You are on page 1of 2

UNIT 3_MULTIPLE COLUMN

TYPE 1_COLUMN WITH TIME CHANGE

TASK ANALYSIS
Chart 1: The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in
one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

Topic: Paraphrase the means of transport used for work journeys in a specific European
task heading city at 20 year intervals from 1960 to 2000.
Overview: Car: went up >< bus went down
Detailed description Flow of change:
From 1960-1980:
Bus and tube: decline (15% and 5%)
Car: doubled its percentage = Train: increased by 10%
From 1980 to 2010:
Bus: decline another 15%
Car: gained in (15%more)
Tube: increased >< train: decreased
Points of comparison:
1960:
Bus: 1st
Car: least popular
1980:
Car=train=tube=bus
2010
Car: 1st
Bus: least widely used
Vocabulary related to the
topic (key words)

The bar chart gives information on the means of transport used for work journeys in a specific European city at 20
year intervals from 1960 to 2000. At the first glance, it is the private transportation namely car that gained in
popularity while the number of bus users dropped significantly over the surveyed period.
In 1960, bus was the most widely used means of transport occupying nearly 40 percent of the total number of
commuters. The number of workers travelling by bus; however, declined substantially to just 15 percent in 2000. In
stark contrast, car, which was the least popular mode of travel in 1960 more than tripled its proportion of travellers,
rising from 8 percent to 23% in 1980. It is noticeable that this way of transportation became the most popularly used
in 2000 with 36%, nearly three times as much as the percentage of bus users.
Train and Tube showed certain variations in its passengers’ volume. While the former experienced a rise from about
16% to around 27% between 1960 and 1980 and then a fall of approximately 5% in 2000, the latter fluctuated slightly
at more or less 25%

1 Dr.LienTran_0983641169| HPU&iShare English Center


BAR 2_The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in
three companies between 1980 and the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and
report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

BAR 3_The table shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930
and 1980.

Bar 2

2 Dr.LienTran_0983641169| HPU&iShare English Center

You might also like