile No. 9582581044 do here by solemnly affirms

with my full knowledge & Belief and declares as under:-

1. That I am complainant have duly authorized & competent

having full knowledge of all facts and swear this

affidavit in support of my Evidence before this

Honorable Court.

2. That all contents in the First part of complaint

mentioned from Sr. No. 1 to 17 & Second Part of Cause

of Actions, Legal Averments & Prayer along with all

Exhibits, Marks mentioned in the complaint may be

treated as a Part and Parcel of this Affidavit. All the

contents of the Complaint have not been repeated for

the sake of Brevity. They may be read as a Part &


Parcel of this Affidavit. All the facts & Contents

mentioned in the complaint and Prayer have been

incorporated by my Counsel as per my instructions &

material supplied to him and these have been read over

by me.

3. That I am fully aware all the facts & Contents & all

the Exhibited Documents. All the Original exhibited

documents have been enclosed with Complaint. All the

Original documents may be read in favor of my Complaint

as a Proof in support of this matter.

4. That the Complaint has been drafted by my Counsel as

per my instructions and material supplied to him by me.

5. That the no such payments against the cheque No.085908

dated 17.12.2017 of Rs. 2.5 Lac drawn on Bank of India,

BALLABGARH either in full or part payment against this

cheque no.085908 dated 17.12.2017 has been received by

me from the Accused at the time of filing this

Complaint in this Honorable Court.

6. That all the contents & matters incorporated in the

complaint & Affidavit is true & correct.

Deponent
Verification:

It is to certify that all above contents mentioned in


the Affidavit from Sr. No. 1 to 6 are correct and true
from the Best of my knowledge and Belief. Nothing has
been concealed & Verified on 01st May 2018 at
Faridabad.

Deponent
List of Exhibited Documents
1. Evidence by way of Affidavit from Complainant.

Exhibited – CW/01A

2. Original Cheque No. 085908 dated 17.12.2017 of Rs.2.5

Lac issued by the Accused to discharge his Debt

Liability Drawn on Bank Of India, BALLABGARH Branch.

Exhibited- CW/02.

3. Original Cheque Returned Memo issued from the ICICI,

Sector-16 Branch, Faridabad dated 02.02.2018. Exhibited

CW/03.

4. Original Cheque returned Memo issued from ICICI,

Sector- 16 Branch, Faridabad dated 03.03.2018.

Exhibited CW/04.

5. Original Legal Demand Notice issued by the Counsel

under Reference No. G&C/NIA/2018/0129 dated 21.03.2018.

Exhibited –CW/05

6. Original Postal Receipts issued by P&T Department,

Sector- 12, Faridabad as POD for issuance of Legal

Notice. Exhibited-CW/06.
7. Original Acknowledgement issued by P&T Department &

Proof of receipt of Legal Notice duly received by the

accused. Exhibited CW/07.

Complainant
List of Witnesses

1. Concerned Registry Clerk/ Postal Staff of Postal

Department in relation to the service of Legal Demand

Notice dated 21.03.2018.

2. Concerned Bank Staff of Bank Of India, BALLABGARH

Branch.

3. Concerned Bank Manager from ICICI Bank, Branch Sector-

16, and Faridabad.

4. Sh. JAGDISH GOYAL House No. MCF 03,GARG COLONY,

BALLABGARH

5. Any other person with the permission from the Order of

the Honorable Court.

Place: - Faridabad

Dated; - 01.05.2018 Complainant


In the Honorable Court of ILLAKA MAGISTRATE
Faridabad (HR)
In the matter of Criminal Complaint No………2017

ARUN GOYAL V/s NARINDER

LIST OF COMPLIANCE OF STATUTORY FORMALITIES


Sr. Requirements Statutory Provisions Compliances
No.
1 Cheque Definition U/s 6 of NI i. Cheque
Act 1881 bearing
No085908
dated
17.12.
2017
Amount
Rs.
2,50,000

2 Drawer Definition U/s 7 of NI NARINDER Singh


Act 1881
3 Drawer Definition U/s 7 of NI BANK OF INDIA,
Branch Act 1881 BALLABGARH
4 Holder Definition U/s 8 of NI ARUN KUMAR
Act 1881 GOYAL.
5 Evidence of U/s 146 of above Bank Returned
Dishonor of mentioned Act Memo dated
Cheque 02.02.2018 &
2nd Memo dated
03.03.2018

6 Legal Notice U/s 138 (b) of NI Act Legal Notice


of dishonor dated
& Demand to 21.03.2018
make payment posted on
21.03.2018 from
Sector 12 P.O.
Faridabad at
all known
address of
accused
7 Expiring of U/s 138 (C) NI Act 05.04.2018
15 days 1881
period to
make the
payment
8 Filing of U/s 142 (b) r/w U/s 01.05.2018
Complainant 420 IPC

Date: 01.05.2018 Complainant

Place: Faridabad

You might also like