Major Project Evaluation Rubrics (Phase-1)
Parameter > 75%
Literature Survey  About 10 recent papers are referred
 Appropriately summarized from peer
reviewed Journals / Magazines /
Conference Papers
Problem statement  Problem formulation is relevant, can be
implemented and tested
 Conforms to one of the four domains:
Signal processing, Communication,
Embedded systems, Microelectronics
 Objectives clearly defined
Project scheduling  Proper time-lines specified
(time-line) and work  Uniform allocation of work among the
delegation team members
Identification of  Identification of blocks with appropriate
essential justification
blocks/concepts  Description and justification of
engineering concepts
Design(s)  Provide feasible solution to the problem
 Identification of existing
algorithm/method
Budget estimate  Budget estimate is done for each of the
resources
Presentation  Well organized oral and multimedia
presentation with equal participation
 Proper time utilization
Project report  Well organized, objectives defined and
conformity to the structure
50- 60%
 Referred to more than 5 papers
 Appropriately summarized; No
recent references
 Problem statement is relevant
 No scope for innovation or visibility
(Publication or exhibitions)
 No clarity in objectives
 Time-line specified without proper
distribution of workload
 Identification of blocks is partially
justified
 Necessary justification / details of
engineering concepts were partially
provided
 Provides solution to the problem
 Existing algorithm/method not
properly identified
 Budget estimate done for few
resources
 Well organized oral and multimedia
presentation with equal participation
 Unequal participation
 Poorly written and partial conformity
to the structure
<40%
 References less than 5 papers
 Not appropriately summarized
 Problem statement is not relevant
 Objectives defined are not clear
 Improper time-line
 Work distribution is not uniform
 Identification of blocks is not
properly justified
 Description of engineering
concepts is not proper
 Does not provides complete
solution to the problem
 Existing algorithm/method not
identified
 Poor budget estimation
 Poor organization of presentation
 Unequal participation
 Not in conformity to the structure
 Time-line not followed